llvm-project/llvm/tools/llvm-mca/llvm-mca.cpp

505 lines
17 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===-- llvm-mca.cpp - Machine Code Analyzer -------------------*- C++ -* -===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This utility is a simple driver that allows static performance analysis on
// machine code similarly to how IACA (Intel Architecture Code Analyzer) works.
//
// llvm-mca [options] <file-name>
// -march <type>
// -mcpu <cpu>
// -o <file>
//
// The target defaults to the host target.
// The cpu defaults to the 'native' host cpu.
// The output defaults to standard output.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
#include "CodeRegion.h"
#include "CodeRegionGenerator.h"
#include "PipelinePrinter.h"
#include "Stages/EntryStage.h"
[llvm-mca] Introduce the llvm-mca library and organize the directory accordingly. NFC. Summary: This patch introduces llvm-mca as a library. The driver (llvm-mca.cpp), views, and stats, are not part of the library. Those are separate components that are not required for the functioning of llvm-mca. The directory has been organized as follows: All library source files now reside in: - `lib/HardwareUnits/` - All subclasses of HardwareUnit (these represent the simulated hardware components of a backend). (LSUnit does not inherit from HardwareUnit, but Scheduler does which uses LSUnit). - `lib/Stages/` - All subclasses of the pipeline stages. - `lib/` - This is the root of the library and contains library code that does not fit into the Stages or HardwareUnit subdirs. All library header files now reside in the `include` directory and mimic the same layout as the `lib` directory mentioned above. In the (near) future we would like to move the library (include and lib) contents from tools and into the core of llvm somewhere. That change would allow various analysis and optimization passes to make use of MCA functionality for things like cost modeling. I left all of the non-library code just where it has always been, in the root of the llvm-mca directory. The include directives for the non-library source file have been updated to refer to the llvm-mca library headers. I updated the llvm-mca/CMakeLists.txt file to include the library headers, but I made the non-library code explicitly reference the library's 'include' directory. Once we eventually (hopefully) migrate the MCA library components into llvm the include directives used by the non-library source files will be updated to point to the proper location in llvm. Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon Reviewed By: andreadb Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50929 llvm-svn: 340755
2018-08-28 01:16:32 +08:00
#include "Stages/InstructionTables.h"
#include "Views/DispatchStatistics.h"
#include "Views/InstructionInfoView.h"
#include "Views/RegisterFileStatistics.h"
#include "Views/ResourcePressureView.h"
#include "Views/RetireControlUnitStatistics.h"
#include "Views/SchedulerStatistics.h"
#include "Views/SummaryView.h"
#include "Views/TimelineView.h"
[llvm-mca] Introduce the llvm-mca library and organize the directory accordingly. NFC. Summary: This patch introduces llvm-mca as a library. The driver (llvm-mca.cpp), views, and stats, are not part of the library. Those are separate components that are not required for the functioning of llvm-mca. The directory has been organized as follows: All library source files now reside in: - `lib/HardwareUnits/` - All subclasses of HardwareUnit (these represent the simulated hardware components of a backend). (LSUnit does not inherit from HardwareUnit, but Scheduler does which uses LSUnit). - `lib/Stages/` - All subclasses of the pipeline stages. - `lib/` - This is the root of the library and contains library code that does not fit into the Stages or HardwareUnit subdirs. All library header files now reside in the `include` directory and mimic the same layout as the `lib` directory mentioned above. In the (near) future we would like to move the library (include and lib) contents from tools and into the core of llvm somewhere. That change would allow various analysis and optimization passes to make use of MCA functionality for things like cost modeling. I left all of the non-library code just where it has always been, in the root of the llvm-mca directory. The include directives for the non-library source file have been updated to refer to the llvm-mca library headers. I updated the llvm-mca/CMakeLists.txt file to include the library headers, but I made the non-library code explicitly reference the library's 'include' directory. Once we eventually (hopefully) migrate the MCA library components into llvm the include directives used by the non-library source files will be updated to point to the proper location in llvm. Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon Reviewed By: andreadb Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50929 llvm-svn: 340755
2018-08-28 01:16:32 +08:00
#include "include/Context.h"
#include "include/Pipeline.h"
#include "include/Support.h"
#include "llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h"
#include "llvm/MC/MCContext.h"
#include "llvm/MC/MCObjectFileInfo.h"
#include "llvm/MC/MCRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorOr.h"
#include "llvm/Support/FileSystem.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Host.h"
#include "llvm/Support/InitLLVM.h"
#include "llvm/Support/MemoryBuffer.h"
#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
#include "llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h"
#include "llvm/Support/TargetSelect.h"
#include "llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h"
#include "llvm/Support/WithColor.h"
using namespace llvm;
static cl::OptionCategory ToolOptions("Tool Options");
static cl::OptionCategory ViewOptions("View Options");
static cl::opt<std::string> InputFilename(cl::Positional,
cl::desc("<input file>"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init("-"));
static cl::opt<std::string> OutputFilename("o", cl::desc("Output filename"),
cl::init("-"), cl::cat(ToolOptions),
cl::value_desc("filename"));
static cl::opt<std::string>
ArchName("march", cl::desc("Target architecture. "
"See -version for available targets"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions));
static cl::opt<std::string>
TripleName("mtriple",
cl::desc("Target triple. See -version for available targets"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions));
static cl::opt<std::string>
MCPU("mcpu",
cl::desc("Target a specific cpu type (-mcpu=help for details)"),
cl::value_desc("cpu-name"), cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init("native"));
static cl::opt<int>
OutputAsmVariant("output-asm-variant",
cl::desc("Syntax variant to use for output printing"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init(-1));
static cl::opt<unsigned> Iterations("iterations",
cl::desc("Number of iterations to run"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init(0));
static cl::opt<unsigned>
DispatchWidth("dispatch", cl::desc("Override the processor dispatch width"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init(0));
static cl::opt<unsigned>
RegisterFileSize("register-file-size",
cl::desc("Maximum number of physical registers which can "
"be used for register mappings"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init(0));
static cl::opt<bool>
PrintRegisterFileStats("register-file-stats",
cl::desc("Print register file statistics"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(false));
static cl::opt<bool> PrintDispatchStats("dispatch-stats",
cl::desc("Print dispatch statistics"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(false));
static cl::opt<bool>
PrintSummaryView("summary-view", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Print summary view (enabled by default)"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(true));
static cl::opt<bool> PrintSchedulerStats("scheduler-stats",
cl::desc("Print scheduler statistics"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(false));
static cl::opt<bool>
PrintRetireStats("retire-stats",
cl::desc("Print retire control unit statistics"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(false));
static cl::opt<bool> PrintResourcePressureView(
"resource-pressure",
cl::desc("Print the resource pressure view (enabled by default)"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(true));
static cl::opt<bool> PrintTimelineView("timeline",
cl::desc("Print the timeline view"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(false));
static cl::opt<unsigned> TimelineMaxIterations(
"timeline-max-iterations",
cl::desc("Maximum number of iterations to print in timeline view"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(0));
static cl::opt<unsigned> TimelineMaxCycles(
"timeline-max-cycles",
cl::desc(
"Maximum number of cycles in the timeline view. Defaults to 80 cycles"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(80));
static cl::opt<bool>
AssumeNoAlias("noalias",
cl::desc("If set, assume that loads and stores do not alias"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init(true));
static cl::opt<unsigned>
LoadQueueSize("lqueue",
[llvm-mca][MC] Add the ability to declare which processor resources model load/store queues (PR36666). This patch adds the ability to specify via tablegen which processor resources are load/store queue resources. A new tablegen class named MemoryQueue can be optionally used to mark resources that model load/store queues. Information about the load/store queue is collected at 'CodeGenSchedule' stage, and analyzed by the 'SubtargetEmitter' to initialize two new fields in struct MCExtraProcessorInfo named `LoadQueueID` and `StoreQueueID`. Those two fields are identifiers for buffered resources used to describe the load queue and the store queue. Field `BufferSize` is interpreted as the number of entries in the queue, while the number of units is a throughput indicator (i.e. number of available pickers for loads/stores). At construction time, LSUnit in llvm-mca checks for the presence of extra processor information (i.e. MCExtraProcessorInfo) in the scheduling model. If that information is available, and fields LoadQueueID and StoreQueueID are set to a value different than zero (i.e. the invalid processor resource index), then LSUnit initializes its LoadQueue/StoreQueue based on the BufferSize value declared by the two processor resources. With this patch, we more accurately track dynamic dispatch stalls caused by the lack of LS tokens (i.e. load/store queue full). This is also shown by the differences in two BdVer2 tests. Stalls that were previously classified as generic SCHEDULER FULL stalls, are not correctly classified either as "load queue full" or "store queue full". About the differences in the -scheduler-stats view: those differences are expected, because entries in the load/store queue are not released at instruction issue stage. Instead, those are released at instruction executed stage. This is the main reason why for the modified tests, the load/store queues gets full before PdEx is full. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54957 llvm-svn: 347857
2018-11-29 20:15:56 +08:00
cl::desc("Size of the load queue"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init(0));
static cl::opt<unsigned>
StoreQueueSize("squeue",
[llvm-mca][MC] Add the ability to declare which processor resources model load/store queues (PR36666). This patch adds the ability to specify via tablegen which processor resources are load/store queue resources. A new tablegen class named MemoryQueue can be optionally used to mark resources that model load/store queues. Information about the load/store queue is collected at 'CodeGenSchedule' stage, and analyzed by the 'SubtargetEmitter' to initialize two new fields in struct MCExtraProcessorInfo named `LoadQueueID` and `StoreQueueID`. Those two fields are identifiers for buffered resources used to describe the load queue and the store queue. Field `BufferSize` is interpreted as the number of entries in the queue, while the number of units is a throughput indicator (i.e. number of available pickers for loads/stores). At construction time, LSUnit in llvm-mca checks for the presence of extra processor information (i.e. MCExtraProcessorInfo) in the scheduling model. If that information is available, and fields LoadQueueID and StoreQueueID are set to a value different than zero (i.e. the invalid processor resource index), then LSUnit initializes its LoadQueue/StoreQueue based on the BufferSize value declared by the two processor resources. With this patch, we more accurately track dynamic dispatch stalls caused by the lack of LS tokens (i.e. load/store queue full). This is also shown by the differences in two BdVer2 tests. Stalls that were previously classified as generic SCHEDULER FULL stalls, are not correctly classified either as "load queue full" or "store queue full". About the differences in the -scheduler-stats view: those differences are expected, because entries in the load/store queue are not released at instruction issue stage. Instead, those are released at instruction executed stage. This is the main reason why for the modified tests, the load/store queues gets full before PdEx is full. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54957 llvm-svn: 347857
2018-11-29 20:15:56 +08:00
cl::desc("Size of the store queue"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init(0));
static cl::opt<bool>
PrintInstructionTables("instruction-tables",
cl::desc("Print instruction tables"),
cl::cat(ToolOptions), cl::init(false));
static cl::opt<bool> PrintInstructionInfoView(
"instruction-info",
cl::desc("Print the instruction info view (enabled by default)"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(true));
static cl::opt<bool> EnableAllStats("all-stats",
cl::desc("Print all hardware statistics"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(false));
static cl::opt<bool>
EnableAllViews("all-views",
cl::desc("Print all views including hardware statistics"),
cl::cat(ViewOptions), cl::init(false));
namespace {
const Target *getTarget(const char *ProgName) {
if (TripleName.empty())
TripleName = Triple::normalize(sys::getDefaultTargetTriple());
Triple TheTriple(TripleName);
// Get the target specific parser.
std::string Error;
const Target *TheTarget =
TargetRegistry::lookupTarget(ArchName, TheTriple, Error);
if (!TheTarget) {
errs() << ProgName << ": " << Error;
return nullptr;
}
// Return the found target.
return TheTarget;
}
ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<ToolOutputFile>> getOutputStream() {
if (OutputFilename == "")
OutputFilename = "-";
std::error_code EC;
auto Out =
llvm::make_unique<ToolOutputFile>(OutputFilename, EC, sys::fs::F_None);
if (!EC)
return std::move(Out);
return EC;
}
} // end of anonymous namespace
static void processOptionImpl(cl::opt<bool> &O, const cl::opt<bool> &Default) {
if (!O.getNumOccurrences() || O.getPosition() < Default.getPosition())
O = Default.getValue();
}
static void processViewOptions() {
if (!EnableAllViews.getNumOccurrences() &&
!EnableAllStats.getNumOccurrences())
return;
if (EnableAllViews.getNumOccurrences()) {
processOptionImpl(PrintSummaryView, EnableAllViews);
processOptionImpl(PrintResourcePressureView, EnableAllViews);
processOptionImpl(PrintTimelineView, EnableAllViews);
processOptionImpl(PrintInstructionInfoView, EnableAllViews);
}
const cl::opt<bool> &Default =
EnableAllViews.getPosition() < EnableAllStats.getPosition()
? EnableAllStats
: EnableAllViews;
processOptionImpl(PrintRegisterFileStats, Default);
processOptionImpl(PrintDispatchStats, Default);
processOptionImpl(PrintSchedulerStats, Default);
processOptionImpl(PrintRetireStats, Default);
}
// Returns true on success.
static bool runPipeline(mca::Pipeline &P) {
// Handle pipeline errors here.
Expected<unsigned> Cycles = P.run();
if (!Cycles) {
WithColor::error() << toString(Cycles.takeError());
return false;
}
return true;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
InitLLVM X(argc, argv);
// Initialize targets and assembly parsers.
InitializeAllTargetInfos();
InitializeAllTargetMCs();
InitializeAllAsmParsers();
// Enable printing of available targets when flag --version is specified.
cl::AddExtraVersionPrinter(TargetRegistry::printRegisteredTargetsForVersion);
cl::HideUnrelatedOptions({&ToolOptions, &ViewOptions});
// Parse flags and initialize target options.
cl::ParseCommandLineOptions(argc, argv,
"llvm machine code performance analyzer.\n");
// Get the target from the triple. If a triple is not specified, then select
// the default triple for the host. If the triple doesn't correspond to any
// registered target, then exit with an error message.
const char *ProgName = argv[0];
const Target *TheTarget = getTarget(ProgName);
if (!TheTarget)
return 1;
// GetTarget() may replaced TripleName with a default triple.
// For safety, reconstruct the Triple object.
Triple TheTriple(TripleName);
ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer>> BufferPtr =
MemoryBuffer::getFileOrSTDIN(InputFilename);
if (std::error_code EC = BufferPtr.getError()) {
WithColor::error() << InputFilename << ": " << EC.message() << '\n';
return 1;
}
// Apply overrides to llvm-mca specific options.
processViewOptions();
SourceMgr SrcMgr;
// Tell SrcMgr about this buffer, which is what the parser will pick up.
SrcMgr.AddNewSourceBuffer(std::move(*BufferPtr), SMLoc());
std::unique_ptr<MCRegisterInfo> MRI(TheTarget->createMCRegInfo(TripleName));
assert(MRI && "Unable to create target register info!");
std::unique_ptr<MCAsmInfo> MAI(TheTarget->createMCAsmInfo(*MRI, TripleName));
assert(MAI && "Unable to create target asm info!");
MCObjectFileInfo MOFI;
MCContext Ctx(MAI.get(), MRI.get(), &MOFI, &SrcMgr);
MOFI.InitMCObjectFileInfo(TheTriple, /* PIC= */ false, Ctx);
std::unique_ptr<buffer_ostream> BOS;
std::unique_ptr<MCInstrInfo> MCII(TheTarget->createMCInstrInfo());
std::unique_ptr<MCInstrAnalysis> MCIA(
TheTarget->createMCInstrAnalysis(MCII.get()));
if (!MCPU.compare("native"))
MCPU = llvm::sys::getHostCPUName();
std::unique_ptr<MCSubtargetInfo> STI(
TheTarget->createMCSubtargetInfo(TripleName, MCPU, /* FeaturesStr */ ""));
if (!STI->isCPUStringValid(MCPU))
return 1;
if (!PrintInstructionTables && !STI->getSchedModel().isOutOfOrder()) {
WithColor::error() << "please specify an out-of-order cpu. '" << MCPU
<< "' is an in-order cpu.\n";
return 1;
}
if (!STI->getSchedModel().hasInstrSchedModel()) {
WithColor::error()
<< "unable to find instruction-level scheduling information for"
<< " target triple '" << TheTriple.normalize() << "' and cpu '" << MCPU
<< "'.\n";
if (STI->getSchedModel().InstrItineraries)
WithColor::note()
<< "cpu '" << MCPU << "' provides itineraries. However, "
<< "instruction itineraries are currently unsupported.\n";
return 1;
}
// Parse the input and create CodeRegions that llvm-mca can analyze.
mca::AsmCodeRegionGenerator CRG(*TheTarget, SrcMgr, Ctx, *MAI, *STI, *MCII);
Expected<const mca::CodeRegions &> RegionsOrErr = CRG.parseCodeRegions();
if (auto Err = RegionsOrErr.takeError()) {
WithColor::error() << Err << "\n";
return 1;
}
const mca::CodeRegions &Regions = *RegionsOrErr;
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
if (Regions.empty()) {
WithColor::error() << "no assembly instructions found.\n";
return 1;
}
// Now initialize the output file.
auto OF = getOutputStream();
if (std::error_code EC = OF.getError()) {
WithColor::error() << EC.message() << '\n';
return 1;
}
unsigned AssemblerDialect = CRG.getAssemblerDialect();
if (OutputAsmVariant >= 0)
AssemblerDialect = static_cast<unsigned>(OutputAsmVariant);
std::unique_ptr<MCInstPrinter> IP(TheTarget->createMCInstPrinter(
Triple(TripleName), AssemblerDialect, *MAI, *MCII, *MRI));
if (!IP) {
WithColor::error()
<< "unable to create instruction printer for target triple '"
<< TheTriple.normalize() << "' with assembly variant "
<< AssemblerDialect << ".\n";
return 1;
}
std::unique_ptr<ToolOutputFile> TOF = std::move(*OF);
const MCSchedModel &SM = STI->getSchedModel();
unsigned Width = SM.IssueWidth;
if (DispatchWidth)
Width = DispatchWidth;
// Create an instruction builder.
mca::InstrBuilder IB(*STI, *MCII, *MRI, *MCIA);
// Create a context to control ownership of the pipeline hardware.
mca::Context MCA(*MRI, *STI);
mca::PipelineOptions PO(Width, RegisterFileSize, LoadQueueSize,
StoreQueueSize, AssumeNoAlias);
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
// Number each region in the sequence.
unsigned RegionIdx = 0;
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
for (const std::unique_ptr<mca::CodeRegion> &Region : Regions) {
// Skip empty code regions.
if (Region->empty())
continue;
// Don't print the header of this region if it is the default region, and
// it doesn't have an end location.
if (Region->startLoc().isValid() || Region->endLoc().isValid()) {
TOF->os() << "\n[" << RegionIdx++ << "] Code Region";
StringRef Desc = Region->getDescription();
if (!Desc.empty())
TOF->os() << " - " << Desc;
TOF->os() << "\n\n";
}
// Lower the MCInst sequence into an mca::Instruction sequence.
ArrayRef<MCInst> Insts = Region->getInstructions();
std::vector<std::unique_ptr<mca::Instruction>> LoweredSequence;
for (const MCInst &MCI : Insts) {
Expected<std::unique_ptr<mca::Instruction>> Inst =
IB.createInstruction(MCI);
if (!Inst) {
if (auto NewE = handleErrors(
Inst.takeError(),
[&IP, &STI](const mca::InstructionError<MCInst> &IE) {
std::string InstructionStr;
raw_string_ostream SS(InstructionStr);
WithColor::error() << IE.Message << '\n';
IP->printInst(&IE.Inst, SS, "", *STI);
SS.flush();
WithColor::note() << "instruction: " << InstructionStr
<< '\n';
})) {
// Default case.
WithColor::error() << toString(std::move(NewE));
}
return 1;
}
LoweredSequence.emplace_back(std::move(Inst.get()));
}
mca::SourceMgr S(LoweredSequence, PrintInstructionTables ? 1 : Iterations);
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
if (PrintInstructionTables) {
// Create a pipeline, stages, and a printer.
auto P = llvm::make_unique<mca::Pipeline>();
P->appendStage(llvm::make_unique<mca::EntryStage>(S));
P->appendStage(llvm::make_unique<mca::InstructionTables>(SM));
mca::PipelinePrinter Printer(*P);
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
// Create the views for this pipeline, execute, and emit a report.
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
if (PrintInstructionInfoView) {
Printer.addView(llvm::make_unique<mca::InstructionInfoView>(
*STI, *MCII, Insts, *IP));
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
}
Printer.addView(
llvm::make_unique<mca::ResourcePressureView>(*STI, *IP, Insts));
if (!runPipeline(*P))
return 1;
Printer.printReport(TOF->os());
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
continue;
}
// Create a basic pipeline simulating an out-of-order backend.
auto P = MCA.createDefaultPipeline(PO, IB, S);
mca::PipelinePrinter Printer(*P);
if (PrintSummaryView)
Printer.addView(llvm::make_unique<mca::SummaryView>(SM, Insts, Width));
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
if (PrintInstructionInfoView)
Printer.addView(
llvm::make_unique<mca::InstructionInfoView>(*STI, *MCII, Insts, *IP));
if (PrintDispatchStats)
Printer.addView(llvm::make_unique<mca::DispatchStatistics>());
if (PrintSchedulerStats)
Printer.addView(llvm::make_unique<mca::SchedulerStatistics>(*STI));
if (PrintRetireStats)
Printer.addView(llvm::make_unique<mca::RetireControlUnitStatistics>(SM));
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
if (PrintRegisterFileStats)
Printer.addView(llvm::make_unique<mca::RegisterFileStatistics>(*STI));
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
if (PrintResourcePressureView)
Printer.addView(
llvm::make_unique<mca::ResourcePressureView>(*STI, *IP, Insts));
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
if (PrintTimelineView) {
unsigned TimelineIterations =
TimelineMaxIterations ? TimelineMaxIterations : 10;
Printer.addView(llvm::make_unique<mca::TimelineView>(
*STI, *IP, Insts, std::min(TimelineIterations, S.getNumIterations()),
TimelineMaxCycles));
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
}
if (!runPipeline(*P))
return 1;
[llvm-mca] Add the ability to mark regions of code for analysis (PR36875) This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special "markers" used to select regions of code. Example: # LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region .... # LLVM-MCA-END The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code region markers. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end of the last region. This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source code locations (SMLoc). MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R. By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples. A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped. Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see llvm-mca-markers-5.s. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433 llvm-svn: 329590
2018-04-10 00:39:52 +08:00
Printer.printReport(TOF->os());
// Clear the InstrBuilder internal state in preparation for another round.
IB.clear();
}
TOF->keep();
return 0;
}