maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/atomic16.ll

268 lines
6.1 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

Fix PR15355 - Clear 'mayStore' flag when loading from the atomic variable before the spin loop - Clear kill flag from one use to multiple use in registers forming the address to that atomic variable - don't use a physical register as live-in register in BB (neither entry nor landing pad.) by copying it into virtual register (patch by Cameron Zwarich) llvm-svn: 176538
2013-03-06 08:17:04 +08:00
; RUN: llc < %s -O0 -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=corei7 -verify-machineinstrs -show-mc-encoding | FileCheck %s --check-prefix X64
; RUN: llc < %s -O0 -mtriple=i386-unknown-unknown -mcpu=corei7 -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s --check-prefix X32
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
@sc16 = external global i16
define void @atomic_fetch_add16() nounwind {
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64-LABEL: atomic_fetch_add16
; X32-LABEL: atomic_fetch_add16
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
entry:
; 32-bit
%t1 = atomicrmw add i16* @sc16, i16 1 acquire
; X64: lock
; X64: incw
; X32: lock
; X32: incw
%t2 = atomicrmw add i16* @sc16, i16 3 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: addw $3, {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: addw $3
%t3 = atomicrmw add i16* @sc16, i16 5 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: xaddw {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: xaddw
%t4 = atomicrmw add i16* @sc16, i16 %t3 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: addw {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: addw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_sub16() nounwind {
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64-LABEL: atomic_fetch_sub16
; X32-LABEL: atomic_fetch_sub16
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
%t1 = atomicrmw sub i16* @sc16, i16 1 acquire
; X64: lock
; X64: decw
; X32: lock
; X32: decw
%t2 = atomicrmw sub i16* @sc16, i16 3 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: subw $3, {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: subw $3
%t3 = atomicrmw sub i16* @sc16, i16 5 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: xaddw {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: xaddw
%t4 = atomicrmw sub i16* @sc16, i16 %t3 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: subw {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: subw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_and16() nounwind {
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64-LABEL: atomic_fetch_and16
; X32-LABEL: atomic_fetch_and16
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
%t1 = atomicrmw and i16* @sc16, i16 3 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: andw $3, {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: andw $3
%t2 = atomicrmw and i16* @sc16, i16 5 acquire
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64: andl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X64: lock
; X64: cmpxchgw
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X32: andl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: cmpxchgw
%t3 = atomicrmw and i16* @sc16, i16 %t2 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: andw {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: andw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_or16() nounwind {
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64-LABEL: atomic_fetch_or16
; X32-LABEL: atomic_fetch_or16
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
%t1 = atomicrmw or i16* @sc16, i16 3 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: orw $3, {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: orw $3
%t2 = atomicrmw or i16* @sc16, i16 5 acquire
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64: orl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X64: lock
; X64: cmpxchgw
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X32: orl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: cmpxchgw
%t3 = atomicrmw or i16* @sc16, i16 %t2 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: orw {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: orw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_xor16() nounwind {
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64-LABEL: atomic_fetch_xor16
; X32-LABEL: atomic_fetch_xor16
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
%t1 = atomicrmw xor i16* @sc16, i16 3 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: xorw $3, {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: xorw $3
%t2 = atomicrmw xor i16* @sc16, i16 5 acquire
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64: xorl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X64: lock
; X64: cmpxchgw
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X32: xorl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: cmpxchgw
%t3 = atomicrmw xor i16* @sc16, i16 %t2 acquire
; X64: lock
x86: Emit LOCK prefix after DATA16 Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact. Test Plan: ninja check Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630 llvm-svn: 224283
2014-12-16 06:34:58 +08:00
; X64: xorw {{.*}} # encoding: [0x66,0xf0
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: xorw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_nand16(i16 %x) nounwind {
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64-LABEL: atomic_fetch_nand16
; X32-LABEL: atomic_fetch_nand16
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
%t1 = atomicrmw nand i16* @sc16, i16 %x acquire
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64: andl
; X64: notl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X64: lock
; X64: cmpxchgw
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X32: andl
; X32: notl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: lock
; X32: cmpxchgw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_max16(i16 %x) nounwind {
%t1 = atomicrmw max i16* @sc16, i16 %x acquire
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64: movswl
; X64: movswl
; X64: subl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X64: cmov
; X64: lock
; X64: cmpxchgw
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X32: movswl
; X32: movswl
; X32: subl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: cmov
; X32: lock
; X32: cmpxchgw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_min16(i16 %x) nounwind {
%t1 = atomicrmw min i16* @sc16, i16 %x acquire
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64: movswl
; X64: movswl
; X64: subl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X64: cmov
; X64: lock
; X64: cmpxchgw
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X32: movswl
; X32: movswl
; X32: subl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: cmov
; X32: lock
; X32: cmpxchgw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_umax16(i16 %x) nounwind {
%t1 = atomicrmw umax i16* @sc16, i16 %x acquire
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64: movzwl
; X64: movzwl
; X64: subl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X64: cmov
; X64: lock
; X64: cmpxchgw
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X32: movzwl
; X32: movzwl
; X32: subl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: cmov
; X32: lock
; X32: cmpxchgw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_umin16(i16 %x) nounwind {
%t1 = atomicrmw umin i16* @sc16, i16 %x acquire
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X64: movzwl
; X64: movzwl
; X64: subl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X64: cmov
; X64: lock
; X64: cmpxchgw
X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs. The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible instructions.. rdar://problem/13496295 llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-02 02:53:31 +08:00
; X32: movzwl
; X32: movzwl
; X32: subl
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X32: cmov
; X32: lock
; X32: cmpxchgw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_cmpxchg16() nounwind {
IR: add a second ordering operand to cmpxhg for failure The syntax for "cmpxchg" should now look something like: cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 3 acquire monotonic where the second ordering argument gives the required semantics in the case that no exchange takes place. It should be no stronger than the first ordering constraint and cannot be either "release" or "acq_rel" (since no store will have taken place). rdar://problem/15996804 llvm-svn: 203559
2014-03-11 18:48:52 +08:00
%t1 = cmpxchg i16* @sc16, i16 0, i16 1 acquire acquire
Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop - Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the following issue: * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop previously the spin-loop looks like thisMBB: newMBB: ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr] op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val] not t3 = t2 (if Invert) mov EAX = t1 lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit] bz newMBB fallthrough -->nextMBB the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into EAX. This loop is refined as: thisMBB: EAX = LOAD [MI.addr] mainMBB: t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined] JNE mainMBB sinkMBB: * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand. * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction td * Fix issues in PR13458 - Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types. NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality. - Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated. llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 11:06:15 +08:00
; X64: lock
; X64: cmpxchgw
; X32: lock
; X32: cmpxchgw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_store16(i16 %x) nounwind {
store atomic i16 %x, i16* @sc16 release, align 4
; X64-NOT: lock
; X64: movw
; X32-NOT: lock
; X32: movw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}
define void @atomic_fetch_swap16(i16 %x) nounwind {
%t1 = atomicrmw xchg i16* @sc16, i16 %x acquire
; X64-NOT: lock
; X64: xchgw
; X32-NOT: lock
; X32: xchgw
ret void
; X64: ret
; X32: ret
}