2014-05-07 09:58:02 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fsyntax-only %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -DCXX11 -fsyntax-only %s
|
2017-08-14 05:32:33 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a -DCXX11 -DCXX2A -fsyntax-only %s
|
2015-10-05 01:51:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fdeclspec -DDECLSPEC -fsyntax-only %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fms-extensions -DDECLSPEC -fsyntax-only %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fborland-extensions -DDECLSPEC -fsyntax-only %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fms-extensions -fno-declspec -fsyntax-only %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fborland-extensions -fno-declspec -fsyntax-only %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fno-declspec -fdeclspec -DDECLSPEC -fsyntax-only %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fdeclspec -fno-declspec -fsyntax-only %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fms-extensions -fno-declspec -fdeclspec -DDECLSPEC -fsyntax-only %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -fms-extensions -fdeclspec -fno-declspec -fsyntax-only %s
|
[MSVC] Recognize `static_assert` keyword in C and C++98
Summary:
The main effect is that clang now accepts the following conforming C11
code with MSVC headers:
#include <assert.h>
static_assert(1, "true");
This is a non-conforming extension (the keyword is outside the
implementer's namespace), so it is placed under -fms-compatibility
instead of -fms-extensions like most MSVC-specific keyword extensions.
Normally, in C11, the compiler is supposed to provide the _Static_assert
keyword, and assert.h should define static_assert to _Static_assert.
However, that is not what MSVC does, and MSVC doesn't even provide
_Static_assert.
This also has the less important side effect of enabling static_assert
in C++98 mode with -fms-compatibility. It's exceptionally difficult to
use modern MSVC headers without C++14 even, so this is relatively
unimportant.
Fixes PR26672
Patch by Andrey Bokhanko!
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis
Subscribers: cfe-commits, STL_MSFT
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17444
llvm-svn: 354162
2019-02-16 03:59:45 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang -std=c++03 -target i686-windows-msvc -DMS -DDECLSPEC -fsyntax-only %s
|
2015-10-05 01:51:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang -std=c++03 -target x86_64-scei-ps4 -DDECLSPEC -fsyntax-only %s
|
[MSVC] Recognize `static_assert` keyword in C and C++98
Summary:
The main effect is that clang now accepts the following conforming C11
code with MSVC headers:
#include <assert.h>
static_assert(1, "true");
This is a non-conforming extension (the keyword is outside the
implementer's namespace), so it is placed under -fms-compatibility
instead of -fms-extensions like most MSVC-specific keyword extensions.
Normally, in C11, the compiler is supposed to provide the _Static_assert
keyword, and assert.h should define static_assert to _Static_assert.
However, that is not what MSVC does, and MSVC doesn't even provide
_Static_assert.
This also has the less important side effect of enabling static_assert
in C++98 mode with -fms-compatibility. It's exceptionally difficult to
use modern MSVC headers without C++14 even, so this is relatively
unimportant.
Fixes PR26672
Patch by Andrey Bokhanko!
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis
Subscribers: cfe-commits, STL_MSFT
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17444
llvm-svn: 354162
2019-02-16 03:59:45 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang -std=c++03 -target i686-windows-msvc -DMS -fno-declspec -fsyntax-only %s
|
2015-10-05 01:51:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang -std=c++03 -target x86_64-scei-ps4 -fno-declspec -fsyntax-only %s
|
2014-05-07 09:58:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define IS_KEYWORD(NAME) _Static_assert(!__is_identifier(NAME), #NAME)
|
|
|
|
#define NOT_KEYWORD(NAME) _Static_assert(__is_identifier(NAME), #NAME)
|
|
|
|
#define IS_TYPE(NAME) void is_##NAME##_type() { int f(NAME); }
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-24 06:43:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#if defined(CXX2A)
|
2015-06-05 09:10:24 +08:00
|
|
|
#define CONCEPTS_KEYWORD(NAME) IS_KEYWORD(NAME)
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define CONCEPTS_KEYWORD(NAME) NOT_KEYWORD(NAME)
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-05 01:51:05 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef DECLSPEC
|
|
|
|
#define DECLSPEC_KEYWORD(NAME) IS_KEYWORD(NAME)
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define DECLSPEC_KEYWORD(NAME) NOT_KEYWORD(NAME)
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-07 09:58:02 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CXX11
|
|
|
|
#define CXX11_KEYWORD(NAME) IS_KEYWORD(NAME)
|
|
|
|
#define CXX11_TYPE(NAME) IS_TYPE(NAME)
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define CXX11_KEYWORD(NAME) NOT_KEYWORD(NAME)
|
|
|
|
#define CXX11_TYPE(NAME)
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// C++11 keywords
|
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(nullptr);
|
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(decltype);
|
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(alignof);
|
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(alignas);
|
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(char16_t);
|
|
|
|
CXX11_TYPE(char16_t);
|
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(char32_t);
|
|
|
|
CXX11_TYPE(char32_t);
|
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(constexpr);
|
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(noexcept);
|
[MSVC] Recognize `static_assert` keyword in C and C++98
Summary:
The main effect is that clang now accepts the following conforming C11
code with MSVC headers:
#include <assert.h>
static_assert(1, "true");
This is a non-conforming extension (the keyword is outside the
implementer's namespace), so it is placed under -fms-compatibility
instead of -fms-extensions like most MSVC-specific keyword extensions.
Normally, in C11, the compiler is supposed to provide the _Static_assert
keyword, and assert.h should define static_assert to _Static_assert.
However, that is not what MSVC does, and MSVC doesn't even provide
_Static_assert.
This also has the less important side effect of enabling static_assert
in C++98 mode with -fms-compatibility. It's exceptionally difficult to
use modern MSVC headers without C++14 even, so this is relatively
unimportant.
Fixes PR26672
Patch by Andrey Bokhanko!
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis
Subscribers: cfe-commits, STL_MSFT
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17444
llvm-svn: 354162
2019-02-16 03:59:45 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef MS
|
2014-05-07 09:58:02 +08:00
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(static_assert);
|
[MSVC] Recognize `static_assert` keyword in C and C++98
Summary:
The main effect is that clang now accepts the following conforming C11
code with MSVC headers:
#include <assert.h>
static_assert(1, "true");
This is a non-conforming extension (the keyword is outside the
implementer's namespace), so it is placed under -fms-compatibility
instead of -fms-extensions like most MSVC-specific keyword extensions.
Normally, in C11, the compiler is supposed to provide the _Static_assert
keyword, and assert.h should define static_assert to _Static_assert.
However, that is not what MSVC does, and MSVC doesn't even provide
_Static_assert.
This also has the less important side effect of enabling static_assert
in C++98 mode with -fms-compatibility. It's exceptionally difficult to
use modern MSVC headers without C++14 even, so this is relatively
unimportant.
Fixes PR26672
Patch by Andrey Bokhanko!
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis
Subscribers: cfe-commits, STL_MSFT
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17444
llvm-svn: 354162
2019-02-16 03:59:45 +08:00
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
// MS compiler recognizes static_assert in all modes. So should we.
|
|
|
|
IS_KEYWORD(static_assert);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2014-05-07 09:58:02 +08:00
|
|
|
CXX11_KEYWORD(thread_local);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-24 06:43:22 +08:00
|
|
|
// Concepts keywords
|
2015-06-05 09:10:24 +08:00
|
|
|
CONCEPTS_KEYWORD(concept);
|
|
|
|
CONCEPTS_KEYWORD(requires);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-05 01:51:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// __declspec extension
|
|
|
|
DECLSPEC_KEYWORD(__declspec);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-07 09:58:02 +08:00
|
|
|
// Clang extension
|
|
|
|
IS_KEYWORD(__char16_t);
|
|
|
|
IS_TYPE(__char16_t);
|
|
|
|
IS_KEYWORD(__char32_t);
|
|
|
|
IS_TYPE(__char32_t);
|