maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/CMakeLists.txt

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

14 lines
231 B
CMake
Raw Normal View History

[cmake] Explicitly mark libraries defined in lib/ as "Component Libraries" Summary: Most libraries are defined in the lib/ directory but there are also a few libraries defined in tools/ e.g. libLLVM, libLTO. I'm defining "Component Libraries" as libraries defined in lib/ that may be included in libLLVM.so. Explicitly marking the libraries in lib/ as component libraries allows us to remove some fragile checks that attempt to differentiate between lib/ libraries and tools/ libraires: 1. In tools/llvm-shlib, because llvm_map_components_to_libnames(LIB_NAMES "all") returned a list of all libraries defined in the whole project, there was custom code needed to filter out libraries defined in tools/, none of which should be included in libLLVM.so. This code assumed that any library defined as static was from lib/ and everything else should be excluded. With this change, llvm_map_components_to_libnames(LIB_NAMES, "all") only returns libraries that have been added to the LLVM_COMPONENT_LIBS global cmake property, so this custom filtering logic can be removed. Doing this also fixes the build with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON and LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON. 2. There was some code in llvm_add_library that assumed that libraries defined in lib/ would not have LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or ARG_LINK_COMPONENTS set. This is only true because libraries defined lib lib/ use LLVMBuild.txt and don't set these values. This code has been fixed now to check if the library has been explicitly marked as a component library, which should now make it easier to remove LLVMBuild at some point in the future. I have tested this patch on Windows, MacOS and Linux with release builds and the following combinations of CMake options: - "" (No options) - -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON - -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON - -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON - -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON - -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON Reviewers: beanz, smeenai, compnerd, phosek Reviewed By: beanz Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, mgorny, mehdi_amini, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, steven_wu, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, dang, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70179
2019-11-14 13:39:58 +08:00
add_llvm_component_library(LLVMJITLink
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
JITLink.cpp
JITLinkGeneric.cpp
[JITLink] Move JITLinkMemoryManager into its own header. llvm-svn: 363444
2019-06-15 03:41:21 +08:00
JITLinkMemoryManager.cpp
[JITLink] Remove a lot of reduntant 'JITLink_' prefixes. NFC. llvm-svn: 358869
2019-04-22 11:03:09 +08:00
EHFrameSupport.cpp
MachO.cpp
[JITLink] Add an initial implementation of JITLink for MachO/AArch64. This implementation has support for all relocation types except TLV. Compact unwind sections are not yet supported, so exceptions/unwinding will not work. llvm-svn: 374476
2019-10-11 07:37:51 +08:00
MachO_arm64.cpp
[JITLink] Remove a lot of reduntant 'JITLink_' prefixes. NFC. llvm-svn: 358869
2019-04-22 11:03:09 +08:00
MachO_x86_64.cpp
[JITLink] Switch from an atom-based model to a "blocks and symbols" model. In the Atom model the symbols, content and relocations of a relocatable object file are represented as a graph of atoms, where each Atom represents a contiguous block of content with a single name (or no name at all if the content is anonymous), and where edges between Atoms represent relocations. If more than one symbol is associated with a contiguous block of content then the content is broken into multiple atoms and layout constraints (represented by edges) are introduced to ensure that the content remains effectively contiguous. These layout constraints must be kept in mind when examining the content associated with a symbol (it may be spread over multiple atoms) or when applying certain relocation types (e.g. MachO subtractors). This patch replaces the Atom model in JITLink with a blocks-and-symbols model. The blocks-and-symbols model represents relocatable object files as bipartite graphs, with one set of nodes representing contiguous content (Blocks) and another representing named or anonymous locations (Symbols) within a Block. Relocations are represented as edges from Blocks to Symbols. This scheme removes layout constraints (simplifying handling of MachO alt-entry symbols, and hopefully ELF sections at some point in the future) and simplifies some relocation logic. llvm-svn: 373689
2019-10-04 11:55:26 +08:00
MachOLinkGraphBuilder.cpp
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
DEPENDS
intrinsics_gen
)