llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/inline-optim.c

38 lines
1.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// Make sure -finline-functions family flags are behaving correctly.
//
// REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-pc-win32 -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=NOINLINE %s
[PM] Introduce options to enable the (still experimental) new pass manager, and a code path to use it. The option is actually a top-level option but does contain 'experimental' in the name. This is the compromise suggested by Richard in discussions. We expect this option will be around long enough and have enough users towards the end that it merits not being relegated to CC1, but it still needs to be clear that this option will go away at some point. The backend code is a fresh codepath dedicated to handling the flow with the new pass manager. This was also Richard's suggested code structuring to essentially leave a clean path for development rather than carrying complexity or idiosyncracies of how we do things just to share code with the parts of this in common with the legacy pass manager. And it turns out, not much is really in common even though we use the legacy pass manager for codegen at this point. I've switched a couple of tests to run with the new pass manager, and they appear to work. There are still plenty of bugs that need squashing (just with basic experiments I've found two already!) but they aren't in this code, and the whole point is to expose the necessary hooks to start experimenting with the pass manager in more realistic scenarios. That said, I want to *strongly caution* anyone itching to play with this: it is still *very shaky*. Several large components have not yet been shaken down. For example I have bugs in both the always inliner and inliner that I have already spotted and will be fixing independently. Still, this is a fun milestone. =D One thing not in this patch (but that might be very reasonable to add) is some level of support for raw textual pass pipelines such as what Sean had a patch for some time ago. I'm mostly interested in the more traditional flow of getting the IR out of Clang and then running it through opt, but I can see other use cases so someone may want to add it. And of course, *many* features are not yet supported! - O1 is currently more like O2 - None of the sanitizers are wired up - ObjC ARC optimizer isn't wired up - ... So plenty of stuff still lef to do! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28077 llvm-svn: 290450
2016-12-24 04:44:01 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-pc-win32 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=NOINLINE %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-pc-win32 -O3 -fno-inline-functions -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=NOINLINE %s
[PM] Introduce options to enable the (still experimental) new pass manager, and a code path to use it. The option is actually a top-level option but does contain 'experimental' in the name. This is the compromise suggested by Richard in discussions. We expect this option will be around long enough and have enough users towards the end that it merits not being relegated to CC1, but it still needs to be clear that this option will go away at some point. The backend code is a fresh codepath dedicated to handling the flow with the new pass manager. This was also Richard's suggested code structuring to essentially leave a clean path for development rather than carrying complexity or idiosyncracies of how we do things just to share code with the parts of this in common with the legacy pass manager. And it turns out, not much is really in common even though we use the legacy pass manager for codegen at this point. I've switched a couple of tests to run with the new pass manager, and they appear to work. There are still plenty of bugs that need squashing (just with basic experiments I've found two already!) but they aren't in this code, and the whole point is to expose the necessary hooks to start experimenting with the pass manager in more realistic scenarios. That said, I want to *strongly caution* anyone itching to play with this: it is still *very shaky*. Several large components have not yet been shaken down. For example I have bugs in both the always inliner and inliner that I have already spotted and will be fixing independently. Still, this is a fun milestone. =D One thing not in this patch (but that might be very reasonable to add) is some level of support for raw textual pass pipelines such as what Sean had a patch for some time ago. I'm mostly interested in the more traditional flow of getting the IR out of Clang and then running it through opt, but I can see other use cases so someone may want to add it. And of course, *many* features are not yet supported! - O1 is currently more like O2 - None of the sanitizers are wired up - ObjC ARC optimizer isn't wired up - ... So plenty of stuff still lef to do! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28077 llvm-svn: 290450
2016-12-24 04:44:01 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-pc-win32 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -O3 -fno-inline-functions -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=NOINLINE %s
Cleanup the handling of noinline function attributes, -fno-inline, -fno-inline-functions, -O0, and optnone. These were really, really tangled together: - We used the noinline LLVM attribute for -fno-inline - But not for -fno-inline-functions (breaking LTO) - But we did use it for -finline-hint-functions (yay, LTO is happy!) - But we didn't for -O0 (LTO is sad yet again...) - We had weird structuring of CodeGenOpts with both an inlining enumeration and a boolean. They interacted in weird ways and needlessly. - A *lot* of set smashing went on with setting these, and then got worse when we considered optnone and other inlining-effecting attributes. - A bunch of inline affecting attributes were managed in a completely different place from -fno-inline. - Even with -fno-inline we failed to put the LLVM noinline attribute onto many generated function definitions because they didn't show up as AST-level functions. - If you passed -O0 but -finline-functions we would run the normal inliner pass in LLVM despite it being in the O0 pipeline, which really doesn't make much sense. - Lastly, we used things like '-fno-inline' to manipulate the pass pipeline which forced the pass pipeline to be much more parameterizable than it really needs to be. Instead we can *just* use the optimization level to select a pipeline and control the rest via attributes. Sadly, this causes a bunch of churn in tests because we don't run the optimizer in the tests and check the contents of attribute sets. It would be awesome if attribute sets were a bit more FileCheck friendly, but oh well. I think this is a significant improvement and should remove the semantic need to change what inliner pass we run in order to comply with the requested inlining semantics by relying completely on attributes. It also cleans up tho optnone and related handling a bit. One unfortunate aspect of this is that for generating alwaysinline routines like those in OpenMP we end up removing noinline and then adding alwaysinline. I tried a bunch of other approaches, but because we recompute function attributes from scratch and don't have a declaration here I couldn't find anything substantially cleaner than this. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28053 llvm-svn: 290398
2016-12-23 09:24:49 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-pc-win32 -O3 -finline-hint-functions -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=HINT %s
[PM] Introduce options to enable the (still experimental) new pass manager, and a code path to use it. The option is actually a top-level option but does contain 'experimental' in the name. This is the compromise suggested by Richard in discussions. We expect this option will be around long enough and have enough users towards the end that it merits not being relegated to CC1, but it still needs to be clear that this option will go away at some point. The backend code is a fresh codepath dedicated to handling the flow with the new pass manager. This was also Richard's suggested code structuring to essentially leave a clean path for development rather than carrying complexity or idiosyncracies of how we do things just to share code with the parts of this in common with the legacy pass manager. And it turns out, not much is really in common even though we use the legacy pass manager for codegen at this point. I've switched a couple of tests to run with the new pass manager, and they appear to work. There are still plenty of bugs that need squashing (just with basic experiments I've found two already!) but they aren't in this code, and the whole point is to expose the necessary hooks to start experimenting with the pass manager in more realistic scenarios. That said, I want to *strongly caution* anyone itching to play with this: it is still *very shaky*. Several large components have not yet been shaken down. For example I have bugs in both the always inliner and inliner that I have already spotted and will be fixing independently. Still, this is a fun milestone. =D One thing not in this patch (but that might be very reasonable to add) is some level of support for raw textual pass pipelines such as what Sean had a patch for some time ago. I'm mostly interested in the more traditional flow of getting the IR out of Clang and then running it through opt, but I can see other use cases so someone may want to add it. And of course, *many* features are not yet supported! - O1 is currently more like O2 - None of the sanitizers are wired up - ObjC ARC optimizer isn't wired up - ... So plenty of stuff still lef to do! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28077 llvm-svn: 290450
2016-12-24 04:44:01 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-pc-win32 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -O3 -finline-hint-functions -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=HINT %s
Cleanup the handling of noinline function attributes, -fno-inline, -fno-inline-functions, -O0, and optnone. These were really, really tangled together: - We used the noinline LLVM attribute for -fno-inline - But not for -fno-inline-functions (breaking LTO) - But we did use it for -finline-hint-functions (yay, LTO is happy!) - But we didn't for -O0 (LTO is sad yet again...) - We had weird structuring of CodeGenOpts with both an inlining enumeration and a boolean. They interacted in weird ways and needlessly. - A *lot* of set smashing went on with setting these, and then got worse when we considered optnone and other inlining-effecting attributes. - A bunch of inline affecting attributes were managed in a completely different place from -fno-inline. - Even with -fno-inline we failed to put the LLVM noinline attribute onto many generated function definitions because they didn't show up as AST-level functions. - If you passed -O0 but -finline-functions we would run the normal inliner pass in LLVM despite it being in the O0 pipeline, which really doesn't make much sense. - Lastly, we used things like '-fno-inline' to manipulate the pass pipeline which forced the pass pipeline to be much more parameterizable than it really needs to be. Instead we can *just* use the optimization level to select a pipeline and control the rest via attributes. Sadly, this causes a bunch of churn in tests because we don't run the optimizer in the tests and check the contents of attribute sets. It would be awesome if attribute sets were a bit more FileCheck friendly, but oh well. I think this is a significant improvement and should remove the semantic need to change what inliner pass we run in order to comply with the requested inlining semantics by relying completely on attributes. It also cleans up tho optnone and related handling a bit. One unfortunate aspect of this is that for generating alwaysinline routines like those in OpenMP we end up removing noinline and then adding alwaysinline. I tried a bunch of other approaches, but because we recompute function attributes from scratch and don't have a declaration here I couldn't find anything substantially cleaner than this. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28053 llvm-svn: 290398
2016-12-23 09:24:49 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-pc-win32 -O3 -finline-functions -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE %s
[PM] Introduce options to enable the (still experimental) new pass manager, and a code path to use it. The option is actually a top-level option but does contain 'experimental' in the name. This is the compromise suggested by Richard in discussions. We expect this option will be around long enough and have enough users towards the end that it merits not being relegated to CC1, but it still needs to be clear that this option will go away at some point. The backend code is a fresh codepath dedicated to handling the flow with the new pass manager. This was also Richard's suggested code structuring to essentially leave a clean path for development rather than carrying complexity or idiosyncracies of how we do things just to share code with the parts of this in common with the legacy pass manager. And it turns out, not much is really in common even though we use the legacy pass manager for codegen at this point. I've switched a couple of tests to run with the new pass manager, and they appear to work. There are still plenty of bugs that need squashing (just with basic experiments I've found two already!) but they aren't in this code, and the whole point is to expose the necessary hooks to start experimenting with the pass manager in more realistic scenarios. That said, I want to *strongly caution* anyone itching to play with this: it is still *very shaky*. Several large components have not yet been shaken down. For example I have bugs in both the always inliner and inliner that I have already spotted and will be fixing independently. Still, this is a fun milestone. =D One thing not in this patch (but that might be very reasonable to add) is some level of support for raw textual pass pipelines such as what Sean had a patch for some time ago. I'm mostly interested in the more traditional flow of getting the IR out of Clang and then running it through opt, but I can see other use cases so someone may want to add it. And of course, *many* features are not yet supported! - O1 is currently more like O2 - None of the sanitizers are wired up - ObjC ARC optimizer isn't wired up - ... So plenty of stuff still lef to do! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28077 llvm-svn: 290450
2016-12-24 04:44:01 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-pc-win32 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -O3 -finline-functions -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE %s
inline int inline_hint(int a, int b) { return(a+b); }
int inline_no_hint(int a, int b) { return (a/b); }
inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) int inline_always(int a, int b) { return(a*b); }
volatile int *pa = (int*) 0x1000;
void foo() {
// NOINLINE-LABEL: @foo
// HINT-LABEL: @foo
// INLINE-LABEL: @foo
// NOINLINE: call i32 @inline_hint
// HINT-NOT: call i32 @inline_hint
// INLINE-NOT: call i32 @inline_hint
pa[0] = inline_hint(pa[1],pa[2]);
// NOINLINE-NOT: call i32 @inline_always
// HINT-NOT: call i32 @inline_always
// INLINE-NOT: call i32 @inline_always
pa[3] = inline_always(pa[4],pa[5]);
// NOINLINE: call i32 @inline_no_hint
// HINT: call i32 @inline_no_hint
// INLINE-NOT: call i32 @inline_no_hint
pa[6] = inline_no_hint(pa[7], pa[8]);
}