llvm-project/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Fuchsia.cpp

303 lines
9.3 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
//===--- Fuchsia.cpp - Fuchsia ToolChain Implementations --------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "Fuchsia.h"
#include "CommonArgs.h"
#include "clang/Config/config.h"
#include "clang/Driver/Compilation.h"
#include "clang/Driver/Driver.h"
#include "clang/Driver/DriverDiagnostic.h"
#include "clang/Driver/Options.h"
#include "clang/Driver/SanitizerArgs.h"
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
#include "llvm/Option/ArgList.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Path.h"
using namespace clang::driver;
using namespace clang::driver::toolchains;
using namespace clang::driver::tools;
using namespace clang;
using namespace llvm::opt;
void fuchsia::Linker::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction &JA,
const InputInfo &Output,
const InputInfoList &Inputs,
const ArgList &Args,
const char *LinkingOutput) const {
const toolchains::Fuchsia &ToolChain =
static_cast<const toolchains::Fuchsia &>(getToolChain());
const Driver &D = ToolChain.getDriver();
ArgStringList CmdArgs;
// Silence warning for "clang -g foo.o -o foo"
Args.ClaimAllArgs(options::OPT_g_Group);
// and "clang -emit-llvm foo.o -o foo"
Args.ClaimAllArgs(options::OPT_emit_llvm);
// and for "clang -w foo.o -o foo". Other warning options are already
// handled somewhere else.
Args.ClaimAllArgs(options::OPT_w);
const char *Exec = Args.MakeArgString(ToolChain.GetLinkerPath());
if (llvm::sys::path::filename(Exec).equals_lower("ld.lld") ||
llvm::sys::path::stem(Exec).equals_lower("ld.lld")) {
CmdArgs.push_back("-z");
CmdArgs.push_back("rodynamic");
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
}
if (!D.SysRoot.empty())
CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString("--sysroot=" + D.SysRoot));
if (!Args.hasArg(options::OPT_shared) && !Args.hasArg(options::OPT_r))
CmdArgs.push_back("-pie");
if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_rdynamic))
CmdArgs.push_back("-export-dynamic");
if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_s))
CmdArgs.push_back("-s");
if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_r)) {
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
CmdArgs.push_back("-r");
} else {
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
CmdArgs.push_back("--build-id");
CmdArgs.push_back("--hash-style=gnu");
}
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
CmdArgs.push_back("--eh-frame-hdr");
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_static))
CmdArgs.push_back("-Bstatic");
else if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_shared))
CmdArgs.push_back("-shared");
if (!Args.hasArg(options::OPT_shared)) {
std::string Dyld = D.DyldPrefix;
if (ToolChain.getSanitizerArgs().needsAsanRt() &&
ToolChain.getSanitizerArgs().needsSharedRt())
Dyld += "asan/";
Dyld += "ld.so.1";
CmdArgs.push_back("-dynamic-linker");
CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString(Dyld));
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
}
CmdArgs.push_back("-o");
CmdArgs.push_back(Output.getFilename());
if (!Args.hasArg(options::OPT_nostdlib, options::OPT_nostartfiles)) {
if (!Args.hasArg(options::OPT_shared)) {
CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString(ToolChain.GetFilePath("Scrt1.o")));
}
}
Args.AddAllArgs(CmdArgs, options::OPT_L);
Args.AddAllArgs(CmdArgs, options::OPT_u);
ToolChain.AddFilePathLibArgs(Args, CmdArgs);
if (D.isUsingLTO()) {
assert(!Inputs.empty() && "Must have at least one input.");
AddGoldPlugin(ToolChain, Args, CmdArgs, Output, Inputs[0],
D.getLTOMode() == LTOK_Thin);
}
addSanitizerRuntimes(ToolChain, Args, CmdArgs);
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
AddLinkerInputs(ToolChain, Inputs, Args, CmdArgs, JA);
if (!Args.hasArg(options::OPT_nostdlib, options::OPT_nodefaultlibs)) {
if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_static))
CmdArgs.push_back("-Bdynamic");
if (D.CCCIsCXX()) {
if (ToolChain.ShouldLinkCXXStdlib(Args)) {
bool OnlyLibstdcxxStatic = Args.hasArg(options::OPT_static_libstdcxx) &&
!Args.hasArg(options::OPT_static);
if (OnlyLibstdcxxStatic)
CmdArgs.push_back("-Bstatic");
ToolChain.AddCXXStdlibLibArgs(Args, CmdArgs);
if (OnlyLibstdcxxStatic)
CmdArgs.push_back("-Bdynamic");
}
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
CmdArgs.push_back("-lm");
}
AddRunTimeLibs(ToolChain, D, CmdArgs, Args);
if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_pthread) ||
Args.hasArg(options::OPT_pthreads))
CmdArgs.push_back("-lpthread");
if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_fsplit_stack))
CmdArgs.push_back("--wrap=pthread_create");
CmdArgs.push_back("-lc");
}
C.addCommand(llvm::make_unique<Command>(JA, *this, Exec, CmdArgs, Inputs));
}
/// Fuchsia - Fuchsia tool chain which can call as(1) and ld(1) directly.
static std::string normalizeTriple(llvm::Triple Triple) {
SmallString<64> T;
T += Triple.getArchName();
T += "-";
T += Triple.getOSName();
return T.str();
}
static std::string getTargetDir(const Driver &D,
llvm::Triple Triple) {
SmallString<128> P(llvm::sys::path::parent_path(D.Dir));
llvm::sys::path::append(P, "lib", normalizeTriple(Triple));
return P.str();
}
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
Fuchsia::Fuchsia(const Driver &D, const llvm::Triple &Triple,
const ArgList &Args)
: ToolChain(D, Triple, Args) {
getProgramPaths().push_back(getDriver().getInstalledDir());
if (getDriver().getInstalledDir() != D.Dir)
getProgramPaths().push_back(D.Dir);
SmallString<128> P(getTargetDir(D, getTriple()));
llvm::sys::path::append(P, "lib");
getFilePaths().push_back(P.str());
if (!D.SysRoot.empty()) {
SmallString<128> P(D.SysRoot);
llvm::sys::path::append(P, "lib");
getFilePaths().push_back(P.str());
}
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
}
std::string Fuchsia::ComputeEffectiveClangTriple(const ArgList &Args,
types::ID InputType) const {
llvm::Triple Triple(ComputeLLVMTriple(Args, InputType));
Triple.setTriple(normalizeTriple(Triple));
return Triple.getTriple();
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
}
Tool *Fuchsia::buildLinker() const {
return new tools::fuchsia::Linker(*this);
}
ToolChain::RuntimeLibType Fuchsia::GetRuntimeLibType(
const ArgList &Args) const {
if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(clang::driver::options::OPT_rtlib_EQ)) {
StringRef Value = A->getValue();
if (Value != "compiler-rt")
getDriver().Diag(clang::diag::err_drv_invalid_rtlib_name)
<< A->getAsString(Args);
}
return ToolChain::RLT_CompilerRT;
}
ToolChain::CXXStdlibType
Fuchsia::GetCXXStdlibType(const ArgList &Args) const {
if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_stdlib_EQ)) {
StringRef Value = A->getValue();
if (Value != "libc++")
getDriver().Diag(diag::err_drv_invalid_stdlib_name)
<< A->getAsString(Args);
}
return ToolChain::CST_Libcxx;
}
void Fuchsia::addClangTargetOptions(const ArgList &DriverArgs,
ArgStringList &CC1Args,
Action::OffloadKind) const {
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
if (DriverArgs.hasFlag(options::OPT_fuse_init_array,
options::OPT_fno_use_init_array, true))
CC1Args.push_back("-fuse-init-array");
}
void Fuchsia::AddClangSystemIncludeArgs(const ArgList &DriverArgs,
ArgStringList &CC1Args) const {
const Driver &D = getDriver();
if (DriverArgs.hasArg(options::OPT_nostdinc))
return;
if (!DriverArgs.hasArg(options::OPT_nobuiltininc)) {
SmallString<128> P(D.ResourceDir);
llvm::sys::path::append(P, "include");
addSystemInclude(DriverArgs, CC1Args, P);
}
if (DriverArgs.hasArg(options::OPT_nostdlibinc))
return;
// Check for configure-time C include directories.
StringRef CIncludeDirs(C_INCLUDE_DIRS);
if (CIncludeDirs != "") {
SmallVector<StringRef, 5> dirs;
CIncludeDirs.split(dirs, ":");
for (StringRef dir : dirs) {
StringRef Prefix =
llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(dir) ? StringRef(D.SysRoot) : "";
addExternCSystemInclude(DriverArgs, CC1Args, Prefix + dir);
}
return;
}
if (!D.SysRoot.empty()) {
SmallString<128> P(D.SysRoot);
llvm::sys::path::append(P, "include");
addExternCSystemInclude(DriverArgs, CC1Args, P.str());
}
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
}
void Fuchsia::AddClangCXXStdlibIncludeArgs(const ArgList &DriverArgs,
ArgStringList &CC1Args) const {
if (DriverArgs.hasArg(options::OPT_nostdlibinc) ||
DriverArgs.hasArg(options::OPT_nostdincxx))
return;
switch (GetCXXStdlibType(DriverArgs)) {
case ToolChain::CST_Libcxx: {
SmallString<128> P(getTargetDir(getDriver(), getTriple()));
llvm::sys::path::append(P, "include", "c++", "v1");
addSystemInclude(DriverArgs, CC1Args, P.str());
break;
}
default:
llvm_unreachable("invalid stdlib name");
}
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
}
void Fuchsia::AddCXXStdlibLibArgs(const ArgList &Args,
ArgStringList &CmdArgs) const {
switch (GetCXXStdlibType(Args)) {
case ToolChain::CST_Libcxx:
CmdArgs.push_back("-lc++");
break;
case ToolChain::CST_Libstdcxx:
llvm_unreachable("invalid stdlib name");
}
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
}
SanitizerMask Fuchsia::getSupportedSanitizers() const {
SanitizerMask Res = ToolChain::getSupportedSanitizers();
Res |= SanitizerKind::Address;
Res |= SanitizerKind::Fuzzer;
Res |= SanitizerKind::FuzzerNoLink;
Res |= SanitizerKind::SafeStack;
Res |= SanitizerKind::Scudo;
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC) Summary: (This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.) This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged. There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file. The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp. I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review. There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files: there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable" in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like "../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper. Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372 llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 09:02:16 +08:00
return Res;
}
SanitizerMask Fuchsia::getDefaultSanitizers() const {
return SanitizerKind::SafeStack;
}