llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/aarch64-branch-protection-a...

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

30 lines
1.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -verify -fsyntax-only %s
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=foo"))) // expected-error {{invalid or misplaced branch protection specification 'foo'}}
[clang][ARM] PACBTI-M frontend support Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying parsing mechanism. These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649): - command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR attributes (metadata). - functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the __attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function declaration. - command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm, following this grammar: branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection> protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ] | <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"] pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ] pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"] b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is unsupported and a-key will be selected instead. - Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the same grammer as the commandline options. This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here: https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference Manual: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest The following people contributed to this patch: - Momchil Velikov - Victor Campos - Ties Stuij Reviewed By: vhscampos Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
2021-12-01 18:22:19 +08:00
void
badvalue0(void) {}
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=+bti"))) // expected-error {{invalid or misplaced branch protection specification '<empty>'}}
[clang][ARM] PACBTI-M frontend support Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying parsing mechanism. These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649): - command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR attributes (metadata). - functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the __attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function declaration. - command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm, following this grammar: branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection> protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ] | <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"] pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ] pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"] b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is unsupported and a-key will be selected instead. - Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the same grammer as the commandline options. This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here: https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference Manual: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest The following people contributed to this patch: - Momchil Velikov - Victor Campos - Ties Stuij Reviewed By: vhscampos Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
2021-12-01 18:22:19 +08:00
void
badvalue1(void) {}
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=bti+"))) // expected-error {{invalid or misplaced branch protection specification '<empty>'}}
[clang][ARM] PACBTI-M frontend support Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying parsing mechanism. These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649): - command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR attributes (metadata). - functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the __attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function declaration. - command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm, following this grammar: branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection> protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ] | <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"] pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ] pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"] b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is unsupported and a-key will be selected instead. - Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the same grammer as the commandline options. This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here: https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference Manual: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest The following people contributed to this patch: - Momchil Velikov - Victor Campos - Ties Stuij Reviewed By: vhscampos Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
2021-12-01 18:22:19 +08:00
void
badvalue2(void) {}
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=pac-ret+bkey"))) // expected-error {{invalid or misplaced branch protection specification 'bkey'}}
[clang][ARM] PACBTI-M frontend support Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying parsing mechanism. These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649): - command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR attributes (metadata). - functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the __attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function declaration. - command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm, following this grammar: branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection> protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ] | <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"] pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ] pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"] b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is unsupported and a-key will be selected instead. - Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the same grammer as the commandline options. This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here: https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference Manual: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest The following people contributed to this patch: - Momchil Velikov - Victor Campos - Ties Stuij Reviewed By: vhscampos Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
2021-12-01 18:22:19 +08:00
void
badvalue3(void) {}
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=bti+leaf"))) // expected-error {{invalid or misplaced branch protection specification 'leaf'}}
[clang][ARM] PACBTI-M frontend support Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying parsing mechanism. These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649): - command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR attributes (metadata). - functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the __attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function declaration. - command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm, following this grammar: branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection> protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ] | <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"] pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ] pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"] b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is unsupported and a-key will be selected instead. - Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the same grammer as the commandline options. This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here: https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference Manual: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest The following people contributed to this patch: - Momchil Velikov - Victor Campos - Ties Stuij Reviewed By: vhscampos Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
2021-12-01 18:22:19 +08:00
void
badoption0(void) {}
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=bti+leaf+pac-ret"))) // expected-error {{invalid or misplaced branch protection specification 'leaf'}}
[clang][ARM] PACBTI-M frontend support Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying parsing mechanism. These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649): - command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR attributes (metadata). - functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the __attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function declaration. - command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm, following this grammar: branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection> protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ] | <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"] pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ] pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"] b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is unsupported and a-key will be selected instead. - Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the same grammer as the commandline options. This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here: https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference Manual: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest The following people contributed to this patch: - Momchil Velikov - Victor Campos - Ties Stuij Reviewed By: vhscampos Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
2021-12-01 18:22:19 +08:00
void
badorder0(void) {}
[clang][ARM] PACBTI-M frontend support Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying parsing mechanism. These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649): - command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR attributes (metadata). - functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the __attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function declaration. - command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm, following this grammar: branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection> protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ] | <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"] pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ] pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"] b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is unsupported and a-key will be selected instead. - Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the same grammer as the commandline options. This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here: https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference Manual: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest The following people contributed to this patch: - Momchil Velikov - Victor Campos - Ties Stuij Reviewed By: vhscampos Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
2021-12-01 18:22:19 +08:00
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=pac-ret+bti+leaf"))) // expected-error {{invalid or misplaced branch protection specification 'leaf'}}
void
badorder1(void) {}