maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/UserExpression.cpp

401 lines
15 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
//===-- UserExpression.cpp ---------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 16:50:56 +08:00
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include <stdio.h>
#if HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
#include <sys/types.h>
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
#endif
#include <cstdlib>
#include <map>
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
#include <string>
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Core/Module.h"
#include "lldb/Core/StreamFile.h"
#include "lldb/Core/ValueObjectConstResult.h"
Add a DiagnosticManager replace error streams in the expression parser. We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave all of them. To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors to the user. This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead pass the Severity flag. The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase. <rdar://problem/22864976> llvm-svn: 263859
2016-03-19 08:03:59 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/DiagnosticManager.h"
[Expression] Remove unused dependency lldbExpression was linking against lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, and lldbPluginExpressionParserClang was linking against lldbExpression. There's no reason lldbExpression should need anything from lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, so let's remove that dependency. llvm-svn: 360208
2019-05-08 07:11:05 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/ExpressionVariable.h"
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/IRExecutionUnit.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/IRInterpreter.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/Materializer.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/UserExpression.h"
#include "lldb/Host/HostInfo.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/Block.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/Function.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/ObjectFile.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/SymbolVendor.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/Type.h"
Now persistent expression data no longer lives with the Target, but rather with the corresponding TypeSystem. This makes sense because what kind of data there is -- and how it can be looked up -- depends on the language. Functionality that is common to all type systems is factored out into PersistentExpressionState. llvm-svn: 248934
2015-10-01 03:57:57 +08:00
#include "lldb/Symbol/TypeSystem.h"
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Symbol/VariableList.h"
#include "lldb/Target/ExecutionContext.h"
#include "lldb/Target/Process.h"
#include "lldb/Target/StackFrame.h"
#include "lldb/Target/Target.h"
#include "lldb/Target/ThreadPlan.h"
#include "lldb/Target/ThreadPlanCallUserExpression.h"
Move classes from Core -> Utility. This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility. ConstString Error RegularExpression Stream StreamString The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies. These are all low level and very widely used classes, and previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes sense from both the short term and long term perspective in solving this problem. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427 llvm-svn: 293941
2017-02-03 05:39:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Utility/ConstString.h"
Move Log from Core -> Utility. All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this class can now safely be lowered into Utility. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559 llvm-svn: 296909
2017-03-04 04:56:28 +08:00
#include "lldb/Utility/Log.h"
Move classes from Core -> Utility. This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility. ConstString Error RegularExpression Stream StreamString The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies. These are all low level and very widely used classes, and previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes sense from both the short term and long term perspective in solving this problem. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427 llvm-svn: 293941
2017-02-03 05:39:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Utility/StreamString.h"
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
using namespace lldb_private;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
UserExpression::UserExpression(ExecutionContextScope &exe_scope,
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
llvm::StringRef expr, llvm::StringRef prefix,
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::LanguageType language,
ResultType desired_type,
Fix an invalid static cast in ClangExpressionParser.cpp This was found by the green dragon sanitizer bot. rdar://problem/48536644 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59314 llvm-svn: 356090
2019-03-14 03:46:30 +08:00
const EvaluateExpressionOptions &options,
ExpressionKind kind)
: Expression(exe_scope, kind), m_expr_text(expr), m_expr_prefix(prefix),
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
m_language(language), m_desired_type(desired_type), m_options(options) {}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
UserExpression::~UserExpression() {}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void UserExpression::InstallContext(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx) {
m_jit_process_wp = exe_ctx.GetProcessSP();
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::StackFrameSP frame_sp = exe_ctx.GetFrameSP();
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (frame_sp)
m_address = frame_sp->GetFrameCodeAddress();
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool UserExpression::LockAndCheckContext(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx,
lldb::TargetSP &target_sp,
lldb::ProcessSP &process_sp,
lldb::StackFrameSP &frame_sp) {
lldb::ProcessSP expected_process_sp = m_jit_process_wp.lock();
process_sp = exe_ctx.GetProcessSP();
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (process_sp != expected_process_sp)
return false;
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
process_sp = exe_ctx.GetProcessSP();
target_sp = exe_ctx.GetTargetSP();
frame_sp = exe_ctx.GetFrameSP();
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (m_address.IsValid()) {
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (!frame_sp)
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return false;
else
return (0 == Address::CompareLoadAddress(m_address,
frame_sp->GetFrameCodeAddress(),
target_sp.get()));
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return true;
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool UserExpression::MatchesContext(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx) {
lldb::TargetSP target_sp;
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp;
lldb::StackFrameSP frame_sp;
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return LockAndCheckContext(exe_ctx, target_sp, process_sp, frame_sp);
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::addr_t UserExpression::GetObjectPointer(lldb::StackFrameSP frame_sp,
ConstString &object_name,
Rename Error -> Status. This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed on the lldb-dev mailing list. A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error" appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too serious. llvm-svn: 302872
2017-05-12 12:51:55 +08:00
Status &err) {
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
err.Clear();
if (!frame_sp) {
err.SetErrorStringWithFormat(
"Couldn't load '%s' because the context is incomplete",
object_name.AsCString());
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
}
lldb::VariableSP var_sp;
lldb::ValueObjectSP valobj_sp;
valobj_sp = frame_sp->GetValueForVariableExpressionPath(
object_name.AsCString(), lldb::eNoDynamicValues,
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionCheckPtrVsMember |
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionsNoFragileObjcIvar |
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionsNoSyntheticChildren |
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionsNoSyntheticArrayRange,
var_sp, err);
if (!err.Success() || !valobj_sp.get())
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
lldb::addr_t ret = valobj_sp->GetValueAsUnsigned(LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS);
if (ret == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
err.SetErrorStringWithFormat(
"Couldn't load '%s' because its value couldn't be evaluated",
object_name.AsCString());
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
}
return ret;
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::ExpressionResults UserExpression::Evaluate(
ExecutionContext &exe_ctx, const EvaluateExpressionOptions &options,
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
llvm::StringRef expr, llvm::StringRef prefix,
[Expression] Remove unused parameter from Evaluate llvm-svn: 355375
2019-03-05 11:33:34 +08:00
lldb::ValueObjectSP &result_valobj_sp, Status &error,
[Expressions] Add support of expressions evaluation in some object's context Summary: This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object. Consider the following example: ``` struct S { int a = 11; int b = 12; }; int main() { S s; int a = 1; int b = 2; // We have stopped here return 0; } ``` This patch allows to do something like that: ``` lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b") ``` and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be used (not locals `a` and `b`). This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad` type). Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318 llvm-svn: 353149
2019-02-05 17:14:36 +08:00
std::string *fixed_expression, lldb::ModuleSP *jit_module_sp_ptr,
ValueObject *ctx_obj) {
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Log *log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAnyCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS |
LIBLLDB_LOG_STEP));
[Expressions] Add support of expressions evaluation in some object's context Summary: This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object. Consider the following example: ``` struct S { int a = 11; int b = 12; }; int main() { S s; int a = 1; int b = 2; // We have stopped here return 0; } ``` This patch allows to do something like that: ``` lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b") ``` and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be used (not locals `a` and `b`). This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad` type). Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318 llvm-svn: 353149
2019-02-05 17:14:36 +08:00
if (ctx_obj) {
static unsigned const ctx_type_mask =
lldb::TypeFlags::eTypeIsClass | lldb::TypeFlags::eTypeIsStructUnion;
if (!(ctx_obj->GetTypeInfo() & ctx_type_mask)) {
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Passed a context object of "
"an invalid type, can't run expressions.");
error.SetErrorString("a context object of an invalid type passed");
return lldb::eExpressionSetupError;
}
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb_private::ExecutionPolicy execution_policy = options.GetExecutionPolicy();
lldb::LanguageType language = options.GetLanguage();
const ResultType desired_type = options.DoesCoerceToId()
? UserExpression::eResultTypeId
: UserExpression::eResultTypeAny;
lldb::ExpressionResults execution_results = lldb::eExpressionSetupError;
Target *target = exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr();
if (!target) {
if (log)
log->Printf("== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Passed a NULL target, can't "
"run expressions.");
UserExpression::Evaluate only returns a non-empty ValueObjectSP if it returns eExpressionCompleted. Don't try to get the error from the ValueObjectSP if that's not true. I just have a report of this from the field, I don't know how to make it fail yet. <rdar://problem/29113004> llvm-svn: 286170
2016-11-08 06:47:01 +08:00
error.SetErrorString("expression passed a null target");
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return lldb::eExpressionSetupError;
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Process *process = exe_ctx.GetProcessPtr();
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (process == NULL || process->GetState() != lldb::eStateStopped) {
if (execution_policy == eExecutionPolicyAlways) {
if (log)
log->Printf("== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Expression may not run, but "
"is not constant ==");
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
error.SetErrorString("expression needed to run but couldn't");
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return execution_results;
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
if (process == NULL || !process->CanJIT())
execution_policy = eExecutionPolicyNever;
// We need to set the expression execution thread here, turns out parse can
Reflow paragraphs in comments. This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read. FYI, the script I used was: import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2) continue if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = "" out.write(line) os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1]) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144 llvm-svn: 331197
2018-05-01 00:49:04 +08:00
// call functions in the process of looking up symbols, which will escape the
// context set by exe_ctx passed to Execute.
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::ThreadSP thread_sp = exe_ctx.GetThreadSP();
ThreadList::ExpressionExecutionThreadPusher execution_thread_pusher(
thread_sp);
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
llvm::StringRef full_prefix;
llvm::StringRef option_prefix(options.GetPrefix());
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
std::string full_prefix_storage;
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
if (!prefix.empty() && !option_prefix.empty()) {
full_prefix_storage = prefix;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
full_prefix_storage.append(option_prefix);
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
full_prefix = full_prefix_storage;
} else if (!prefix.empty())
full_prefix = prefix;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
else
full_prefix = option_prefix;
Reflow paragraphs in comments. This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read. FYI, the script I used was: import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2) continue if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = "" out.write(line) os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1]) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144 llvm-svn: 331197
2018-05-01 00:49:04 +08:00
// If the language was not specified in the expression command, set it to the
// language in the target's properties if specified, else default to the
// langage for the frame.
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (language == lldb::eLanguageTypeUnknown) {
if (target->GetLanguage() != lldb::eLanguageTypeUnknown)
language = target->GetLanguage();
else if (StackFrame *frame = exe_ctx.GetFramePtr())
language = frame->GetLanguage();
}
lldb::UserExpressionSP user_expression_sp(
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
target->GetUserExpressionForLanguage(expr, full_prefix, language,
[Expressions] Add support of expressions evaluation in some object's context Summary: This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object. Consider the following example: ``` struct S { int a = 11; int b = 12; }; int main() { S s; int a = 1; int b = 2; // We have stopped here return 0; } ``` This patch allows to do something like that: ``` lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b") ``` and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be used (not locals `a` and `b`). This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad` type). Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318 llvm-svn: 353149
2019-02-05 17:14:36 +08:00
desired_type, options, ctx_obj,
error));
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (error.Fail()) {
if (log)
log->Printf("== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Getting expression: %s ==",
error.AsCString());
return lldb::eExpressionSetupError;
}
if (log)
log->Printf("== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Parsing expression %s ==",
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
expr.str().c_str());
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
const bool keep_expression_in_memory = true;
const bool generate_debug_info = options.GetGenerateDebugInfo();
if (options.InvokeCancelCallback(lldb::eExpressionEvaluationParse)) {
error.SetErrorString("expression interrupted by callback before parse");
result_valobj_sp = ValueObjectConstResult::Create(
exe_ctx.GetBestExecutionContextScope(), error);
return lldb::eExpressionInterrupted;
}
DiagnosticManager diagnostic_manager;
bool parse_success =
user_expression_sp->Parse(diagnostic_manager, exe_ctx, execution_policy,
keep_expression_in_memory, generate_debug_info);
// Calculate the fixed expression always, since we need it for errors.
std::string tmp_fixed_expression;
if (fixed_expression == nullptr)
fixed_expression = &tmp_fixed_expression;
const char *fixed_text = user_expression_sp->GetFixedText();
if (fixed_text != nullptr)
fixed_expression->append(fixed_text);
// If there is a fixed expression, try to parse it:
if (!parse_success) {
execution_results = lldb::eExpressionParseError;
if (fixed_expression && !fixed_expression->empty() &&
options.GetAutoApplyFixIts()) {
lldb::UserExpressionSP fixed_expression_sp(
target->GetUserExpressionForLanguage(fixed_expression->c_str(),
full_prefix, language,
[Expressions] Add support of expressions evaluation in some object's context Summary: This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object. Consider the following example: ``` struct S { int a = 11; int b = 12; }; int main() { S s; int a = 1; int b = 2; // We have stopped here return 0; } ``` This patch allows to do something like that: ``` lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b") ``` and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be used (not locals `a` and `b`). This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad` type). Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318 llvm-svn: 353149
2019-02-05 17:14:36 +08:00
desired_type, options, ctx_obj,
error));
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
DiagnosticManager fixed_diagnostic_manager;
parse_success = fixed_expression_sp->Parse(
fixed_diagnostic_manager, exe_ctx, execution_policy,
keep_expression_in_memory, generate_debug_info);
if (parse_success) {
diagnostic_manager.Clear();
user_expression_sp = fixed_expression_sp;
} else {
// If the fixed expression failed to parse, don't tell the user about,
// that won't help.
fixed_expression->clear();
}
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (!parse_success) {
if (!fixed_expression->empty() && target->GetEnableNotifyAboutFixIts()) {
error.SetExpressionErrorWithFormat(
execution_results,
"expression failed to parse, fixed expression suggested:\n %s",
fixed_expression->c_str());
} else {
if (!diagnostic_manager.Diagnostics().size())
error.SetExpressionError(execution_results,
"expression failed to parse, unknown error");
else
error.SetExpressionError(execution_results,
diagnostic_manager.GetString().c_str());
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
if (parse_success) {
// If a pointer to a lldb::ModuleSP was passed in, return the JIT'ed module
// if one was created
if (jit_module_sp_ptr)
*jit_module_sp_ptr = user_expression_sp->GetJITModule();
lldb::ExpressionVariableSP expr_result;
if (execution_policy == eExecutionPolicyNever &&
!user_expression_sp->CanInterpret()) {
if (log)
log->Printf("== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Expression may not run, but "
"is not constant ==");
if (!diagnostic_manager.Diagnostics().size())
error.SetExpressionError(lldb::eExpressionSetupError,
"expression needed to run but couldn't");
} else if (execution_policy == eExecutionPolicyTopLevel) {
Revert "Return a named error in the result object of an expression with no result" This reverts commit r344647. This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in: lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350 lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529 (maybe there could be more) As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the author to resolve. llvm-svn: 344722
2018-10-18 11:10:43 +08:00
error.SetError(UserExpression::kNoResult, lldb::eErrorTypeGeneric);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return lldb::eExpressionCompleted;
} else {
if (options.InvokeCancelCallback(lldb::eExpressionEvaluationExecution)) {
error.SetExpressionError(
lldb::eExpressionInterrupted,
"expression interrupted by callback before execution");
result_valobj_sp = ValueObjectConstResult::Create(
exe_ctx.GetBestExecutionContextScope(), error);
return lldb::eExpressionInterrupted;
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
diagnostic_manager.Clear();
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (log)
log->Printf("== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Executing expression ==");
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
execution_results =
user_expression_sp->Execute(diagnostic_manager, exe_ctx, options,
user_expression_sp, expr_result);
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (execution_results != lldb::eExpressionCompleted) {
if (log)
log->Printf("== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Execution completed "
"abnormally ==");
if (!diagnostic_manager.Diagnostics().size())
error.SetExpressionError(
execution_results, "expression failed to execute, unknown error");
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
else
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
error.SetExpressionError(execution_results,
diagnostic_manager.GetString().c_str());
} else {
if (expr_result) {
result_valobj_sp = expr_result->GetValueObject();
if (log)
log->Printf("== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Execution completed "
"normally with result %s ==",
result_valobj_sp->GetValueAsCString());
} else {
if (log)
log->Printf("== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Execution completed "
"normally with no result ==");
Revert "Return a named error in the result object of an expression with no result" This reverts commit r344647. This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in: lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350 lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529 (maybe there could be more) As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the author to resolve. llvm-svn: 344722
2018-10-18 11:10:43 +08:00
error.SetError(UserExpression::kNoResult, lldb::eErrorTypeGeneric);
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (options.InvokeCancelCallback(lldb::eExpressionEvaluationComplete)) {
error.SetExpressionError(
lldb::eExpressionInterrupted,
"expression interrupted by callback after complete");
return lldb::eExpressionInterrupted;
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (result_valobj_sp.get() == NULL) {
result_valobj_sp = ValueObjectConstResult::Create(
exe_ctx.GetBestExecutionContextScope(), error);
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return execution_results;
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
Breakpoint conditions were making result variables, which they should not do. The result variables aren't useful, and if you have a breakpoint on a common function you can generate a lot of these. So I changed the code that checks the condition to set ResultVariableIsInternal in the EvaluateExpressionOptions that we pass to the execution. Unfortunately, the check for this variable was done in the wrong place (the static UserExpression::Evaluate) which is not how breakpoint conditions execute expressions (UserExpression::Execute). So I moved the check to UserExpression::Execute (which Evaluate also calls) and made the overridden method DoExecute. llvm-svn: 266093
2016-04-13 01:17:35 +08:00
lldb::ExpressionResults
UserExpression::Execute(DiagnosticManager &diagnostic_manager,
ExecutionContext &exe_ctx,
const EvaluateExpressionOptions &options,
lldb::UserExpressionSP &shared_ptr_to_me,
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::ExpressionVariableSP &result_var) {
lldb::ExpressionResults expr_result = DoExecute(
diagnostic_manager, exe_ctx, options, shared_ptr_to_me, result_var);
Target *target = exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr();
if (options.GetResultIsInternal() && result_var && target) {
target->GetPersistentExpressionStateForLanguage(m_language)
->RemovePersistentVariable(result_var);
}
return expr_result;
Breakpoint conditions were making result variables, which they should not do. The result variables aren't useful, and if you have a breakpoint on a common function you can generate a lot of these. So I changed the code that checks the condition to set ResultVariableIsInternal in the EvaluateExpressionOptions that we pass to the execution. Unfortunately, the check for this variable was done in the wrong place (the static UserExpression::Evaluate) which is not how breakpoint conditions execute expressions (UserExpression::Execute). So I moved the check to UserExpression::Execute (which Evaluate also calls) and made the overridden method DoExecute. llvm-svn: 266093
2016-04-13 01:17:35 +08:00
}