maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-platform-reg.ll

28 lines
975 B
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

[AArch64] Remove check for Darwin that was needed to decide if x18 should be reserved. The decision to reserve x18 is going to be made solely by the front-end, so it isn't necessary to check if the OS is Darwin in the backend. llvm-svn: 243308
2015-07-28 03:18:47 +08:00
; RUN: llc -mtriple=arm64-apple-ios -mattr=+reserve-x18 -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-RESERVE-X18
[AArch64] Define subtarget feature "reserve-x18", which is used to decide whether register x18 should be reserved. This change is needed because we cannot use a backend option to set cl::opt "aarch64-reserve-x18" when doing LTO. Out-of-tree projects currently using cl::opt option "-aarch64-reserve-x18" to reserve x18 should make changes to add subtarget feature "reserve-x18" to the IR. rdar://problem/21529937 Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11463 llvm-svn: 243186
2015-07-25 08:18:31 +08:00
; RUN: llc -mtriple=arm64-freebsd-gnu -mattr=+reserve-x18 -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-RESERVE-X18
ARM64: initial backend import This adds a second implementation of the AArch64 architecture to LLVM, accessible in parallel via the "arm64" triple. The plan over the coming weeks & months is to merge the two into a single backend, during which time thorough code review should naturally occur. Everything will be easier with the target in-tree though, hence this commit. llvm-svn: 205090
2014-03-29 18:18:08 +08:00
; RUN: llc -mtriple=arm64-linux-gnu -o - %s | FileCheck %s
; x18 is reserved as a platform register on Darwin but not on other
; systems. Create loads of register pressure and make sure this is respected.
; Also, fp must always refer to a valid frame record, even if it's not the one
; of the current function, so it shouldn't be used either.
@var = global [30 x i64] zeroinitializer
define void @keep_live() {
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786. A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278) import fileinput import sys import re pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)") for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line)) Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649 llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-28 05:17:42 +08:00
%val = load volatile [30 x i64], [30 x i64]* @var
ARM64: initial backend import This adds a second implementation of the AArch64 architecture to LLVM, accessible in parallel via the "arm64" triple. The plan over the coming weeks & months is to merge the two into a single backend, during which time thorough code review should naturally occur. Everything will be easier with the target in-tree though, hence this commit. llvm-svn: 205090
2014-03-29 18:18:08 +08:00
store volatile [30 x i64] %val, [30 x i64]* @var
; CHECK: ldr x18
; CHECK: str x18
AArch64: add backend option to reserve x18 (platform register) AAPCS64 says that it's up to the platform to specify whether x18 is reserved, and a first step on that way is to add a flag controlling it. From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> llvm-svn: 226664
2015-01-21 23:43:31 +08:00
; CHECK-RESERVE-X18-NOT: ldr fp
; CHECK-RESERVE-X18-NOT: ldr x18
; CHECK-RESERVE-X18: Spill
; CHECK-RESERVE-X18-NOT: ldr fp
; CHECK-RESERVE-X18-NOT: ldr x18
; CHECK-RESERVE-X18: ret
ARM64: initial backend import This adds a second implementation of the AArch64 architecture to LLVM, accessible in parallel via the "arm64" triple. The plan over the coming weeks & months is to merge the two into a single backend, during which time thorough code review should naturally occur. Everything will be easier with the target in-tree though, hence this commit. llvm-svn: 205090
2014-03-29 18:18:08 +08:00
ret void
}