2018-01-12 17:35:57 +08:00
|
|
|
# REQUIRES: ppc
|
2018-05-04 23:09:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-04-23 23:01:24 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=powerpc64le-unknown-linux %s -o %t.o
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o %t
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-readelf -s %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=SYM %s
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-readelf -S %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=SECTIONS %s
|
|
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d --no-show-raw-insn %t | FileCheck %s
|
2019-08-03 10:26:52 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-readobj -r %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=REL %s
|
2018-05-04 23:09:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=powerpc64-unknown-linux %s -o %t.o
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o %t
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-readelf -s %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=SYM %s
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-readelf -S %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=SECTIONS %s
|
|
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d --no-show-raw-insn %t | FileCheck %s
|
2019-08-03 10:26:52 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-readobj -r %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=REL %s
|
2018-05-07 03:13:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# SYM: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx
|
|
|
|
|
# SYM: 0000000010028298 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN 4 .TOC.
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# SYM: 0000000010010284 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 3 ifunc1
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# SYM: 0000000010010210 0 IFUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 2 ifunc2
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# SYM: 0000000010010274 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 3 ifunc3
|
2018-05-07 03:13:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# SECTIONS: .plt NOBITS 00000000100302a0 0002a0 000018 00 WA 0 0 8
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
[ELF][PPC] Allow PT_LOAD to have overlapping p_offset ranges
This change affects the non-linker script case (precisely, when the
`SECTIONS` command is not used). It deletes 3 alignments at PT_LOAD
boundaries for the default case: the size of a powerpc64 binary can be
decreased by at most 192kb. The technique can be ported to other
targets.
Let me demonstrate the idea with a maxPageSize=65536 example:
When assigning the address to the first output section of a new PT_LOAD,
if the end p_vaddr of the previous PT_LOAD is 0x10020, we advance to
the next multiple of maxPageSize: 0x20000. The new PT_LOAD will thus
have p_vaddr=0x20000. Because p_offset and p_vaddr are congruent modulo
maxPageSize, p_offset will be 0x20000, leaving a p_offset gap [0x10020,
0x20000) in the output.
Alternatively, if we advance to 0x20020, the new PT_LOAD will have
p_vaddr=0x20020. We can pick either 0x10020 or 0x20020 for p_offset!
Obviously 0x10020 is the choice because it leaves no gap. At runtime,
p_vaddr will be rounded down by pagesize (65536 if
pagesize=maxPageSize). This PT_LOAD will load additional initial
contents from p_offset ranges [0x10000,0x10020), which will also be
loaded by the previous PT_LOAD. This is fine if -z noseparate-code is in
effect or if we are not transiting between executable and non-executable
segments.
ld.bfd -z noseparate-code leverages this technique to keep output small.
This patch implements the technique in lld, which is mostly effective on
targets with large defaultMaxPageSize (AArch64/MIPS/PPC: 65536). The 3
removed alignments can save almost 3*65536 bytes.
Two places that rely on p_vaddr%pagesize = 0 have to be updated.
1) We used to round p_memsz(PT_GNU_RELRO) up to commonPageSize (defaults
to 4096 on all targets). Now p_vaddr%commonPageSize may be non-zero.
The updated formula takes account of that factor.
2) Our TP offsets formulae are only correct if p_vaddr%p_align = 0.
Fix them. See the updated comments in InputSection.cpp for details.
On targets that we enable the technique (only PPC64 now),
we can potentially make `p_vaddr(PT_TLS)%p_align(PT_TLS) != 0`
if `sh_addralign(.tdata) < sh_addralign(.tbss)`
This exposes many problems in ld.so implementations, especially the
offsets of dynamic TLS blocks. Known issues:
FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT rtld-elf (i386/amd64/powerpc/arm64)
glibc (HEAD) i386 and x86_64 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24606
musl<=1.1.22 on TLS Variant I architectures (aarch64/powerpc64/...)
So, force p_vaddr%p_align = 0 by rounding dot up to p_align(PT_TLS).
The technique will be enabled (with updated tests) for other targets in
subsequent patches.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64906
llvm-svn: 369343
2019-08-20 16:34:25 +08:00
|
|
|
# __plt_ifunc - . = 0x10010218 - 0x10010208 = 16
|
|
|
|
|
# __plt_ifunc2 - . = 0x1001022c - 0x10010210 = 28
|
2019-05-10 13:51:00 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK: _start:
|
[ELF][PPC] Allow PT_LOAD to have overlapping p_offset ranges
This change affects the non-linker script case (precisely, when the
`SECTIONS` command is not used). It deletes 3 alignments at PT_LOAD
boundaries for the default case: the size of a powerpc64 binary can be
decreased by at most 192kb. The technique can be ported to other
targets.
Let me demonstrate the idea with a maxPageSize=65536 example:
When assigning the address to the first output section of a new PT_LOAD,
if the end p_vaddr of the previous PT_LOAD is 0x10020, we advance to
the next multiple of maxPageSize: 0x20000. The new PT_LOAD will thus
have p_vaddr=0x20000. Because p_offset and p_vaddr are congruent modulo
maxPageSize, p_offset will be 0x20000, leaving a p_offset gap [0x10020,
0x20000) in the output.
Alternatively, if we advance to 0x20020, the new PT_LOAD will have
p_vaddr=0x20020. We can pick either 0x10020 or 0x20020 for p_offset!
Obviously 0x10020 is the choice because it leaves no gap. At runtime,
p_vaddr will be rounded down by pagesize (65536 if
pagesize=maxPageSize). This PT_LOAD will load additional initial
contents from p_offset ranges [0x10000,0x10020), which will also be
loaded by the previous PT_LOAD. This is fine if -z noseparate-code is in
effect or if we are not transiting between executable and non-executable
segments.
ld.bfd -z noseparate-code leverages this technique to keep output small.
This patch implements the technique in lld, which is mostly effective on
targets with large defaultMaxPageSize (AArch64/MIPS/PPC: 65536). The 3
removed alignments can save almost 3*65536 bytes.
Two places that rely on p_vaddr%pagesize = 0 have to be updated.
1) We used to round p_memsz(PT_GNU_RELRO) up to commonPageSize (defaults
to 4096 on all targets). Now p_vaddr%commonPageSize may be non-zero.
The updated formula takes account of that factor.
2) Our TP offsets formulae are only correct if p_vaddr%p_align = 0.
Fix them. See the updated comments in InputSection.cpp for details.
On targets that we enable the technique (only PPC64 now),
we can potentially make `p_vaddr(PT_TLS)%p_align(PT_TLS) != 0`
if `sh_addralign(.tdata) < sh_addralign(.tbss)`
This exposes many problems in ld.so implementations, especially the
offsets of dynamic TLS blocks. Known issues:
FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT rtld-elf (i386/amd64/powerpc/arm64)
glibc (HEAD) i386 and x86_64 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24606
musl<=1.1.22 on TLS Variant I architectures (aarch64/powerpc64/...)
So, force p_vaddr%p_align = 0 by rounding dot up to p_align(PT_TLS).
The technique will be enabled (with updated tests) for other targets in
subsequent patches.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64906
llvm-svn: 369343
2019-08-20 16:34:25 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addis 2, 12, 2
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addi 2, 2, -32636
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: 1001021c: bl .+32
|
2019-05-10 13:51:00 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: ld 2, 24(1)
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: 10010224: bl .+44
|
2019-05-10 13:51:00 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: ld 2, 24(1)
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addis 3, 2, -2
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addi 3, 3, 32748
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addis 3, 2, -2
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addi 3, 3, 32732
|
2019-05-10 13:51:00 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# .plt[0] - .TOC. = 0x100302a0 - 0x10028298 = (1<<16) - 32760
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK: __plt_ifunc2:
|
2018-05-07 03:13:29 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: std 2, 24(1)
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addis 12, 2, 1
|
[ELF][PPC] Allow PT_LOAD to have overlapping p_offset ranges
This change affects the non-linker script case (precisely, when the
`SECTIONS` command is not used). It deletes 3 alignments at PT_LOAD
boundaries for the default case: the size of a powerpc64 binary can be
decreased by at most 192kb. The technique can be ported to other
targets.
Let me demonstrate the idea with a maxPageSize=65536 example:
When assigning the address to the first output section of a new PT_LOAD,
if the end p_vaddr of the previous PT_LOAD is 0x10020, we advance to
the next multiple of maxPageSize: 0x20000. The new PT_LOAD will thus
have p_vaddr=0x20000. Because p_offset and p_vaddr are congruent modulo
maxPageSize, p_offset will be 0x20000, leaving a p_offset gap [0x10020,
0x20000) in the output.
Alternatively, if we advance to 0x20020, the new PT_LOAD will have
p_vaddr=0x20020. We can pick either 0x10020 or 0x20020 for p_offset!
Obviously 0x10020 is the choice because it leaves no gap. At runtime,
p_vaddr will be rounded down by pagesize (65536 if
pagesize=maxPageSize). This PT_LOAD will load additional initial
contents from p_offset ranges [0x10000,0x10020), which will also be
loaded by the previous PT_LOAD. This is fine if -z noseparate-code is in
effect or if we are not transiting between executable and non-executable
segments.
ld.bfd -z noseparate-code leverages this technique to keep output small.
This patch implements the technique in lld, which is mostly effective on
targets with large defaultMaxPageSize (AArch64/MIPS/PPC: 65536). The 3
removed alignments can save almost 3*65536 bytes.
Two places that rely on p_vaddr%pagesize = 0 have to be updated.
1) We used to round p_memsz(PT_GNU_RELRO) up to commonPageSize (defaults
to 4096 on all targets). Now p_vaddr%commonPageSize may be non-zero.
The updated formula takes account of that factor.
2) Our TP offsets formulae are only correct if p_vaddr%p_align = 0.
Fix them. See the updated comments in InputSection.cpp for details.
On targets that we enable the technique (only PPC64 now),
we can potentially make `p_vaddr(PT_TLS)%p_align(PT_TLS) != 0`
if `sh_addralign(.tdata) < sh_addralign(.tbss)`
This exposes many problems in ld.so implementations, especially the
offsets of dynamic TLS blocks. Known issues:
FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT rtld-elf (i386/amd64/powerpc/arm64)
glibc (HEAD) i386 and x86_64 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24606
musl<=1.1.22 on TLS Variant I architectures (aarch64/powerpc64/...)
So, force p_vaddr%p_align = 0 by rounding dot up to p_align(PT_TLS).
The technique will be enabled (with updated tests) for other targets in
subsequent patches.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64906
llvm-svn: 369343
2019-08-20 16:34:25 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: ld 12, -32760(12)
|
2018-05-07 03:13:29 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: mtctr 12
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: bctr
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# .plt[1] - .TOC. = 0x100302a0+8 - 0x10028298 = (1<<16) - 32752
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK: __plt_ifunc3:
|
2018-05-07 03:13:29 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: std 2, 24(1)
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addis 12, 2, 1
|
[ELF][PPC] Allow PT_LOAD to have overlapping p_offset ranges
This change affects the non-linker script case (precisely, when the
`SECTIONS` command is not used). It deletes 3 alignments at PT_LOAD
boundaries for the default case: the size of a powerpc64 binary can be
decreased by at most 192kb. The technique can be ported to other
targets.
Let me demonstrate the idea with a maxPageSize=65536 example:
When assigning the address to the first output section of a new PT_LOAD,
if the end p_vaddr of the previous PT_LOAD is 0x10020, we advance to
the next multiple of maxPageSize: 0x20000. The new PT_LOAD will thus
have p_vaddr=0x20000. Because p_offset and p_vaddr are congruent modulo
maxPageSize, p_offset will be 0x20000, leaving a p_offset gap [0x10020,
0x20000) in the output.
Alternatively, if we advance to 0x20020, the new PT_LOAD will have
p_vaddr=0x20020. We can pick either 0x10020 or 0x20020 for p_offset!
Obviously 0x10020 is the choice because it leaves no gap. At runtime,
p_vaddr will be rounded down by pagesize (65536 if
pagesize=maxPageSize). This PT_LOAD will load additional initial
contents from p_offset ranges [0x10000,0x10020), which will also be
loaded by the previous PT_LOAD. This is fine if -z noseparate-code is in
effect or if we are not transiting between executable and non-executable
segments.
ld.bfd -z noseparate-code leverages this technique to keep output small.
This patch implements the technique in lld, which is mostly effective on
targets with large defaultMaxPageSize (AArch64/MIPS/PPC: 65536). The 3
removed alignments can save almost 3*65536 bytes.
Two places that rely on p_vaddr%pagesize = 0 have to be updated.
1) We used to round p_memsz(PT_GNU_RELRO) up to commonPageSize (defaults
to 4096 on all targets). Now p_vaddr%commonPageSize may be non-zero.
The updated formula takes account of that factor.
2) Our TP offsets formulae are only correct if p_vaddr%p_align = 0.
Fix them. See the updated comments in InputSection.cpp for details.
On targets that we enable the technique (only PPC64 now),
we can potentially make `p_vaddr(PT_TLS)%p_align(PT_TLS) != 0`
if `sh_addralign(.tdata) < sh_addralign(.tbss)`
This exposes many problems in ld.so implementations, especially the
offsets of dynamic TLS blocks. Known issues:
FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT rtld-elf (i386/amd64/powerpc/arm64)
glibc (HEAD) i386 and x86_64 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24606
musl<=1.1.22 on TLS Variant I architectures (aarch64/powerpc64/...)
So, force p_vaddr%p_align = 0 by rounding dot up to p_align(PT_TLS).
The technique will be enabled (with updated tests) for other targets in
subsequent patches.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64906
llvm-svn: 369343
2019-08-20 16:34:25 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: ld 12, -32752(12)
|
2018-05-07 03:13:29 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: mtctr 12
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: bctr
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-EMPTY:
|
2018-05-07 03:13:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
## .glink has 3 IPLT entries for ifunc1, ifunc2 and ifunc3.
|
|
|
|
|
## ifunc2 and ifunc3 have the same code sequence as their PLT call stubs.
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK: Disassembly of section .glink:
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-EMPTY:
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: 0000000010010264 .glink:
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addis 12, 2, 1
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: ld 12, -32760(12)
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: mtctr 12
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: bctr
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-EMPTY:
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: 0000000010010274 ifunc3:
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addis 12, 2, 1
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: ld 12, -32752(12)
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: mtctr 12
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: bctr
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-EMPTY:
|
2020-01-16 09:44:14 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: 0000000010010284 ifunc1:
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: addis 12, 2, 1
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: ld 12, -32744(12)
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: mtctr 12
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK-NEXT: bctr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Check that we emit 3 R_PPC64_IRELATIVE in .rela.dyn.
|
2019-08-03 10:26:52 +08:00
|
|
|
# REL: .rela.dyn {
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
# REL-NEXT: 0x100302A0 R_PPC64_IRELATIVE - 0x10010210
|
|
|
|
|
# REL-NEXT: 0x100302A8 R_PPC64_IRELATIVE - 0x10010210
|
|
|
|
|
# REL-NEXT: 0x100302B0 R_PPC64_IRELATIVE - 0x10010210
|
2019-08-03 10:26:52 +08:00
|
|
|
# REL-NEXT: }
|
2018-01-12 17:35:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
.type ifunc1,@gnu_indirect_function
|
|
|
|
|
.type ifunc2,@gnu_indirect_function
|
|
|
|
|
.type ifunc3,@gnu_indirect_function
|
|
|
|
|
.globl ifunc1, ifunc2, ifunc3
|
|
|
|
|
ifunc1:
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
ifunc2:
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
ifunc3:
|
|
|
|
|
blr
|
2018-01-12 17:35:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
.global _start
|
|
|
|
|
.type _start,@function
|
2018-05-07 03:13:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 17:35:57 +08:00
|
|
|
_start:
|
2018-05-07 03:13:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.Lfunc_gep0:
|
|
|
|
|
addis 2, 12, .TOC.-.Lfunc_gep0@ha
|
|
|
|
|
addi 2, 2, .TOC.-.Lfunc_gep0@l
|
|
|
|
|
.Lfunc_lep0:
|
|
|
|
|
.localentry _start, .Lfunc_lep0-.Lfunc_gep0
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## ifunc1 is taken address.
|
|
|
|
|
## ifunc2 is called.
|
|
|
|
|
## ifunc3 is both taken address and called.
|
|
|
|
|
## We need to create IPLT entries in .glink for ifunc1 and ifunc3, change
|
|
|
|
|
## their types from STT_GNU_IFUNC to STT_FUNC, and set their st_shndx/st_value
|
|
|
|
|
## to their .glink entries. Technically we don't need an entry for ifunc2 in
|
|
|
|
|
## .glink, but we currently do that.
|
2019-04-23 19:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
bl ifunc2
|
|
|
|
|
nop
|
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-14 10:30:21 +08:00
|
|
|
bl ifunc3
|
|
|
|
|
nop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
addis 3, 2, ifunc1@toc@ha
|
|
|
|
|
addi 3, 3, ifunc1@toc@l
|
|
|
|
|
addis 3, 2, ifunc3@toc@ha
|
|
|
|
|
addi 3, 3, ifunc3@toc@l
|