llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/missing-field-initializers.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

53 lines
1.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wmissing-field-initializers %s
// This was PR4808.
struct Foo { int a, b; };
struct Foo foo0 = { 1 }; // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
struct Foo foo1 = { .a = 1 }; // designator avoids MFI warning
struct Foo foo2 = { .b = 1 }; // designator avoids MFI warning
struct Foo bar0[] = {
{ 1,2 },
{ 1 }, // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
{ 1,2 }
};
struct Foo bar1[] = {
1, 2,
1, 2,
1
}; // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
struct Foo bar2[] = { {}, {}, {} };
struct One { int a; int b; };
struct Two { float c; float d; float e; };
struct Three {
union {
struct One one;
struct Two two;
} both;
};
struct Three t0 = {
{ .one = { 1, 2 } }
};
struct Three t1 = {
{ .two = { 1.0f, 2.0f, 3.0f } }
};
struct Three data[] = {
{ { .one = { 1, 2 } } },
{ { .one = { 1 } } }, // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
{ { .two = { 1.0f, 2.0f, 3.0f } } },
{ { .two = { 1.0f, 2.0f } } } // expected-warning {{missing field 'e' initializer}}
};
struct { int:5; int a; int:5; int b; int:5; } noNamedImplicit[] = {
{ 1, 2 },
{ 1 } // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
};