2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --function-signature --scrub-attributes
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: opt -attributor -attributor-manifest-internal -attributor-disable=false -attributor-max-iterations-verify -attributor-annotate-decl-cs -attributor-max-iterations=4 -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,NOT_CGSCC_NPM,NOT_CGSCC_OPM,NOT_TUNIT_NPM,IS__TUNIT____,IS________OPM,IS__TUNIT_OPM
|
|
|
|
; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes=attributor -attributor-manifest-internal -attributor-disable=false -attributor-max-iterations-verify -attributor-annotate-decl-cs -attributor-max-iterations=4 -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,NOT_CGSCC_OPM,NOT_CGSCC_NPM,NOT_TUNIT_OPM,IS__TUNIT____,IS________NPM,IS__TUNIT_NPM
|
|
|
|
; RUN: opt -attributor-cgscc -attributor-manifest-internal -attributor-disable=false -attributor-annotate-decl-cs -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,NOT_TUNIT_NPM,NOT_TUNIT_OPM,NOT_CGSCC_NPM,IS__CGSCC____,IS________OPM,IS__CGSCC_OPM
|
|
|
|
; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes=attributor-cgscc -attributor-manifest-internal -attributor-disable=false -attributor-annotate-decl-cs -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,NOT_TUNIT_NPM,NOT_TUNIT_OPM,NOT_CGSCC_OPM,IS__CGSCC____,IS________NPM,IS__CGSCC_NPM
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
|
|
|
|
declare void @f(i32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Test1: Replace argument with constant
|
|
|
|
define internal void @test1(i32 %a) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test1()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @f(i32 1)
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
tail call void @f(i32 %a)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @test1_helper() {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test1_helper()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @test1()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
tail call void @test1(i32 1)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TEST 2 : Simplify return value
|
|
|
|
define i32 @return0() {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@return0()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 0
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
ret i32 0
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i32 @return1() {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@return1()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 1
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
ret i32 1
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i32 @test2_1(i1 %c) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test2_1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-SAME: (i1 [[C:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[C]], label [[IF_TRUE:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: if.true:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RET0:%.*]] = add i32 0, 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[END:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: if.false:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[END]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: end:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RET:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[RET0]], [[IF_TRUE]] ], [ 1, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 1
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false
|
|
|
|
if.true:
|
|
|
|
%call = tail call i32 @return0()
|
|
|
|
%ret0 = add i32 %call, 1
|
|
|
|
br label %end
|
|
|
|
if.false:
|
|
|
|
%ret1 = tail call i32 @return1()
|
|
|
|
br label %end
|
|
|
|
end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%ret = phi i32 [ %ret0, %if.true ], [ %ret1, %if.false ]
|
|
|
|
|
[Attributor] AAValueConstantRange: Value range analysis using constant range
Summary:
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created in `getAssumedConstant` method when `AAValueSimplify` returns `nullptr`(worst state).
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: phosek, davezarzycki, baziotis, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
2020-01-15 14:25:52 +08:00
|
|
|
ret i32 1
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i32 @test2_2(i1 %c) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test2_2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-SAME: (i1 [[C:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 1
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
%ret = tail call i32 @test2_1(i1 %c)
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %ret
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declare void @use(i32)
|
|
|
|
define void @test3(i1 %c) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test3
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-SAME: (i1 [[C:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[C]], label [[IF_TRUE:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: if.true:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[END:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: if.false:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[END]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: end:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 1, [[IF_TRUE]] ], [ 1, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @use(i32 1)
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false
|
|
|
|
if.true:
|
|
|
|
br label %end
|
|
|
|
if.false:
|
|
|
|
%ret1 = tail call i32 @return1()
|
|
|
|
br label %end
|
|
|
|
end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%r = phi i32 [ 1, %if.true ], [ %ret1, %if.false ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tail call void @use(i32 %r)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @test-select-phi(i1 %c) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test-select-phi
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-SAME: (i1 [[C:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @use(i32 1)
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SELECT_NOT_SAME:%.*]] = select i1 [[C]], i32 1, i32 0
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @use(i32 [[SELECT_NOT_SAME]])
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[C]], label [[IF_TRUE:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: if-true:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[END:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: if-false:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[END]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: end:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI_SAME:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 1, [[IF_TRUE]] ], [ 1, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI_NOT_SAME:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[IF_TRUE]] ], [ 1, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI_SAME_PROP:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 1, [[IF_TRUE]] ], [ 1, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI_SAME_UNDEF:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 1, [[IF_TRUE]] ], [ undef, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SELECT_NOT_SAME_UNDEF:%.*]] = select i1 [[C]], i32 [[PHI_NOT_SAME]], i32 undef
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @use(i32 1)
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @use(i32 [[PHI_NOT_SAME]])
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @use(i32 1)
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @use(i32 1)
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @use(i32 [[SELECT_NOT_SAME_UNDEF]])
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-09-07 15:03:05 +08:00
|
|
|
%select-same = select i1 %c, i32 1, i32 1
|
|
|
|
tail call void @use(i32 %select-same)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%select-not-same = select i1 %c, i32 1, i32 0
|
|
|
|
tail call void @use(i32 %select-not-same)
|
|
|
|
br i1 %c, label %if-true, label %if-false
|
|
|
|
if-true:
|
|
|
|
br label %end
|
|
|
|
if-false:
|
|
|
|
br label %end
|
|
|
|
end:
|
|
|
|
%phi-same = phi i32 [ 1, %if-true ], [ 1, %if-false ]
|
|
|
|
%phi-not-same = phi i32 [ 0, %if-true ], [ 1, %if-false ]
|
|
|
|
%phi-same-prop = phi i32 [ 1, %if-true ], [ %select-same, %if-false ]
|
|
|
|
%phi-same-undef = phi i32 [ 1, %if-true ], [ undef, %if-false ]
|
|
|
|
%select-not-same-undef = select i1 %c, i32 %phi-not-same, i32 undef
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tail call void @use(i32 %phi-same)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tail call void @use(i32 %phi-not-same)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tail call void @use(i32 %phi-same-prop)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tail call void @use(i32 %phi-same-undef)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tail call void @use(i32 %select-not-same-undef)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-30 00:47:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i32 @ipccp1(i32 %a) {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@ipccp1
|
[Attributor] AAValueConstantRange: Value range analysis using constant range
Summary:
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created in `getAssumedConstant` method when `AAValueSimplify` returns `nullptr`(worst state).
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: phosek, davezarzycki, baziotis, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
2020-01-15 14:25:52 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-SAME: (i32 returned [[A:%.*]])
|
2019-10-30 00:47:47 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label [[T:%.*]], label [[F:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: t:
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[A]]
|
2019-10-30 00:47:47 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: f:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
br i1 true, label %t, label %f
|
|
|
|
t:
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %a
|
|
|
|
f:
|
|
|
|
%r = call i32 @ipccp1(i32 5)
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %r
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define internal i1 @ipccp2i(i1 %a) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@ipccp2i()
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: br label [[T:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____: t:
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: ret i1 true
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____: f:
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: unreachable
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-10-30 00:47:47 +08:00
|
|
|
br i1 %a, label %t, label %f
|
|
|
|
t:
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %a
|
|
|
|
f:
|
|
|
|
%r = call i1 @ipccp2i(i1 false)
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %r
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i1 @ipccp2() {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@ipccp2()
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-NEXT: ret i1 true
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@ipccp2()
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = call i1 @ipccp2i()
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: ret i1 [[R]]
|
2019-10-30 00:47:47 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%r = call i1 @ipccp2i(i1 true)
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %r
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-24 07:12:56 +08:00
|
|
|
define internal i1 @ipccp2ib(i1 %a) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@ipccp2ib()
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: br label [[T:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____: t:
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: ret i1 true
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____: f:
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: unreachable
|
|
|
|
;
|
2020-01-24 07:12:56 +08:00
|
|
|
br i1 %a, label %t, label %f
|
|
|
|
t:
|
|
|
|
ret i1 true
|
|
|
|
f:
|
|
|
|
%r = call i1 @ipccp2ib(i1 false)
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %r
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i1 @ipccp2b() {
|
2020-01-12 15:09:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@ipccp2b()
|
2020-01-24 07:12:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
|
2019-10-30 00:47:47 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2020-01-24 07:12:56 +08:00
|
|
|
%r = call i1 @ipccp2ib(i1 true)
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %r
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define internal i32 @ipccp3i(i32 %a) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@ipccp3i()
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: br label [[T:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____: t:
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: ret i32 7
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____: f:
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: unreachable
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-10-30 00:47:47 +08:00
|
|
|
%c = icmp eq i32 %a, 7
|
|
|
|
br i1 %c, label %t, label %f
|
|
|
|
t:
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %a
|
|
|
|
f:
|
|
|
|
%r = call i32 @ipccp3i(i32 5)
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %r
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define i32 @ipccp3() {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@ipccp3()
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-NEXT: ret i32 7
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@ipccp3()
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = call i32 @ipccp3i()
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: ret i32 [[R]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-10-30 00:47:47 +08:00
|
|
|
%r = call i32 @ipccp3i(i32 7)
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %r
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Do not touch complicated arguments (for now)
|
|
|
|
%struct.X = type { i8* }
|
|
|
|
define internal i32* @test_inalloca(i32* inalloca %a) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_inalloca
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-SAME: (i32* inalloca noalias nofree returned writeonly align 536870912 "no-capture-maybe-returned" [[A:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-NEXT: ret i32* [[A]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_inalloca
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-SAME: (i32* inalloca noalias nofree returned writeonly "no-capture-maybe-returned" [[A:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: ret i32* [[A]]
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
ret i32* %a
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define i32* @complicated_args_inalloca() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@complicated_args_inalloca()
|
2020-01-22 06:04:47 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CALL:%.*]] = call i32* @test_inalloca(i32* noalias nofree writeonly align 536870912 null)
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32* [[CALL]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%call = call i32* @test_inalloca(i32* null)
|
|
|
|
ret i32* %call
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define internal void @test_sret(%struct.X* sret %a, %struct.X** %b) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_sret
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-SAME: (%struct.X* noalias nofree sret writeonly align 536870912 [[A:%.*]], %struct.X** nocapture nofree nonnull writeonly align 8 dereferenceable(8) [[B:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-NEXT: store %struct.X* [[A]], %struct.X** [[B]], align 8
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_sret
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-SAME: (%struct.X* noalias nofree sret writeonly [[A:%.*]], %struct.X** nocapture nofree nonnull writeonly align 8 dereferenceable(8) [[B:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: store %struct.X* [[A]], %struct.X** [[B]], align 8
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: ret void
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
store %struct.X* %a, %struct.X** %b
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-02 10:46:03 +08:00
|
|
|
; FIXME: Alignment and dereferenceability are not propagated to the argument
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
define void @complicated_args_sret(%struct.X** %b) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@complicated_args_sret
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-SAME: (%struct.X** nocapture nofree writeonly [[B:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-NEXT: call void @test_sret(%struct.X* noalias nofree writeonly align 536870912 null, %struct.X** nocapture nofree writeonly align 8 [[B]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@complicated_args_sret
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-SAME: (%struct.X** nocapture nofree nonnull writeonly align 8 dereferenceable(8) [[B:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: call void @test_sret(%struct.X* noalias nofree writeonly align 536870912 null, %struct.X** nocapture nofree nonnull writeonly align 8 dereferenceable(8) [[B]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: ret void
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
call void @test_sret(%struct.X* null, %struct.X** %b)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define internal %struct.X* @test_nest(%struct.X* nest %a) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_nest
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-SAME: (%struct.X* nest noalias nofree readnone returned align 536870912 "no-capture-maybe-returned" [[A:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__TUNIT____-NEXT: ret %struct.X* [[A]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_nest
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-SAME: (%struct.X* nest noalias nofree readnone returned "no-capture-maybe-returned" [[A:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC____-NEXT: ret %struct.X* [[A]]
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
ret %struct.X* %a
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define %struct.X* @complicated_args_nest() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@complicated_args_nest()
|
2020-01-22 06:04:47 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CALL:%.*]] = call %struct.X* @test_nest(%struct.X* noalias nofree readnone align 536870912 null)
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret %struct.X* [[CALL]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%call = call %struct.X* @test_nest(%struct.X* null)
|
|
|
|
ret %struct.X* %call
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@S = external global %struct.X
|
|
|
|
define internal void @test_byval(%struct.X* byval %a) {
|
[Attributor] Unify testing (=updates,prefixes,run configurations,...)
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
2020-04-09 08:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_OPM-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_byval
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_OPM-SAME: (%struct.X* noalias nocapture nofree nonnull writeonly byval align 8 dereferenceable(8) [[A:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_OPM-NEXT: [[G0:%.*]] = getelementptr [[STRUCT_X:%.*]], %struct.X* [[A]], i32 0, i32 0
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_OPM-NEXT: store i8* null, i8** [[G0]], align 8
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_OPM-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_NPM-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_byval
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_NPM-SAME: (i8* nocapture nofree readnone [[TMP0:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_NPM-NEXT: [[A_PRIV:%.*]] = alloca [[STRUCT_X:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_NPM-NEXT: [[A_PRIV_CAST:%.*]] = bitcast %struct.X* [[A_PRIV]] to i8**
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_NPM-NEXT: store i8* [[TMP0]], i8** [[A_PRIV_CAST]]
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_NPM-NEXT: [[G0:%.*]] = getelementptr [[STRUCT_X]], %struct.X* [[A_PRIV]], i32 0, i32 0
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_NPM-NEXT: store i8* null, i8** [[G0]], align 8
|
|
|
|
; IS__CGSCC_NPM-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
2019-11-02 02:42:54 +08:00
|
|
|
%g0 = getelementptr %struct.X, %struct.X* %a, i32 0, i32 0
|
|
|
|
store i8* null, i8** %g0
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define void @complicated_args_byval() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@complicated_args_byval()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
call void @test_byval(%struct.X* @S)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-26 16:51:57 +08:00
|
|
|
define internal i8*@test_byval2(%struct.X* byval %a) {
|
2020-02-17 06:45:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_byval2()
|
2020-01-26 16:51:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[G0:%.*]] = getelementptr [[STRUCT_X:%.*]], %struct.X* @S, i32 0, i32 0
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[L:%.*]] = load i8*, i8** [[G0]], align 8
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8* [[L]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%g0 = getelementptr %struct.X, %struct.X* %a, i32 0, i32 0
|
|
|
|
%l = load i8*, i8** %g0
|
|
|
|
ret i8* %l
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define i8* @complicated_args_byval2() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@complicated_args_byval2()
|
2020-02-17 06:45:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = call i8* @test_byval2()
|
2020-01-26 16:51:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8* [[C]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%c = call i8* @test_byval2(%struct.X* @S)
|
|
|
|
ret i8* %c
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 03:25:47 +08:00
|
|
|
define void @fixpoint_changed(i32* %p) {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@fixpoint_changed
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-SAME: (i32* nocapture nofree writeonly [[P:%.*]])
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_COND:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: for.cond:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[J_0:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[INC:%.*]], [[SW_EPILOG:%.*]] ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[J_0]], 30
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP]], label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]], label [[FOR_END:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: for.body:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: switch i32 [[J_0]], label [[SW_EPILOG]] [
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: i32 1, label [[SW_BB:%.*]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: sw.bb:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[SW_EPILOG]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: sw.epilog:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[X_0:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 255, [[FOR_BODY]] ], [ 253, [[SW_BB]] ]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 [[X_0]], i32* [[P]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INC]] = add nsw i32 [[J_0]], 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_COND]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: for.end:
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
br label %for.cond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.cond:
|
|
|
|
%j.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %sw.epilog ]
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp slt i32 %j.0, 30
|
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body:
|
|
|
|
switch i32 %j.0, label %sw.epilog [
|
|
|
|
i32 1, label %sw.bb
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sw.bb:
|
|
|
|
br label %sw.epilog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sw.epilog:
|
|
|
|
%x.0 = phi i32 [ 255, %for.body ], [ 253, %sw.bb ]
|
|
|
|
store i32 %x.0, i32* %p
|
|
|
|
%inc = add nsw i32 %j.0, 1
|
|
|
|
br label %for.cond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end:
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 10:11:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; Check we merge undef and a constant properly.
|
|
|
|
; FIXME fold the addition and return the constant.
|
|
|
|
define i8 @caller0() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@caller0()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = call i8 @callee()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[C]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%c = call i8 @callee(i8 undef)
|
|
|
|
ret i8 %c
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define i8 @caller1() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@caller1()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = call i8 @callee()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[C]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%c = call i8 @callee(i8 undef)
|
|
|
|
ret i8 %c
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define i8 @caller2() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@caller2()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = call i8 @callee()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[C]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%c = call i8 @callee(i8 undef)
|
|
|
|
ret i8 %c
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define i8 @caller_middle() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@caller_middle()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = call i8 @callee()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[C]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%c = call i8 @callee(i8 42)
|
|
|
|
ret i8 %c
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define i8 @caller3() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@caller3()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = call i8 @callee()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[C]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%c = call i8 @callee(i8 undef)
|
|
|
|
ret i8 %c
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define i8 @caller4() {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@caller4()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = call i8 @callee()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[C]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%c = call i8 @callee(i8 undef)
|
|
|
|
ret i8 %c
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define internal i8 @callee(i8 %a) {
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@callee()
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = add i8 42, 7
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[C]]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
%c = add i8 %a, 7
|
|
|
|
ret i8 %c
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|