llvm-project/flang/lib/Semantics/expression.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

3044 lines
113 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===-- lib/Semantics/expression.cpp --------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "flang/Semantics/expression.h"
#include "check-call.h"
#include "pointer-assignment.h"
#include "resolve-names.h"
#include "flang/Common/idioms.h"
#include "flang/Evaluate/common.h"
#include "flang/Evaluate/fold.h"
#include "flang/Evaluate/tools.h"
#include "flang/Parser/characters.h"
#include "flang/Parser/dump-parse-tree.h"
#include "flang/Parser/parse-tree-visitor.h"
#include "flang/Parser/parse-tree.h"
#include "flang/Semantics/scope.h"
#include "flang/Semantics/semantics.h"
#include "flang/Semantics/symbol.h"
#include "flang/Semantics/tools.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include <functional>
#include <optional>
#include <set>
// Typedef for optional generic expressions (ubiquitous in this file)
using MaybeExpr =
std::optional<Fortran::evaluate::Expr<Fortran::evaluate::SomeType>>;
// Much of the code that implements semantic analysis of expressions is
// tightly coupled with their typed representations in lib/Evaluate,
// and appears here in namespace Fortran::evaluate for convenience.
namespace Fortran::evaluate {
using common::LanguageFeature;
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
using common::NumericOperator;
using common::TypeCategory;
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
static inline std::string ToUpperCase(const std::string &str) {
return parser::ToUpperCaseLetters(str);
}
struct DynamicTypeWithLength : public DynamicType {
explicit DynamicTypeWithLength(const DynamicType &t) : DynamicType{t} {}
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> LEN() const;
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> length;
};
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> DynamicTypeWithLength::LEN() const {
if (length) {
return length;
}
if (auto *lengthParam{charLength()}) {
if (const auto &len{lengthParam->GetExplicit()}) {
return ConvertToType<SubscriptInteger>(common::Clone(*len));
}
}
return std::nullopt; // assumed or deferred length
}
static std::optional<DynamicTypeWithLength> AnalyzeTypeSpec(
const std::optional<parser::TypeSpec> &spec) {
if (spec) {
if (const semantics::DeclTypeSpec * typeSpec{spec->declTypeSpec}) {
// Name resolution sets TypeSpec::declTypeSpec only when it's valid
// (viz., an intrinsic type with valid known kind or a non-polymorphic
// & non-ABSTRACT derived type).
if (const semantics::IntrinsicTypeSpec *
intrinsic{typeSpec->AsIntrinsic()}) {
TypeCategory category{intrinsic->category()};
if (auto optKind{ToInt64(intrinsic->kind())}) {
int kind{static_cast<int>(*optKind)};
if (category == TypeCategory::Character) {
const semantics::CharacterTypeSpec &cts{
typeSpec->characterTypeSpec()};
const semantics::ParamValue &len{cts.length()};
// N.B. CHARACTER(LEN=*) is allowed in type-specs in ALLOCATE() &
// type guards, but not in array constructors.
return DynamicTypeWithLength{DynamicType{kind, len}};
} else {
return DynamicTypeWithLength{DynamicType{category, kind}};
}
}
} else if (const semantics::DerivedTypeSpec *
derived{typeSpec->AsDerived()}) {
return DynamicTypeWithLength{DynamicType{*derived}};
}
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// Wraps a object in an explicitly typed representation (e.g., Designator<>
// or FunctionRef<>) that has been instantiated on a dynamically chosen type.
template <TypeCategory CATEGORY, template <typename> typename WRAPPER,
typename WRAPPED>
common::IfNoLvalue<MaybeExpr, WRAPPED> WrapperHelper(int kind, WRAPPED &&x) {
return common::SearchTypes(
TypeKindVisitor<CATEGORY, WRAPPER, WRAPPED>{kind, std::move(x)});
}
template <template <typename> typename WRAPPER, typename WRAPPED>
common::IfNoLvalue<MaybeExpr, WRAPPED> TypedWrapper(
const DynamicType &dyType, WRAPPED &&x) {
switch (dyType.category()) {
SWITCH_COVERS_ALL_CASES
case TypeCategory::Integer:
return WrapperHelper<TypeCategory::Integer, WRAPPER, WRAPPED>(
dyType.kind(), std::move(x));
case TypeCategory::Real:
return WrapperHelper<TypeCategory::Real, WRAPPER, WRAPPED>(
dyType.kind(), std::move(x));
case TypeCategory::Complex:
return WrapperHelper<TypeCategory::Complex, WRAPPER, WRAPPED>(
dyType.kind(), std::move(x));
case TypeCategory::Character:
return WrapperHelper<TypeCategory::Character, WRAPPER, WRAPPED>(
dyType.kind(), std::move(x));
case TypeCategory::Logical:
return WrapperHelper<TypeCategory::Logical, WRAPPER, WRAPPED>(
dyType.kind(), std::move(x));
case TypeCategory::Derived:
return AsGenericExpr(Expr<SomeDerived>{WRAPPER<SomeDerived>{std::move(x)}});
}
}
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
class ArgumentAnalyzer {
public:
explicit ArgumentAnalyzer(ExpressionAnalyzer &context)
: context_{context}, allowAssumedType_{false} {}
ArgumentAnalyzer(ExpressionAnalyzer &context, parser::CharBlock source,
bool allowAssumedType = false)
: context_{context}, source_{source}, allowAssumedType_{
allowAssumedType} {}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
bool fatalErrors() const { return fatalErrors_; }
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
ActualArguments &&GetActuals() {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
CHECK(!fatalErrors_);
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
return std::move(actuals_);
}
const Expr<SomeType> &GetExpr(std::size_t i) const {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return DEREF(actuals_.at(i).value().UnwrapExpr());
}
Expr<SomeType> &&MoveExpr(std::size_t i) {
return std::move(DEREF(actuals_.at(i).value().UnwrapExpr()));
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
void Analyze(const common::Indirection<parser::Expr> &x) {
Analyze(x.value());
}
void Analyze(const parser::Expr &x) {
actuals_.emplace_back(AnalyzeExpr(x));
fatalErrors_ |= !actuals_.back();
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
void Analyze(const parser::Variable &);
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
void Analyze(const parser::ActualArgSpec &, bool isSubroutine);
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
bool IsIntrinsicRelational(RelationalOperator) const;
bool IsIntrinsicLogical() const;
bool IsIntrinsicNumeric(NumericOperator) const;
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
bool IsIntrinsicConcat() const;
// Find and return a user-defined operator or report an error.
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
// The provided message is used if there is no such operator.
MaybeExpr TryDefinedOp(
const char *, parser::MessageFixedText &&, bool isUserOp = false);
template <typename E>
MaybeExpr TryDefinedOp(E opr, parser::MessageFixedText &&msg) {
return TryDefinedOp(
context_.context().languageFeatures().GetNames(opr), std::move(msg));
}
// Find and return a user-defined assignment
std::optional<ProcedureRef> TryDefinedAssignment();
std::optional<ProcedureRef> GetDefinedAssignmentProc();
void Dump(llvm::raw_ostream &);
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
private:
MaybeExpr TryDefinedOp(
std::vector<const char *>, parser::MessageFixedText &&);
MaybeExpr TryBoundOp(const Symbol &, int passIndex);
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
std::optional<ActualArgument> AnalyzeExpr(const parser::Expr &);
bool AreConformable() const;
const Symbol *FindBoundOp(parser::CharBlock, int passIndex);
bool OkLogicalIntegerAssignment(TypeCategory lhs, TypeCategory rhs);
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
std::optional<DynamicType> GetType(std::size_t) const;
int GetRank(std::size_t) const;
bool IsBOZLiteral(std::size_t i) const {
return std::holds_alternative<BOZLiteralConstant>(GetExpr(i).u);
}
void SayNoMatch(const std::string &, bool isAssignment = false);
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
std::string TypeAsFortran(std::size_t);
bool AnyUntypedOperand();
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
ExpressionAnalyzer &context_;
ActualArguments actuals_;
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
parser::CharBlock source_;
bool fatalErrors_{false};
const bool allowAssumedType_;
const Symbol *sawDefinedOp_{nullptr};
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
};
// Wraps a data reference in a typed Designator<>, and a procedure
// or procedure pointer reference in a ProcedureDesignator.
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Designate(DataRef &&ref) {
const Symbol &symbol{ref.GetLastSymbol().GetUltimate()};
if (semantics::IsProcedure(symbol)) {
if (auto *component{std::get_if<Component>(&ref.u)}) {
return Expr<SomeType>{ProcedureDesignator{std::move(*component)}};
} else if (!std::holds_alternative<SymbolRef>(ref.u)) {
DIE("unexpected alternative in DataRef");
} else if (!symbol.attrs().test(semantics::Attr::INTRINSIC)) {
return Expr<SomeType>{ProcedureDesignator{symbol}};
} else if (auto interface{context_.intrinsics().IsSpecificIntrinsicFunction(
symbol.name().ToString())}) {
SpecificIntrinsic intrinsic{
symbol.name().ToString(), std::move(*interface)};
intrinsic.isRestrictedSpecific = interface->isRestrictedSpecific;
return Expr<SomeType>{ProcedureDesignator{std::move(intrinsic)}};
} else {
Say("'%s' is not a specific intrinsic procedure"_err_en_US,
symbol.name());
return std::nullopt;
}
} else if (auto dyType{DynamicType::From(symbol)}) {
return TypedWrapper<Designator, DataRef>(*dyType, std::move(ref));
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// Some subscript semantic checks must be deferred until all of the
// subscripts are in hand.
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::CompleteSubscripts(ArrayRef &&ref) {
const Symbol &symbol{ref.GetLastSymbol().GetUltimate()};
const auto *object{symbol.detailsIf<semantics::ObjectEntityDetails>()};
int symbolRank{symbol.Rank()};
int subscripts{static_cast<int>(ref.size())};
if (subscripts == 0) {
// nothing to check
} else if (subscripts != symbolRank) {
if (symbolRank != 0) {
Say("Reference to rank-%d object '%s' has %d subscripts"_err_en_US,
symbolRank, symbol.name(), subscripts);
}
return std::nullopt;
} else if (Component * component{ref.base().UnwrapComponent()}) {
int baseRank{component->base().Rank()};
if (baseRank > 0) {
int subscriptRank{0};
for (const auto &expr : ref.subscript()) {
subscriptRank += expr.Rank();
}
if (subscriptRank > 0) {
Say("Subscripts of component '%s' of rank-%d derived type "
"array have rank %d but must all be scalar"_err_en_US,
symbol.name(), baseRank, subscriptRank);
return std::nullopt;
}
}
} else if (object) {
// C928 & C1002
if (Triplet * last{std::get_if<Triplet>(&ref.subscript().back().u)}) {
if (!last->upper() && object->IsAssumedSize()) {
Say("Assumed-size array '%s' must have explicit final "
"subscript upper bound value"_err_en_US,
symbol.name());
return std::nullopt;
}
}
}
return Designate(DataRef{std::move(ref)});
}
// Applies subscripts to a data reference.
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::ApplySubscripts(
DataRef &&dataRef, std::vector<Subscript> &&subscripts) {
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[&](SymbolRef &&symbol) {
return CompleteSubscripts(ArrayRef{symbol, std::move(subscripts)});
},
[&](Component &&c) {
return CompleteSubscripts(
ArrayRef{std::move(c), std::move(subscripts)});
},
[&](auto &&) -> MaybeExpr {
DIE("bad base for ArrayRef");
return std::nullopt;
},
},
std::move(dataRef.u));
}
// Top-level checks for data references.
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::TopLevelChecks(DataRef &&dataRef) {
if (Component * component{std::get_if<Component>(&dataRef.u)}) {
const Symbol &symbol{component->GetLastSymbol()};
int componentRank{symbol.Rank()};
if (componentRank > 0) {
int baseRank{component->base().Rank()};
if (baseRank > 0) {
Say("Reference to whole rank-%d component '%%%s' of "
"rank-%d array of derived type is not allowed"_err_en_US,
componentRank, symbol.name(), baseRank);
}
}
}
return Designate(std::move(dataRef));
}
// Parse tree correction after a substring S(j:k) was misparsed as an
// array section. N.B. Fortran substrings have to have a range, not a
// single index.
static void FixMisparsedSubstring(const parser::Designator &d) {
auto &mutate{const_cast<parser::Designator &>(d)};
if (auto *dataRef{std::get_if<parser::DataRef>(&mutate.u)}) {
if (auto *ae{std::get_if<common::Indirection<parser::ArrayElement>>(
&dataRef->u)}) {
parser::ArrayElement &arrElement{ae->value()};
if (!arrElement.subscripts.empty()) {
auto iter{arrElement.subscripts.begin()};
if (auto *triplet{std::get_if<parser::SubscriptTriplet>(&iter->u)}) {
if (!std::get<2>(triplet->t) /* no stride */ &&
++iter == arrElement.subscripts.end() /* one subscript */) {
if (Symbol *
symbol{std::visit(
common::visitors{
[](parser::Name &n) { return n.symbol; },
[](common::Indirection<parser::StructureComponent>
&sc) { return sc.value().component.symbol; },
[](auto &) -> Symbol * { return nullptr; },
},
arrElement.base.u)}) {
const Symbol &ultimate{symbol->GetUltimate()};
if (const semantics::DeclTypeSpec * type{ultimate.GetType()}) {
if (!ultimate.IsObjectArray() &&
type->category() == semantics::DeclTypeSpec::Character) {
// The ambiguous S(j:k) was parsed as an array section
// reference, but it's now clear that it's a substring.
// Fix the parse tree in situ.
mutate.u = arrElement.ConvertToSubstring();
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Designator &d) {
auto restorer{GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(d.source)};
FixMisparsedSubstring(d);
// These checks have to be deferred to these "top level" data-refs where
// we can be sure that there are no following subscripts (yet).
// Substrings have already been run through TopLevelChecks() and
// won't be returned by ExtractDataRef().
if (MaybeExpr result{Analyze(d.u)}) {
if (std::optional<DataRef> dataRef{ExtractDataRef(std::move(result))}) {
return TopLevelChecks(std::move(*dataRef));
}
return result;
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// A utility subroutine to repackage optional expressions of various levels
// of type specificity as fully general MaybeExpr values.
template <typename A> common::IfNoLvalue<MaybeExpr, A> AsMaybeExpr(A &&x) {
return std::make_optional(AsGenericExpr(std::move(x)));
}
template <typename A> MaybeExpr AsMaybeExpr(std::optional<A> &&x) {
if (x) {
return AsMaybeExpr(std::move(*x));
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// Type kind parameter values for literal constants.
int ExpressionAnalyzer::AnalyzeKindParam(
const std::optional<parser::KindParam> &kindParam, int defaultKind) {
if (!kindParam) {
return defaultKind;
}
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[](std::uint64_t k) { return static_cast<int>(k); },
[&](const parser::Scalar<
parser::Integer<parser::Constant<parser::Name>>> &n) {
if (MaybeExpr ie{Analyze(n)}) {
if (std::optional<std::int64_t> i64{ToInt64(*ie)}) {
int iv = *i64;
if (iv == *i64) {
return iv;
}
}
}
return defaultKind;
},
},
kindParam->u);
}
// Common handling of parser::IntLiteralConstant and SignedIntLiteralConstant
struct IntTypeVisitor {
using Result = MaybeExpr;
using Types = IntegerTypes;
template <typename T> Result Test() {
if (T::kind >= kind) {
const char *p{digits.begin()};
auto value{T::Scalar::Read(p, 10, true /*signed*/)};
if (!value.overflow) {
if (T::kind > kind) {
if (!isDefaultKind ||
!analyzer.context().IsEnabled(LanguageFeature::BigIntLiterals)) {
return std::nullopt;
} else if (analyzer.context().ShouldWarn(
LanguageFeature::BigIntLiterals)) {
analyzer.Say(digits,
"Integer literal is too large for default INTEGER(KIND=%d); "
"assuming INTEGER(KIND=%d)"_en_US,
kind, T::kind);
}
}
return Expr<SomeType>{
Expr<SomeInteger>{Expr<T>{Constant<T>{std::move(value.value)}}}};
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
ExpressionAnalyzer &analyzer;
parser::CharBlock digits;
int kind;
bool isDefaultKind;
};
template <typename PARSED>
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::IntLiteralConstant(const PARSED &x) {
const auto &kindParam{std::get<std::optional<parser::KindParam>>(x.t)};
bool isDefaultKind{!kindParam};
int kind{AnalyzeKindParam(kindParam, GetDefaultKind(TypeCategory::Integer))};
if (CheckIntrinsicKind(TypeCategory::Integer, kind)) {
auto digits{std::get<parser::CharBlock>(x.t)};
if (MaybeExpr result{common::SearchTypes(
IntTypeVisitor{*this, digits, kind, isDefaultKind})}) {
return result;
} else if (isDefaultKind) {
Say(digits,
"Integer literal is too large for any allowable "
"kind of INTEGER"_err_en_US);
} else {
Say(digits, "Integer literal is too large for INTEGER(KIND=%d)"_err_en_US,
kind);
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::IntLiteralConstant &x) {
auto restorer{
GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(std::get<parser::CharBlock>(x.t))};
return IntLiteralConstant(x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(
const parser::SignedIntLiteralConstant &x) {
auto restorer{GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(x.source)};
return IntLiteralConstant(x);
}
template <typename TYPE>
Constant<TYPE> ReadRealLiteral(
parser::CharBlock source, FoldingContext &context) {
const char *p{source.begin()};
auto valWithFlags{Scalar<TYPE>::Read(p, context.rounding())};
CHECK(p == source.end());
RealFlagWarnings(context, valWithFlags.flags, "conversion of REAL literal");
auto value{valWithFlags.value};
if (context.flushSubnormalsToZero()) {
value = value.FlushSubnormalToZero();
}
return {value};
}
struct RealTypeVisitor {
using Result = std::optional<Expr<SomeReal>>;
using Types = RealTypes;
RealTypeVisitor(int k, parser::CharBlock lit, FoldingContext &ctx)
: kind{k}, literal{lit}, context{ctx} {}
template <typename T> Result Test() {
if (kind == T::kind) {
return {AsCategoryExpr(ReadRealLiteral<T>(literal, context))};
}
return std::nullopt;
}
int kind;
parser::CharBlock literal;
FoldingContext &context;
};
// Reads a real literal constant and encodes it with the right kind.
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::RealLiteralConstant &x) {
// Use a local message context around the real literal for better
// provenance on any messages.
auto restorer{GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(x.real.source)};
// If a kind parameter appears, it defines the kind of the literal and the
// letter used in an exponent part must be 'E' (e.g., the 'E' in
// "6.02214E+23"). In the absence of an explicit kind parameter, any
// exponent letter determines the kind. Otherwise, defaults apply.
auto &defaults{context_.defaultKinds()};
int defaultKind{defaults.GetDefaultKind(TypeCategory::Real)};
const char *end{x.real.source.end()};
char expoLetter{' '};
std::optional<int> letterKind;
for (const char *p{x.real.source.begin()}; p < end; ++p) {
if (parser::IsLetter(*p)) {
expoLetter = *p;
switch (expoLetter) {
case 'e':
letterKind = defaults.GetDefaultKind(TypeCategory::Real);
break;
case 'd':
letterKind = defaults.doublePrecisionKind();
break;
case 'q':
letterKind = defaults.quadPrecisionKind();
break;
default:
Say("Unknown exponent letter '%c'"_err_en_US, expoLetter);
}
break;
}
}
if (letterKind) {
defaultKind = *letterKind;
}
// C716 requires 'E' as an exponent, but this is more useful
auto kind{AnalyzeKindParam(x.kind, defaultKind)};
if (letterKind && kind != *letterKind && expoLetter != 'e') {
Say("Explicit kind parameter on real constant disagrees with "
"exponent letter '%c'"_en_US,
expoLetter);
}
auto result{common::SearchTypes(
RealTypeVisitor{kind, x.real.source, GetFoldingContext()})};
if (!result) { // C717
Say("Unsupported REAL(KIND=%d)"_err_en_US, kind);
}
return AsMaybeExpr(std::move(result));
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(
const parser::SignedRealLiteralConstant &x) {
if (auto result{Analyze(std::get<parser::RealLiteralConstant>(x.t))}) {
auto &realExpr{std::get<Expr<SomeReal>>(result->u)};
if (auto sign{std::get<std::optional<parser::Sign>>(x.t)}) {
if (sign == parser::Sign::Negative) {
return {AsGenericExpr(-std::move(realExpr))};
}
}
return result;
}
return std::nullopt;
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(
const parser::SignedComplexLiteralConstant &x) {
auto result{Analyze(std::get<parser::ComplexLiteralConstant>(x.t))};
if (!result) {
return std::nullopt;
} else if (std::get<parser::Sign>(x.t) == parser::Sign::Negative) {
return AsGenericExpr(-std::move(std::get<Expr<SomeComplex>>(result->u)));
} else {
return result;
}
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::ComplexPart &x) {
return Analyze(x.u);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::ComplexLiteralConstant &z) {
return AsMaybeExpr(
ConstructComplex(GetContextualMessages(), Analyze(std::get<0>(z.t)),
Analyze(std::get<1>(z.t)), GetDefaultKind(TypeCategory::Real)));
}
// CHARACTER literal processing.
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::AnalyzeString(std::string &&string, int kind) {
if (!CheckIntrinsicKind(TypeCategory::Character, kind)) {
return std::nullopt;
}
switch (kind) {
case 1:
return AsGenericExpr(Constant<Type<TypeCategory::Character, 1>>{
parser::DecodeString<std::string, parser::Encoding::LATIN_1>(
string, true)});
case 2:
return AsGenericExpr(Constant<Type<TypeCategory::Character, 2>>{
parser::DecodeString<std::u16string, parser::Encoding::UTF_8>(
string, true)});
case 4:
return AsGenericExpr(Constant<Type<TypeCategory::Character, 4>>{
parser::DecodeString<std::u32string, parser::Encoding::UTF_8>(
string, true)});
default:
CRASH_NO_CASE;
}
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::CharLiteralConstant &x) {
int kind{
AnalyzeKindParam(std::get<std::optional<parser::KindParam>>(x.t), 1)};
auto value{std::get<std::string>(x.t)};
return AnalyzeString(std::move(value), kind);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(
const parser::HollerithLiteralConstant &x) {
int kind{GetDefaultKind(TypeCategory::Character)};
auto value{x.v};
return AnalyzeString(std::move(value), kind);
}
// .TRUE. and .FALSE. of various kinds
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::LogicalLiteralConstant &x) {
auto kind{AnalyzeKindParam(std::get<std::optional<parser::KindParam>>(x.t),
GetDefaultKind(TypeCategory::Logical))};
bool value{std::get<bool>(x.t)};
auto result{common::SearchTypes(
TypeKindVisitor<TypeCategory::Logical, Constant, bool>{
kind, std::move(value)})};
if (!result) {
Say("unsupported LOGICAL(KIND=%d)"_err_en_US, kind); // C728
}
return result;
}
// BOZ typeless literals
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::BOZLiteralConstant &x) {
const char *p{x.v.c_str()};
std::uint64_t base{16};
switch (*p++) {
case 'b':
base = 2;
break;
case 'o':
base = 8;
break;
case 'z':
break;
case 'x':
break;
default:
CRASH_NO_CASE;
}
CHECK(*p == '"');
++p;
auto value{BOZLiteralConstant::Read(p, base, false /*unsigned*/)};
if (*p != '"') {
Say("Invalid digit ('%c') in BOZ literal '%s'"_err_en_US, *p, x.v);
return std::nullopt;
}
if (value.overflow) {
Say("BOZ literal '%s' too large"_err_en_US, x.v);
return std::nullopt;
}
return AsGenericExpr(std::move(value.value));
}
// For use with SearchTypes to create a TypeParamInquiry with the
// right integer kind.
struct TypeParamInquiryVisitor {
using Result = std::optional<Expr<SomeInteger>>;
using Types = IntegerTypes;
TypeParamInquiryVisitor(int k, NamedEntity &&b, const Symbol &param)
: kind{k}, base{std::move(b)}, parameter{param} {}
TypeParamInquiryVisitor(int k, const Symbol &param)
: kind{k}, parameter{param} {}
template <typename T> Result Test() {
if (kind == T::kind) {
return Expr<SomeInteger>{
Expr<T>{TypeParamInquiry<T::kind>{std::move(base), parameter}}};
}
return std::nullopt;
}
int kind;
std::optional<NamedEntity> base;
const Symbol &parameter;
};
static std::optional<Expr<SomeInteger>> MakeBareTypeParamInquiry(
const Symbol *symbol) {
if (std::optional<DynamicType> dyType{DynamicType::From(symbol)}) {
if (dyType->category() == TypeCategory::Integer) {
return common::SearchTypes(
TypeParamInquiryVisitor{dyType->kind(), *symbol});
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// Names and named constants
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Name &n) {
if (std::optional<int> kind{IsAcImpliedDo(n.source)}) {
return AsMaybeExpr(ConvertToKind<TypeCategory::Integer>(
*kind, AsExpr(ImpliedDoIndex{n.source})));
} else if (context_.HasError(n) || !n.symbol) {
return std::nullopt;
} else {
const Symbol &ultimate{n.symbol->GetUltimate()};
if (ultimate.has<semantics::TypeParamDetails>()) {
// A bare reference to a derived type parameter (within a parameterized
// derived type definition)
return AsMaybeExpr(MakeBareTypeParamInquiry(&ultimate));
} else {
if (n.symbol->attrs().test(semantics::Attr::VOLATILE)) {
if (const semantics::Scope *
pure{semantics::FindPureProcedureContaining(
context_.FindScope(n.source))}) {
SayAt(n,
"VOLATILE variable '%s' may not be referenced in pure subprogram '%s'"_err_en_US,
n.source, DEREF(pure->symbol()).name());
n.symbol->attrs().reset(semantics::Attr::VOLATILE);
}
}
return Designate(DataRef{*n.symbol});
}
}
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::NamedConstant &n) {
if (MaybeExpr value{Analyze(n.v)}) {
Expr<SomeType> folded{Fold(std::move(*value))};
if (IsConstantExpr(folded)) {
return {folded};
}
Say(n.v.source, "must be a constant"_err_en_US); // C718
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// Substring references
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> ExpressionAnalyzer::GetSubstringBound(
const std::optional<parser::ScalarIntExpr> &bound) {
if (bound) {
if (MaybeExpr expr{Analyze(*bound)}) {
if (expr->Rank() > 1) {
Say("substring bound expression has rank %d"_err_en_US, expr->Rank());
}
if (auto *intExpr{std::get_if<Expr<SomeInteger>>(&expr->u)}) {
if (auto *ssIntExpr{std::get_if<Expr<SubscriptInteger>>(&intExpr->u)}) {
return {std::move(*ssIntExpr)};
}
return {Expr<SubscriptInteger>{
Convert<SubscriptInteger, TypeCategory::Integer>{
std::move(*intExpr)}}};
} else {
Say("substring bound expression is not INTEGER"_err_en_US);
}
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Substring &ss) {
if (MaybeExpr baseExpr{Analyze(std::get<parser::DataRef>(ss.t))}) {
if (std::optional<DataRef> dataRef{ExtractDataRef(std::move(*baseExpr))}) {
if (MaybeExpr newBaseExpr{TopLevelChecks(std::move(*dataRef))}) {
if (std::optional<DataRef> checked{
ExtractDataRef(std::move(*newBaseExpr))}) {
const parser::SubstringRange &range{
std::get<parser::SubstringRange>(ss.t)};
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> first{
GetSubstringBound(std::get<0>(range.t))};
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> last{
GetSubstringBound(std::get<1>(range.t))};
const Symbol &symbol{checked->GetLastSymbol()};
if (std::optional<DynamicType> dynamicType{
DynamicType::From(symbol)}) {
if (dynamicType->category() == TypeCategory::Character) {
return WrapperHelper<TypeCategory::Character, Designator,
Substring>(dynamicType->kind(),
Substring{std::move(checked.value()), std::move(first),
std::move(last)});
}
}
Say("substring may apply only to CHARACTER"_err_en_US);
}
}
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// CHARACTER literal substrings
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(
const parser::CharLiteralConstantSubstring &x) {
const parser::SubstringRange &range{std::get<parser::SubstringRange>(x.t)};
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> lower{
GetSubstringBound(std::get<0>(range.t))};
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> upper{
GetSubstringBound(std::get<1>(range.t))};
if (MaybeExpr string{Analyze(std::get<parser::CharLiteralConstant>(x.t))}) {
if (auto *charExpr{std::get_if<Expr<SomeCharacter>>(&string->u)}) {
Expr<SubscriptInteger> length{
std::visit([](const auto &ckExpr) { return ckExpr.LEN().value(); },
charExpr->u)};
if (!lower) {
lower = Expr<SubscriptInteger>{1};
}
if (!upper) {
upper = Expr<SubscriptInteger>{
static_cast<std::int64_t>(ToInt64(length).value())};
}
return std::visit(
[&](auto &&ckExpr) -> MaybeExpr {
using Result = ResultType<decltype(ckExpr)>;
auto *cp{std::get_if<Constant<Result>>(&ckExpr.u)};
CHECK(DEREF(cp).size() == 1);
StaticDataObject::Pointer staticData{StaticDataObject::Create()};
staticData->set_alignment(Result::kind)
.set_itemBytes(Result::kind)
.Push(cp->GetScalarValue().value());
Substring substring{std::move(staticData), std::move(lower.value()),
std::move(upper.value())};
return AsGenericExpr(Expr<SomeCharacter>{
Expr<Result>{Designator<Result>{std::move(substring)}}});
},
std::move(charExpr->u));
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// Subscripted array references
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> ExpressionAnalyzer::AsSubscript(
MaybeExpr &&expr) {
if (expr) {
if (expr->Rank() > 1) {
Say("Subscript expression has rank %d greater than 1"_err_en_US,
expr->Rank());
}
if (auto *intExpr{std::get_if<Expr<SomeInteger>>(&expr->u)}) {
if (auto *ssIntExpr{std::get_if<Expr<SubscriptInteger>>(&intExpr->u)}) {
return std::move(*ssIntExpr);
} else {
return Expr<SubscriptInteger>{
Convert<SubscriptInteger, TypeCategory::Integer>{
std::move(*intExpr)}};
}
} else {
Say("Subscript expression is not INTEGER"_err_en_US);
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
std::optional<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> ExpressionAnalyzer::TripletPart(
const std::optional<parser::Subscript> &s) {
if (s) {
return AsSubscript(Analyze(*s));
} else {
return std::nullopt;
}
}
std::optional<Subscript> ExpressionAnalyzer::AnalyzeSectionSubscript(
const parser::SectionSubscript &ss) {
return std::visit(common::visitors{
[&](const parser::SubscriptTriplet &t) {
return std::make_optional<Subscript>(
Triplet{TripletPart(std::get<0>(t.t)),
TripletPart(std::get<1>(t.t)),
TripletPart(std::get<2>(t.t))});
},
[&](const auto &s) -> std::optional<Subscript> {
if (auto subscriptExpr{AsSubscript(Analyze(s))}) {
return Subscript{std::move(*subscriptExpr)};
} else {
return std::nullopt;
}
},
},
ss.u);
}
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
// Empty result means an error occurred
std::vector<Subscript> ExpressionAnalyzer::AnalyzeSectionSubscripts(
const std::list<parser::SectionSubscript> &sss) {
bool error{false};
std::vector<Subscript> subscripts;
for (const auto &s : sss) {
if (auto subscript{AnalyzeSectionSubscript(s)}) {
subscripts.emplace_back(std::move(*subscript));
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
} else {
error = true;
}
}
return !error ? subscripts : std::vector<Subscript>{};
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::ArrayElement &ae) {
if (MaybeExpr baseExpr{Analyze(ae.base)}) {
if (ae.subscripts.empty()) {
// will be converted to function call later or error reported
return std::nullopt;
} else if (baseExpr->Rank() == 0) {
if (const Symbol * symbol{GetLastSymbol(*baseExpr)}) {
Say("'%s' is not an array"_err_en_US, symbol->name());
}
} else if (std::optional<DataRef> dataRef{
ExtractDataRef(std::move(*baseExpr))}) {
return ApplySubscripts(
std::move(*dataRef), AnalyzeSectionSubscripts(ae.subscripts));
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
} else {
Say("Subscripts may be applied only to an object, component, or array constant"_err_en_US);
}
}
// error was reported: analyze subscripts without reporting more errors
auto restorer{GetContextualMessages().DiscardMessages()};
AnalyzeSectionSubscripts(ae.subscripts);
return std::nullopt;
}
// Type parameter inquiries apply to data references, but don't depend
// on any trailing (co)subscripts.
static NamedEntity IgnoreAnySubscripts(Designator<SomeDerived> &&designator) {
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[](SymbolRef &&symbol) { return NamedEntity{symbol}; },
[](Component &&component) {
return NamedEntity{std::move(component)};
},
[](ArrayRef &&arrayRef) { return std::move(arrayRef.base()); },
[](CoarrayRef &&coarrayRef) {
return NamedEntity{coarrayRef.GetLastSymbol()};
},
},
std::move(designator.u));
}
// Components of parent derived types are explicitly represented as such.
static std::optional<Component> CreateComponent(
DataRef &&base, const Symbol &component, const semantics::Scope &scope) {
if (&component.owner() == &scope) {
return Component{std::move(base), component};
}
if (const semantics::Scope * parentScope{scope.GetDerivedTypeParent()}) {
if (const Symbol * parentComponent{parentScope->GetSymbol()}) {
return CreateComponent(
DataRef{Component{std::move(base), *parentComponent}}, component,
*parentScope);
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// Derived type component references and type parameter inquiries
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::StructureComponent &sc) {
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
MaybeExpr base{Analyze(sc.base)};
if (!base) {
return std::nullopt;
}
Symbol *sym{sc.component.symbol};
if (context_.HasError(sym)) {
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
return std::nullopt;
}
const auto &name{sc.component.source};
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
if (auto *dtExpr{UnwrapExpr<Expr<SomeDerived>>(*base)}) {
const auto *dtSpec{GetDerivedTypeSpec(dtExpr->GetType())};
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
if (sym->detailsIf<semantics::TypeParamDetails>()) {
if (auto *designator{UnwrapExpr<Designator<SomeDerived>>(*dtExpr)}) {
if (std::optional<DynamicType> dyType{DynamicType::From(*sym)}) {
if (dyType->category() == TypeCategory::Integer) {
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
return AsMaybeExpr(
common::SearchTypes(TypeParamInquiryVisitor{dyType->kind(),
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
IgnoreAnySubscripts(std::move(*designator)), *sym}));
}
}
Say(name, "Type parameter is not INTEGER"_err_en_US);
} else {
Say(name,
"A type parameter inquiry must be applied to "
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
"a designator"_err_en_US);
}
} else if (!dtSpec || !dtSpec->scope()) {
CHECK(context_.AnyFatalError() || !foldingContext_.messages().empty());
return std::nullopt;
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
} else if (std::optional<DataRef> dataRef{
ExtractDataRef(std::move(*dtExpr))}) {
if (auto component{
CreateComponent(std::move(*dataRef), *sym, *dtSpec->scope())}) {
return Designate(DataRef{std::move(*component)});
} else {
Say(name, "Component is not in scope of derived TYPE(%s)"_err_en_US,
dtSpec->typeSymbol().name());
}
} else {
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
Say(name,
"Base of component reference must be a data reference"_err_en_US);
}
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
} else if (auto *details{sym->detailsIf<semantics::MiscDetails>()}) {
// special part-ref: %re, %im, %kind, %len
// Type errors are detected and reported in semantics.
using MiscKind = semantics::MiscDetails::Kind;
MiscKind kind{details->kind()};
if (kind == MiscKind::ComplexPartRe || kind == MiscKind::ComplexPartIm) {
if (auto *zExpr{std::get_if<Expr<SomeComplex>>(&base->u)}) {
if (std::optional<DataRef> dataRef{ExtractDataRef(std::move(*zExpr))}) {
Expr<SomeReal> realExpr{std::visit(
[&](const auto &z) {
using PartType = typename ResultType<decltype(z)>::Part;
auto part{kind == MiscKind::ComplexPartRe
? ComplexPart::Part::RE
: ComplexPart::Part::IM};
return AsCategoryExpr(Designator<PartType>{
ComplexPart{std::move(*dataRef), part}});
},
zExpr->u)};
return {AsGenericExpr(std::move(realExpr))};
}
}
} else if (kind == MiscKind::KindParamInquiry ||
kind == MiscKind::LenParamInquiry) {
// Convert x%KIND -> intrinsic KIND(x), x%LEN -> intrinsic LEN(x)
return MakeFunctionRef(
name, ActualArguments{ActualArgument{std::move(*base)}});
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
} else {
DIE("unexpected MiscDetails::Kind");
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
}
} else {
Say(name, "derived type required before component reference"_err_en_US);
}
return std::nullopt;
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::CoindexedNamedObject &x) {
if (auto maybeDataRef{ExtractDataRef(Analyze(x.base))}) {
DataRef *dataRef{&*maybeDataRef};
std::vector<Subscript> subscripts;
SymbolVector reversed;
if (auto *aRef{std::get_if<ArrayRef>(&dataRef->u)}) {
subscripts = std::move(aRef->subscript());
reversed.push_back(aRef->GetLastSymbol());
if (Component * component{aRef->base().UnwrapComponent()}) {
dataRef = &component->base();
} else {
dataRef = nullptr;
}
}
if (dataRef) {
while (auto *component{std::get_if<Component>(&dataRef->u)}) {
reversed.push_back(component->GetLastSymbol());
dataRef = &component->base();
}
if (auto *baseSym{std::get_if<SymbolRef>(&dataRef->u)}) {
reversed.push_back(*baseSym);
} else {
Say("Base of coindexed named object has subscripts or cosubscripts"_err_en_US);
}
}
std::vector<Expr<SubscriptInteger>> cosubscripts;
bool cosubsOk{true};
for (const auto &cosub :
std::get<std::list<parser::Cosubscript>>(x.imageSelector.t)) {
MaybeExpr coex{Analyze(cosub)};
if (auto *intExpr{UnwrapExpr<Expr<SomeInteger>>(coex)}) {
cosubscripts.push_back(
ConvertToType<SubscriptInteger>(std::move(*intExpr)));
} else {
cosubsOk = false;
}
}
if (cosubsOk && !reversed.empty()) {
int numCosubscripts{static_cast<int>(cosubscripts.size())};
const Symbol &symbol{reversed.front()};
if (numCosubscripts != symbol.Corank()) {
Say("'%s' has corank %d, but coindexed reference has %d cosubscripts"_err_en_US,
symbol.name(), symbol.Corank(), numCosubscripts);
}
}
// TODO: stat=/team=/team_number=
// Reverse the chain of symbols so that the base is first and coarray
// ultimate component is last.
return Designate(
DataRef{CoarrayRef{SymbolVector{reversed.crbegin(), reversed.crend()},
std::move(subscripts), std::move(cosubscripts)}});
}
return std::nullopt;
}
int ExpressionAnalyzer::IntegerTypeSpecKind(
const parser::IntegerTypeSpec &spec) {
Expr<SubscriptInteger> value{
AnalyzeKindSelector(TypeCategory::Integer, spec.v)};
if (auto kind{ToInt64(value)}) {
return static_cast<int>(*kind);
}
SayAt(spec, "Constant INTEGER kind value required here"_err_en_US);
return GetDefaultKind(TypeCategory::Integer);
}
// Array constructors
// Inverts a collection of generic ArrayConstructorValues<SomeType> that
// all happen to have the same actual type T into one ArrayConstructor<T>.
template <typename T>
ArrayConstructorValues<T> MakeSpecific(
ArrayConstructorValues<SomeType> &&from) {
ArrayConstructorValues<T> to;
for (ArrayConstructorValue<SomeType> &x : from) {
std::visit(
common::visitors{
[&](common::CopyableIndirection<Expr<SomeType>> &&expr) {
auto *typed{UnwrapExpr<Expr<T>>(expr.value())};
to.Push(std::move(DEREF(typed)));
},
[&](ImpliedDo<SomeType> &&impliedDo) {
to.Push(ImpliedDo<T>{impliedDo.name(),
std::move(impliedDo.lower()), std::move(impliedDo.upper()),
std::move(impliedDo.stride()),
MakeSpecific<T>(std::move(impliedDo.values()))});
},
},
std::move(x.u));
}
return to;
}
class ArrayConstructorContext {
public:
ArrayConstructorContext(
ExpressionAnalyzer &c, std::optional<DynamicTypeWithLength> &&t)
: exprAnalyzer_{c}, type_{std::move(t)} {}
void Add(const parser::AcValue &);
MaybeExpr ToExpr();
// These interfaces allow *this to be used as a type visitor argument to
// common::SearchTypes() to convert the array constructor to a typed
// expression in ToExpr().
using Result = MaybeExpr;
using Types = AllTypes;
template <typename T> Result Test() {
if (type_ && type_->category() == T::category) {
if constexpr (T::category == TypeCategory::Derived) {
return AsMaybeExpr(ArrayConstructor<T>{
type_->GetDerivedTypeSpec(), MakeSpecific<T>(std::move(values_))});
} else if (type_->kind() == T::kind) {
if constexpr (T::category == TypeCategory::Character) {
if (auto len{type_->LEN()}) {
return AsMaybeExpr(ArrayConstructor<T>{
*std::move(len), MakeSpecific<T>(std::move(values_))});
}
} else {
return AsMaybeExpr(
ArrayConstructor<T>{MakeSpecific<T>(std::move(values_))});
}
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
private:
void Push(MaybeExpr &&);
template <int KIND, typename A>
std::optional<Expr<Type<TypeCategory::Integer, KIND>>> GetSpecificIntExpr(
const A &x) {
if (MaybeExpr y{exprAnalyzer_.Analyze(x)}) {
Expr<SomeInteger> *intExpr{UnwrapExpr<Expr<SomeInteger>>(*y)};
return ConvertToType<Type<TypeCategory::Integer, KIND>>(
std::move(DEREF(intExpr)));
}
return std::nullopt;
}
// Nested array constructors all reference the same ExpressionAnalyzer,
// which represents the nest of active implied DO loop indices.
ExpressionAnalyzer &exprAnalyzer_;
std::optional<DynamicTypeWithLength> type_;
bool explicitType_{type_.has_value()};
std::optional<std::int64_t> constantLength_;
ArrayConstructorValues<SomeType> values_;
};
void ArrayConstructorContext::Push(MaybeExpr &&x) {
if (!x) {
return;
}
if (auto dyType{x->GetType()}) {
DynamicTypeWithLength xType{*dyType};
if (Expr<SomeCharacter> * charExpr{UnwrapExpr<Expr<SomeCharacter>>(*x)}) {
CHECK(xType.category() == TypeCategory::Character);
xType.length =
std::visit([](const auto &kc) { return kc.LEN(); }, charExpr->u);
}
if (!type_) {
// If there is no explicit type-spec in an array constructor, the type
// of the array is the declared type of all of the elements, which must
// be well-defined and all match.
// TODO: Possible language extension: use the most general type of
// the values as the type of a numeric constructed array, convert all
// of the other values to that type. Alternative: let the first value
// determine the type, and convert the others to that type.
CHECK(!explicitType_);
type_ = std::move(xType);
constantLength_ = ToInt64(type_->length);
values_.Push(std::move(*x));
} else if (!explicitType_) {
if (static_cast<const DynamicType &>(*type_) ==
static_cast<const DynamicType &>(xType)) {
values_.Push(std::move(*x));
if (auto thisLen{ToInt64(xType.LEN())}) {
if (constantLength_) {
if (exprAnalyzer_.context().warnOnNonstandardUsage() &&
*thisLen != *constantLength_) {
exprAnalyzer_.Say(
"Character literal in array constructor without explicit "
"type has different length than earlier element"_en_US);
}
if (*thisLen > *constantLength_) {
// Language extension: use the longest literal to determine the
// length of the array constructor's character elements, not the
// first, when there is no explicit type.
*constantLength_ = *thisLen;
type_->length = xType.LEN();
}
} else {
constantLength_ = *thisLen;
type_->length = xType.LEN();
}
}
} else {
exprAnalyzer_.Say(
"Values in array constructor must have the same declared type "
"when no explicit type appears"_err_en_US);
}
} else {
if (auto cast{ConvertToType(*type_, std::move(*x))}) {
values_.Push(std::move(*cast));
} else {
exprAnalyzer_.Say(
"Value in array constructor could not be converted to the type "
"of the array"_err_en_US);
}
}
}
}
void ArrayConstructorContext::Add(const parser::AcValue &x) {
using IntType = ResultType<ImpliedDoIndex>;
std::visit(
common::visitors{
[&](const parser::AcValue::Triplet &triplet) {
// Transform l:u(:s) into (_,_=l,u(,s)) with an anonymous index '_'
std::optional<Expr<IntType>> lower{
GetSpecificIntExpr<IntType::kind>(std::get<0>(triplet.t))};
std::optional<Expr<IntType>> upper{
GetSpecificIntExpr<IntType::kind>(std::get<1>(triplet.t))};
std::optional<Expr<IntType>> stride{
GetSpecificIntExpr<IntType::kind>(std::get<2>(triplet.t))};
if (lower && upper) {
if (!stride) {
stride = Expr<IntType>{1};
}
if (!type_) {
type_ = DynamicTypeWithLength{IntType::GetType()};
}
auto v{std::move(values_)};
parser::CharBlock anonymous;
Push(Expr<SomeType>{
Expr<SomeInteger>{Expr<IntType>{ImpliedDoIndex{anonymous}}}});
std::swap(v, values_);
values_.Push(ImpliedDo<SomeType>{anonymous, std::move(*lower),
std::move(*upper), std::move(*stride), std::move(v)});
}
},
[&](const common::Indirection<parser::Expr> &expr) {
auto restorer{exprAnalyzer_.GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(
expr.value().source)};
if (MaybeExpr v{exprAnalyzer_.Analyze(expr.value())}) {
Push(std::move(*v));
}
},
[&](const common::Indirection<parser::AcImpliedDo> &impliedDo) {
const auto &control{
std::get<parser::AcImpliedDoControl>(impliedDo.value().t)};
const auto &bounds{
std::get<parser::AcImpliedDoControl::Bounds>(control.t)};
exprAnalyzer_.Analyze(bounds.name);
parser::CharBlock name{bounds.name.thing.thing.source};
const Symbol *symbol{bounds.name.thing.thing.symbol};
int kind{IntType::kind};
if (const auto dynamicType{DynamicType::From(symbol)}) {
kind = dynamicType->kind();
}
if (exprAnalyzer_.AddAcImpliedDo(name, kind)) {
std::optional<Expr<IntType>> lower{
GetSpecificIntExpr<IntType::kind>(bounds.lower)};
std::optional<Expr<IntType>> upper{
GetSpecificIntExpr<IntType::kind>(bounds.upper)};
if (lower && upper) {
std::optional<Expr<IntType>> stride{
GetSpecificIntExpr<IntType::kind>(bounds.step)};
auto v{std::move(values_)};
for (const auto &value :
std::get<std::list<parser::AcValue>>(impliedDo.value().t)) {
Add(value);
}
if (!stride) {
stride = Expr<IntType>{1};
}
std::swap(v, values_);
values_.Push(ImpliedDo<SomeType>{name, std::move(*lower),
std::move(*upper), std::move(*stride), std::move(v)});
}
exprAnalyzer_.RemoveAcImpliedDo(name);
} else {
exprAnalyzer_.SayAt(name,
"Implied DO index is active in surrounding implied DO loop "
"and may not have the same name"_err_en_US);
}
},
},
x.u);
}
MaybeExpr ArrayConstructorContext::ToExpr() {
return common::SearchTypes(std::move(*this));
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::ArrayConstructor &array) {
const parser::AcSpec &acSpec{array.v};
ArrayConstructorContext acContext{*this, AnalyzeTypeSpec(acSpec.type)};
for (const parser::AcValue &value : acSpec.values) {
acContext.Add(value);
}
return acContext.ToExpr();
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(
const parser::StructureConstructor &structure) {
auto &parsedType{std::get<parser::DerivedTypeSpec>(structure.t)};
parser::CharBlock typeName{std::get<parser::Name>(parsedType.t).source};
if (!parsedType.derivedTypeSpec) {
return std::nullopt;
}
const auto &spec{*parsedType.derivedTypeSpec};
const Symbol &typeSymbol{spec.typeSymbol()};
if (!spec.scope() || !typeSymbol.has<semantics::DerivedTypeDetails>()) {
return std::nullopt; // error recovery
}
const auto &typeDetails{typeSymbol.get<semantics::DerivedTypeDetails>()};
const Symbol *parentComponent{typeDetails.GetParentComponent(*spec.scope())};
if (typeSymbol.attrs().test(semantics::Attr::ABSTRACT)) { // C796
AttachDeclaration(Say(typeName,
"ABSTRACT derived type '%s' may not be used in a "
"structure constructor"_err_en_US,
typeName),
typeSymbol);
}
// This iterator traverses all of the components in the derived type and its
// parents. The symbols for whole parent components appear after their
// own components and before the components of the types that extend them.
// E.g., TYPE :: A; REAL X; END TYPE
// TYPE, EXTENDS(A) :: B; REAL Y; END TYPE
// produces the component list X, A, Y.
// The order is important below because a structure constructor can
// initialize X or A by name, but not both.
auto components{semantics::OrderedComponentIterator{spec}};
auto nextAnonymous{components.begin()};
std::set<parser::CharBlock> unavailable;
bool anyKeyword{false};
StructureConstructor result{spec};
bool checkConflicts{true}; // until we hit one
for (const auto &component :
std::get<std::list<parser::ComponentSpec>>(structure.t)) {
const parser::Expr &expr{
std::get<parser::ComponentDataSource>(component.t).v.value()};
parser::CharBlock source{expr.source};
auto &messages{GetContextualMessages()};
auto restorer{messages.SetLocation(source)};
const Symbol *symbol{nullptr};
MaybeExpr value{Analyze(expr)};
std::optional<DynamicType> valueType{DynamicType::From(value)};
if (const auto &kw{std::get<std::optional<parser::Keyword>>(component.t)}) {
anyKeyword = true;
source = kw->v.source;
symbol = kw->v.symbol;
if (!symbol) {
auto componentIter{std::find_if(components.begin(), components.end(),
[=](const Symbol &symbol) { return symbol.name() == source; })};
if (componentIter != components.end()) {
symbol = &*componentIter;
}
}
if (!symbol) { // C7101
Say(source,
"Keyword '%s=' does not name a component of derived type '%s'"_err_en_US,
source, typeName);
}
} else {
if (anyKeyword) { // C7100
Say(source,
"Value in structure constructor lacks a component name"_err_en_US);
checkConflicts = false; // stem cascade
}
// Here's a regrettably common extension of the standard: anonymous
// initialization of parent components, e.g., T(PT(1)) rather than
// T(1) or T(PT=PT(1)).
if (nextAnonymous == components.begin() && parentComponent &&
valueType == DynamicType::From(*parentComponent) &&
context().IsEnabled(LanguageFeature::AnonymousParents)) {
auto iter{
std::find(components.begin(), components.end(), *parentComponent)};
if (iter != components.end()) {
symbol = parentComponent;
nextAnonymous = ++iter;
if (context().ShouldWarn(LanguageFeature::AnonymousParents)) {
Say(source,
"Whole parent component '%s' in structure "
"constructor should not be anonymous"_en_US,
symbol->name());
}
}
}
while (!symbol && nextAnonymous != components.end()) {
const Symbol &next{*nextAnonymous};
++nextAnonymous;
if (!next.test(Symbol::Flag::ParentComp)) {
symbol = &next;
}
}
if (!symbol) {
Say(source, "Unexpected value in structure constructor"_err_en_US);
}
}
if (symbol) {
if (const auto *currScope{context_.globalScope().FindScope(source)}) {
if (auto msg{CheckAccessibleComponent(*currScope, *symbol)}) {
Say(source, *msg);
}
}
if (checkConflicts) {
auto componentIter{
std::find(components.begin(), components.end(), *symbol)};
if (unavailable.find(symbol->name()) != unavailable.cend()) {
// C797, C798
Say(source,
"Component '%s' conflicts with another component earlier in "
"this structure constructor"_err_en_US,
symbol->name());
} else if (symbol->test(Symbol::Flag::ParentComp)) {
// Make earlier components unavailable once a whole parent appears.
for (auto it{components.begin()}; it != componentIter; ++it) {
unavailable.insert(it->name());
}
} else {
// Make whole parent components unavailable after any of their
// constituents appear.
for (auto it{componentIter}; it != components.end(); ++it) {
if (it->test(Symbol::Flag::ParentComp)) {
unavailable.insert(it->name());
}
}
}
}
unavailable.insert(symbol->name());
if (value) {
if (symbol->has<semantics::ProcEntityDetails>()) {
CHECK(IsPointer(*symbol));
} else if (symbol->has<semantics::ObjectEntityDetails>()) {
// C1594(4)
const auto &innermost{context_.FindScope(expr.source)};
if (const auto *pureProc{FindPureProcedureContaining(innermost)}) {
if (const Symbol * pointer{FindPointerComponent(*symbol)}) {
if (const Symbol *
object{FindExternallyVisibleObject(*value, *pureProc)}) {
if (auto *msg{Say(expr.source,
"Externally visible object '%s' may not be "
"associated with pointer component '%s' in a "
"pure procedure"_err_en_US,
object->name(), pointer->name())}) {
msg->Attach(object->name(), "Object declaration"_en_US)
.Attach(pointer->name(), "Pointer declaration"_en_US);
}
}
}
}
} else if (symbol->has<semantics::TypeParamDetails>()) {
Say(expr.source,
"Type parameter '%s' may not appear as a component "
"of a structure constructor"_err_en_US,
symbol->name());
continue;
} else {
Say(expr.source,
"Component '%s' is neither a procedure pointer "
"nor a data object"_err_en_US,
symbol->name());
continue;
}
if (IsPointer(*symbol)) {
semantics::CheckPointerAssignment(
GetFoldingContext(), *symbol, *value); // C7104, C7105
result.Add(*symbol, Fold(std::move(*value)));
} else if (MaybeExpr converted{
ConvertToType(*symbol, std::move(*value))}) {
result.Add(*symbol, std::move(*converted));
} else if (IsAllocatable(*symbol) &&
std::holds_alternative<NullPointer>(value->u)) {
// NULL() with no arguments allowed by 7.5.10 para 6 for ALLOCATABLE
} else if (auto symType{DynamicType::From(symbol)}) {
if (valueType) {
AttachDeclaration(
Say(expr.source,
"Value in structure constructor of type %s is "
"incompatible with component '%s' of type %s"_err_en_US,
valueType->AsFortran(), symbol->name(),
symType->AsFortran()),
*symbol);
} else {
AttachDeclaration(
Say(expr.source,
"Value in structure constructor is incompatible with "
" component '%s' of type %s"_err_en_US,
symbol->name(), symType->AsFortran()),
*symbol);
}
}
}
}
}
// Ensure that unmentioned component objects have default initializers.
for (const Symbol &symbol : components) {
if (!symbol.test(Symbol::Flag::ParentComp) &&
unavailable.find(symbol.name()) == unavailable.cend() &&
!IsAllocatable(symbol)) {
if (const auto *details{
symbol.detailsIf<semantics::ObjectEntityDetails>()}) {
if (details->init()) {
result.Add(symbol, common::Clone(*details->init()));
} else { // C799
AttachDeclaration(Say(typeName,
"Structure constructor lacks a value for "
"component '%s'"_err_en_US,
symbol.name()),
symbol);
}
}
}
}
return AsMaybeExpr(Expr<SomeDerived>{std::move(result)});
}
static std::optional<parser::CharBlock> GetPassName(
const semantics::Symbol &proc) {
return std::visit(
[](const auto &details) {
if constexpr (std::is_base_of_v<semantics::WithPassArg,
std::decay_t<decltype(details)>>) {
return details.passName();
} else {
return std::optional<parser::CharBlock>{};
}
},
proc.details());
}
static int GetPassIndex(const Symbol &proc) {
CHECK(!proc.attrs().test(semantics::Attr::NOPASS));
std::optional<parser::CharBlock> passName{GetPassName(proc)};
const auto *interface{semantics::FindInterface(proc)};
if (!passName || !interface) {
return 0; // first argument is passed-object
}
const auto &subp{interface->get<semantics::SubprogramDetails>()};
int index{0};
for (const auto *arg : subp.dummyArgs()) {
if (arg && arg->name() == passName) {
return index;
}
++index;
}
DIE("PASS argument name not in dummy argument list");
}
// Injects an expression into an actual argument list as the "passed object"
// for a type-bound procedure reference that is not NOPASS. Adds an
// argument keyword if possible, but not when the passed object goes
// before a positional argument.
// e.g., obj%tbp(x) -> tbp(obj,x).
static void AddPassArg(ActualArguments &actuals, const Expr<SomeDerived> &expr,
const Symbol &component, bool isPassedObject = true) {
if (component.attrs().test(semantics::Attr::NOPASS)) {
return;
}
int passIndex{GetPassIndex(component)};
auto iter{actuals.begin()};
int at{0};
while (iter < actuals.end() && at < passIndex) {
if (*iter && (*iter)->keyword()) {
iter = actuals.end();
break;
}
++iter;
++at;
}
ActualArgument passed{AsGenericExpr(common::Clone(expr))};
passed.set_isPassedObject(isPassedObject);
if (iter == actuals.end()) {
if (auto passName{GetPassName(component)}) {
passed.set_keyword(*passName);
}
}
actuals.emplace(iter, std::move(passed));
}
// Return the compile-time resolution of a procedure binding, if possible.
static const Symbol *GetBindingResolution(
const std::optional<DynamicType> &baseType, const Symbol &component) {
const auto *binding{component.detailsIf<semantics::ProcBindingDetails>()};
if (!binding) {
return nullptr;
}
if (!component.attrs().test(semantics::Attr::NON_OVERRIDABLE) &&
(!baseType || baseType->IsPolymorphic())) {
return nullptr;
}
return &binding->symbol();
}
auto ExpressionAnalyzer::AnalyzeProcedureComponentRef(
const parser::ProcComponentRef &pcr, ActualArguments &&arguments)
-> std::optional<CalleeAndArguments> {
const parser::StructureComponent &sc{pcr.v.thing};
const auto &name{sc.component.source};
if (MaybeExpr base{Analyze(sc.base)}) {
if (const Symbol * sym{sc.component.symbol}) {
if (auto *dtExpr{UnwrapExpr<Expr<SomeDerived>>(*base)}) {
if (sym->has<semantics::GenericDetails>()) {
AdjustActuals adjustment{
[&](const Symbol &proc, ActualArguments &actuals) {
if (!proc.attrs().test(semantics::Attr::NOPASS)) {
AddPassArg(actuals, std::move(*dtExpr), proc);
}
return true;
}};
sym = ResolveGeneric(*sym, arguments, adjustment);
if (!sym) {
EmitGenericResolutionError(*sc.component.symbol);
return std::nullopt;
}
}
if (const Symbol *
resolution{GetBindingResolution(dtExpr->GetType(), *sym)}) {
AddPassArg(arguments, std::move(*dtExpr), *sym, false);
return CalleeAndArguments{
ProcedureDesignator{*resolution}, std::move(arguments)};
} else if (std::optional<DataRef> dataRef{
ExtractDataRef(std::move(*dtExpr))}) {
if (sym->attrs().test(semantics::Attr::NOPASS)) {
return CalleeAndArguments{
ProcedureDesignator{Component{std::move(*dataRef), *sym}},
std::move(arguments)};
} else {
AddPassArg(arguments,
Expr<SomeDerived>{Designator<SomeDerived>{std::move(*dataRef)}},
*sym);
return CalleeAndArguments{
ProcedureDesignator{*sym}, std::move(arguments)};
}
}
}
Say(name,
"Base of procedure component reference is not a derived-type object"_err_en_US);
}
}
CHECK(!GetContextualMessages().empty());
return std::nullopt;
}
// Can actual be argument associated with dummy?
static bool CheckCompatibleArgument(bool isElemental,
const ActualArgument &actual, const characteristics::DummyArgument &dummy) {
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[&](const characteristics::DummyDataObject &x) {
characteristics::TypeAndShape dummyTypeAndShape{x.type};
if (!isElemental && actual.Rank() != dummyTypeAndShape.Rank()) {
return false;
} else if (auto actualType{actual.GetType()}) {
return dummyTypeAndShape.type().IsTkCompatibleWith(*actualType);
} else {
return false;
}
},
[&](const characteristics::DummyProcedure &) {
const auto *expr{actual.UnwrapExpr()};
return expr && IsProcedurePointer(*expr);
},
[&](const characteristics::AlternateReturn &) {
return actual.isAlternateReturn();
},
},
dummy.u);
}
// Are the actual arguments compatible with the dummy arguments of procedure?
static bool CheckCompatibleArguments(
const characteristics::Procedure &procedure,
const ActualArguments &actuals) {
bool isElemental{procedure.IsElemental()};
const auto &dummies{procedure.dummyArguments};
CHECK(dummies.size() == actuals.size());
for (std::size_t i{0}; i < dummies.size(); ++i) {
const characteristics::DummyArgument &dummy{dummies[i]};
const std::optional<ActualArgument> &actual{actuals[i]};
if (actual && !CheckCompatibleArgument(isElemental, *actual, dummy)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
// Handles a forward reference to a module function from what must
// be a specification expression. Return false if the symbol is
// an invalid forward reference.
bool ExpressionAnalyzer::ResolveForward(const Symbol &symbol) {
if (context_.HasError(symbol)) {
return false;
}
if (const auto *details{
symbol.detailsIf<semantics::SubprogramNameDetails>()}) {
if (details->kind() == semantics::SubprogramKind::Module) {
// If this symbol is still a SubprogramNameDetails, we must be
// checking a specification expression in a sibling module
// procedure. Resolve its names now so that its interface
// is known.
semantics::ResolveSpecificationParts(context_, symbol);
if (symbol.has<semantics::SubprogramNameDetails>()) {
// When the symbol hasn't had its details updated, we must have
// already been in the process of resolving the function's
// specification part; but recursive function calls are not
// allowed in specification parts (10.1.11 para 5).
Say("The module function '%s' may not be referenced recursively in a specification expression"_err_en_US,
symbol.name());
context_.SetError(const_cast<Symbol &>(symbol));
return false;
}
} else { // 10.1.11 para 4
Say("The internal function '%s' may not be referenced in a specification expression"_err_en_US,
symbol.name());
context_.SetError(const_cast<Symbol &>(symbol));
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
// Resolve a call to a generic procedure with given actual arguments.
// adjustActuals is called on procedure bindings to handle pass arg.
const Symbol *ExpressionAnalyzer::ResolveGeneric(const Symbol &symbol,
const ActualArguments &actuals, const AdjustActuals &adjustActuals,
bool mightBeStructureConstructor) {
const Symbol *elemental{nullptr}; // matching elemental specific proc
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
const auto &details{symbol.GetUltimate().get<semantics::GenericDetails>()};
for (const Symbol &specific : details.specificProcs()) {
if (!ResolveForward(specific)) {
continue;
}
if (std::optional<characteristics::Procedure> procedure{
characteristics::Procedure::Characterize(
ProcedureDesignator{specific}, context_.intrinsics())}) {
ActualArguments localActuals{actuals};
if (specific.has<semantics::ProcBindingDetails>()) {
if (!adjustActuals.value()(specific, localActuals)) {
continue;
}
}
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
if (semantics::CheckInterfaceForGeneric(
*procedure, localActuals, GetFoldingContext())) {
if (CheckCompatibleArguments(*procedure, localActuals)) {
if (!procedure->IsElemental()) {
return &specific; // takes priority over elemental match
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
elemental = &specific;
}
}
}
}
if (elemental) {
return elemental;
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
// Check parent derived type
if (const auto *parentScope{symbol.owner().GetDerivedTypeParent()}) {
if (const Symbol * extended{parentScope->FindComponent(symbol.name())}) {
if (extended->GetUltimate().has<semantics::GenericDetails>()) {
if (const Symbol *
result{ResolveGeneric(*extended, actuals, adjustActuals, false)}) {
return result;
}
}
}
}
if (mightBeStructureConstructor && details.derivedType()) {
return details.derivedType();
}
return nullptr;
}
void ExpressionAnalyzer::EmitGenericResolutionError(const Symbol &symbol) {
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
if (semantics::IsGenericDefinedOp(symbol)) {
Say("No specific procedure of generic operator '%s' matches the actual arguments"_err_en_US,
symbol.name());
} else {
Say("No specific procedure of generic '%s' matches the actual arguments"_err_en_US,
symbol.name());
}
}
auto ExpressionAnalyzer::GetCalleeAndArguments(
const parser::ProcedureDesignator &pd, ActualArguments &&arguments,
bool isSubroutine, bool mightBeStructureConstructor)
-> std::optional<CalleeAndArguments> {
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
[&](const parser::Name &name) {
return GetCalleeAndArguments(name, std::move(arguments),
isSubroutine, mightBeStructureConstructor);
},
[&](const parser::ProcComponentRef &pcr) {
return AnalyzeProcedureComponentRef(pcr, std::move(arguments));
},
},
pd.u);
}
auto ExpressionAnalyzer::GetCalleeAndArguments(const parser::Name &name,
ActualArguments &&arguments, bool isSubroutine,
bool mightBeStructureConstructor) -> std::optional<CalleeAndArguments> {
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
const Symbol *symbol{name.symbol};
if (context_.HasError(symbol)) {
return std::nullopt; // also handles null symbol
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
const Symbol &ultimate{DEREF(symbol).GetUltimate()};
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
if (ultimate.attrs().test(semantics::Attr::INTRINSIC)) {
if (std::optional<SpecificCall> specificCall{context_.intrinsics().Probe(
CallCharacteristics{ultimate.name().ToString(), isSubroutine},
arguments, GetFoldingContext())}) {
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
return CalleeAndArguments{
ProcedureDesignator{std::move(specificCall->specificIntrinsic)},
std::move(specificCall->arguments)};
}
} else {
CheckForBadRecursion(name.source, ultimate);
if (ultimate.has<semantics::GenericDetails>()) {
ExpressionAnalyzer::AdjustActuals noAdjustment;
symbol = ResolveGeneric(
*symbol, arguments, noAdjustment, mightBeStructureConstructor);
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
if (symbol) {
if (symbol->GetUltimate().has<semantics::DerivedTypeDetails>()) {
if (mightBeStructureConstructor) {
return CalleeAndArguments{
semantics::SymbolRef{*symbol}, std::move(arguments)};
}
} else {
return CalleeAndArguments{
ProcedureDesignator{*symbol}, std::move(arguments)};
}
} else if (std::optional<SpecificCall> specificCall{
context_.intrinsics().Probe(
CallCharacteristics{
ultimate.name().ToString(), isSubroutine},
arguments, GetFoldingContext())}) {
// Generics can extend intrinsics
return CalleeAndArguments{
ProcedureDesignator{std::move(specificCall->specificIntrinsic)},
std::move(specificCall->arguments)};
} else {
EmitGenericResolutionError(*name.symbol);
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
}
return std::nullopt;
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
void ExpressionAnalyzer::CheckForBadRecursion(
parser::CharBlock callSite, const semantics::Symbol &proc) {
if (const auto *scope{proc.scope()}) {
if (scope->sourceRange().Contains(callSite)) {
parser::Message *msg{nullptr};
if (proc.attrs().test(semantics::Attr::NON_RECURSIVE)) { // 15.6.2.1(3)
msg = Say("NON_RECURSIVE procedure '%s' cannot call itself"_err_en_US,
callSite);
} else if (IsAssumedLengthCharacter(proc) && IsExternal(proc)) {
msg = Say( // 15.6.2.1(3)
"Assumed-length CHARACTER(*) function '%s' cannot call itself"_err_en_US,
callSite);
}
AttachDeclaration(msg, proc);
}
}
}
template <typename A> static const Symbol *AssumedTypeDummy(const A &x) {
if (const auto *designator{
std::get_if<common::Indirection<parser::Designator>>(&x.u)}) {
if (const auto *dataRef{
std::get_if<parser::DataRef>(&designator->value().u)}) {
if (const auto *name{std::get_if<parser::Name>(&dataRef->u)}) {
if (const Symbol * symbol{name->symbol}) {
if (const auto *type{symbol->GetType()}) {
if (type->category() == semantics::DeclTypeSpec::TypeStar) {
return symbol;
}
}
}
}
}
}
return nullptr;
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::FunctionReference &funcRef,
std::optional<parser::StructureConstructor> *structureConstructor) {
const parser::Call &call{funcRef.v};
auto restorer{GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(call.source)};
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{*this, call.source, true /* allowAssumedType */};
for (const auto &arg : std::get<std::list<parser::ActualArgSpec>>(call.t)) {
analyzer.Analyze(arg, false /* not subroutine call */);
}
if (analyzer.fatalErrors()) {
return std::nullopt;
}
if (std::optional<CalleeAndArguments> callee{
GetCalleeAndArguments(std::get<parser::ProcedureDesignator>(call.t),
analyzer.GetActuals(), false /* not subroutine */,
true /* might be structure constructor */)}) {
if (auto *proc{std::get_if<ProcedureDesignator>(&callee->u)}) {
return MakeFunctionRef(
call.source, std::move(*proc), std::move(callee->arguments));
} else if (structureConstructor) {
// Structure constructor misparsed as function reference?
CHECK(std::holds_alternative<semantics::SymbolRef>(callee->u));
const Symbol &derivedType{*std::get<semantics::SymbolRef>(callee->u)};
const auto &designator{std::get<parser::ProcedureDesignator>(call.t)};
if (const auto *name{std::get_if<parser::Name>(&designator.u)}) {
semantics::Scope &scope{context_.FindScope(name->source)};
const semantics::DeclTypeSpec &type{
semantics::FindOrInstantiateDerivedType(scope,
semantics::DerivedTypeSpec{
name->source, derivedType.GetUltimate()},
context_)};
auto &mutableRef{const_cast<parser::FunctionReference &>(funcRef)};
*structureConstructor =
mutableRef.ConvertToStructureConstructor(type.derivedTypeSpec());
return Analyze(structureConstructor->value());
}
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
void ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::CallStmt &callStmt) {
const parser::Call &call{callStmt.v};
auto restorer{GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(call.source)};
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{*this, call.source, true /* allowAssumedType */};
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
for (const auto &arg : std::get<std::list<parser::ActualArgSpec>>(call.t)) {
analyzer.Analyze(arg, true /* is subroutine call */);
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
if (!analyzer.fatalErrors()) {
if (std::optional<CalleeAndArguments> callee{
GetCalleeAndArguments(std::get<parser::ProcedureDesignator>(call.t),
analyzer.GetActuals(), true /* subroutine */)}) {
ProcedureDesignator *proc{std::get_if<ProcedureDesignator>(&callee->u)};
CHECK(proc);
if (CheckCall(call.source, *proc, callee->arguments)) {
callStmt.typedCall.reset(
new ProcedureRef{std::move(*proc), std::move(callee->arguments)});
}
}
}
}
const Assignment *ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::AssignmentStmt &x) {
if (!x.typedAssignment) {
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{*this};
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<parser::Variable>(x.t));
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<parser::Expr>(x.t));
if (analyzer.fatalErrors()) {
x.typedAssignment.reset(new GenericAssignmentWrapper{});
} else {
std::optional<ProcedureRef> procRef{analyzer.TryDefinedAssignment()};
Assignment assignment{
Fold(analyzer.MoveExpr(0)), Fold(analyzer.MoveExpr(1))};
if (procRef) {
assignment.u = std::move(*procRef);
}
x.typedAssignment.reset(
new GenericAssignmentWrapper{std::move(assignment)});
}
}
return common::GetPtrFromOptional(x.typedAssignment->v);
}
const Assignment *ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(
const parser::PointerAssignmentStmt &x) {
if (!x.typedAssignment) {
MaybeExpr lhs{Analyze(std::get<parser::DataRef>(x.t))};
MaybeExpr rhs{Analyze(std::get<parser::Expr>(x.t))};
if (!lhs || !rhs) {
x.typedAssignment.reset(new GenericAssignmentWrapper{});
} else {
Assignment assignment{std::move(*lhs), std::move(*rhs)};
std::visit(common::visitors{
[&](const std::list<parser::BoundsRemapping> &list) {
Assignment::BoundsRemapping bounds;
for (const auto &elem : list) {
auto lower{AsSubscript(Analyze(std::get<0>(elem.t)))};
auto upper{AsSubscript(Analyze(std::get<1>(elem.t)))};
if (lower && upper) {
bounds.emplace_back(Fold(std::move(*lower)),
Fold(std::move(*upper)));
}
}
assignment.u = std::move(bounds);
},
[&](const std::list<parser::BoundsSpec> &list) {
Assignment::BoundsSpec bounds;
for (const auto &bound : list) {
if (auto lower{AsSubscript(Analyze(bound.v))}) {
bounds.emplace_back(Fold(std::move(*lower)));
}
}
assignment.u = std::move(bounds);
},
},
std::get<parser::PointerAssignmentStmt::Bounds>(x.t).u);
x.typedAssignment.reset(
new GenericAssignmentWrapper{std::move(assignment)});
}
}
return common::GetPtrFromOptional(x.typedAssignment->v);
}
static bool IsExternalCalledImplicitly(
parser::CharBlock callSite, const ProcedureDesignator &proc) {
if (const auto *symbol{proc.GetSymbol()}) {
return symbol->has<semantics::SubprogramDetails>() &&
symbol->owner().IsGlobal() &&
(!symbol->scope() /*ENTRY*/ ||
!symbol->scope()->sourceRange().Contains(callSite));
} else {
return false;
}
}
std::optional<characteristics::Procedure> ExpressionAnalyzer::CheckCall(
parser::CharBlock callSite, const ProcedureDesignator &proc,
ActualArguments &arguments) {
auto chars{
characteristics::Procedure::Characterize(proc, context_.intrinsics())};
if (chars) {
bool treatExternalAsImplicit{IsExternalCalledImplicitly(callSite, proc)};
if (treatExternalAsImplicit && !chars->CanBeCalledViaImplicitInterface()) {
Say(callSite,
"References to the procedure '%s' require an explicit interface"_en_US,
DEREF(proc.GetSymbol()).name());
}
semantics::CheckArguments(*chars, arguments, GetFoldingContext(),
context_.FindScope(callSite), treatExternalAsImplicit);
if (!chars->attrs.test(characteristics::Procedure::Attr::Pure)) {
if (const semantics::Scope *
pure{semantics::FindPureProcedureContaining(
context_.FindScope(callSite))}) {
Say(callSite,
"Procedure '%s' referenced in pure subprogram '%s' must be pure too"_err_en_US,
DEREF(proc.GetSymbol()).name(), DEREF(pure->symbol()).name());
}
}
}
return chars;
}
// Unary operations
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::Parentheses &x) {
if (MaybeExpr operand{Analyze(x.v.value())}) {
if (const semantics::Symbol * symbol{GetLastSymbol(*operand)}) {
if (const semantics::Symbol * result{FindFunctionResult(*symbol)}) {
if (semantics::IsProcedurePointer(*result)) {
Say("A function reference that returns a procedure "
"pointer may not be parenthesized"_err_en_US); // C1003
}
}
}
return Parenthesize(std::move(*operand));
}
return std::nullopt;
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
static MaybeExpr NumericUnaryHelper(ExpressionAnalyzer &context,
NumericOperator opr, const parser::Expr::IntrinsicUnary &x) {
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{context};
analyzer.Analyze(x.v);
if (analyzer.fatalErrors()) {
return std::nullopt;
} else if (analyzer.IsIntrinsicNumeric(opr)) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
if (opr == NumericOperator::Add) {
return analyzer.MoveExpr(0);
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
return Negation(context.GetContextualMessages(), analyzer.MoveExpr(0));
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
return analyzer.TryDefinedOp(AsFortran(opr),
"Operand of unary %s must be numeric; have %s"_err_en_US);
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::UnaryPlus &x) {
return NumericUnaryHelper(*this, NumericOperator::Add, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::Negate &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return NumericUnaryHelper(*this, NumericOperator::Subtract, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::NOT &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{*this};
analyzer.Analyze(x.v);
if (analyzer.fatalErrors()) {
return std::nullopt;
} else if (analyzer.IsIntrinsicLogical()) {
return AsGenericExpr(
LogicalNegation(std::get<Expr<SomeLogical>>(analyzer.MoveExpr(0).u)));
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
return analyzer.TryDefinedOp(LogicalOperator::Not,
"Operand of %s must be LOGICAL; have %s"_err_en_US);
}
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::PercentLoc &x) {
// Represent %LOC() exactly as if it had been a call to the LOC() extension
// intrinsic function.
// Use the actual source for the name of the call for error reporting.
std::optional<ActualArgument> arg;
if (const Symbol * assumedTypeDummy{AssumedTypeDummy(x.v.value())}) {
arg = ActualArgument{ActualArgument::AssumedType{*assumedTypeDummy}};
} else if (MaybeExpr argExpr{Analyze(x.v.value())}) {
arg = ActualArgument{std::move(*argExpr)};
} else {
return std::nullopt;
}
parser::CharBlock at{GetContextualMessages().at()};
CHECK(at.size() >= 4);
parser::CharBlock loc{at.begin() + 1, 3};
CHECK(loc == "loc");
return MakeFunctionRef(loc, ActualArguments{std::move(*arg)});
}
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::DefinedUnary &x) {
const auto &name{std::get<parser::DefinedOpName>(x.t).v};
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{*this, name.source};
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<1>(x.t));
return analyzer.TryDefinedOp(name.source.ToString().c_str(),
"No operator %s defined for %s"_err_en_US, true);
}
// Binary (dyadic) operations
template <template <typename> class OPR>
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
MaybeExpr NumericBinaryHelper(ExpressionAnalyzer &context, NumericOperator opr,
const parser::Expr::IntrinsicBinary &x) {
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{context};
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<0>(x.t));
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<1>(x.t));
if (analyzer.fatalErrors()) {
return std::nullopt;
} else if (analyzer.IsIntrinsicNumeric(opr)) {
return NumericOperation<OPR>(context.GetContextualMessages(),
analyzer.MoveExpr(0), analyzer.MoveExpr(1),
context.GetDefaultKind(TypeCategory::Real));
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
return analyzer.TryDefinedOp(AsFortran(opr),
"Operands of %s must be numeric; have %s and %s"_err_en_US);
}
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::Power &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return NumericBinaryHelper<Power>(*this, NumericOperator::Power, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::Multiply &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return NumericBinaryHelper<Multiply>(*this, NumericOperator::Multiply, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::Divide &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return NumericBinaryHelper<Divide>(*this, NumericOperator::Divide, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::Add &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return NumericBinaryHelper<Add>(*this, NumericOperator::Add, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::Subtract &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return NumericBinaryHelper<Subtract>(*this, NumericOperator::Subtract, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(
const parser::Expr::ComplexConstructor &x) {
auto re{Analyze(std::get<0>(x.t).value())};
auto im{Analyze(std::get<1>(x.t).value())};
if (re && im) {
ConformabilityCheck(GetContextualMessages(), *re, *im);
}
return AsMaybeExpr(ConstructComplex(GetContextualMessages(), std::move(re),
std::move(im), GetDefaultKind(TypeCategory::Real)));
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::Concat &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{*this};
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<0>(x.t));
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<1>(x.t));
if (analyzer.fatalErrors()) {
return std::nullopt;
} else if (analyzer.IsIntrinsicConcat()) {
return std::visit(
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
[&](auto &&x, auto &&y) -> MaybeExpr {
using T = ResultType<decltype(x)>;
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<T, ResultType<decltype(y)>>) {
return AsGenericExpr(Concat<T::kind>{std::move(x), std::move(y)});
} else {
DIE("different types for intrinsic concat");
}
},
std::move(std::get<Expr<SomeCharacter>>(analyzer.MoveExpr(0).u).u),
std::move(std::get<Expr<SomeCharacter>>(analyzer.MoveExpr(1).u).u));
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
return analyzer.TryDefinedOp("//",
"Operands of %s must be CHARACTER with the same kind; have %s and %s"_err_en_US);
}
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
// The Name represents a user-defined intrinsic operator.
// If the actuals match one of the specific procedures, return a function ref.
// Otherwise report the error in messages.
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::AnalyzeDefinedOp(
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
const parser::Name &name, ActualArguments &&actuals) {
if (auto callee{GetCalleeAndArguments(name, std::move(actuals))}) {
CHECK(std::holds_alternative<ProcedureDesignator>(callee->u));
return MakeFunctionRef(name.source,
std::move(std::get<ProcedureDesignator>(callee->u)),
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
std::move(callee->arguments));
} else {
return std::nullopt;
}
}
MaybeExpr RelationHelper(ExpressionAnalyzer &context, RelationalOperator opr,
const parser::Expr::IntrinsicBinary &x) {
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{context};
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<0>(x.t));
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<1>(x.t));
if (analyzer.fatalErrors()) {
return std::nullopt;
} else if (analyzer.IsIntrinsicRelational(opr)) {
return AsMaybeExpr(Relate(context.GetContextualMessages(), opr,
analyzer.MoveExpr(0), analyzer.MoveExpr(1)));
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
return analyzer.TryDefinedOp(opr,
"Operands of %s must have comparable types; have %s and %s"_err_en_US);
}
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::LT &x) {
return RelationHelper(*this, RelationalOperator::LT, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::LE &x) {
return RelationHelper(*this, RelationalOperator::LE, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::EQ &x) {
return RelationHelper(*this, RelationalOperator::EQ, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::NE &x) {
return RelationHelper(*this, RelationalOperator::NE, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::GE &x) {
return RelationHelper(*this, RelationalOperator::GE, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::GT &x) {
return RelationHelper(*this, RelationalOperator::GT, x);
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
MaybeExpr LogicalBinaryHelper(ExpressionAnalyzer &context, LogicalOperator opr,
const parser::Expr::IntrinsicBinary &x) {
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{context};
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<0>(x.t));
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<1>(x.t));
if (analyzer.fatalErrors()) {
return std::nullopt;
} else if (analyzer.IsIntrinsicLogical()) {
return AsGenericExpr(BinaryLogicalOperation(opr,
std::get<Expr<SomeLogical>>(analyzer.MoveExpr(0).u),
std::get<Expr<SomeLogical>>(analyzer.MoveExpr(1).u)));
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
return analyzer.TryDefinedOp(
opr, "Operands of %s must be LOGICAL; have %s and %s"_err_en_US);
}
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::AND &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return LogicalBinaryHelper(*this, LogicalOperator::And, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::OR &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return LogicalBinaryHelper(*this, LogicalOperator::Or, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::EQV &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return LogicalBinaryHelper(*this, LogicalOperator::Eqv, x);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::NEQV &x) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return LogicalBinaryHelper(*this, LogicalOperator::Neqv, x);
}
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr::DefinedBinary &x) {
const auto &name{std::get<parser::DefinedOpName>(x.t).v};
ArgumentAnalyzer analyzer{*this, name.source};
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<1>(x.t));
analyzer.Analyze(std::get<2>(x.t));
return analyzer.TryDefinedOp(name.source.ToString().c_str(),
"No operator %s defined for %s and %s"_err_en_US, true);
}
static void CheckFuncRefToArrayElementRefHasSubscripts(
semantics::SemanticsContext &context,
const parser::FunctionReference &funcRef) {
// Emit message if the function reference fix will end up an array element
// reference with no subscripts because it will not be possible to later tell
// the difference in expressions between empty subscript list due to bad
// subscripts error recovery or because the user did not put any.
if (std::get<std::list<parser::ActualArgSpec>>(funcRef.v.t).empty()) {
auto &proc{std::get<parser::ProcedureDesignator>(funcRef.v.t)};
const auto *name{std::get_if<parser::Name>(&proc.u)};
if (!name) {
name = &std::get<parser::ProcComponentRef>(proc.u).v.thing.component;
}
auto &msg{context.Say(funcRef.v.source,
name->symbol && name->symbol->Rank() == 0
? "'%s' is not a function"_err_en_US
: "Reference to array '%s' with empty subscript list"_err_en_US,
name->source)};
if (name->symbol) {
if (semantics::IsFunctionResultWithSameNameAsFunction(*name->symbol)) {
msg.Attach(name->source,
"A result variable must be declared with RESULT to allow recursive "
"function calls"_en_US);
} else {
AttachDeclaration(&msg, *name->symbol);
}
}
}
}
// Converts, if appropriate, an original misparse of ambiguous syntax like
// A(1) as a function reference into an array reference.
// Misparse structure constructors are detected elsewhere after generic
// function call resolution fails.
template <typename... A>
static void FixMisparsedFunctionReference(
semantics::SemanticsContext &context, const std::variant<A...> &constU) {
// The parse tree is updated in situ when resolving an ambiguous parse.
using uType = std::decay_t<decltype(constU)>;
auto &u{const_cast<uType &>(constU)};
if (auto *func{
std::get_if<common::Indirection<parser::FunctionReference>>(&u)}) {
parser::FunctionReference &funcRef{func->value()};
auto &proc{std::get<parser::ProcedureDesignator>(funcRef.v.t)};
if (Symbol *
origSymbol{
std::visit(common::visitors{
[&](parser::Name &name) { return name.symbol; },
[&](parser::ProcComponentRef &pcr) {
return pcr.v.thing.component.symbol;
},
},
proc.u)}) {
Symbol &symbol{origSymbol->GetUltimate()};
if (symbol.has<semantics::ObjectEntityDetails>() ||
symbol.has<semantics::AssocEntityDetails>()) {
// Note that expression in AssocEntityDetails cannot be a procedure
// pointer as per C1105 so this cannot be a function reference.
if constexpr (common::HasMember<common::Indirection<parser::Designator>,
uType>) {
CheckFuncRefToArrayElementRefHasSubscripts(context, funcRef);
u = common::Indirection{funcRef.ConvertToArrayElementRef()};
} else {
DIE("can't fix misparsed function as array reference");
}
}
}
}
}
// Common handling of parser::Expr and parser::Variable
template <typename PARSED>
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::ExprOrVariable(const PARSED &x) {
if (!x.typedExpr) {
FixMisparsedFunctionReference(context_, x.u);
MaybeExpr result;
if (AssumedTypeDummy(x)) { // C710
Say("TYPE(*) dummy argument may only be used as an actual argument"_err_en_US);
} else {
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<PARSED, parser::Expr>) {
// Analyze the expression in a specified source position context for
// better error reporting.
auto restorer{GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(x.source)};
result = evaluate::Fold(foldingContext_, Analyze(x.u));
} else {
result = Analyze(x.u);
}
}
x.typedExpr.reset(new GenericExprWrapper{std::move(result)});
if (!x.typedExpr->v) {
if (!context_.AnyFatalError()) {
std::string buf;
llvm::raw_string_ostream dump{buf};
parser::DumpTree(dump, x);
Say("Internal error: Expression analysis failed on: %s"_err_en_US,
dump.str());
}
fatalErrors_ = true;
}
}
return x.typedExpr->v;
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Expr &expr) {
auto restorer{GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(expr.source)};
return ExprOrVariable(expr);
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Variable &variable) {
auto restorer{GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(variable.GetSource())};
return ExprOrVariable(variable);
}
Expr<SubscriptInteger> ExpressionAnalyzer::AnalyzeKindSelector(
TypeCategory category,
const std::optional<parser::KindSelector> &selector) {
int defaultKind{GetDefaultKind(category)};
if (!selector) {
return Expr<SubscriptInteger>{defaultKind};
}
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[&](const parser::ScalarIntConstantExpr &x) {
if (MaybeExpr kind{Analyze(x)}) {
Expr<SomeType> folded{Fold(std::move(*kind))};
if (std::optional<std::int64_t> code{ToInt64(folded)}) {
if (CheckIntrinsicKind(category, *code)) {
return Expr<SubscriptInteger>{*code};
}
} else if (auto *intExpr{UnwrapExpr<Expr<SomeInteger>>(folded)}) {
return ConvertToType<SubscriptInteger>(std::move(*intExpr));
}
}
return Expr<SubscriptInteger>{defaultKind};
},
[&](const parser::KindSelector::StarSize &x) {
std::intmax_t size = x.v;
if (!CheckIntrinsicSize(category, size)) {
size = defaultKind;
} else if (category == TypeCategory::Complex) {
size /= 2;
}
return Expr<SubscriptInteger>{size};
},
},
selector->u);
}
int ExpressionAnalyzer::GetDefaultKind(common::TypeCategory category) {
return context_.GetDefaultKind(category);
}
DynamicType ExpressionAnalyzer::GetDefaultKindOfType(
common::TypeCategory category) {
return {category, GetDefaultKind(category)};
}
bool ExpressionAnalyzer::CheckIntrinsicKind(
TypeCategory category, std::int64_t kind) {
if (IsValidKindOfIntrinsicType(category, kind)) { // C712, C714, C715, C727
return true;
} else {
Say("%s(KIND=%jd) is not a supported type"_err_en_US,
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
ToUpperCase(EnumToString(category)), kind);
return false;
}
}
bool ExpressionAnalyzer::CheckIntrinsicSize(
TypeCategory category, std::int64_t size) {
if (category == TypeCategory::Complex) {
// COMPLEX*16 == COMPLEX(KIND=8)
if (size % 2 == 0 && IsValidKindOfIntrinsicType(category, size / 2)) {
return true;
}
} else if (IsValidKindOfIntrinsicType(category, size)) {
return true;
}
Say("%s*%jd is not a supported type"_err_en_US,
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
ToUpperCase(EnumToString(category)), size);
return false;
}
bool ExpressionAnalyzer::AddAcImpliedDo(parser::CharBlock name, int kind) {
return acImpliedDos_.insert(std::make_pair(name, kind)).second;
}
void ExpressionAnalyzer::RemoveAcImpliedDo(parser::CharBlock name) {
auto iter{acImpliedDos_.find(name)};
if (iter != acImpliedDos_.end()) {
acImpliedDos_.erase(iter);
}
}
std::optional<int> ExpressionAnalyzer::IsAcImpliedDo(
parser::CharBlock name) const {
auto iter{acImpliedDos_.find(name)};
if (iter != acImpliedDos_.cend()) {
return {iter->second};
} else {
return std::nullopt;
}
}
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
bool ExpressionAnalyzer::EnforceTypeConstraint(parser::CharBlock at,
const MaybeExpr &result, TypeCategory category, bool defaultKind) {
if (result) {
if (auto type{result->GetType()}) {
if (type->category() != category) { // C885
Say(at, "Must have %s type, but is %s"_err_en_US,
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
ToUpperCase(EnumToString(category)),
ToUpperCase(type->AsFortran()));
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
return false;
} else if (defaultKind) {
int kind{context_.GetDefaultKind(category)};
if (type->kind() != kind) {
Say(at, "Must have default kind(%d) of %s type, but is %s"_err_en_US,
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
kind, ToUpperCase(EnumToString(category)),
ToUpperCase(type->AsFortran()));
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
return false;
}
}
} else {
Say(at, "Must have %s type, but is typeless"_err_en_US,
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
ToUpperCase(EnumToString(category)));
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
return false;
}
}
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
return true;
}
[flang] Continue semantic checking after name resolution error When an error occurs in name resolution, continue semantic processing in order to detect other errors. This means we can no longer assume that every `parser::Name` has a symbol even after name resolution completes. In `RewriteMutator`, only report internal error for unresolved symbol if there have been no fatal errors. Add `Error` flag to `Symbol` to indicate that an error occcurred related to it. Once we report an error about a symbol we should avoid reporting any more to prevent cascading errors. Add `HasError()` and `SetError()` to simplify working with this flag. Change some places that we assume that a `parser::Name` has a non-null symbol. There are probably more. `resolve-names.cc`: Set the `Error` flag when we report a fatal error related to a symbol. (This requires making some symbols non-const.) Remove `CheckScalarIntegerType()` as `ExprChecker` will take care of those constraints if they are expressed in the parse tree. One exception to that is the name in a `ConcurrentControl`. Explicitly perform that check using `EvaluateExpr()` and constraint classes so we get consistent error messages. In expression analysis, when a constraint is violated (like `Scalar<>` or `Integer<>`), reset the wrapped expression so that we don't assume it is valid. A `GenericExprWrapper` holding a std::nullopt indicates error. Change `EnforceTypeConstraint()` to return false when the constraint fails to enable this. check-do-concurrent.cc: Reorganize the Gather*VariableNames functions into one to simplify the task of filtering out unresolved names. Remove `CheckNoDuplicates()` and `CheckNoCollisions()` as those checks is already done in name resolution when the names are added to the scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bcdb679405906575f36d3314f17da89e3e89d45c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/429 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-04-26 04:18:33 +08:00
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::MakeFunctionRef(parser::CharBlock callSite,
ProcedureDesignator &&proc, ActualArguments &&arguments) {
if (const auto *intrinsic{std::get_if<SpecificIntrinsic>(&proc.u)}) {
if (intrinsic->name == "null" && arguments.empty()) {
return Expr<SomeType>{NullPointer{}};
}
}
if (const Symbol * symbol{proc.GetSymbol()}) {
if (!ResolveForward(*symbol)) {
return std::nullopt;
}
}
if (auto chars{CheckCall(callSite, proc, arguments)}) {
if (chars->functionResult) {
const auto &result{*chars->functionResult};
if (result.IsProcedurePointer()) {
return Expr<SomeType>{
ProcedureRef{std::move(proc), std::move(arguments)}};
} else {
// Not a procedure pointer, so type and shape are known.
return TypedWrapper<FunctionRef, ProcedureRef>(
DEREF(result.GetTypeAndShape()).type(),
ProcedureRef{std::move(proc), std::move(arguments)});
}
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
MaybeExpr ExpressionAnalyzer::MakeFunctionRef(
parser::CharBlock intrinsic, ActualArguments &&arguments) {
if (std::optional<SpecificCall> specificCall{
context_.intrinsics().Probe(CallCharacteristics{intrinsic.ToString()},
arguments, context_.foldingContext())}) {
return MakeFunctionRef(intrinsic,
ProcedureDesignator{std::move(specificCall->specificIntrinsic)},
std::move(specificCall->arguments));
} else {
return std::nullopt;
}
}
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
void ArgumentAnalyzer::Analyze(const parser::Variable &x) {
source_.ExtendToCover(x.GetSource());
if (MaybeExpr expr{context_.Analyze(x)}) {
if (!IsConstantExpr(*expr)) {
actuals_.emplace_back(std::move(*expr));
return;
}
const Symbol *symbol{GetFirstSymbol(*expr)};
context_.Say(x.GetSource(),
"Assignment to constant '%s' is not allowed"_err_en_US,
symbol ? symbol->name() : x.GetSource());
}
fatalErrors_ = true;
}
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
void ArgumentAnalyzer::Analyze(
const parser::ActualArgSpec &arg, bool isSubroutine) {
// TODO: C1002: Allow a whole assumed-size array to appear if the dummy
// argument would accept it. Handle by special-casing the context
// ActualArg -> Variable -> Designator.
// TODO: Actual arguments that are procedures and procedure pointers need to
// be detected and represented (they're not expressions).
// TODO: C1534: Don't allow a "restricted" specific intrinsic to be passed.
std::optional<ActualArgument> actual;
std::visit(common::visitors{
[&](const common::Indirection<parser::Expr> &x) {
// TODO: Distinguish & handle procedure name and
// proc-component-ref
actual = AnalyzeExpr(x.value());
},
[&](const parser::AltReturnSpec &) {
if (!isSubroutine) {
context_.Say(
"alternate return specification may not appear on"
" function reference"_err_en_US);
}
},
[&](const parser::ActualArg::PercentRef &) {
context_.Say("TODO: %REF() argument"_err_en_US);
},
[&](const parser::ActualArg::PercentVal &) {
context_.Say("TODO: %VAL() argument"_err_en_US);
},
},
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
std::get<parser::ActualArg>(arg.t).u);
if (actual) {
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
if (const auto &argKW{std::get<std::optional<parser::Keyword>>(arg.t)}) {
actual->set_keyword(argKW->v.source);
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
actuals_.emplace_back(std::move(*actual));
} else {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
fatalErrors_ = true;
}
}
bool ArgumentAnalyzer::IsIntrinsicRelational(RelationalOperator opr) const {
CHECK(actuals_.size() == 2);
return semantics::IsIntrinsicRelational(
opr, *GetType(0), GetRank(0), *GetType(1), GetRank(1));
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
bool ArgumentAnalyzer::IsIntrinsicNumeric(NumericOperator opr) const {
std::optional<DynamicType> type0{GetType(0)};
if (actuals_.size() == 1) {
if (IsBOZLiteral(0)) {
return opr == NumericOperator::Add;
} else {
return type0 && semantics::IsIntrinsicNumeric(*type0);
}
} else {
std::optional<DynamicType> type1{GetType(1)};
if (IsBOZLiteral(0) && type1) {
auto cat1{type1->category()};
return cat1 == TypeCategory::Integer || cat1 == TypeCategory::Real;
} else if (IsBOZLiteral(1) && type0) { // Integer/Real opr BOZ
auto cat0{type0->category()};
return cat0 == TypeCategory::Integer || cat0 == TypeCategory::Real;
} else {
return type0 && type1 &&
semantics::IsIntrinsicNumeric(*type0, GetRank(0), *type1, GetRank(1));
}
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
bool ArgumentAnalyzer::IsIntrinsicLogical() const {
if (actuals_.size() == 1) {
return semantics::IsIntrinsicLogical(*GetType(0));
return GetType(0)->category() == TypeCategory::Logical;
} else {
return semantics::IsIntrinsicLogical(
*GetType(0), GetRank(0), *GetType(1), GetRank(1));
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
bool ArgumentAnalyzer::IsIntrinsicConcat() const {
return semantics::IsIntrinsicConcat(
*GetType(0), GetRank(0), *GetType(1), GetRank(1));
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
MaybeExpr ArgumentAnalyzer::TryDefinedOp(
const char *opr, parser::MessageFixedText &&error, bool isUserOp) {
if (AnyUntypedOperand()) {
context_.Say(
std::move(error), ToUpperCase(opr), TypeAsFortran(0), TypeAsFortran(1));
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return std::nullopt;
}
{
auto restorer{context_.GetContextualMessages().DiscardMessages()};
std::string oprNameString{
isUserOp ? std::string{opr} : "operator("s + opr + ')'};
parser::CharBlock oprName{oprNameString};
const auto &scope{context_.context().FindScope(source_)};
if (Symbol * symbol{scope.FindSymbol(oprName)}) {
parser::Name name{symbol->name(), symbol};
if (auto result{context_.AnalyzeDefinedOp(name, GetActuals())}) {
return result;
}
sawDefinedOp_ = symbol;
}
for (std::size_t passIndex{0}; passIndex < actuals_.size(); ++passIndex) {
if (const Symbol * symbol{FindBoundOp(oprName, passIndex)}) {
if (MaybeExpr result{TryBoundOp(*symbol, passIndex)}) {
return result;
}
}
}
}
if (sawDefinedOp_) {
SayNoMatch(ToUpperCase(sawDefinedOp_->name().ToString()));
} else if (actuals_.size() == 1 || AreConformable()) {
context_.Say(
std::move(error), ToUpperCase(opr), TypeAsFortran(0), TypeAsFortran(1));
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
context_.Say(
"Operands of %s are not conformable; have rank %d and rank %d"_err_en_US,
ToUpperCase(opr), actuals_[0]->Rank(), actuals_[1]->Rank());
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
return std::nullopt;
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
MaybeExpr ArgumentAnalyzer::TryDefinedOp(
std::vector<const char *> oprs, parser::MessageFixedText &&error) {
for (std::size_t i{1}; i < oprs.size(); ++i) {
auto restorer{context_.GetContextualMessages().DiscardMessages()};
if (auto result{TryDefinedOp(oprs[i], std::move(error))}) {
return result;
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
return TryDefinedOp(oprs[0], std::move(error));
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
}
MaybeExpr ArgumentAnalyzer::TryBoundOp(const Symbol &symbol, int passIndex) {
ActualArguments localActuals{actuals_};
const Symbol *proc{GetBindingResolution(GetType(passIndex), symbol)};
if (!proc) {
proc = &symbol;
localActuals.at(passIndex).value().set_isPassedObject();
}
return context_.MakeFunctionRef(
source_, ProcedureDesignator{*proc}, std::move(localActuals));
}
std::optional<ProcedureRef> ArgumentAnalyzer::TryDefinedAssignment() {
using semantics::Tristate;
const Expr<SomeType> &lhs{GetExpr(0)};
const Expr<SomeType> &rhs{GetExpr(1)};
std::optional<DynamicType> lhsType{lhs.GetType()};
std::optional<DynamicType> rhsType{rhs.GetType()};
int lhsRank{lhs.Rank()};
int rhsRank{rhs.Rank()};
Tristate isDefined{
semantics::IsDefinedAssignment(lhsType, lhsRank, rhsType, rhsRank)};
if (isDefined == Tristate::No) {
return std::nullopt; // user-defined assignment not allowed for these args
}
auto restorer{context_.GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(source_)};
if (std::optional<ProcedureRef> procRef{GetDefinedAssignmentProc()}) {
context_.CheckCall(source_, procRef->proc(), procRef->arguments());
return std::move(*procRef);
}
if (isDefined == Tristate::Yes) {
if (!lhsType || !rhsType || (lhsRank != rhsRank && rhsRank != 0) ||
!OkLogicalIntegerAssignment(lhsType->category(), rhsType->category())) {
SayNoMatch("ASSIGNMENT(=)", true);
}
}
return std::nullopt;
}
bool ArgumentAnalyzer::OkLogicalIntegerAssignment(
TypeCategory lhs, TypeCategory rhs) {
if (!context_.context().languageFeatures().IsEnabled(
common::LanguageFeature::LogicalIntegerAssignment)) {
return false;
}
std::optional<parser::MessageFixedText> msg;
if (lhs == TypeCategory::Integer && rhs == TypeCategory::Logical) {
// allow assignment to LOGICAL from INTEGER as a legacy extension
msg = "nonstandard usage: assignment of LOGICAL to INTEGER"_en_US;
} else if (lhs == TypeCategory::Logical && rhs == TypeCategory::Integer) {
// ... and assignment to LOGICAL from INTEGER
msg = "nonstandard usage: assignment of INTEGER to LOGICAL"_en_US;
} else {
return false;
}
if (context_.context().languageFeatures().ShouldWarn(
common::LanguageFeature::LogicalIntegerAssignment)) {
context_.Say(std::move(*msg));
}
return true;
}
std::optional<ProcedureRef> ArgumentAnalyzer::GetDefinedAssignmentProc() {
auto restorer{context_.GetContextualMessages().DiscardMessages()};
std::string oprNameString{"assignment(=)"};
parser::CharBlock oprName{oprNameString};
const Symbol *proc{nullptr};
const auto &scope{context_.context().FindScope(source_)};
if (const Symbol * symbol{scope.FindSymbol(oprName)}) {
ExpressionAnalyzer::AdjustActuals noAdjustment;
if (const Symbol *
specific{context_.ResolveGeneric(*symbol, actuals_, noAdjustment)}) {
proc = specific;
} else {
context_.EmitGenericResolutionError(*symbol);
}
}
for (std::size_t passIndex{0}; passIndex < actuals_.size(); ++passIndex) {
if (const Symbol * specific{FindBoundOp(oprName, passIndex)}) {
proc = specific;
}
}
if (proc) {
ActualArguments actualsCopy{actuals_};
actualsCopy[1]->Parenthesize();
return ProcedureRef{ProcedureDesignator{*proc}, std::move(actualsCopy)};
} else {
return std::nullopt;
}
}
void ArgumentAnalyzer::Dump(llvm::raw_ostream &os) {
os << "source_: " << source_.ToString() << " fatalErrors_ = " << fatalErrors_
<< '\n';
for (const auto &actual : actuals_) {
if (!actual.has_value()) {
os << "- error\n";
} else if (const Symbol * symbol{actual->GetAssumedTypeDummy()}) {
os << "- assumed type: " << symbol->name().ToString() << '\n';
} else if (const Expr<SomeType> *expr{actual->UnwrapExpr()}) {
expr->AsFortran(os << "- expr: ") << '\n';
} else {
DIE("bad ActualArgument");
}
}
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
std::optional<ActualArgument> ArgumentAnalyzer::AnalyzeExpr(
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
const parser::Expr &expr) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
source_.ExtendToCover(expr.source);
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
if (const Symbol * assumedTypeDummy{AssumedTypeDummy(expr)}) {
expr.typedExpr.reset(new GenericExprWrapper{});
if (allowAssumedType_) {
return ActualArgument{ActualArgument::AssumedType{*assumedTypeDummy}};
} else {
context_.SayAt(expr.source,
"TYPE(*) dummy argument may only be used as an actual argument"_err_en_US);
return std::nullopt;
}
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
} else if (MaybeExpr argExpr{context_.Analyze(expr)}) {
return ActualArgument{context_.Fold(std::move(*argExpr))};
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
} else {
return std::nullopt;
}
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
bool ArgumentAnalyzer::AreConformable() const {
CHECK(!fatalErrors_ && actuals_.size() == 2);
return evaluate::AreConformable(*actuals_[0], *actuals_[1]);
}
// Look for a type-bound operator in the type of arg number passIndex.
const Symbol *ArgumentAnalyzer::FindBoundOp(
parser::CharBlock oprName, int passIndex) {
const auto *type{GetDerivedTypeSpec(GetType(passIndex))};
if (!type || !type->scope()) {
return nullptr;
}
const Symbol *symbol{type->scope()->FindComponent(oprName)};
if (!symbol) {
return nullptr;
}
sawDefinedOp_ = symbol;
ExpressionAnalyzer::AdjustActuals adjustment{
[&](const Symbol &proc, ActualArguments &) {
return passIndex == GetPassIndex(proc);
}};
const Symbol *result{context_.ResolveGeneric(*symbol, actuals_, adjustment)};
if (!result) {
context_.EmitGenericResolutionError(*symbol);
}
return result;
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
std::optional<DynamicType> ArgumentAnalyzer::GetType(std::size_t i) const {
return i < actuals_.size() ? actuals_[i].value().GetType() : std::nullopt;
}
int ArgumentAnalyzer::GetRank(std::size_t i) const {
return i < actuals_.size() ? actuals_[i].value().Rank() : 0;
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
// Report error resolving opr when there is a user-defined one available
void ArgumentAnalyzer::SayNoMatch(const std::string &opr, bool isAssignment) {
std::string type0{TypeAsFortran(0)};
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
auto rank0{actuals_[0]->Rank()};
if (actuals_.size() == 1) {
if (rank0 > 0) {
context_.Say("No intrinsic or user-defined %s matches "
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
"rank %d array of %s"_err_en_US,
opr, rank0, type0);
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
context_.Say("No intrinsic or user-defined %s matches "
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
"operand type %s"_err_en_US,
opr, type0);
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
} else {
std::string type1{TypeAsFortran(1)};
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
auto rank1{actuals_[1]->Rank()};
if (rank0 > 0 && rank1 > 0 && rank0 != rank1) {
context_.Say("No intrinsic or user-defined %s matches "
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
"rank %d array of %s and rank %d array of %s"_err_en_US,
opr, rank0, type0, rank1, type1);
} else if (isAssignment && rank0 != rank1) {
if (rank0 == 0) {
context_.Say("No intrinsic or user-defined %s matches "
"scalar %s and rank %d array of %s"_err_en_US,
opr, type0, rank1, type1);
} else {
context_.Say("No intrinsic or user-defined %s matches "
"rank %d array of %s and scalar %s"_err_en_US,
opr, rank0, type0, type1);
}
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
} else {
context_.Say("No intrinsic or user-defined %s matches "
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
"operand types %s and %s"_err_en_US,
opr, type0, type1);
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
}
}
}
std::string ArgumentAnalyzer::TypeAsFortran(std::size_t i) {
if (std::optional<DynamicType> type{GetType(i)}) {
return type->category() == TypeCategory::Derived
? "TYPE("s + type->AsFortran() + ')'
: type->category() == TypeCategory::Character
? "CHARACTER(KIND="s + std::to_string(type->kind()) + ')'
: ToUpperCase(type->AsFortran());
} else {
return "untyped";
}
}
bool ArgumentAnalyzer::AnyUntypedOperand() {
for (const auto &actual : actuals_) {
if (!actual.value().GetType()) {
[flang] Resolve extended intrinsic operators Enhance `ArgumentAnalyzer` to do most of the work for this. For each kind of operator that might have a user-defined form we follow this process: - analyze the arguments - if the types and shapes match the intrinsic operator do the usual processing - otherwise attempt to interpret it as a user-defined operator with `TryDefinedOp` When we fail to resolve an operator, produce different errors depending on whether there is a user-defined operator available or not. If there is, report that neither user-defined nor intrinsic operator worked. If there is not, describe the rules for the intrinsic operator. In either case, include the type(s) of the operand(s). Most of the uses of `ArgumentAnalyzer` are in helper functions that apply to classes of operators. For consistency, rename `BinaryOperationHelper` to `NumericBinaryOperator` and `LogicalHelper` to `LogicalBinaryHelper` and introduce `NumericUnaryHelper` for unary `+` and `-`. `.NOT.` and `//` are not implemented in helpers. Replace `success_` with `fatalErrors_` in `ArgumentAnalyzer` for consistency with `ExpressionAnalyzer`. Add `NumericOperator` and `LogicalOperator` enums to `Fortran.h` to go with `RelationalOperator`. Add `AddFortran` functions to each to convert to a Fortran source string. `RelationalOperator` also has `AllFortranNames` because there are multiple names for each operator. This replaces `LogicalOperator` in `expression.h` and the string representation of the operators in `formatting.cc`. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3bb9d664e86c931a67b3e78859d2108e53d23f80 Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/807
2019-11-03 00:56:46 +08:00
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
} // namespace Fortran::evaluate
[flang] Resolve defined operators to specifics Most of these changes involve moving code around so that it case be used for `DefinedUnary` and `DefinedBinary`. The functional changes are in the `Analyze` member functions for those cases where the arguments are now analyzed, the generic is resolved, and a `FunctionRef` is created. Add `ArgumentAnalyzer` to handling building of the `ActualArguments` of a call. This allows the code to be shared with the defined unary and defined binary cases. Move `AnalyzeActualArgument` and `AnalyzeActualArgument` into that class (renaming both to `Analyze`). Create an overload of `GetCalleeAndArguments` for the `Name` case so it can be used for defined ops where we don't have a `ProcedureDesignator`. Move `IsGenericDefinedOp` to `tools.h` to make it available to the new code. We were using `semantics::CheckExplicitInterface` to resolve a generic interface to a specific procedure based on actual arguments. The problem with that is that it performs too many checks. We just want to get the right specific; there may be errors reported later during call analysis. To fix this, add a new function, `CheckInterfaceForGeneric`, to perform this check. It shares code with `CheckExplicitInterface`, but it passes in a null scope to indicate that the full set of checks aren't necessary in `CheckExplicitInterfaceArg`. Instead we lift the call to `TypeAndShape::IsCompatibleWith` out of `CheckExplicitDataArg`, and skip the latter when there is no scope. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@fff2d1580f26719e0c384c66576aa6620d04faff Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/786
2019-10-23 00:31:33 +08:00
namespace Fortran::semantics {
[flang] Create framework for checking statement semantics Add `SemanticsVisitor` as the visitor class to perform statement semantics checks. Its template parameters are "checker" classes that perform the checks. They have `Enter` and `Leave` functions that are called for the corresponding parse tree nodes (`Enter` before the children, `Leave` after). Unlike `Pre` and `Post` in visitors they cannot prevent the parse tree walker from visiting child nodes. Existing checks have been incorporated into this framework: - `ExprChecker` replaces `AnalyzeExpressions()` - `AssignmentChecker` replaces `AnalyzeAssignments()` - `DoConcurrentChecker` replaces `CheckDoConcurrentConstraints()` Adding a new checker requires: - defining the checker class: - with BaseChecker as virtual base class - constructible from `SemanticsContext` - with Enter/Leave functions for nodes of interest - add the checker class to the template parameters of `StatementSemantics` Because these checkers and also `ResolveNamesVisitor` require tracking the current statement source location, that has been moved into `SemanticsContext`. `ResolveNamesVisitor` and `SemanticsVisitor` update the location when `Statement` nodes are encountered, making it available for error messages. `AnalyzeKindSelector()` now has access to the current statement through the context and so no longer needs to have it passed in. Test `assign01.f90` was added to verify that `AssignmentChecker` is actually doing something. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3a222c36731029fabf026e5301dc60f0587595be Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/315 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-03-06 08:52:50 +08:00
evaluate::Expr<evaluate::SubscriptInteger> AnalyzeKindSelector(
SemanticsContext &context, common::TypeCategory category,
const std::optional<parser::KindSelector> &selector) {
evaluate::ExpressionAnalyzer analyzer{context};
auto restorer{
analyzer.GetContextualMessages().SetLocation(context.location().value())};
return analyzer.AnalyzeKindSelector(category, selector);
[flang] Create framework for checking statement semantics Add `SemanticsVisitor` as the visitor class to perform statement semantics checks. Its template parameters are "checker" classes that perform the checks. They have `Enter` and `Leave` functions that are called for the corresponding parse tree nodes (`Enter` before the children, `Leave` after). Unlike `Pre` and `Post` in visitors they cannot prevent the parse tree walker from visiting child nodes. Existing checks have been incorporated into this framework: - `ExprChecker` replaces `AnalyzeExpressions()` - `AssignmentChecker` replaces `AnalyzeAssignments()` - `DoConcurrentChecker` replaces `CheckDoConcurrentConstraints()` Adding a new checker requires: - defining the checker class: - with BaseChecker as virtual base class - constructible from `SemanticsContext` - with Enter/Leave functions for nodes of interest - add the checker class to the template parameters of `StatementSemantics` Because these checkers and also `ResolveNamesVisitor` require tracking the current statement source location, that has been moved into `SemanticsContext`. `ResolveNamesVisitor` and `SemanticsVisitor` update the location when `Statement` nodes are encountered, making it available for error messages. `AnalyzeKindSelector()` now has access to the current statement through the context and so no longer needs to have it passed in. Test `assign01.f90` was added to verify that `AssignmentChecker` is actually doing something. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@3a222c36731029fabf026e5301dc60f0587595be Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/315 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-03-06 08:52:50 +08:00
}
void AnalyzeCallStmt(SemanticsContext &context, const parser::CallStmt &call) {
evaluate::ExpressionAnalyzer{context}.Analyze(call);
}
const evaluate::Assignment *AnalyzeAssignmentStmt(
SemanticsContext &context, const parser::AssignmentStmt &stmt) {
return evaluate::ExpressionAnalyzer{context}.Analyze(stmt);
}
const evaluate::Assignment *AnalyzePointerAssignmentStmt(
SemanticsContext &context, const parser::PointerAssignmentStmt &stmt) {
return evaluate::ExpressionAnalyzer{context}.Analyze(stmt);
}
ExprChecker::ExprChecker(SemanticsContext &context) : context_{context} {}
bool ExprChecker::Walk(const parser::Program &program) {
parser::Walk(program, *this);
return !context_.AnyFatalError();
}
bool ExprChecker::Pre(const parser::DataStmtConstant &x) {
std::visit(common::visitors{
[&](const parser::NullInit &) {},
[&](const parser::InitialDataTarget &y) {
AnalyzeExpr(context_, y.value());
},
[&](const auto &y) { AnalyzeExpr(context_, y); },
},
x.u);
return false;
}
} // namespace Fortran::semantics