llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64LegalizerInfo.cpp

689 lines
26 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- AArch64LegalizerInfo.cpp ----------------------------------*- C++ -*-==//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// \file
/// This file implements the targeting of the Machinelegalizer class for
/// AArch64.
/// \todo This should be generated by TableGen.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "AArch64LegalizerInfo.h"
#include "AArch64Subtarget.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/MachineIRBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetOpcodes.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/ValueTypes.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Type.h"
#define DEBUG_TYPE "aarch64-legalinfo"
using namespace llvm;
using namespace LegalizeActions;
using namespace LegalizeMutations;
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
using namespace LegalityPredicates;
[GlobalISel] Enable legalizing non-power-of-2 sized types. This changes the interface of how targets describe how to legalize, see the below description. 1. Interface for targets to describe how to legalize. In GlobalISel, the API in the LegalizerInfo class is the main interface for targets to specify which types are legal for which operations, and what to do to turn illegal type/operation combinations into legal ones. For each operation the type sizes that can be legalized without having to change the size of the type are specified with a call to setAction. This isn't different to how GlobalISel worked before. For example, for a target that supports 32 and 64 bit adds natively: for (auto Ty : {s32, s64}) setAction({G_ADD, 0, s32}, Legal); or for a target that needs a library call for a 32 bit division: setAction({G_SDIV, s32}, Libcall); The main conceptual change to the LegalizerInfo API, is in specifying how to legalize the type sizes for which a change of size is needed. For example, in the above example, how to specify how all types from i1 to i8388607 (apart from s32 and s64 which are legal) need to be legalized and expressed in terms of operations on the available legal sizes (again, i32 and i64 in this case). Before, the implementation only allowed specifying power-of-2-sized types (e.g. setAction({G_ADD, 0, s128}, NarrowScalar). A worse limitation was that if you'd wanted to specify how to legalize all the sized types as allowed by the LLVM-IR LangRef, i1 to i8388607, you'd have to call setAction 8388607-3 times and probably would need a lot of memory to store all of these specifications. Instead, the legalization actions that need to change the size of the type are specified now using a "SizeChangeStrategy". For example: setLegalizeScalarToDifferentSizeStrategy( G_ADD, 0, widenToLargerAndNarrowToLargest); This example indicates that for type sizes for which there is a larger size that can be legalized towards, do it by Widening the size. For example, G_ADD on s17 will be legalized by first doing WidenScalar to make it s32, after which it's legal. The "NarrowToLargest" indicates what to do if there is no larger size that can be legalized towards. E.g. G_ADD on s92 will be legalized by doing NarrowScalar to s64. Another example, taken from the ARM backend is: for (unsigned Op : {G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) { setLegalizeScalarToDifferentSizeStrategy(Op, 0, widenToLargerTypesUnsupportedOtherwise); if (ST.hasDivideInARMMode()) setAction({Op, s32}, Legal); else setAction({Op, s32}, Libcall); } For this example, G_SDIV on s8, on a target without a divide instruction, would be legalized by first doing action (WidenScalar, s32), followed by (Libcall, s32). The same principle is also followed for when the number of vector lanes on vector data types need to be changed, e.g.: setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(8, 8)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal); setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(16, 8)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal); setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(4, 16)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal); setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(8, 16)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal); setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(2, 32)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal); setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(4, 32)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal); setLegalizeVectorElementToDifferentSizeStrategy( G_ADD, 0, widenToLargerTypesUnsupportedOtherwise); As currently implemented here, vector types are legalized by first making the vector element size legal, followed by then making the number of lanes legal. The strategy to follow in the first step is set by a call to setLegalizeVectorElementToDifferentSizeStrategy, see example above. The strategy followed in the second step "moreToWiderTypesAndLessToWidest" (see code for its definition), indicating that vectors are widened to more elements so they map to natively supported vector widths, or when there isn't a legal wider vector, split the vector to map it to the widest vector supported. Therefore, for the above specification, some example legalizations are: * getAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(3, 3)}) returns {WidenScalar, LLT::vector(3, 8)} * getAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(3, 8)}) then returns {MoreElements, LLT::vector(8, 8)} * getAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(20, 8)}) returns {FewerElements, LLT::vector(16, 8)} 2. Key implementation aspects. How to legalize a specific (operation, type index, size) tuple is represented by mapping intervals of integers representing a range of size types to an action to take, e.g.: setScalarAction({G_ADD, LLT:scalar(1)}, {{1, WidenScalar}, // bit sizes [ 1, 31[ {32, Legal}, // bit sizes [32, 33[ {33, WidenScalar}, // bit sizes [33, 64[ {64, Legal}, // bit sizes [64, 65[ {65, NarrowScalar} // bit sizes [65, +inf[ }); Please note that most of the code to do the actual lowering of non-power-of-2 sized types is currently missing, this is just trying to make it possible for targets to specify what is legal, and how non-legal types should be legalized. Probably quite a bit of further work is needed in the actual legalizing and the other passes in GlobalISel to support non-power-of-2 sized types. I hope the documentation in LegalizerInfo.h and the examples provided in the various {Target}LegalizerInfo.cpp and LegalizerInfoTest.cpp explains well enough how this is meant to be used. This drops the need for LLT::{half,double}...Size(). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30529 llvm-svn: 317560
2017-11-07 18:34:34 +08:00
AArch64LegalizerInfo::AArch64LegalizerInfo(const AArch64Subtarget &ST) {
using namespace TargetOpcode;
const LLT p0 = LLT::pointer(0, 64);
const LLT s1 = LLT::scalar(1);
const LLT s8 = LLT::scalar(8);
const LLT s16 = LLT::scalar(16);
const LLT s32 = LLT::scalar(32);
const LLT s64 = LLT::scalar(64);
const LLT s128 = LLT::scalar(128);
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
const LLT s256 = LLT::scalar(256);
const LLT s512 = LLT::scalar(512);
const LLT v16s8 = LLT::vector(16, 8);
const LLT v8s8 = LLT::vector(8, 8);
const LLT v4s8 = LLT::vector(4, 8);
const LLT v8s16 = LLT::vector(8, 16);
const LLT v4s16 = LLT::vector(4, 16);
const LLT v2s16 = LLT::vector(2, 16);
const LLT v2s32 = LLT::vector(2, 32);
const LLT v4s32 = LLT::vector(4, 32);
const LLT v2s64 = LLT::vector(2, 64);
const LLT v2p0 = LLT::vector(2, p0);
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_IMPLICIT_DEF)
.legalFor({p0, s1, s8, s16, s32, s64, v4s32, v2s64})
.clampScalar(0, s1, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0, 8)
.fewerElementsIf(
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[0].isVector() &&
(Query.Types[0].getElementType() != s64 ||
Query.Types[0].getNumElements() != 2);
},
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
LLT EltTy = Query.Types[0].getElementType();
if (EltTy == s64)
return std::make_pair(0, LLT::vector(2, 64));
return std::make_pair(0, EltTy);
});
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_PHI)
.legalFor({p0, s16, s32, s64, v2s32, v4s32, v2s64})
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.clampScalar(0, s16, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0);
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_BSWAP)
.legalFor({s32, s64, v4s32, v2s32, v2s64})
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.clampScalar(0, s16, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_ADD, G_SUB, G_MUL, G_AND, G_OR, G_XOR})
.legalFor({s32, s64, v2s32, v4s32, v2s64, v8s16, v16s8})
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0)
.clampNumElements(0, v2s32, v4s32)
.clampNumElements(0, v2s64, v2s64)
.moreElementsToNextPow2(0);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_SHL)
.legalFor({{s32, s32}, {s64, s64},
{v2s32, v2s32}, {v4s32, v4s32}, {v2s64, v2s64}})
.clampScalar(1, s32, s64)
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0)
.clampNumElements(0, v2s32, v4s32)
.clampNumElements(0, v2s64, v2s64)
.moreElementsToNextPow2(0)
.minScalarSameAs(1, 0);
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_GEP)
.legalFor({{p0, s64}})
.clampScalar(1, s64, s64);
[AArch64][GlobalISel] Legalize narrow scalar ops again. Since r279760, we've been marking as legal operations on narrow integer types that have wider legal equivalents (for instance, G_ADD s8). Compared to legalizing these operations, this reduced the amount of extends/truncates required, but was always a weird legalization decision made at selection time. So far, we haven't been able to formalize it in a way that permits the selector generated from SelectionDAG patterns to be sufficient. Using a wide instruction (say, s64), when a narrower instruction exists (s32) would introduce register class incompatibilities (when one narrow generic instruction is selected to the wider variant, but another is selected to the narrower variant). It's also impractical to limit which narrow operations are matched for which instruction, as restricting "narrow selection" to ranges of types clashes with potentially incompatible instruction predicates. Concerns were also raised regarding MIPS64's sign-extended register assumptions, as well as wrapping behavior. See discussions in https://reviews.llvm.org/D26878. Instead, legalize the operations. Should we ever revert to selecting these narrow operations, we should try to represent this more accurately: for instance, by separating a "concrete" type on operations, and an "underlying" type on vregs, we could move the "this narrow-looking op is really legal" decision to the legalizer, and let the selector use the "underlying" vreg type only, which would be guaranteed to map to a register class. In any case, we eventually should mitigate: - the performance impact by selecting no-op extract/truncates to COPYs (which we currently do), and the COPYs to register reuses (which we don't do yet). - the compile-time impact by optimizing away extract/truncate sequences in the legalizer. llvm-svn: 292827
2017-01-24 05:10:05 +08:00
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_PTR_MASK).legalFor({p0});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_SDIV, G_UDIV})
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.legalFor({s32, s64})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0)
.scalarize(0);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_LSHR, G_ASHR})
.legalFor({{s32, s32}, {s64, s64}, {v2s32, v2s32}, {v4s32, v4s32}})
.clampScalar(1, s32, s64)
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.minScalarSameAs(1, 0);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_SREM, G_UREM})
.lowerFor({s1, s8, s16, s32, s64});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_SMULO, G_UMULO})
.lowerFor({{s64, s1}});
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_SMULH, G_UMULH}).legalFor({s32, s64});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_UADDE, G_USUBE, G_SADDO, G_SSUBO, G_UADDO})
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s64, s1}});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_FADD, G_FSUB, G_FMUL, G_FDIV, G_FNEG})
.legalFor({s32, s64, v2s64, v4s32, v2s32});
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_FREM).libcallFor({s32, s64});
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_FCEIL, G_FABS, G_FSQRT, G_FFLOOR, G_FRINT,
G_FMA, G_INTRINSIC_TRUNC, G_INTRINSIC_ROUND,
G_FNEARBYINT})
// If we don't have full FP16 support, then scalarize the elements of
// vectors containing fp16 types.
.fewerElementsIf(
[=, &ST](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const auto &Ty = Query.Types[0];
return Ty.isVector() && Ty.getElementType() == s16 &&
!ST.hasFullFP16();
},
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { return std::make_pair(0, s16); })
// If we don't have full FP16 support, then widen s16 to s32 if we
// encounter it.
.widenScalarIf(
[=, &ST](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[0] == s16 && !ST.hasFullFP16();
},
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { return std::make_pair(0, s32); })
.legalFor({s16, s32, s64, v2s32, v4s32, v2s64, v2s16, v4s16, v8s16});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(
{G_FCOS, G_FSIN, G_FLOG10, G_FLOG, G_FLOG2, G_FEXP, G_FEXP2, G_FPOW})
// We need a call for these, so we always need to scalarize.
.scalarize(0)
// Regardless of FP16 support, widen 16-bit elements to 32-bits.
.minScalar(0, s32)
.libcallFor({s32, s64, v2s32, v4s32, v2s64});
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_INSERT)
.unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits();
})
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0];
const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1];
if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0)
return false;
return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) &&
(Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8);
})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0)
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16)
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(1);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_EXTRACT)
.unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() >= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits();
})
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0];
const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1];
if (Ty1 != s32 && Ty1 != s64)
return false;
if (Ty1 == p0)
return true;
return isPowerOf2_32(Ty0.getSizeInBits()) &&
(Ty0.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty0.getSizeInBits() >= 8);
})
.clampScalar(1, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(1)
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(1, {s32}), 0, s16)
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(1, {s64}), 0, s32)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0);
[globalisel][legalizerinfo] Introduce dedicated extending loads and add lowerings for them Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch begins changing the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. This patch introduces the new generic instructions and new variation on G_LOAD and adds lowering for them to convert back to the existing representations. Depends on D45466 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, aemerson, javed.absar Reviewed By: aemerson Subscribers: aemerson, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45540 llvm-svn: 331115
2018-04-29 02:14:50 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_SEXTLOAD, G_ZEXTLOAD})
.legalForTypesWithMemDesc({{s32, p0, 8, 8},
{s32, p0, 16, 8},
{s32, p0, 32, 8},
{s64, p0, 64, 8},
{p0, p0, 64, 8},
{v2s32, p0, 64, 8}})
[globalisel] Update GlobalISel emitter to match new representation of extending loads Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch changes the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. Each extending load can be lowered by the legalizer into separate extends and loads, however a target that supports s1 will need the any-extending load to extend to at least s8 since LLVM does not represent memory accesses smaller than 8 bit. The legalizer can widenScalar G_LOAD into an any-extending load but sign/zero-extending loads need help from something else like a combiner pass. A follow-up patch that adds combiner helpers for for this will follow. The new representation requires that the MMO correctly reflect the memory access so this has been corrected in a couple tests. I've also moved the extending loads to their own tests since they are (mostly) separate opcodes now. Additionally, the re-write appears to have invalidated two tests from select-with-no-legality-check.mir since the matcher table no longer contains loads that result in s1's and they aren't legal in AArch64 anymore. Depends on D45540 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar Reviewed By: rtereshin Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45541 llvm-svn: 331601
2018-05-06 04:53:24 +08:00
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0)
// TODO: We could support sum-of-pow2's but the lowering code doesn't know
// how to do that yet.
.unsupportedIfMemSizeNotPow2()
// Lower anything left over into G_*EXT and G_LOAD
[globalisel][legalizerinfo] Introduce dedicated extending loads and add lowerings for them Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch begins changing the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. This patch introduces the new generic instructions and new variation on G_LOAD and adds lowering for them to convert back to the existing representations. Depends on D45466 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, aemerson, javed.absar Reviewed By: aemerson Subscribers: aemerson, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45540 llvm-svn: 331115
2018-04-29 02:14:50 +08:00
.lower();
auto IsPtrVecPred = [=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &ValTy = Query.Types[0];
if (!ValTy.isVector())
return false;
const LLT EltTy = ValTy.getElementType();
return EltTy.isPointer() && EltTy.getAddressSpace() == 0;
};
[globalisel] Update GlobalISel emitter to match new representation of extending loads Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch changes the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. Each extending load can be lowered by the legalizer into separate extends and loads, however a target that supports s1 will need the any-extending load to extend to at least s8 since LLVM does not represent memory accesses smaller than 8 bit. The legalizer can widenScalar G_LOAD into an any-extending load but sign/zero-extending loads need help from something else like a combiner pass. A follow-up patch that adds combiner helpers for for this will follow. The new representation requires that the MMO correctly reflect the memory access so this has been corrected in a couple tests. I've also moved the extending loads to their own tests since they are (mostly) separate opcodes now. Additionally, the re-write appears to have invalidated two tests from select-with-no-legality-check.mir since the matcher table no longer contains loads that result in s1's and they aren't legal in AArch64 anymore. Depends on D45540 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar Reviewed By: rtereshin Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45541 llvm-svn: 331601
2018-05-06 04:53:24 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_LOAD)
.legalForTypesWithMemDesc({{s8, p0, 8, 8},
{s16, p0, 16, 8},
{s32, p0, 32, 8},
{s64, p0, 64, 8},
{p0, p0, 64, 8},
{v8s8, p0, 64, 8},
{v16s8, p0, 128, 8},
{v4s16, p0, 64, 8},
{v8s16, p0, 128, 8},
{v2s32, p0, 64, 8},
{v4s32, p0, 128, 8},
{v2s64, p0, 128, 8}})
[globalisel] Update GlobalISel emitter to match new representation of extending loads Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch changes the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. Each extending load can be lowered by the legalizer into separate extends and loads, however a target that supports s1 will need the any-extending load to extend to at least s8 since LLVM does not represent memory accesses smaller than 8 bit. The legalizer can widenScalar G_LOAD into an any-extending load but sign/zero-extending loads need help from something else like a combiner pass. A follow-up patch that adds combiner helpers for for this will follow. The new representation requires that the MMO correctly reflect the memory access so this has been corrected in a couple tests. I've also moved the extending loads to their own tests since they are (mostly) separate opcodes now. Additionally, the re-write appears to have invalidated two tests from select-with-no-legality-check.mir since the matcher table no longer contains loads that result in s1's and they aren't legal in AArch64 anymore. Depends on D45540 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar Reviewed By: rtereshin Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45541 llvm-svn: 331601
2018-05-06 04:53:24 +08:00
// These extends are also legal
.legalForTypesWithMemDesc({{s32, p0, 8, 8},
{s32, p0, 16, 8}})
[globalisel] Update GlobalISel emitter to match new representation of extending loads Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch changes the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. Each extending load can be lowered by the legalizer into separate extends and loads, however a target that supports s1 will need the any-extending load to extend to at least s8 since LLVM does not represent memory accesses smaller than 8 bit. The legalizer can widenScalar G_LOAD into an any-extending load but sign/zero-extending loads need help from something else like a combiner pass. A follow-up patch that adds combiner helpers for for this will follow. The new representation requires that the MMO correctly reflect the memory access so this has been corrected in a couple tests. I've also moved the extending loads to their own tests since they are (mostly) separate opcodes now. Additionally, the re-write appears to have invalidated two tests from select-with-no-legality-check.mir since the matcher table no longer contains loads that result in s1's and they aren't legal in AArch64 anymore. Depends on D45540 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar Reviewed By: rtereshin Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45541 llvm-svn: 331601
2018-05-06 04:53:24 +08:00
.clampScalar(0, s8, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0)
// TODO: We could support sum-of-pow2's but the lowering code doesn't know
// how to do that yet.
.unsupportedIfMemSizeNotPow2()
[globalisel] Update GlobalISel emitter to match new representation of extending loads Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch changes the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. Each extending load can be lowered by the legalizer into separate extends and loads, however a target that supports s1 will need the any-extending load to extend to at least s8 since LLVM does not represent memory accesses smaller than 8 bit. The legalizer can widenScalar G_LOAD into an any-extending load but sign/zero-extending loads need help from something else like a combiner pass. A follow-up patch that adds combiner helpers for for this will follow. The new representation requires that the MMO correctly reflect the memory access so this has been corrected in a couple tests. I've also moved the extending loads to their own tests since they are (mostly) separate opcodes now. Additionally, the re-write appears to have invalidated two tests from select-with-no-legality-check.mir since the matcher table no longer contains loads that result in s1's and they aren't legal in AArch64 anymore. Depends on D45540 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar Reviewed By: rtereshin Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45541 llvm-svn: 331601
2018-05-06 04:53:24 +08:00
// Lower any any-extending loads left into G_ANYEXT and G_LOAD
.lowerIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() != Query.MMODescrs[0].SizeInBits;
[globalisel] Update GlobalISel emitter to match new representation of extending loads Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch changes the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. Each extending load can be lowered by the legalizer into separate extends and loads, however a target that supports s1 will need the any-extending load to extend to at least s8 since LLVM does not represent memory accesses smaller than 8 bit. The legalizer can widenScalar G_LOAD into an any-extending load but sign/zero-extending loads need help from something else like a combiner pass. A follow-up patch that adds combiner helpers for for this will follow. The new representation requires that the MMO correctly reflect the memory access so this has been corrected in a couple tests. I've also moved the extending loads to their own tests since they are (mostly) separate opcodes now. Additionally, the re-write appears to have invalidated two tests from select-with-no-legality-check.mir since the matcher table no longer contains loads that result in s1's and they aren't legal in AArch64 anymore. Depends on D45540 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar Reviewed By: rtereshin Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45541 llvm-svn: 331601
2018-05-06 04:53:24 +08:00
})
.clampMaxNumElements(0, s32, 2)
.clampMaxNumElements(0, s64, 1)
.customIf(IsPtrVecPred);
[globalisel] Update GlobalISel emitter to match new representation of extending loads Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch changes the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. Each extending load can be lowered by the legalizer into separate extends and loads, however a target that supports s1 will need the any-extending load to extend to at least s8 since LLVM does not represent memory accesses smaller than 8 bit. The legalizer can widenScalar G_LOAD into an any-extending load but sign/zero-extending loads need help from something else like a combiner pass. A follow-up patch that adds combiner helpers for for this will follow. The new representation requires that the MMO correctly reflect the memory access so this has been corrected in a couple tests. I've also moved the extending loads to their own tests since they are (mostly) separate opcodes now. Additionally, the re-write appears to have invalidated two tests from select-with-no-legality-check.mir since the matcher table no longer contains loads that result in s1's and they aren't legal in AArch64 anymore. Depends on D45540 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar Reviewed By: rtereshin Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45541 llvm-svn: 331601
2018-05-06 04:53:24 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_STORE)
.legalForTypesWithMemDesc({{s8, p0, 8, 8},
{s16, p0, 16, 8},
{s32, p0, 32, 8},
{s64, p0, 64, 8},
{p0, p0, 64, 8},
{v16s8, p0, 128, 8},
{v4s16, p0, 64, 8},
{v8s16, p0, 128, 8},
{v2s32, p0, 64, 8},
{v4s32, p0, 128, 8},
{v2s64, p0, 128, 8}})
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.clampScalar(0, s8, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0)
// TODO: We could support sum-of-pow2's but the lowering code doesn't know
// how to do that yet.
.unsupportedIfMemSizeNotPow2()
[globalisel][legalizerinfo] Introduce dedicated extending loads and add lowerings for them Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch begins changing the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. This patch introduces the new generic instructions and new variation on G_LOAD and adds lowering for them to convert back to the existing representations. Depends on D45466 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, aemerson, javed.absar Reviewed By: aemerson Subscribers: aemerson, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45540 llvm-svn: 331115
2018-04-29 02:14:50 +08:00
.lowerIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[0].isScalar() &&
Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() != Query.MMODescrs[0].SizeInBits;
[globalisel][legalizerinfo] Introduce dedicated extending loads and add lowerings for them Summary: Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)). This had a few drawbacks: * G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if registers didn't naturally hold those sizes. * All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the extend went missing (e.g. by optimization). * At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were permitted. * The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern rewriting to translate patterns into this style. This patch begins changing the representation to: * (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x) * (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits() which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from SelectionDAG patterns. This patch introduces the new generic instructions and new variation on G_LOAD and adds lowering for them to convert back to the existing representations. Depends on D45466 Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, aemerson, javed.absar Reviewed By: aemerson Subscribers: aemerson, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45540 llvm-svn: 331115
2018-04-29 02:14:50 +08:00
})
.clampMaxNumElements(0, s32, 2)
.clampMaxNumElements(0, s64, 1)
.customIf(IsPtrVecPred);
// Constants
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_CONSTANT)
.legalFor({p0, s32, s64})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_FCONSTANT)
.legalFor({s32, s64})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_ICMP)
.legalFor({{s32, s32},
{s32, s64},
{s32, p0},
{v4s32, v4s32},
{v2s32, v2s32},
{v2s64, v2s64},
{v2s64, v2p0},
{v4s16, v4s16},
{v8s16, v8s16},
{v8s8, v8s8},
{v16s8, v16s8}})
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.clampScalar(0, s32, s32)
.clampScalar(1, s32, s64)
.minScalarEltSameAsIf(
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &Ty = Query.Types[0];
const LLT &SrcTy = Query.Types[1];
return Ty.isVector() && !SrcTy.getElementType().isPointer() &&
Ty.getElementType() != SrcTy.getElementType();
},
0, 1)
.minScalarOrEltIf(
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { return Query.Types[1] == v2s16; },
1, s32)
.minScalarOrEltIf(
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { return Query.Types[1] == v2p0; }, 0,
s64)
.widenScalarOrEltToNextPow2(1);
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_FCMP)
.legalFor({{s32, s32}, {s32, s64}})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s32)
.clampScalar(1, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(1);
// Extensions
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_ZEXT, G_SEXT, G_ANYEXT})
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
unsigned DstSize = Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits();
// Make sure that we have something that will fit in a register, and
// make sure it's a power of 2.
if (DstSize < 8 || DstSize > 128 || !isPowerOf2_32(DstSize))
return false;
const LLT &SrcTy = Query.Types[1];
// Special case for s1.
if (SrcTy == s1)
return true;
// Make sure we fit in a register otherwise. Don't bother checking that
// the source type is below 128 bits. We shouldn't be allowing anything
// through which is wider than the destination in the first place.
unsigned SrcSize = SrcTy.getSizeInBits();
if (SrcSize < 8 || !isPowerOf2_32(SrcSize))
return false;
return true;
});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_TRUNC).alwaysLegal();
// FP conversions
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_FPTRUNC).legalFor(
{{s16, s32}, {s16, s64}, {s32, s64}, {v4s16, v4s32}, {v2s32, v2s64}});
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_FPEXT).legalFor(
{{s32, s16}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}, {v4s32, v4s16}, {v2s64, v2s32}});
// Conversions
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_FPTOSI, G_FPTOUI})
.legalForCartesianProduct({s32, s64, v2s64, v4s32, v2s32})
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0)
.clampScalar(1, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(1);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_SITOFP, G_UITOFP})
.legalForCartesianProduct({s32, s64, v2s64, v4s32, v2s32})
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.clampScalar(1, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(1)
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0);
// Control-flow
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_BRCOND).legalFor({s1, s8, s16, s32});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_BRINDIRECT).legalFor({p0});
// Select
// FIXME: We can probably do a bit better than just scalarizing vector
// selects.
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_SELECT)
.legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s64, s1}, {p0, s1}})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0)
.scalarize(0);
// Pointer-handling
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_FRAME_INDEX).legalFor({p0});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_GLOBAL_VALUE).legalFor({p0});
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_PTRTOINT)
.legalForCartesianProduct({s1, s8, s16, s32, s64}, {p0})
.maxScalar(0, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0, /*Min*/ 8);
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_INTTOPTR)
.unsupportedIf([&](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() != Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits();
})
.legalFor({{p0, s64}});
// Casts for 32 and 64-bit width type are just copies.
// Same for 128-bit width type, except they are on the FPR bank.
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_BITCAST)
// FIXME: This is wrong since G_BITCAST is not allowed to change the
// number of bits but it's what the previous code described and fixing
// it breaks tests.
.legalForCartesianProduct({s1, s8, s16, s32, s64, s128, v16s8, v8s8, v4s8,
v8s16, v4s16, v2s16, v4s32, v2s32, v2s64,
v2p0});
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_VASTART).legalFor({p0});
// va_list must be a pointer, but most sized types are pretty easy to handle
// as the destination.
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_VAARG)
.customForCartesianProduct({s8, s16, s32, s64, p0}, {p0})
.clampScalar(0, s8, s64)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(0, /*Min*/ 8);
if (ST.hasLSE()) {
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_ATOMIC_CMPXCHG_WITH_SUCCESS)
.lowerIf(all(
typeInSet(0, {s8, s16, s32, s64}), typeIs(1, s1), typeIs(2, p0),
atomicOrderingAtLeastOrStrongerThan(0, AtomicOrdering::Monotonic)));
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(
{G_ATOMICRMW_XCHG, G_ATOMICRMW_ADD, G_ATOMICRMW_SUB, G_ATOMICRMW_AND,
G_ATOMICRMW_OR, G_ATOMICRMW_XOR, G_ATOMICRMW_MIN, G_ATOMICRMW_MAX,
G_ATOMICRMW_UMIN, G_ATOMICRMW_UMAX, G_ATOMIC_CMPXCHG})
.legalIf(all(
typeInSet(0, {s8, s16, s32, s64}), typeIs(1, p0),
atomicOrderingAtLeastOrStrongerThan(0, AtomicOrdering::Monotonic)));
}
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_BLOCK_ADDR).legalFor({p0});
// Merge/Unmerge
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
for (unsigned Op : {G_MERGE_VALUES, G_UNMERGE_VALUES}) {
unsigned BigTyIdx = Op == G_MERGE_VALUES ? 0 : 1;
unsigned LitTyIdx = Op == G_MERGE_VALUES ? 1 : 0;
auto notValidElt = [](const LegalityQuery &Query, unsigned TypeIdx) {
const LLT &Ty = Query.Types[TypeIdx];
if (Ty.isVector()) {
const LLT &EltTy = Ty.getElementType();
if (EltTy.getSizeInBits() < 8 || EltTy.getSizeInBits() > 64)
return true;
if (!isPowerOf2_32(EltTy.getSizeInBits()))
return true;
}
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
return false;
};
// FIXME: This rule is horrible, but specifies the same as what we had
// before with the particularly strange definitions removed (e.g.
// s8 = G_MERGE_VALUES s32, s32).
// Part of the complexity comes from these ops being extremely flexible. For
// example, you can build/decompose vectors with it, concatenate vectors,
// etc. and in addition to this you can also bitcast with it at the same
// time. We've been considering breaking it up into multiple ops to make it
// more manageable throughout the backend.
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(Op)
// Break up vectors with weird elements into scalars
.fewerElementsIf(
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { return notValidElt(Query, 0); },
scalarize(0))
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
.fewerElementsIf(
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { return notValidElt(Query, 1); },
scalarize(1))
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
// Clamp the big scalar to s8-s512 and make it either a power of 2, 192,
// or 384.
.clampScalar(BigTyIdx, s8, s512)
.widenScalarIf(
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &Ty = Query.Types[BigTyIdx];
return !isPowerOf2_32(Ty.getSizeInBits()) &&
Ty.getSizeInBits() % 64 != 0;
},
[=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
// Pick the next power of 2, or a multiple of 64 over 128.
// Whichever is smaller.
const LLT &Ty = Query.Types[BigTyIdx];
unsigned NewSizeInBits = 1
<< Log2_32_Ceil(Ty.getSizeInBits() + 1);
if (NewSizeInBits >= 256) {
unsigned RoundedTo = alignTo<64>(Ty.getSizeInBits() + 1);
if (RoundedTo < NewSizeInBits)
NewSizeInBits = RoundedTo;
}
return std::make_pair(BigTyIdx, LLT::scalar(NewSizeInBits));
})
// Clamp the little scalar to s8-s256 and make it a power of 2. It's not
// worth considering the multiples of 64 since 2*192 and 2*384 are not
// valid.
.clampScalar(LitTyIdx, s8, s256)
.widenScalarToNextPow2(LitTyIdx, /*Min*/ 8)
// So at this point, we have s8, s16, s32, s64, s128, s192, s256, s384,
// s512, <X x s8>, <X x s16>, <X x s32>, or <X x s64>.
// At this point it's simple enough to accept the legal types.
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &BigTy = Query.Types[BigTyIdx];
const LLT &LitTy = Query.Types[LitTyIdx];
if (BigTy.isVector() && BigTy.getSizeInBits() < 32)
return false;
if (LitTy.isVector() && LitTy.getSizeInBits() < 32)
return false;
return BigTy.getSizeInBits() % LitTy.getSizeInBits() == 0;
})
// Any vectors left are the wrong size. Scalarize them.
.scalarize(0)
.scalarize(1);
[globalisel][legalizer] Adapt LegalizerInfo to support inter-type dependencies and other things. Summary: As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types. For example, declaring the following setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal) setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal) currently declares these type combinations as legal: {s32, s32} {s64, s32} {s32, s64} {s64, s64} but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/ G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently described incorrectly. Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR). It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize type1 first. Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make illegal MIR more legal. This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets have been migrated) which resolves all these issues. Here are the rules for shift and division: for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) getActionDefinitions(BinOp) .legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32 // If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64 .widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to make illegal things legal. Here's an example of a complex rule: getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT) .unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits(); }) .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) { // If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal // We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that. const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0]; const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1]; if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0) return false; return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) && (Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8); }) .clampScalar(0, s32, s64) .widenScalarToPow2(0) .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16 .maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32 .widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2 .unsupported(); This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to: .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}}) In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now. I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization cost. Future work: * Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet. * Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64) * Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules. * Improve initialization cost using constexpr Possible future work: * It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom. With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization change the opcode to something that's considered legal. Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner Reviewed By: bogner Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251 llvm-svn: 323681
2018-01-30 03:54:49 +08:00
}
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT)
.unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &EltTy = Query.Types[1].getElementType();
return Query.Types[0] != EltTy;
})
.minScalar(2, s64)
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &VecTy = Query.Types[1];
return VecTy == v2s16 || VecTy == v4s16 || VecTy == v8s16 ||
VecTy == v4s32 || VecTy == v2s64 || VecTy == v2s32;
});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_INSERT_VECTOR_ELT)
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &VecTy = Query.Types[0];
// TODO: Support s8 and s16
return VecTy == v2s32 || VecTy == v4s32 || VecTy == v2s64;
});
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_BUILD_VECTOR)
.legalFor({{v4s16, s16},
{v8s16, s16},
{v2s32, s32},
{v4s32, s32},
{v2p0, p0},
{v2s64, s64}})
.clampNumElements(0, v4s32, v4s32)
.clampNumElements(0, v2s64, v2s64)
// Deal with larger scalar types, which will be implicitly truncated.
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return Query.Types[0].getScalarSizeInBits() <
Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits();
})
.minScalarSameAs(1, 0);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_CTLZ).legalForCartesianProduct(
{s32, s64, v8s8, v16s8, v4s16, v8s16, v2s32, v4s32})
.scalarize(1);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_SHUFFLE_VECTOR)
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
const LLT &DstTy = Query.Types[0];
const LLT &SrcTy = Query.Types[1];
// For now just support the TBL2 variant which needs the source vectors
// to be the same size as the dest.
if (DstTy != SrcTy)
return false;
for (auto &Ty : {v2s32, v4s32, v2s64}) {
if (DstTy == Ty)
return true;
}
return false;
})
// G_SHUFFLE_VECTOR can have scalar sources (from 1 x s vectors), we
// just want those lowered into G_BUILD_VECTOR
.lowerIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
return !Query.Types[1].isVector();
})
.clampNumElements(0, v4s32, v4s32)
.clampNumElements(0, v2s64, v2s64);
getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_CONCAT_VECTORS)
.legalFor({{v4s32, v2s32}, {v8s16, v4s16}});
computeTables();
verify(*ST.getInstrInfo());
}
bool AArch64LegalizerInfo::legalizeCustom(MachineInstr &MI,
MachineRegisterInfo &MRI,
MachineIRBuilder &MIRBuilder,
GISelChangeObserver &Observer) const {
switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
default:
// No idea what to do.
return false;
case TargetOpcode::G_VAARG:
return legalizeVaArg(MI, MRI, MIRBuilder);
case TargetOpcode::G_LOAD:
case TargetOpcode::G_STORE:
return legalizeLoadStore(MI, MRI, MIRBuilder, Observer);
}
llvm_unreachable("expected switch to return");
}
bool AArch64LegalizerInfo::legalizeLoadStore(
MachineInstr &MI, MachineRegisterInfo &MRI, MachineIRBuilder &MIRBuilder,
GISelChangeObserver &Observer) const {
assert(MI.getOpcode() == TargetOpcode::G_STORE ||
MI.getOpcode() == TargetOpcode::G_LOAD);
// Here we just try to handle vector loads/stores where our value type might
// have pointer elements, which the SelectionDAG importer can't handle. To
// allow the existing patterns for s64 to fire for p0, we just try to bitcast
// the value to use s64 types.
// Custom legalization requires the instruction, if not deleted, must be fully
// legalized. In order to allow further legalization of the inst, we create
// a new instruction and erase the existing one.
unsigned ValReg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();
const LLT ValTy = MRI.getType(ValReg);
if (!ValTy.isVector() || !ValTy.getElementType().isPointer() ||
ValTy.getElementType().getAddressSpace() != 0) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Tried to do custom legalization on wrong load/store");
return false;
}
MIRBuilder.setInstr(MI);
unsigned PtrSize = ValTy.getElementType().getSizeInBits();
const LLT NewTy = LLT::vector(ValTy.getNumElements(), PtrSize);
auto &MMO = **MI.memoperands_begin();
if (MI.getOpcode() == TargetOpcode::G_STORE) {
auto Bitcast = MIRBuilder.buildBitcast({NewTy}, {ValReg});
MIRBuilder.buildStore(Bitcast.getReg(0), MI.getOperand(1).getReg(), MMO);
} else {
unsigned NewReg = MRI.createGenericVirtualRegister(NewTy);
auto NewLoad = MIRBuilder.buildLoad(NewReg, MI.getOperand(1).getReg(), MMO);
MIRBuilder.buildBitcast({ValReg}, {NewLoad});
}
MI.eraseFromParent();
return true;
}
bool AArch64LegalizerInfo::legalizeVaArg(MachineInstr &MI,
MachineRegisterInfo &MRI,
MachineIRBuilder &MIRBuilder) const {
MIRBuilder.setInstr(MI);
MachineFunction &MF = MIRBuilder.getMF();
unsigned Align = MI.getOperand(2).getImm();
unsigned Dst = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();
unsigned ListPtr = MI.getOperand(1).getReg();
LLT PtrTy = MRI.getType(ListPtr);
LLT IntPtrTy = LLT::scalar(PtrTy.getSizeInBits());
const unsigned PtrSize = PtrTy.getSizeInBits() / 8;
unsigned List = MRI.createGenericVirtualRegister(PtrTy);
MIRBuilder.buildLoad(
List, ListPtr,
*MF.getMachineMemOperand(MachinePointerInfo(), MachineMemOperand::MOLoad,
PtrSize, /* Align = */ PtrSize));
unsigned DstPtr;
if (Align > PtrSize) {
// Realign the list to the actual required alignment.
auto AlignMinus1 = MIRBuilder.buildConstant(IntPtrTy, Align - 1);
unsigned ListTmp = MRI.createGenericVirtualRegister(PtrTy);
MIRBuilder.buildGEP(ListTmp, List, AlignMinus1.getReg(0));
DstPtr = MRI.createGenericVirtualRegister(PtrTy);
MIRBuilder.buildPtrMask(DstPtr, ListTmp, Log2_64(Align));
} else
DstPtr = List;
uint64_t ValSize = MRI.getType(Dst).getSizeInBits() / 8;
MIRBuilder.buildLoad(
Dst, DstPtr,
*MF.getMachineMemOperand(MachinePointerInfo(), MachineMemOperand::MOLoad,
ValSize, std::max(Align, PtrSize)));
[GlobalISel] Enable CSE in the IRTranslator & legalizer for -O0 with constants only. Other opcodes shouldn't be CSE'd until we can be sure debug info quality won't be degraded. This change also improves the IRTranslator so that in most places, but not all, it creates constants using the MIRBuilder directly instead of first creating a new destination vreg and then creating a constant. By doing this, the buildConstant() method can just return the vreg of an existing G_CONSTANT instead of having to create a COPY from it. I measured a 0.2% improvement in compile time and a 0.9% improvement in code size at -O0 ARM64. Compile time: Program base cse diff test-suite...ark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 9.04 9.12 0.8% test-suite...Mark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 2.68 2.66 -0.7% test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 5.53 5.51 -0.4% test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 5.30 5.28 -0.3% test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 25.82 25.76 -0.2% test-suite...:: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 6.92 6.90 -0.2% test-suite...TMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 34.24 34.17 -0.2% test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 6.25 6.24 -0.1% test-suite...:: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 1.66 1.66 -0.1% test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 13.61 13.60 -0.0% Geomean difference -0.2% Code size: Program base cse diff test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 1315632 1266480 -3.7% test-suite...:: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 1313892 1297508 -1.2% test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 1439504 1423112 -1.1% test-suite...TMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 2936980 2904172 -1.1% test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 3478276 3445460 -0.9% test-suite...ark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 8082868 8033492 -0.6% test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 3870380 3853972 -0.4% test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 1434904 1434896 -0.0% test-suite...Mark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 764528 764528 0.0% test-suite...:: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 782092 782092 0.0% Geomean difference -0.9% Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60580 llvm-svn: 358369
2019-04-15 13:04:20 +08:00
auto Size = MIRBuilder.buildConstant(IntPtrTy, alignTo(ValSize, PtrSize));
unsigned NewList = MRI.createGenericVirtualRegister(PtrTy);
[GlobalISel] Enable CSE in the IRTranslator & legalizer for -O0 with constants only. Other opcodes shouldn't be CSE'd until we can be sure debug info quality won't be degraded. This change also improves the IRTranslator so that in most places, but not all, it creates constants using the MIRBuilder directly instead of first creating a new destination vreg and then creating a constant. By doing this, the buildConstant() method can just return the vreg of an existing G_CONSTANT instead of having to create a COPY from it. I measured a 0.2% improvement in compile time and a 0.9% improvement in code size at -O0 ARM64. Compile time: Program base cse diff test-suite...ark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 9.04 9.12 0.8% test-suite...Mark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 2.68 2.66 -0.7% test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 5.53 5.51 -0.4% test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 5.30 5.28 -0.3% test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 25.82 25.76 -0.2% test-suite...:: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 6.92 6.90 -0.2% test-suite...TMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 34.24 34.17 -0.2% test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 6.25 6.24 -0.1% test-suite...:: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 1.66 1.66 -0.1% test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 13.61 13.60 -0.0% Geomean difference -0.2% Code size: Program base cse diff test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 1315632 1266480 -3.7% test-suite...:: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 1313892 1297508 -1.2% test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 1439504 1423112 -1.1% test-suite...TMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 2936980 2904172 -1.1% test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 3478276 3445460 -0.9% test-suite...ark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 8082868 8033492 -0.6% test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 3870380 3853972 -0.4% test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 1434904 1434896 -0.0% test-suite...Mark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 764528 764528 0.0% test-suite...:: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 782092 782092 0.0% Geomean difference -0.9% Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60580 llvm-svn: 358369
2019-04-15 13:04:20 +08:00
MIRBuilder.buildGEP(NewList, DstPtr, Size.getReg(0));
MIRBuilder.buildStore(
NewList, ListPtr,
*MF.getMachineMemOperand(MachinePointerInfo(), MachineMemOperand::MOStore,
PtrSize, /* Align = */ PtrSize));
MI.eraseFromParent();
return true;
}