maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/Verifier/func-dbg.ll

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

26 lines
904 B
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

Move the stripping of invalid debug info from the Verifier to AutoUpgrade. This came out of a recent discussion on llvm-dev (https://reviews.llvm.org/D38042). Currently the Verifier will strip the debug info metadata from a module if it finds the dbeug info to be malformed. This feature is very valuable since it allows us to improve the Verifier by making it stricter without breaking bcompatibility, but arguable the Verifier pass should not be modifying the IR. This patch moves the stripping of broken debug info into AutoUpgrade (UpgradeDebugInfo to be precise), which is a much better location for this since the stripping of malformed (i.e., produced by older, buggy versions of Clang) is a (harsh) form of AutoUpgrade. This change is mostly NFC in nature, the one big difference is the behavior when LLVM module passes are introducing malformed debug info. Prior to this patch, a NoAsserts build would have printed a warning and stripped the debug info, after this patch the Verifier will report a fatal error. I believe this behavior is actually more desirable anyway. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38184 llvm-svn: 314699
2017-10-03 02:31:29 +08:00
; RUN: llvm-as -disable-output < %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
[Verifier] Fix !dbg validation if Scope is the Subprogram Summary: We are inserting both Scope and SP into the Seen map and check whether it was already there in which case we skip the validation (the idea being that we already checked this Subprogram before). However, if (Scope == SP) as MDNodes, then inserting the Scope, will trigger the Seen check causing us to incorrectly not validate this !dbg attachment. Fix this by not performing the SP Seen check if Scope == SP Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith, dblaikie Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14697 llvm-svn: 254887
2015-12-07 07:05:38 +08:00
define i32 @foo() !dbg !4 {
entry:
ret i32 0, !dbg !6
}
define i32 @bar() !dbg !5 {
entry:
; CHECK: !dbg attachment points at wrong subprogram for function
ret i32 0, !dbg !6
}
Move the stripping of invalid debug info from the Verifier to AutoUpgrade. This came out of a recent discussion on llvm-dev (https://reviews.llvm.org/D38042). Currently the Verifier will strip the debug info metadata from a module if it finds the dbeug info to be malformed. This feature is very valuable since it allows us to improve the Verifier by making it stricter without breaking bcompatibility, but arguable the Verifier pass should not be modifying the IR. This patch moves the stripping of broken debug info into AutoUpgrade (UpgradeDebugInfo to be precise), which is a much better location for this since the stripping of malformed (i.e., produced by older, buggy versions of Clang) is a (harsh) form of AutoUpgrade. This change is mostly NFC in nature, the one big difference is the behavior when LLVM module passes are introducing malformed debug info. Prior to this patch, a NoAsserts build would have printed a warning and stripped the debug info, after this patch the Verifier will report a fatal error. I believe this behavior is actually more desirable anyway. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38184 llvm-svn: 314699
2017-10-03 02:31:29 +08:00
; CHECK: warning: ignoring invalid debug info
[Verifier] Fix !dbg validation if Scope is the Subprogram Summary: We are inserting both Scope and SP into the Seen map and check whether it was already there in which case we skip the validation (the idea being that we already checked this Subprogram before). However, if (Scope == SP) as MDNodes, then inserting the Scope, will trigger the Seen check causing us to incorrectly not validate this !dbg attachment. Fix this by not performing the SP Seen check if Scope == SP Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith, dblaikie Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14697 llvm-svn: 254887
2015-12-07 07:05:38 +08:00
!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0}
!llvm.module.flags = !{!7, !8}
[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram. Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing. Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info. Motivation ---------- Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when doing a ThinLTO build of clang. We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a reference the block containing the inlined subprogram. Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034 <rdar://problem/25256815> llvm-svn: 266446
2016-04-15 23:57:41 +08:00
!0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !2, globals: !2, imports: !2)
[Verifier] Fix !dbg validation if Scope is the Subprogram Summary: We are inserting both Scope and SP into the Seen map and check whether it was already there in which case we skip the validation (the idea being that we already checked this Subprogram before). However, if (Scope == SP) as MDNodes, then inserting the Scope, will trigger the Seen check causing us to incorrectly not validate this !dbg attachment. Fix this by not performing the SP Seen check if Scope == SP Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith, dblaikie Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14697 llvm-svn: 254887
2015-12-07 07:05:38 +08:00
!1 = !DIFile(filename: "dwarf-test.c", directory: "test")
!2 = !{}
[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram. Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing. Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info. Motivation ---------- Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when doing a ThinLTO build of clang. We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a reference the block containing the inlined subprogram. Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034 <rdar://problem/25256815> llvm-svn: 266446
2016-04-15 23:57:41 +08:00
!4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !0, isDefinition: true, unit: !0)
!5 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "bar", scope: !0, isDefinition: true, unit: !0)
[Verifier] Fix !dbg validation if Scope is the Subprogram Summary: We are inserting both Scope and SP into the Seen map and check whether it was already there in which case we skip the validation (the idea being that we already checked this Subprogram before). However, if (Scope == SP) as MDNodes, then inserting the Scope, will trigger the Seen check causing us to incorrectly not validate this !dbg attachment. Fix this by not performing the SP Seen check if Scope == SP Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith, dblaikie Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14697 llvm-svn: 254887
2015-12-07 07:05:38 +08:00
!6 = !DILocation(line: 7, scope: !4)
!7 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 3}
!8 = !{i32 1, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}