2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -march=amdgcn -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=GCN,SI
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -march=amdgcn -mcpu=tonga -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=GCN,VI
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -march=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx900 -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=GCN,GFX9
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -march=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1010 -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=GCN,GFX10
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Test that add/sub with a constant is swapped to sub/add with negated
|
|
|
|
; constant to minimize code size.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i32_x_sub_64(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u32_e32 v0, vcc, 64, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_subrev_u32_e32 v1, 64, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_subrev_nc_u32_e32 v1, 64, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i32 %x, 64
|
|
|
|
store i32 %result, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i32_x_sub_64_multi_use(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_64_multi_use:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v3, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(1)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 64, v3
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v3, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_64_multi_use:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v4, v[0:1]
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(1) lgkmcnt(1)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u32_e32 v2, vcc, 64, v3
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 64, v4
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v3
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_64_multi_use:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v2, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(1)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_subrev_u32_e32 v1, 64, v1
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_subrev_u32_e32 v2, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v2, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_64_multi_use:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-05-01 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_clause 0x1
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v2, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(1)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_subrev_nc_u32_e32 v1, 64, v1
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_subrev_nc_u32_e32 v2, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v2, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load volatile i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%y = load volatile i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result0 = sub i32 %x, 64
|
|
|
|
%result1 = sub i32 %y, 64
|
|
|
|
store volatile i32 %result0, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
store volatile i32 %result1, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i32_64_sub_x(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i32_64_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_sub_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i32_64_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_sub_u32_e32 v0, vcc, 64, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i32_64_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_sub_u32_e32 v1, 64, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i32_64_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_sub_nc_u32_e32 v1, 64, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i32 64, %x
|
|
|
|
store i32 %result, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i32_x_sub_65(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_65:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xffffffbf, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_65:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, 0xffffffbf, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_65:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v1, 0xffffffbf, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_65:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v1, 0xffffffbf, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i32 %x, 65
|
|
|
|
store i32 %result, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i32_65_sub_x(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i32_65_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_sub_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0x41, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i32_65_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_sub_u32_e32 v0, vcc, 0x41, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i32_65_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_sub_u32_e32 v1, 0x41, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i32_65_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_sub_nc_u32_e32 v1, 0x41, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i32 65, %x
|
|
|
|
store i32 %result, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i32_x_sub_neg16(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 16, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, 16, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v1, 16, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v1, 16, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i32 %x, -16
|
|
|
|
store i32 %result, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i32_neg16_sub_x(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i32_neg16_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_sub_i32_e32 v2, vcc, -16, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i32_neg16_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_sub_u32_e32 v0, vcc, -16, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i32_neg16_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_sub_u32_e32 v1, -16, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i32_neg16_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_sub_nc_u32_e32 v1, -16, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i32 -16, %x
|
|
|
|
store i32 %result, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i32_x_sub_neg17(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_neg17:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 17, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_neg17:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, 17, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_neg17:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v1, 17, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i32_x_sub_neg17:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v1, 17, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i32 %x, -17
|
|
|
|
store i32 %result, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i32_neg17_sub_x(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i32 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i32_neg17_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_sub_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xffffffef, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i32_neg17_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_sub_u32_e32 v0, vcc, 0xffffffef, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i32_neg17_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_sub_u32_e32 v1, 0xffffffef, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i32_neg17_sub_x:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_sub_nc_u32_e32 v1, 0xffffffef, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i32 -17, %x
|
|
|
|
store i32 %result, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @s_test_i32_x_sub_64(i32 %x) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: s_test_i32_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_sub_i32 s0, s0, 64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: ;;#ASMSTART
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: ; use s0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: ;;#ASMEND
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: s_test_i32_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_sub_i32 s0, s0, 64
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: ;;#ASMSTART
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: ; use s0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: ;;#ASMEND
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: s_test_i32_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_sub_i32 s0, s0, 64
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: ;;#ASMSTART
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: ; use s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: ;;#ASMEND
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: s_test_i32_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_sub_i32 s0, s0, 64
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ;;#ASMSTART
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; use s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ;;#ASMEND
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%result = sub i32 %x, 64
|
|
|
|
call void asm sideeffect "; use $0", "s"(i32 %result)
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i16_x_sub_64(i16 addrspace(1)* %out, i16 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 1, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_short v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 1, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_ushort v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v0, 64, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_short v[2:3], v0
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 1, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ushort v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v1, 64, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_short v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 1, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_ushort v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_sub_nc_u16_e64 v1, v1, 64
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_short v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i16 %x, 64
|
|
|
|
store i16 %result, i16 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i16_x_sub_64_zext_to_i32(i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i16 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64_zext_to_i32:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v1, 1, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_ushort v3, v[1:2], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v1, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v0, vcc, 64, v3
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v0, 0xffff, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, v[1:2], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64_zext_to_i32:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v1, 1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v1, vcc, s2, v1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v2, vcc, 0, v2, vcc
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v3, vcc, s0, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_ushort v0, v[1:2]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v4, vcc, 0, v4, vcc
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v0, 64, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[3:4], v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64_zext_to_i32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v1, 1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ushort v1, v1, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v1, 64, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64_zext_to_i32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v1, 1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_ushort v1, v1, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_sub_nc_u16_e64 v1, v1, 64
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v1, 0xffff, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub i16 %x, 64
|
|
|
|
%zext = zext i16 %result to i32
|
|
|
|
store i32 %zext, i32 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-22 05:39:51 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_i16_x_sub_64_multi_use(i16 addrspace(1)* %out, i16 addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64_multi_use:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 1, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_ushort v3, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(1)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 64, v3
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_short v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_short v3, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64_multi_use:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 1, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_ushort v3, v[0:1]
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_ushort v4, v[0:1]
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(1) lgkmcnt(1)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v2, 64, v3
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v3, 64, v4
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_short v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_short v[0:1], v3
|
2019-05-31 23:06:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64_multi_use:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 1, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ushort v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(1)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v1, 64, v1
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v2, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_short v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_short v0, v2, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_i16_x_sub_64_multi_use:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 1, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-05-01 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_clause 0x1
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_ushort v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(1)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_sub_nc_u16_e64 v1, v1, 64
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_sub_nc_u16_e64 v2, v2, 64
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_short v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_short v0, v2, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load volatile i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%y = load volatile i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result0 = sub i16 %x, 64
|
|
|
|
%result1 = sub i16 %y, 64
|
|
|
|
store volatile i16 %result0, i16 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
store volatile i16 %result1, i16 addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_64(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_64:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff0000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v2, v3
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xffc00000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_64:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, 64
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_sub_u16_sdwa v2, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v3, 64, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 64 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 64 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub <2 x i16> %x, <i16 64, i16 64>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_64(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_64:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v3, vcc, -7, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff0000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v2, v3
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xffc00000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_64:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, 64
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_e32 v2, -7, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_sub_u16_sdwa v3, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, 0x400007
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_64:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-05 03:44:01 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 0x400007
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub <2 x i16> %x, <i16 7, i16 64>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_123(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_123:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 64, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff0000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v2, v3
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xff850000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_123:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, 0xffffff85
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v2, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v3, 64, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_123:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, 0x7b0040
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_64_123:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-05 03:44:01 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 0x7b0040
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub <2 x i16> %x, <i16 64, i16 123>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Can fold 0 and inline immediate in other half.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_0(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_0:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v3, vcc, -7, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v3, v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_0:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff0000, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_e32 v3, -7, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_7_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 7
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub <2 x i16> %x, <i16 7, i16 0>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Can fold 0 and inline immediate in other half.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_16(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_16:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xfff00000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_16:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, -16
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v1, v0, v1 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v0, v0, v1 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 16 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 16 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub <2 x i16> %x, <i16 0, i16 16>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_1_0(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_1_0:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0x3c000000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_1_0:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0x3c00
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v1, v0, v1 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v0, v0, v1 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_1_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_brev_b32 s2, 35
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_1_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 0xc400 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub <2 x i16> %x, <i16 0, i16 -15360>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_neg1_0(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_neg1_0:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xbc000000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_neg1_0:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0xffffbc00
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v1, v0, v1 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v0, v0, v1 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_neg1_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_brev_b32 s2, 34
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_sub_0_neg1_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_i16 v1, v1, 0x4400 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = sub <2 x i16> %x, <i16 0, i16 17408>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; -32 isn't an inline immediate, but 32 is
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_neg32(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 32, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff0000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v2, v3
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xffe00000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, 32
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_sub_u16_sdwa v2, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v3, 32, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 -32, i16 -32>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg32(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xffe00000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 32
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_sub_u16_sdwa v1, v0, v1 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v0, v0, v1 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 0, i16 -32>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_0(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_0:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 32, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v3, v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_0:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff0000, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v3, 32, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 -32, i16 0>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; 16 and -16 are both inline immediates
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_neg16(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v3, vcc, -16, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff0000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v2, v3
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xfff00000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, -16
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_e32 v2, -16, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v3, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 16 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 16 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 -16, i16 -16>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg16(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xfff00000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, -16
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v1, v0, v1 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v0, v0, v1 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 16 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_0_neg16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 16 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 0, i16 -16>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_0(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_0:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v3, vcc, -16, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v3, v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_0:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff0000, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_e32 v3, -16, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg16_0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 -16, i16 0>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fpone(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fpone:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 0xffffc400, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff0000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v2, v3
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xc4000000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fpone:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s2, 0xc400
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_e32 v2, s2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v3, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fpone:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, 0x3c003c00
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fpone:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 0x3c00 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 -15360, i16 -15360>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfpone(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfpone:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 0x4400, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff0000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v2, v3
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0x44000000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfpone:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s2, 0x4400
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_e32 v2, s2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v3, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfpone:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, 0xbc00bc00
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfpone:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 0xbc00 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 17408, i16 17408>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fptwo(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fptwo:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 0x4000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff0000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v2, v3
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 2.0, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fptwo:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s2, 0x4000
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_e32 v2, s2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v3, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fptwo:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, 0xc000c000
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_fptwo:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 0xc000 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 16384, i16 16384>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfptwo(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfptwo:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-09-25 00:02:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v3, vcc, 0xffffc000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s4, 0xffff0000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_bfi_b32 v2, s4, v2, v3
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, -2.0, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfptwo:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v3, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s2, 0xc000
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_e32 v2, s2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u16_sdwa v3, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfptwo:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, 0x40004000
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg_negfptwo:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 0x4000 op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 -16384, i16 -16384>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_undef_neg32(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_undef_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff0000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 0xffe00000, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_undef_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 32
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_sub_u16_sdwa v0, v0, v1 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_undef_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_undef_neg32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32 op_sel:[0,1] op_sel_hi:[1,0]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 undef, i16 -32>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_undef(<2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in) #0 {
|
|
|
|
; SI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_undef:
|
|
|
|
; SI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s7, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s6, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[4:5], s[2:3]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_load_dword v2, v[0:1], s[4:7], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 s[2:3], s[6:7]
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_subrev_i32_e32 v2, vcc, 32, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff, v2
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v2, v[0:1], s[0:3], 0 addr64
|
|
|
|
; SI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; VI-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_undef:
|
|
|
|
; VI: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 2, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v0, vcc, s2, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_load_dword v0, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, s0, v2
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_addc_u32_e32 v3, vcc, 0, v3, vcc
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0) lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: v_subrev_u16_e32 v0, 32, v0
|
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[2:3], v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; VI-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_undef:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-LABEL: v_test_v2i16_x_add_neg32_undef:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10: ; %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v0, 2, v0
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_load_dword v1, v0, s[2:3]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-08-14 04:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: v_pk_sub_u16 v1, v1, 32
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: global_store_dword v0, v1, s[0:1]
|
2020-01-08 02:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-20 06:37:08 +08:00
|
|
|
%tid = call i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x()
|
|
|
|
%tid.ext = sext i32 %tid to i64
|
|
|
|
%gep = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %in, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%gep.out = getelementptr inbounds <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %out, i64 %tid.ext
|
|
|
|
%x = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep
|
|
|
|
%result = add <2 x i16> %x, <i16 -32, i16 undef>
|
|
|
|
store <2 x i16> %result, <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %gep.out
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-31 03:30:24 +08:00
|
|
|
declare i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x() #1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributes #0 = { nounwind }
|
|
|
|
attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone }
|