llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCTargetMachine.cpp

380 lines
13 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===-- PPCTargetMachine.cpp - Define TargetMachine for PowerPC -----------===//
//
2004-06-22 00:55:25 +08:00
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
2004-06-22 00:55:25 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Top-level implementation for the PowerPC target.
2004-06-22 00:55:25 +08:00
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "PPCTargetMachine.h"
#include "PPC.h"
#include "PPCTargetObjectFile.h"
#include "PPCTargetTransformInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h"
#include "llvm/MC/MCStreamer.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/FormattedStream.h"
#include "llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetOptions.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
2004-06-22 00:55:25 +08:00
using namespace llvm;
static cl::
opt<bool> DisableCTRLoops("disable-ppc-ctrloops", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Disable CTR loops for PPC"));
[PowerPC] Prepare loops for pre-increment loads/stores PowerPC supports pre-increment load/store instructions (except for Altivec/VSX vector load/stores). Using these on embedded cores can be very important, but most loops are not naturally set up to use them. We can often change that, however, by placing loops into a non-canonical form. Generically, this means transforming loops like this: for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) array[i] = c; to look like this: T *p = array[-1]; for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) *++p = c; the key point is that addresses accessed are pulled into dedicated PHIs and "pre-decremented" in the loop preheader. This allows the use of pre-increment load/store instructions without loop peeling. A target-specific late IR-level pass (running post-LSR), PPCLoopPreIncPrep, is introduced to perform this transformation. I've used this code out-of-tree for generating code for the PPC A2 for over a year. Somewhat to my surprise, running the test suite + externals on a P7 with this transformation enabled showed no performance regressions, and one speedup: External/SPEC/CINT2006/483.xalancbmk/483.xalancbmk -2.32514% +/- 1.03736% So I'm going to enable it on everything for now. I was surprised by this because, on the POWER cores, these pre-increment load/store instructions are cracked (and, thus, harder to schedule effectively). But seeing no regressions, and feeling that it is generally easier to split instructions apart late than it is to combine them late, this might be the better approach regardless. In the future, we might want to integrate this functionality into LSR (but currently LSR does not create new PHI nodes, so (for that and other reasons) significant work would need to be done). llvm-svn: 228328
2015-02-06 02:43:00 +08:00
static cl::
opt<bool> DisablePreIncPrep("disable-ppc-preinc-prep", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Disable PPC loop preinc prep"));
[PowerPC] Select between VSX A-type and M-type FMA instructions just before RA The VSX instruction set has two types of FMA instructions: A-type (where the addend is taken from the output register) and M-type (where one of the product operands is taken from the output register). This adds a small pass that runs just after MI scheduling (and, thus, just before register allocation) that mutates A-type instructions (that are created during isel) into M-type instructions when: 1. This will eliminate an otherwise-necessary copy of the addend 2. One of the product operands is killed by the instruction The "right" moment to make this decision is in between scheduling and register allocation, because only there do we know whether or not one of the product operands is killed by any particular instruction. Unfortunately, this also makes the implementation somewhat complicated, because the MIs are not in SSA form and we need to preserve the LiveIntervals analysis. As a simple example, if we have: %vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg9; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg9 %vreg5<def,tied1> = XSMADDADP %vreg5<tied0>, %vreg17, %vreg16, %RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg17,%vreg16 ... %vreg9<def,tied1> = XSMADDADP %vreg9<tied0>, %vreg17, %vreg19, %RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg9,%vreg17,%vreg19 ... We can eliminate the copy by changing from the A-type to the M-type instruction. This means: %vreg5<def,tied1> = XSMADDADP %vreg5<tied0>, %vreg17, %vreg16, %RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg17,%vreg16 is replaced by: %vreg16<def,tied1> = XSMADDMDP %vreg16<tied0>, %vreg18, %vreg9, %RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg16,%vreg18,%vreg9 and we remove: %vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg9; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg9 llvm-svn: 204768
2014-03-26 07:29:21 +08:00
static cl::opt<bool>
VSXFMAMutateEarly("schedule-ppc-vsx-fma-mutation-early",
cl::Hidden, cl::desc("Schedule VSX FMA instruction mutation early"));
[PPC64LE] Remove unnecessary swaps from lane-insensitive vector computations This patch adds a new SSA MI pass that runs on little-endian PPC64 code with VSX enabled. Loads and stores of 4x32 and 2x64 vectors without alignment constraints are accomplished for little-endian using lxvd2x/xxswapd and xxswapd/stxvd2x. The existence of the additional xxswapd instructions hurts performance in comparison with big-endian code, but they are necessary in the general case to support correct semantics. However, the general case does not apply to most vector code. Many vector instructions are lane-insensitive; they do not "care" which lanes the parallel computations are performed within, provided that the resulting data is stored into the correct locations. Thus this pass looks for computations that perform only lane-insensitive operations, and remove the unnecessary swaps from loads and stores in such computations. Future improvements will allow computations using certain lane-sensitive operations to also be optimized in this manner, by modifying the lane-sensitive operations to account for the permuted order of the lanes. However, this patch only adds the infrastructure to permit this; no lane-sensitive operations are optimized at this time. This code is heavily exercised by the various vectorizing applications in the projects/test-suite tree. For the time being, I have only added one simple test case to demonstrate what the pass is doing. Although it is quite simple, it provides coverage for much of the code, including the special case handling of copies and subreg-to-reg operations feeding the swaps. I plan to add additional tests in the future as I fill in more of the "special handling" code. Two existing tests were affected, because they expected the swaps to be present, but they are now removed. llvm-svn: 235910
2015-04-28 03:57:34 +08:00
static cl::
opt<bool> DisableVSXSwapRemoval("disable-ppc-vsx-swap-removal", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Disable VSX Swap Removal for PPC"));
static cl::opt<bool>
EnableGEPOpt("ppc-gep-opt", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Enable optimizations on complex GEPs"),
cl::init(true));
static cl::opt<bool>
EnablePrefetch("enable-ppc-prefetching",
cl::desc("disable software prefetching on PPC"),
cl::init(false), cl::Hidden);
[PowerPC] Add extra r2 read deps on @toc@l relocations If some commits are happy, and some commits are sad, this is a sad commit. It is sad because it restricts instruction scheduling to work around a binutils linker bug, and moreover, one that may never be fixed. On 2012-05-21, GCC was updated not to produce code triggering this bug, and now we'll do the same... When resolving an address using the ELF ABI TOC pointer, two relocations are generally required: one for the high part and one for the low part. Only the high part generally explicitly depends on r2 (the TOC pointer). And, so, we might produce code like this: .Ltmp526: addis 3, 2, .LC12@toc@ha .Ltmp1628: std 2, 40(1) ld 5, 0(27) ld 2, 8(27) ld 11, 16(27) ld 3, .LC12@toc@l(3) rldicl 4, 4, 0, 32 mtctr 5 bctrl ld 2, 40(1) And there is nothing wrong with this code, as such, but there is a linker bug in binutils (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414) that will misoptimize this code sequence to this: nop std r2,40(r1) ld r5,0(r27) ld r2,8(r27) ld r11,16(r27) ld r3,-32472(r2) clrldi r4,r4,32 mtctr r5 bctrl ld r2,40(r1) because the linker does not know (and does not check) that the value in r2 changed in between the instruction using the .LC12@toc@ha (TOC-relative) relocation and the instruction using the .LC12@toc@l(3) relocation. Because it finds these instructions using the relocations (and not by scanning the instructions), it has been asserted that there is no good way to detect the change of r2 in between. As a result, this bug may never be fixed (i.e. it may become part of the definition of the ABI). GCC was updated to add extra dependencies on r2 to instructions using the @toc@l relocations to avoid this problem, and we'll do the same here. This is done as a separate pass because: 1. These extra r2 dependencies are not really properties of the instructions, but rather due to a linker bug, and maybe one day we'll be able to get rid of them when targeting linkers without this bug (and, thus, keeping the logic centralized here will make that straightforward). 2. There are ISel-level peephole optimizations that propagate the @toc@l relocations to some user instructions, and so the exta dependencies do not apply only to a fixed set of instructions (without undesirable definition replication). The test case was reduced with the help of bugpoint, with minimal cleaning. I'm looking forward to our upcoming MI serialization support, and with that, much better tests can be created. llvm-svn: 237556
2015-05-18 14:25:59 +08:00
static cl::opt<bool>
EnableExtraTOCRegDeps("enable-ppc-extra-toc-reg-deps",
cl::desc("Add extra TOC register dependencies"),
cl::init(true), cl::Hidden);
static cl::opt<bool>
EnableMachineCombinerPass("ppc-machine-combiner",
cl::desc("Enable the machine combiner pass"),
cl::init(true), cl::Hidden);
extern "C" void LLVMInitializePowerPCTarget() {
// Register the targets
2012-02-03 13:12:30 +08:00
RegisterTargetMachine<PPC32TargetMachine> A(ThePPC32Target);
RegisterTargetMachine<PPC64TargetMachine> B(ThePPC64Target);
RegisterTargetMachine<PPC64TargetMachine> C(ThePPC64LETarget);
}
/// Return the datalayout string of a subtarget.
static std::string getDataLayoutString(const Triple &T) {
bool is64Bit = T.getArch() == Triple::ppc64 || T.getArch() == Triple::ppc64le;
std::string Ret;
// Most PPC* platforms are big endian, PPC64LE is little endian.
if (T.getArch() == Triple::ppc64le)
Ret = "e";
else
Ret = "E";
Ret += DataLayout::getManglingComponent(T);
// PPC32 has 32 bit pointers. The PS3 (OS Lv2) is a PPC64 machine with 32 bit
// pointers.
if (!is64Bit || T.getOS() == Triple::Lv2)
Ret += "-p:32:32";
// Note, the alignment values for f64 and i64 on ppc64 in Darwin
// documentation are wrong; these are correct (i.e. "what gcc does").
if (is64Bit || !T.isOSDarwin())
Ret += "-i64:64";
else
Ret += "-f64:32:64";
// PPC64 has 32 and 64 bit registers, PPC32 has only 32 bit ones.
if (is64Bit)
Ret += "-n32:64";
else
Ret += "-n32";
return Ret;
}
static std::string computeFSAdditions(StringRef FS, CodeGenOpt::Level OL,
const Triple &TT) {
std::string FullFS = FS;
// Make sure 64-bit features are available when CPUname is generic
if (TT.getArch() == Triple::ppc64 || TT.getArch() == Triple::ppc64le) {
if (!FullFS.empty())
FullFS = "+64bit," + FullFS;
else
FullFS = "+64bit";
}
if (OL >= CodeGenOpt::Default) {
if (!FullFS.empty())
FullFS = "+crbits," + FullFS;
else
FullFS = "+crbits";
}
[PowerPC] Loosen ELFv1 PPC64 func descriptor loads for indirect calls Function pointers under PPC64 ELFv1 (which is used on PPC64/Linux on the POWER7, A2 and earlier cores) are really pointers to a function descriptor, a structure with three pointers: the actual pointer to the code to which to jump, the pointer to the TOC needed by the callee, and an environment pointer. We used to chain these loads, and make them opaque to the rest of the optimizer, so that they'd always occur directly before the call. This is not necessary, and in fact, highly suboptimal on embedded cores. Once the function pointer is known, the loads can be performed ahead of time; in fact, they can be hoisted out of loops. Now these function descriptors are almost always generated by the linker, and thus the contents of the descriptors are invariant. As a result, by default, we'll mark the associated loads as invariant (allowing them to be hoisted out of loops). I've added a target feature to turn this off, however, just in case someone needs that option (constructing an on-stack descriptor, casting it to a function pointer, and then calling it cannot be well-defined C/C++ code, but I can imagine some JIT-compilation system doing so). Consider this simple test: $ cat call.c typedef void (*fp)(); void bar(fp x) { for (int i = 0; i < 1600000000; ++i) x(); } $ cat main.c typedef void (*fp)(); void bar(fp x); void foo() {} int main() { bar(foo); } On the PPC A2 (the BG/Q supercomputer), marking the function-descriptor loads as invariant brings the execution time down to ~8 seconds from ~32 seconds with the loads in the loop. The difference on the POWER7 is smaller. Compiling with: gcc -std=c99 -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c : ~6 seconds [this is 4.8.2] clang -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c : ~5.3 seconds clang -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c -mno-invariant-function-descriptors : ~4 seconds (looks like we'd benefit from additional loop unrolling here, as a first guess, because this is faster with the extra loads) The -mno-invariant-function-descriptors will be added to Clang shortly. llvm-svn: 226207
2015-01-16 05:17:34 +08:00
if (OL != CodeGenOpt::None) {
2015-09-22 19:13:55 +08:00
if (!FullFS.empty())
[PowerPC] Loosen ELFv1 PPC64 func descriptor loads for indirect calls Function pointers under PPC64 ELFv1 (which is used on PPC64/Linux on the POWER7, A2 and earlier cores) are really pointers to a function descriptor, a structure with three pointers: the actual pointer to the code to which to jump, the pointer to the TOC needed by the callee, and an environment pointer. We used to chain these loads, and make them opaque to the rest of the optimizer, so that they'd always occur directly before the call. This is not necessary, and in fact, highly suboptimal on embedded cores. Once the function pointer is known, the loads can be performed ahead of time; in fact, they can be hoisted out of loops. Now these function descriptors are almost always generated by the linker, and thus the contents of the descriptors are invariant. As a result, by default, we'll mark the associated loads as invariant (allowing them to be hoisted out of loops). I've added a target feature to turn this off, however, just in case someone needs that option (constructing an on-stack descriptor, casting it to a function pointer, and then calling it cannot be well-defined C/C++ code, but I can imagine some JIT-compilation system doing so). Consider this simple test: $ cat call.c typedef void (*fp)(); void bar(fp x) { for (int i = 0; i < 1600000000; ++i) x(); } $ cat main.c typedef void (*fp)(); void bar(fp x); void foo() {} int main() { bar(foo); } On the PPC A2 (the BG/Q supercomputer), marking the function-descriptor loads as invariant brings the execution time down to ~8 seconds from ~32 seconds with the loads in the loop. The difference on the POWER7 is smaller. Compiling with: gcc -std=c99 -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c : ~6 seconds [this is 4.8.2] clang -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c : ~5.3 seconds clang -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c -mno-invariant-function-descriptors : ~4 seconds (looks like we'd benefit from additional loop unrolling here, as a first guess, because this is faster with the extra loads) The -mno-invariant-function-descriptors will be added to Clang shortly. llvm-svn: 226207
2015-01-16 05:17:34 +08:00
FullFS = "+invariant-function-descriptors," + FullFS;
else
FullFS = "+invariant-function-descriptors";
}
return FullFS;
}
static std::unique_ptr<TargetLoweringObjectFile> createTLOF(const Triple &TT) {
// If it isn't a Mach-O file then it's going to be a linux ELF
// object file.
if (TT.isOSDarwin())
return make_unique<TargetLoweringObjectFileMachO>();
return make_unique<PPC64LinuxTargetObjectFile>();
}
static PPCTargetMachine::PPCABI computeTargetABI(const Triple &TT,
const TargetOptions &Options) {
if (Options.MCOptions.getABIName().startswith("elfv1"))
return PPCTargetMachine::PPC_ABI_ELFv1;
else if (Options.MCOptions.getABIName().startswith("elfv2"))
return PPCTargetMachine::PPC_ABI_ELFv2;
assert(Options.MCOptions.getABIName().empty() &&
2015-09-22 19:15:07 +08:00
"Unknown target-abi option!");
if (!TT.isMacOSX()) {
switch (TT.getArch()) {
case Triple::ppc64le:
return PPCTargetMachine::PPC_ABI_ELFv2;
case Triple::ppc64:
return PPCTargetMachine::PPC_ABI_ELFv1;
default:
// Fallthrough.
;
}
}
return PPCTargetMachine::PPC_ABI_UNKNOWN;
}
// The FeatureString here is a little subtle. We are modifying the feature
// string with what are (currently) non-function specific overrides as it goes
// into the LLVMTargetMachine constructor and then using the stored value in the
// Subtarget constructor below it.
PPCTargetMachine::PPCTargetMachine(const Target &T, const Triple &TT,
StringRef CPU, StringRef FS,
const TargetOptions &Options,
Reloc::Model RM, CodeModel::Model CM,
CodeGenOpt::Level OL)
: LLVMTargetMachine(T, getDataLayoutString(TT), TT, CPU,
computeFSAdditions(FS, OL, TT), Options, RM, CM, OL),
TLOF(createTLOF(getTargetTriple())),
TargetABI(computeTargetABI(TT, Options)),
Subtarget(TargetTriple, CPU, computeFSAdditions(FS, OL, TT), *this) {
// For the estimates, convergence is quadratic, so we essentially double the
// number of digits correct after every iteration. For both FRE and FRSQRTE,
// the minimum architected relative accuracy is 2^-5. When hasRecipPrec(),
// this is 2^-14. IEEE float has 23 digits and double has 52 digits.
unsigned RefinementSteps = Subtarget.hasRecipPrec() ? 1 : 3,
RefinementSteps64 = RefinementSteps + 1;
this->Options.Reciprocals.setDefaults("sqrtf", true, RefinementSteps);
this->Options.Reciprocals.setDefaults("vec-sqrtf", true, RefinementSteps);
this->Options.Reciprocals.setDefaults("divf", true, RefinementSteps);
this->Options.Reciprocals.setDefaults("vec-divf", true, RefinementSteps);
this->Options.Reciprocals.setDefaults("sqrtd", true, RefinementSteps64);
this->Options.Reciprocals.setDefaults("vec-sqrtd", true, RefinementSteps64);
this->Options.Reciprocals.setDefaults("divd", true, RefinementSteps64);
this->Options.Reciprocals.setDefaults("vec-divd", true, RefinementSteps64);
initAsmInfo();
}
PPCTargetMachine::~PPCTargetMachine() {}
void PPC32TargetMachine::anchor() { }
PPC32TargetMachine::PPC32TargetMachine(const Target &T, const Triple &TT,
StringRef CPU, StringRef FS,
const TargetOptions &Options,
Reloc::Model RM, CodeModel::Model CM,
CodeGenOpt::Level OL)
: PPCTargetMachine(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL) {}
void PPC64TargetMachine::anchor() { }
PPC64TargetMachine::PPC64TargetMachine(const Target &T, const Triple &TT,
StringRef CPU, StringRef FS,
const TargetOptions &Options,
Reloc::Model RM, CodeModel::Model CM,
CodeGenOpt::Level OL)
: PPCTargetMachine(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL) {}
const PPCSubtarget *
PPCTargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl(const Function &F) const {
Attribute CPUAttr = F.getFnAttribute("target-cpu");
Attribute FSAttr = F.getFnAttribute("target-features");
std::string CPU = !CPUAttr.hasAttribute(Attribute::None)
? CPUAttr.getValueAsString().str()
: TargetCPU;
std::string FS = !FSAttr.hasAttribute(Attribute::None)
? FSAttr.getValueAsString().str()
: TargetFS;
auto &I = SubtargetMap[CPU + FS];
if (!I) {
// This needs to be done before we create a new subtarget since any
// creation will depend on the TM and the code generation flags on the
// function that reside in TargetOptions.
resetTargetOptions(F);
I = llvm::make_unique<PPCSubtarget>(
TargetTriple, CPU,
// FIXME: It would be good to have the subtarget additions here
// not necessary. Anything that turns them on/off (overrides) ends
// up being put at the end of the feature string, but the defaults
// shouldn't require adding them. Fixing this means pulling Feature64Bit
// out of most of the target cpus in the .td file and making it set only
// as part of initialization via the TargetTriple.
computeFSAdditions(FS, getOptLevel(), getTargetTriple()), *this);
}
return I.get();
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Pass Pipeline Configuration
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
namespace {
/// PPC Code Generator Pass Configuration Options.
class PPCPassConfig : public TargetPassConfig {
public:
PPCPassConfig(PPCTargetMachine *TM, PassManagerBase &PM)
: TargetPassConfig(TM, PM) {}
PPCTargetMachine &getPPCTargetMachine() const {
return getTM<PPCTargetMachine>();
}
void addIRPasses() override;
bool addPreISel() override;
bool addILPOpts() override;
bool addInstSelector() override;
[PPC64LE] Remove unnecessary swaps from lane-insensitive vector computations This patch adds a new SSA MI pass that runs on little-endian PPC64 code with VSX enabled. Loads and stores of 4x32 and 2x64 vectors without alignment constraints are accomplished for little-endian using lxvd2x/xxswapd and xxswapd/stxvd2x. The existence of the additional xxswapd instructions hurts performance in comparison with big-endian code, but they are necessary in the general case to support correct semantics. However, the general case does not apply to most vector code. Many vector instructions are lane-insensitive; they do not "care" which lanes the parallel computations are performed within, provided that the resulting data is stored into the correct locations. Thus this pass looks for computations that perform only lane-insensitive operations, and remove the unnecessary swaps from loads and stores in such computations. Future improvements will allow computations using certain lane-sensitive operations to also be optimized in this manner, by modifying the lane-sensitive operations to account for the permuted order of the lanes. However, this patch only adds the infrastructure to permit this; no lane-sensitive operations are optimized at this time. This code is heavily exercised by the various vectorizing applications in the projects/test-suite tree. For the time being, I have only added one simple test case to demonstrate what the pass is doing. Although it is quite simple, it provides coverage for much of the code, including the special case handling of copies and subreg-to-reg operations feeding the swaps. I plan to add additional tests in the future as I fill in more of the "special handling" code. Two existing tests were affected, because they expected the swaps to be present, but they are now removed. llvm-svn: 235910
2015-04-28 03:57:34 +08:00
void addMachineSSAOptimization() override;
void addPreRegAlloc() override;
void addPreSched2() override;
void addPreEmitPass() override;
};
} // namespace
TargetPassConfig *PPCTargetMachine::createPassConfig(PassManagerBase &PM) {
return new PPCPassConfig(this, PM);
}
void PPCPassConfig::addIRPasses() {
addPass(createAtomicExpandPass(&getPPCTargetMachine()));
// For the BG/Q (or if explicitly requested), add explicit data prefetch
// intrinsics.
bool UsePrefetching = TM->getTargetTriple().getVendor() == Triple::BGQ &&
getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None;
if (EnablePrefetch.getNumOccurrences() > 0)
UsePrefetching = EnablePrefetch;
if (UsePrefetching)
addPass(createPPCLoopDataPrefetchPass());
if (TM->getOptLevel() == CodeGenOpt::Aggressive && EnableGEPOpt) {
// Call SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP pass to extract constants within indices
// and lower a GEP with multiple indices to either arithmetic operations or
// multiple GEPs with single index.
addPass(createSeparateConstOffsetFromGEPPass(TM, true));
// Call EarlyCSE pass to find and remove subexpressions in the lowered
// result.
addPass(createEarlyCSEPass());
// Do loop invariant code motion in case part of the lowered result is
// invariant.
addPass(createLICMPass());
}
TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses();
}
Implement PPC counter loops as a late IR-level pass The old PPCCTRLoops pass, like the Hexagon pass version from which it was derived, could only handle some simple loops in canonical form. We cannot directly adapt the new Hexagon hardware loops pass, however, because the Hexagon pass contains a fundamental assumption that non-constant-trip-count loops will contain a guard, and this is not always true (the result being that incorrect negative counts can be generated). With this commit, we replace the pass with a late IR-level pass which makes use of SE to calculate the backedge-taken counts and safely generate the loop-count expressions (including any necessary max() parts). This IR level pass inserts custom intrinsics that are lowered into the desired decrement-and-branch instructions. The most fragile part of this new implementation is that interfering uses of the counter register must be detected on the IR level (and, on PPC, this also includes any indirect branches in addition to function calls). Also, to make all of this work, we need a variant of the mtctr instruction that is marked as having side effects. Without this, machine-code level CSE, DCE, etc. illegally transform the resulting code. Hopefully, this can be improved in the future. This new pass is smaller than the original (and much smaller than the new Hexagon hardware loops pass), and can handle many additional cases correctly. In addition, the preheader-creation code has been copied from LoopSimplify, and after we decide on where it belongs, this code will be refactored so that it can be explicitly shared (making this implementation even smaller). The new test-case files ctrloop-{le,lt,ne}.ll have been adapted from tests for the new Hexagon pass. There are a few classes of loops that this pass does not transform (noted by FIXMEs in the files), but these deficiencies can be addressed within the SE infrastructure (thus helping many other passes as well). llvm-svn: 181927
2013-05-16 05:37:41 +08:00
bool PPCPassConfig::addPreISel() {
[PowerPC] Prepare loops for pre-increment loads/stores PowerPC supports pre-increment load/store instructions (except for Altivec/VSX vector load/stores). Using these on embedded cores can be very important, but most loops are not naturally set up to use them. We can often change that, however, by placing loops into a non-canonical form. Generically, this means transforming loops like this: for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) array[i] = c; to look like this: T *p = array[-1]; for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) *++p = c; the key point is that addresses accessed are pulled into dedicated PHIs and "pre-decremented" in the loop preheader. This allows the use of pre-increment load/store instructions without loop peeling. A target-specific late IR-level pass (running post-LSR), PPCLoopPreIncPrep, is introduced to perform this transformation. I've used this code out-of-tree for generating code for the PPC A2 for over a year. Somewhat to my surprise, running the test suite + externals on a P7 with this transformation enabled showed no performance regressions, and one speedup: External/SPEC/CINT2006/483.xalancbmk/483.xalancbmk -2.32514% +/- 1.03736% So I'm going to enable it on everything for now. I was surprised by this because, on the POWER cores, these pre-increment load/store instructions are cracked (and, thus, harder to schedule effectively). But seeing no regressions, and feeling that it is generally easier to split instructions apart late than it is to combine them late, this might be the better approach regardless. In the future, we might want to integrate this functionality into LSR (but currently LSR does not create new PHI nodes, so (for that and other reasons) significant work would need to be done). llvm-svn: 228328
2015-02-06 02:43:00 +08:00
if (!DisablePreIncPrep && getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None)
addPass(createPPCLoopPreIncPrepPass(getPPCTargetMachine()));
if (!DisableCTRLoops && getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None)
Implement PPC counter loops as a late IR-level pass The old PPCCTRLoops pass, like the Hexagon pass version from which it was derived, could only handle some simple loops in canonical form. We cannot directly adapt the new Hexagon hardware loops pass, however, because the Hexagon pass contains a fundamental assumption that non-constant-trip-count loops will contain a guard, and this is not always true (the result being that incorrect negative counts can be generated). With this commit, we replace the pass with a late IR-level pass which makes use of SE to calculate the backedge-taken counts and safely generate the loop-count expressions (including any necessary max() parts). This IR level pass inserts custom intrinsics that are lowered into the desired decrement-and-branch instructions. The most fragile part of this new implementation is that interfering uses of the counter register must be detected on the IR level (and, on PPC, this also includes any indirect branches in addition to function calls). Also, to make all of this work, we need a variant of the mtctr instruction that is marked as having side effects. Without this, machine-code level CSE, DCE, etc. illegally transform the resulting code. Hopefully, this can be improved in the future. This new pass is smaller than the original (and much smaller than the new Hexagon hardware loops pass), and can handle many additional cases correctly. In addition, the preheader-creation code has been copied from LoopSimplify, and after we decide on where it belongs, this code will be refactored so that it can be explicitly shared (making this implementation even smaller). The new test-case files ctrloop-{le,lt,ne}.ll have been adapted from tests for the new Hexagon pass. There are a few classes of loops that this pass does not transform (noted by FIXMEs in the files), but these deficiencies can be addressed within the SE infrastructure (thus helping many other passes as well). llvm-svn: 181927
2013-05-16 05:37:41 +08:00
addPass(createPPCCTRLoops(getPPCTargetMachine()));
return false;
}
bool PPCPassConfig::addILPOpts() {
addPass(&EarlyIfConverterID);
if (EnableMachineCombinerPass)
addPass(&MachineCombinerID);
return true;
}
bool PPCPassConfig::addInstSelector() {
// Install an instruction selector.
addPass(createPPCISelDag(getPPCTargetMachine()));
#ifndef NDEBUG
if (!DisableCTRLoops && getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None)
addPass(createPPCCTRLoopsVerify());
#endif
addPass(createPPCVSXCopyPass());
return false;
}
[PPC64LE] Remove unnecessary swaps from lane-insensitive vector computations This patch adds a new SSA MI pass that runs on little-endian PPC64 code with VSX enabled. Loads and stores of 4x32 and 2x64 vectors without alignment constraints are accomplished for little-endian using lxvd2x/xxswapd and xxswapd/stxvd2x. The existence of the additional xxswapd instructions hurts performance in comparison with big-endian code, but they are necessary in the general case to support correct semantics. However, the general case does not apply to most vector code. Many vector instructions are lane-insensitive; they do not "care" which lanes the parallel computations are performed within, provided that the resulting data is stored into the correct locations. Thus this pass looks for computations that perform only lane-insensitive operations, and remove the unnecessary swaps from loads and stores in such computations. Future improvements will allow computations using certain lane-sensitive operations to also be optimized in this manner, by modifying the lane-sensitive operations to account for the permuted order of the lanes. However, this patch only adds the infrastructure to permit this; no lane-sensitive operations are optimized at this time. This code is heavily exercised by the various vectorizing applications in the projects/test-suite tree. For the time being, I have only added one simple test case to demonstrate what the pass is doing. Although it is quite simple, it provides coverage for much of the code, including the special case handling of copies and subreg-to-reg operations feeding the swaps. I plan to add additional tests in the future as I fill in more of the "special handling" code. Two existing tests were affected, because they expected the swaps to be present, but they are now removed. llvm-svn: 235910
2015-04-28 03:57:34 +08:00
void PPCPassConfig::addMachineSSAOptimization() {
TargetPassConfig::addMachineSSAOptimization();
// For little endian, remove where possible the vector swap instructions
// introduced at code generation to normalize vector element order.
if (TM->getTargetTriple().getArch() == Triple::ppc64le &&
[PPC64LE] Remove unnecessary swaps from lane-insensitive vector computations This patch adds a new SSA MI pass that runs on little-endian PPC64 code with VSX enabled. Loads and stores of 4x32 and 2x64 vectors without alignment constraints are accomplished for little-endian using lxvd2x/xxswapd and xxswapd/stxvd2x. The existence of the additional xxswapd instructions hurts performance in comparison with big-endian code, but they are necessary in the general case to support correct semantics. However, the general case does not apply to most vector code. Many vector instructions are lane-insensitive; they do not "care" which lanes the parallel computations are performed within, provided that the resulting data is stored into the correct locations. Thus this pass looks for computations that perform only lane-insensitive operations, and remove the unnecessary swaps from loads and stores in such computations. Future improvements will allow computations using certain lane-sensitive operations to also be optimized in this manner, by modifying the lane-sensitive operations to account for the permuted order of the lanes. However, this patch only adds the infrastructure to permit this; no lane-sensitive operations are optimized at this time. This code is heavily exercised by the various vectorizing applications in the projects/test-suite tree. For the time being, I have only added one simple test case to demonstrate what the pass is doing. Although it is quite simple, it provides coverage for much of the code, including the special case handling of copies and subreg-to-reg operations feeding the swaps. I plan to add additional tests in the future as I fill in more of the "special handling" code. Two existing tests were affected, because they expected the swaps to be present, but they are now removed. llvm-svn: 235910
2015-04-28 03:57:34 +08:00
!DisableVSXSwapRemoval)
addPass(createPPCVSXSwapRemovalPass());
}
void PPCPassConfig::addPreRegAlloc() {
initializePPCVSXFMAMutatePass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
insertPass(VSXFMAMutateEarly ? &RegisterCoalescerID : &MachineSchedulerID,
&PPCVSXFMAMutateID);
if (getPPCTargetMachine().getRelocationModel() == Reloc::PIC_)
addPass(createPPCTLSDynamicCallPass());
[PowerPC] Add extra r2 read deps on @toc@l relocations If some commits are happy, and some commits are sad, this is a sad commit. It is sad because it restricts instruction scheduling to work around a binutils linker bug, and moreover, one that may never be fixed. On 2012-05-21, GCC was updated not to produce code triggering this bug, and now we'll do the same... When resolving an address using the ELF ABI TOC pointer, two relocations are generally required: one for the high part and one for the low part. Only the high part generally explicitly depends on r2 (the TOC pointer). And, so, we might produce code like this: .Ltmp526: addis 3, 2, .LC12@toc@ha .Ltmp1628: std 2, 40(1) ld 5, 0(27) ld 2, 8(27) ld 11, 16(27) ld 3, .LC12@toc@l(3) rldicl 4, 4, 0, 32 mtctr 5 bctrl ld 2, 40(1) And there is nothing wrong with this code, as such, but there is a linker bug in binutils (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414) that will misoptimize this code sequence to this: nop std r2,40(r1) ld r5,0(r27) ld r2,8(r27) ld r11,16(r27) ld r3,-32472(r2) clrldi r4,r4,32 mtctr r5 bctrl ld r2,40(r1) because the linker does not know (and does not check) that the value in r2 changed in between the instruction using the .LC12@toc@ha (TOC-relative) relocation and the instruction using the .LC12@toc@l(3) relocation. Because it finds these instructions using the relocations (and not by scanning the instructions), it has been asserted that there is no good way to detect the change of r2 in between. As a result, this bug may never be fixed (i.e. it may become part of the definition of the ABI). GCC was updated to add extra dependencies on r2 to instructions using the @toc@l relocations to avoid this problem, and we'll do the same here. This is done as a separate pass because: 1. These extra r2 dependencies are not really properties of the instructions, but rather due to a linker bug, and maybe one day we'll be able to get rid of them when targeting linkers without this bug (and, thus, keeping the logic centralized here will make that straightforward). 2. There are ISel-level peephole optimizations that propagate the @toc@l relocations to some user instructions, and so the exta dependencies do not apply only to a fixed set of instructions (without undesirable definition replication). The test case was reduced with the help of bugpoint, with minimal cleaning. I'm looking forward to our upcoming MI serialization support, and with that, much better tests can be created. llvm-svn: 237556
2015-05-18 14:25:59 +08:00
if (EnableExtraTOCRegDeps)
addPass(createPPCTOCRegDepsPass());
[PowerPC] Select between VSX A-type and M-type FMA instructions just before RA The VSX instruction set has two types of FMA instructions: A-type (where the addend is taken from the output register) and M-type (where one of the product operands is taken from the output register). This adds a small pass that runs just after MI scheduling (and, thus, just before register allocation) that mutates A-type instructions (that are created during isel) into M-type instructions when: 1. This will eliminate an otherwise-necessary copy of the addend 2. One of the product operands is killed by the instruction The "right" moment to make this decision is in between scheduling and register allocation, because only there do we know whether or not one of the product operands is killed by any particular instruction. Unfortunately, this also makes the implementation somewhat complicated, because the MIs are not in SSA form and we need to preserve the LiveIntervals analysis. As a simple example, if we have: %vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg9; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg9 %vreg5<def,tied1> = XSMADDADP %vreg5<tied0>, %vreg17, %vreg16, %RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg17,%vreg16 ... %vreg9<def,tied1> = XSMADDADP %vreg9<tied0>, %vreg17, %vreg19, %RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg9,%vreg17,%vreg19 ... We can eliminate the copy by changing from the A-type to the M-type instruction. This means: %vreg5<def,tied1> = XSMADDADP %vreg5<tied0>, %vreg17, %vreg16, %RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg17,%vreg16 is replaced by: %vreg16<def,tied1> = XSMADDMDP %vreg16<tied0>, %vreg18, %vreg9, %RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg16,%vreg18,%vreg9 and we remove: %vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg9; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg9 llvm-svn: 204768
2014-03-26 07:29:21 +08:00
}
void PPCPassConfig::addPreSched2() {
if (getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None)
addPass(&IfConverterID);
}
void PPCPassConfig::addPreEmitPass() {
if (getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None)
addPass(createPPCEarlyReturnPass(), false);
// Must run branch selection immediately preceding the asm printer.
addPass(createPPCBranchSelectionPass(), false);
}
TargetIRAnalysis PPCTargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis() {
return TargetIRAnalysis([this](const Function &F) {
return TargetTransformInfo(PPCTTIImpl(this, F));
});
}