maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/Other/cgscc-devirt-iteration.ll

132 lines
5.4 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

[PM] Introduce a devirtualization iteration layer for the new PM. This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the cost. The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility. The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds. This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible. This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114 llvm-svn: 290665
2016-12-28 19:07:33 +08:00
; The CGSCC pass manager includes an SCC iteration utility that tracks indirect
; calls that are turned into direct calls (devirtualization) and re-visits the
; SCC to expose those calls to the SCC-based IPO passes. We trigger
; devirtualization here with GVN which forwards a store through a load and to
; an indirect call.
;
; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='cgscc(function-attrs,function(gvn,instcombine))' -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=BEFORE
; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='cgscc(devirt<1>(function-attrs,function(gvn,instcombine)))' -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AFTER --check-prefix=AFTER1
; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='cgscc(devirt<2>(function-attrs,function(gvn,instcombine)))' -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AFTER --check-prefix=AFTER2
[PM] Add devirtualization-based iteration utility into the new PM's default pipeline. A clang with this patch built with ASan and asserts can build all of the test-suite as well, so it seems to not uncover any latent problems. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29853 llvm-svn: 294888
2017-02-12 13:38:04 +08:00
;
; We also verify that the real O2 pipeline catches these cases.
; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='default<O2>' -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AFTER --check-prefix=AFTER2
[PM] Introduce a devirtualization iteration layer for the new PM. This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the cost. The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility. The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds. This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible. This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114 llvm-svn: 290665
2016-12-28 19:07:33 +08:00
declare void @readnone() readnone
; CHECK: Function Attrs: readnone
[PM][FunctionAttrs] add NoUnwind attribute inference to PostOrderFunctionAttrs pass Summary: This was motivated by absence of PrunEH functionality in new PM. It was decided that a proper way to do PruneEH is to add NoUnwind inference into PostOrderFunctionAttrs and then perform normal SimplifyCFG on top. This change generalizes attribute handling implemented for (a removal of) Convergent attribute, by introducing a generic builder-like class AttributeInferer It registers all the attribute inference requests, storing per-attribute predicates into a vector, and then goes through an SCC Node, scanning all the instructions for not breaking attribute assumptions. The main idea is that as soon all the instructions from all the functions of SCC Node conform to attribute assumptions then we are free to infer the attribute as set for all the functions of SCC Node. It handles two distinct cases of attributes: - those that might break due to derefinement of the function code for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference only if all the functions are "exact definitions". Example - NoUnwind. - those that do not care about derefinement for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference as soon as we see any function definition. Example - removal of Convergent attribute. Also in this commit: * Converted all the FunctionAttrs tests to use FileCheck and added new-PM invocations to them * FunctionAttrs/convergent.ll test demonstrates a difference in behavior between new and old PM implementations. Marked with FIXME. * PruneEH tests were converted to new-PM as well, using function-attrs+simplify-cfg combo as intended * some of "other" tests were updated since function-attrs now infers 'nounwind' even for old PM pipeline * -disable-nounwind-inference hidden option added as a possible workaround for a supposedly rare case when nounwind being inferred by default presents a problem Reviewers: chandlerc, jlebar Reviewed By: jlebar Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44415 llvm-svn: 328377
2018-03-24 05:46:16 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: declare void @readnone()
[PM] Introduce a devirtualization iteration layer for the new PM. This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the cost. The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility. The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds. This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible. This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114 llvm-svn: 290665
2016-12-28 19:07:33 +08:00
declare void @unknown()
; CHECK-NOT: Function Attrs
[PM][FunctionAttrs] add NoUnwind attribute inference to PostOrderFunctionAttrs pass Summary: This was motivated by absence of PrunEH functionality in new PM. It was decided that a proper way to do PruneEH is to add NoUnwind inference into PostOrderFunctionAttrs and then perform normal SimplifyCFG on top. This change generalizes attribute handling implemented for (a removal of) Convergent attribute, by introducing a generic builder-like class AttributeInferer It registers all the attribute inference requests, storing per-attribute predicates into a vector, and then goes through an SCC Node, scanning all the instructions for not breaking attribute assumptions. The main idea is that as soon all the instructions from all the functions of SCC Node conform to attribute assumptions then we are free to infer the attribute as set for all the functions of SCC Node. It handles two distinct cases of attributes: - those that might break due to derefinement of the function code for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference only if all the functions are "exact definitions". Example - NoUnwind. - those that do not care about derefinement for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference as soon as we see any function definition. Example - removal of Convergent attribute. Also in this commit: * Converted all the FunctionAttrs tests to use FileCheck and added new-PM invocations to them * FunctionAttrs/convergent.ll test demonstrates a difference in behavior between new and old PM implementations. Marked with FIXME. * PruneEH tests were converted to new-PM as well, using function-attrs+simplify-cfg combo as intended * some of "other" tests were updated since function-attrs now infers 'nounwind' even for old PM pipeline * -disable-nounwind-inference hidden option added as a possible workaround for a supposedly rare case when nounwind being inferred by default presents a problem Reviewers: chandlerc, jlebar Reviewed By: jlebar Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44415 llvm-svn: 328377
2018-03-24 05:46:16 +08:00
; CHECK-LABEL: declare void @unknown(){{ *$}}
[PM] Introduce a devirtualization iteration layer for the new PM. This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the cost. The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility. The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds. This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible. This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114 llvm-svn: 290665
2016-12-28 19:07:33 +08:00
; The @test1 function checks that when we refine an indirect call to a direct
; call we revisit the SCC passes to reflect the more precise information. This
; is the basic functionality.
define void @test1() {
; BEFORE-NOT: Function Attrs
; AFTER: Function Attrs: readnone
[PM][FunctionAttrs] add NoUnwind attribute inference to PostOrderFunctionAttrs pass Summary: This was motivated by absence of PrunEH functionality in new PM. It was decided that a proper way to do PruneEH is to add NoUnwind inference into PostOrderFunctionAttrs and then perform normal SimplifyCFG on top. This change generalizes attribute handling implemented for (a removal of) Convergent attribute, by introducing a generic builder-like class AttributeInferer It registers all the attribute inference requests, storing per-attribute predicates into a vector, and then goes through an SCC Node, scanning all the instructions for not breaking attribute assumptions. The main idea is that as soon all the instructions from all the functions of SCC Node conform to attribute assumptions then we are free to infer the attribute as set for all the functions of SCC Node. It handles two distinct cases of attributes: - those that might break due to derefinement of the function code for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference only if all the functions are "exact definitions". Example - NoUnwind. - those that do not care about derefinement for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference as soon as we see any function definition. Example - removal of Convergent attribute. Also in this commit: * Converted all the FunctionAttrs tests to use FileCheck and added new-PM invocations to them * FunctionAttrs/convergent.ll test demonstrates a difference in behavior between new and old PM implementations. Marked with FIXME. * PruneEH tests were converted to new-PM as well, using function-attrs+simplify-cfg combo as intended * some of "other" tests were updated since function-attrs now infers 'nounwind' even for old PM pipeline * -disable-nounwind-inference hidden option added as a possible workaround for a supposedly rare case when nounwind being inferred by default presents a problem Reviewers: chandlerc, jlebar Reviewed By: jlebar Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44415 llvm-svn: 328377
2018-03-24 05:46:16 +08:00
; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test1()
[PM] Introduce a devirtualization iteration layer for the new PM. This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the cost. The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility. The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds. This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible. This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114 llvm-svn: 290665
2016-12-28 19:07:33 +08:00
entry:
%fptr = alloca void ()*
store void ()* @readnone, void ()** %fptr
%f = load void ()*, void ()** %fptr
call void %f()
ret void
}
; The @test2_* functions check that when we need multiple (in this case 2)
; repetitions to compute some state that is incrementally exposed with each
; one, the limit on repetitions is enforced. So we make progress with
; one repetition but not as much as with three.
;
; This is somewhat awkward to test because we have to contrive to have a state
; repetition triggered and observed with very few passes. The technique here
; is to have one indirect call that can only be resolved when the entire SCC is
; deduced as readonly, and mark that indirect call at the call site as readonly
; to make that possible. This forces us to first deduce readonly, then
; devirtualize again, and then deduce readnone.
declare void @readnone_with_arg(void ()**) readnone
; CHECK: Function Attrs: readnone
[PM][FunctionAttrs] add NoUnwind attribute inference to PostOrderFunctionAttrs pass Summary: This was motivated by absence of PrunEH functionality in new PM. It was decided that a proper way to do PruneEH is to add NoUnwind inference into PostOrderFunctionAttrs and then perform normal SimplifyCFG on top. This change generalizes attribute handling implemented for (a removal of) Convergent attribute, by introducing a generic builder-like class AttributeInferer It registers all the attribute inference requests, storing per-attribute predicates into a vector, and then goes through an SCC Node, scanning all the instructions for not breaking attribute assumptions. The main idea is that as soon all the instructions from all the functions of SCC Node conform to attribute assumptions then we are free to infer the attribute as set for all the functions of SCC Node. It handles two distinct cases of attributes: - those that might break due to derefinement of the function code for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference only if all the functions are "exact definitions". Example - NoUnwind. - those that do not care about derefinement for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference as soon as we see any function definition. Example - removal of Convergent attribute. Also in this commit: * Converted all the FunctionAttrs tests to use FileCheck and added new-PM invocations to them * FunctionAttrs/convergent.ll test demonstrates a difference in behavior between new and old PM implementations. Marked with FIXME. * PruneEH tests were converted to new-PM as well, using function-attrs+simplify-cfg combo as intended * some of "other" tests were updated since function-attrs now infers 'nounwind' even for old PM pipeline * -disable-nounwind-inference hidden option added as a possible workaround for a supposedly rare case when nounwind being inferred by default presents a problem Reviewers: chandlerc, jlebar Reviewed By: jlebar Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44415 llvm-svn: 328377
2018-03-24 05:46:16 +08:00
; CHECK-LABEL: declare void @readnone_with_arg(void ()**)
[PM] Introduce a devirtualization iteration layer for the new PM. This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the cost. The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility. The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds. This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible. This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114 llvm-svn: 290665
2016-12-28 19:07:33 +08:00
define void @test2_a(void ()** %ignore) {
; BEFORE-NOT: Function Attrs
; AFTER1: Function Attrs: readonly
; AFTER2: Function Attrs: readnone
; BEFORE: define void @test2_a(void ()** %ignore)
; AFTER: define void @test2_a(void ()** readnone %ignore)
entry:
%f1ptr = alloca void (void ()**)*
store void (void ()**)* @readnone_with_arg, void (void ()**)** %f1ptr
%f1 = load void (void ()**)*, void (void ()**)** %f1ptr
; This indirect call is the first to be resolved, allowing us to deduce
; readonly but not (yet) readnone.
call void %f1(void ()** %ignore)
; CHECK: call void @readnone_with_arg(void ()** %ignore)
; Bogus call to test2_b to make this a cycle.
call void @test2_b()
ret void
}
define void @test2_b() {
; BEFORE-NOT: Function Attrs
; AFTER1: Function Attrs: readonly
; AFTER2: Function Attrs: readnone
[PM][FunctionAttrs] add NoUnwind attribute inference to PostOrderFunctionAttrs pass Summary: This was motivated by absence of PrunEH functionality in new PM. It was decided that a proper way to do PruneEH is to add NoUnwind inference into PostOrderFunctionAttrs and then perform normal SimplifyCFG on top. This change generalizes attribute handling implemented for (a removal of) Convergent attribute, by introducing a generic builder-like class AttributeInferer It registers all the attribute inference requests, storing per-attribute predicates into a vector, and then goes through an SCC Node, scanning all the instructions for not breaking attribute assumptions. The main idea is that as soon all the instructions from all the functions of SCC Node conform to attribute assumptions then we are free to infer the attribute as set for all the functions of SCC Node. It handles two distinct cases of attributes: - those that might break due to derefinement of the function code for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference only if all the functions are "exact definitions". Example - NoUnwind. - those that do not care about derefinement for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference as soon as we see any function definition. Example - removal of Convergent attribute. Also in this commit: * Converted all the FunctionAttrs tests to use FileCheck and added new-PM invocations to them * FunctionAttrs/convergent.ll test demonstrates a difference in behavior between new and old PM implementations. Marked with FIXME. * PruneEH tests were converted to new-PM as well, using function-attrs+simplify-cfg combo as intended * some of "other" tests were updated since function-attrs now infers 'nounwind' even for old PM pipeline * -disable-nounwind-inference hidden option added as a possible workaround for a supposedly rare case when nounwind being inferred by default presents a problem Reviewers: chandlerc, jlebar Reviewed By: jlebar Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44415 llvm-svn: 328377
2018-03-24 05:46:16 +08:00
; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test2_b()
[PM] Introduce a devirtualization iteration layer for the new PM. This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the cost. The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility. The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds. This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible. This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114 llvm-svn: 290665
2016-12-28 19:07:33 +08:00
entry:
%f2ptr = alloca void ()*
store void ()* @readnone, void ()** %f2ptr
; Call the other function here to prevent forwarding until the SCC has had
; function attrs deduced.
call void @test2_a(void ()** %f2ptr)
%f2 = load void ()*, void ()** %f2ptr
; This is the second indirect call to be resolved, and can only be resolved
; after we deduce 'readonly' for the rest of the SCC. Once it is
; devirtualized, we can deduce readnone for the SCC.
call void %f2() readonly
; BEFORE: call void %f2()
; AFTER: call void @readnone()
ret void
}
declare i8* @memcpy(i8*, i8*, i64)
[PM][FunctionAttrs] add NoUnwind attribute inference to PostOrderFunctionAttrs pass Summary: This was motivated by absence of PrunEH functionality in new PM. It was decided that a proper way to do PruneEH is to add NoUnwind inference into PostOrderFunctionAttrs and then perform normal SimplifyCFG on top. This change generalizes attribute handling implemented for (a removal of) Convergent attribute, by introducing a generic builder-like class AttributeInferer It registers all the attribute inference requests, storing per-attribute predicates into a vector, and then goes through an SCC Node, scanning all the instructions for not breaking attribute assumptions. The main idea is that as soon all the instructions from all the functions of SCC Node conform to attribute assumptions then we are free to infer the attribute as set for all the functions of SCC Node. It handles two distinct cases of attributes: - those that might break due to derefinement of the function code for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference only if all the functions are "exact definitions". Example - NoUnwind. - those that do not care about derefinement for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference as soon as we see any function definition. Example - removal of Convergent attribute. Also in this commit: * Converted all the FunctionAttrs tests to use FileCheck and added new-PM invocations to them * FunctionAttrs/convergent.ll test demonstrates a difference in behavior between new and old PM implementations. Marked with FIXME. * PruneEH tests were converted to new-PM as well, using function-attrs+simplify-cfg combo as intended * some of "other" tests were updated since function-attrs now infers 'nounwind' even for old PM pipeline * -disable-nounwind-inference hidden option added as a possible workaround for a supposedly rare case when nounwind being inferred by default presents a problem Reviewers: chandlerc, jlebar Reviewed By: jlebar Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44415 llvm-svn: 328377
2018-03-24 05:46:16 +08:00
; CHECK-LABEL: declare i8* @memcpy(
[PM] Introduce a devirtualization iteration layer for the new PM. This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the cost. The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility. The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds. This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible. This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114 llvm-svn: 290665
2016-12-28 19:07:33 +08:00
; The @test3 function checks that when we refine an indirect call to an
; intrinsic we still revisit the SCC pass. This also covers cases where the
; value handle itself doesn't persist due to the nature of how instcombine
; creates the memcpy intrinsic call, and we rely on the count of indirect calls
; decreasing and the count of direct calls increasing.
[PM][FunctionAttrs] add NoUnwind attribute inference to PostOrderFunctionAttrs pass Summary: This was motivated by absence of PrunEH functionality in new PM. It was decided that a proper way to do PruneEH is to add NoUnwind inference into PostOrderFunctionAttrs and then perform normal SimplifyCFG on top. This change generalizes attribute handling implemented for (a removal of) Convergent attribute, by introducing a generic builder-like class AttributeInferer It registers all the attribute inference requests, storing per-attribute predicates into a vector, and then goes through an SCC Node, scanning all the instructions for not breaking attribute assumptions. The main idea is that as soon all the instructions from all the functions of SCC Node conform to attribute assumptions then we are free to infer the attribute as set for all the functions of SCC Node. It handles two distinct cases of attributes: - those that might break due to derefinement of the function code for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference only if all the functions are "exact definitions". Example - NoUnwind. - those that do not care about derefinement for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference as soon as we see any function definition. Example - removal of Convergent attribute. Also in this commit: * Converted all the FunctionAttrs tests to use FileCheck and added new-PM invocations to them * FunctionAttrs/convergent.ll test demonstrates a difference in behavior between new and old PM implementations. Marked with FIXME. * PruneEH tests were converted to new-PM as well, using function-attrs+simplify-cfg combo as intended * some of "other" tests were updated since function-attrs now infers 'nounwind' even for old PM pipeline * -disable-nounwind-inference hidden option added as a possible workaround for a supposedly rare case when nounwind being inferred by default presents a problem Reviewers: chandlerc, jlebar Reviewed By: jlebar Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44415 llvm-svn: 328377
2018-03-24 05:46:16 +08:00
; Adding 'noinline' attribute to force attributes for improved matching.
define void @test3(i8* %src, i8* %dest, i64 %size) noinline {
; CHECK: Function Attrs
; CHECK-NOT: read
; CHECK-SAME: noinline
; BEFORE-LABEL: define void @test3(i8* %src, i8* %dest, i64 %size)
; AFTER-LABEL: define void @test3(i8* nocapture readonly %src, i8* nocapture %dest, i64 %size)
[PM] Introduce a devirtualization iteration layer for the new PM. This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the cost. The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility. The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds. This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible. This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114 llvm-svn: 290665
2016-12-28 19:07:33 +08:00
%fptr = alloca i8* (i8*, i8*, i64)*
store i8* (i8*, i8*, i64)* @memcpy, i8* (i8*, i8*, i64)** %fptr
%f = load i8* (i8*, i8*, i64)*, i8* (i8*, i8*, i64)** %fptr
call i8* %f(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i64 %size)
; CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy
ret void
}
[PM] Add devirtualization-based iteration utility into the new PM's default pipeline. A clang with this patch built with ASan and asserts can build all of the test-suite as well, so it seems to not uncover any latent problems. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29853 llvm-svn: 294888
2017-02-12 13:38:04 +08:00
; A boring function that just keeps our declarations around.
define void @keep(i8** %sink) {
; CHECK-NOT: Function Attrs
[PM][FunctionAttrs] add NoUnwind attribute inference to PostOrderFunctionAttrs pass Summary: This was motivated by absence of PrunEH functionality in new PM. It was decided that a proper way to do PruneEH is to add NoUnwind inference into PostOrderFunctionAttrs and then perform normal SimplifyCFG on top. This change generalizes attribute handling implemented for (a removal of) Convergent attribute, by introducing a generic builder-like class AttributeInferer It registers all the attribute inference requests, storing per-attribute predicates into a vector, and then goes through an SCC Node, scanning all the instructions for not breaking attribute assumptions. The main idea is that as soon all the instructions from all the functions of SCC Node conform to attribute assumptions then we are free to infer the attribute as set for all the functions of SCC Node. It handles two distinct cases of attributes: - those that might break due to derefinement of the function code for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference only if all the functions are "exact definitions". Example - NoUnwind. - those that do not care about derefinement for these attributes we are allowed to apply inference as soon as we see any function definition. Example - removal of Convergent attribute. Also in this commit: * Converted all the FunctionAttrs tests to use FileCheck and added new-PM invocations to them * FunctionAttrs/convergent.ll test demonstrates a difference in behavior between new and old PM implementations. Marked with FIXME. * PruneEH tests were converted to new-PM as well, using function-attrs+simplify-cfg combo as intended * some of "other" tests were updated since function-attrs now infers 'nounwind' even for old PM pipeline * -disable-nounwind-inference hidden option added as a possible workaround for a supposedly rare case when nounwind being inferred by default presents a problem Reviewers: chandlerc, jlebar Reviewed By: jlebar Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44415 llvm-svn: 328377
2018-03-24 05:46:16 +08:00
; CHECK-LABEL: define void @keep(
[PM] Add devirtualization-based iteration utility into the new PM's default pipeline. A clang with this patch built with ASan and asserts can build all of the test-suite as well, so it seems to not uncover any latent problems. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29853 llvm-svn: 294888
2017-02-12 13:38:04 +08:00
entry:
store volatile i8* bitcast (void ()* @readnone to i8*), i8** %sink
store volatile i8* bitcast (void ()* @unknown to i8*), i8** %sink
store volatile i8* bitcast (i8* (i8*, i8*, i64)* @memcpy to i8*), i8** %sink
call void @unknown()
ret void
}