llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/overload-member-call.cpp

99 lines
3.6 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
struct X {
int& f(int) const; // expected-note 2 {{candidate function}}
float& f(int); // expected-note 2 {{candidate function}}
void test_f(int x) const {
int& i = f(x);
}
void test_f2(int x) {
float& f2 = f(x);
}
int& g(int) const; // expected-note 2 {{candidate function}}
float& g(int); // expected-note 2 {{candidate function}}
static double& g(double); // expected-note 2 {{candidate function}}
void h(int);
void test_member() {
float& f1 = f(0);
float& f2 = g(0);
double& d1 = g(0.0);
}
void test_member_const() const {
int &i1 = f(0);
int &i2 = g(0);
double& d1 = g(0.0);
}
static void test_member_static() {
double& d1 = g(0.0);
g(0); // expected-error{{call to 'g' is ambiguous; candidates are:}}
}
};
void test(X x, const X xc, X* xp, const X* xcp, volatile X xv, volatile X* xvp) {
int& i1 = xc.f(0);
int& i2 = xcp->f(0);
float& f1 = x.f(0);
float& f2 = xp->f(0);
xv.f(0); // expected-error{{no matching member function for call to 'f'; candidates are:}}
xvp->f(0); // expected-error{{no matching member function for call to 'f'; candidates are:}}
int& i3 = xc.g(0);
int& i4 = xcp->g(0);
float& f3 = x.g(0);
float& f4 = xp->g(0);
double& d1 = xp->g(0.0);
double& d2 = X::g(0.0);
X::g(0); // expected-error{{call to 'g' is ambiguous; candidates are:}}
X::h(0); // expected-error{{call to non-static member function without an object argument}}
}
struct X1 {
int& member();
float& member() const;
};
struct X2 : X1 { };
void test_X2(X2 *x2p, const X2 *cx2p) {
int &ir = x2p->member();
float &fr = cx2p->member();
}
// Tests the exact text used to note the candidates
namespace test1 {
class A {
template <class T> void foo(T t, unsigned N); // expected-note {{candidate function [with T = int] not viable: no known conversion from 'const char [6]' to 'unsigned int' for 2nd argument}}
void foo(int n, char N); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'const char [6]' to 'char' for 2nd argument}}
void foo(int n); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires 1 argument, but 2 were provided}}
void foo(unsigned n = 10); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at most 1 argument, but 2 were provided}}
void foo(int n, const char *s, int t); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires 3 arguments, but 2 were provided}}
void foo(int n, const char *s, int t, ...); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at least 3 arguments, but 2 were provided}}
void foo(int n, const char *s, int t, int u = 0); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at least 3 arguments, but 2 were provided}}
void bar(double d); //expected-note {{candidate function not viable: 'this' argument has type 'const test1::A', but method is not marked const}}
void bar(int i); //expected-note {{candidate function not viable: 'this' argument has type 'const test1::A', but method is not marked const}}
void baz(A &d); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: 1st argument ('const test1::A') would lose const qualifier}}
void baz(int i); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'const test1::A' to 'int' for 1st argument}}
};
void test() {
A a;
a.foo(4, "hello"); //expected-error {{no matching member function for call to 'foo'}}
Rework base and member initialization in constructors, with several (necessarily simultaneous) changes: - CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries created by the initializer (which we never handled before!). - Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers, since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer. - Switched base and member initialization over to the new initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it - Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced by the previous (special-purpose) code. - Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in the AST. - When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the AST, because they'll look like they were explicit. - Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of constructor. There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not regress, for example: - Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for variables. That's fixed now. - When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor when we're defining the body. llvm-svn: 94952
2010-01-31 17:12:51 +08:00
const A b = A();
b.bar(0); //expected-error {{no matching member function for call to 'bar'}}
a.baz(b); //expected-error {{no matching member function for call to 'baz'}}
}
}