llvm-project/llvm/test/Other/new-pm-lto-defaults.ll

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

180 lines
9.5 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

; Basic test for the new LTO pipeline.
; For now the only difference is between -O1 and everything else, so
; -O2, -O3, -Os, -Oz are the same.
[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes + turn on eagerly invalidate analyses Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify, then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation. So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used. This is part of an effort to investigate running the function simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the inliner pipeline. However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR. To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific parts of the pipeline. Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect. For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes (except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses). Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage. https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructions https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917 shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes. Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive. Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
2021-05-04 07:50:26 +08:00
; RUN: opt -disable-verify -verify-cfg-preserved=0 -eagerly-invalidate-analyses=0 -debug-pass-manager \
; RUN: -passes='lto<O1>' -S %s 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-O --check-prefix=CHECK-O1
[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes + turn on eagerly invalidate analyses Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify, then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation. So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used. This is part of an effort to investigate running the function simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the inliner pipeline. However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR. To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific parts of the pipeline. Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect. For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes (except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses). Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage. https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructions https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917 shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes. Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive. Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
2021-05-04 07:50:26 +08:00
; RUN: opt -disable-verify -verify-cfg-preserved=0 -eagerly-invalidate-analyses=0 -debug-pass-manager \
; RUN: -passes='lto<O1>' -S %s -passes-ep-full-link-time-optimization-early=no-op-module \
; RUN: -passes-ep-full-link-time-optimization-last=no-op-module 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-O --check-prefix=CHECK-O1 --check-prefix=CHECK-EP
; RUN: opt -disable-verify -verify-cfg-preserved=0 -eagerly-invalidate-analyses=0 -debug-pass-manager \
; RUN: -passes='lto<O2>' -S %s 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-O --check-prefix=CHECK-O23SZ \
; RUN: --check-prefix=CHECK-O2
[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes + turn on eagerly invalidate analyses Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify, then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation. So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used. This is part of an effort to investigate running the function simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the inliner pipeline. However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR. To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific parts of the pipeline. Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect. For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes (except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses). Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage. https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructions https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917 shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes. Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive. Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
2021-05-04 07:50:26 +08:00
; RUN: opt -disable-verify -verify-cfg-preserved=0 -eagerly-invalidate-analyses=0 -debug-pass-manager \
; RUN: -passes='lto<O2>' -S %s -passes-ep-full-link-time-optimization-early=no-op-module \
; RUN: -passes-ep-full-link-time-optimization-last=no-op-module 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-O --check-prefix=CHECK-O23SZ \
; RUN: --check-prefix=CHECK-O2 --check-prefix=CHECK-EP
; RUN: opt -disable-verify -verify-cfg-preserved=0 -eagerly-invalidate-analyses=0 -debug-pass-manager \
; RUN: -passes='lto<O3>' -S %s 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-O --check-prefix=CHECK-O23SZ \
; RUN: --check-prefix=CHECK-O3
[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes + turn on eagerly invalidate analyses Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify, then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation. So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used. This is part of an effort to investigate running the function simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the inliner pipeline. However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR. To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific parts of the pipeline. Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect. For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes (except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses). Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage. https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructions https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917 shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes. Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive. Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
2021-05-04 07:50:26 +08:00
; RUN: opt -disable-verify -verify-cfg-preserved=0 -eagerly-invalidate-analyses=0 -debug-pass-manager \
; RUN: -passes='lto<Os>' -S %s 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-O --check-prefix=CHECK-O23SZ \
; RUN: --check-prefix=CHECK-OS
[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes + turn on eagerly invalidate analyses Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify, then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation. So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used. This is part of an effort to investigate running the function simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the inliner pipeline. However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR. To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific parts of the pipeline. Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect. For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes (except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses). Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage. https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructions https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917 shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes. Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive. Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
2021-05-04 07:50:26 +08:00
; RUN: opt -disable-verify -verify-cfg-preserved=0 -eagerly-invalidate-analyses=0 -debug-pass-manager \
; RUN: -passes='lto<Oz>' -S %s 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-O --check-prefix=CHECK-O23SZ
[NewPM] Only invalidate modified functions' analyses in CGSCC passes + turn on eagerly invalidate analyses Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify, then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation. So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used. This is part of an effort to investigate running the function simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the inliner pipeline. However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR. To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific parts of the pipeline. Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect. For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes (except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses). Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage. https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructions https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917 shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes. Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive. Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
2021-05-04 07:50:26 +08:00
; RUN: opt -disable-verify -verify-cfg-preserved=0 -eagerly-invalidate-analyses=0 -debug-pass-manager \
; RUN: -passes='lto<O3>' -S %s -passes-ep-peephole='no-op-function' 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-O --check-prefix=CHECK-O23SZ \
; RUN: --check-prefix=CHECK-O3 --check-prefix=CHECK-EP-Peephole
; CHECK-O: Running pass: Annotation2Metadata
; CHECK-EP-NEXT: Running pass: NoOpModulePass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: CrossDSOCFIPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: OpenMPOptPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: GlobalDCEPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: ForceFunctionAttrsPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: InferFunctionAttrsPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: InnerAnalysisManagerProxy<{{.*}}Module
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: TargetLibraryAnalysis
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: CallSiteSplittingPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: TargetLibraryAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: TargetIRAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: DominatorTreeAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: PGOIndirectCallPromotion
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: ProfileSummaryAnalysis
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: OptimizationRemarkEmitterAnalysis
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: IPSCCPPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: AssumptionAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: CalledValuePropagationPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: InnerAnalysisManagerProxy<{{.*}}SCC
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: LazyCallGraphAnalysis
; CHECK-O1-NEXT: Running analysis: TargetLibraryAnalysis
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: OuterAnalysisManagerProxy<{{.*}}LazyCallGraph{{.*}}>
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: PostOrderFunctionAttrsPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: AAManager
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: BasicAA
; CHECK-O1-NEXT: Running analysis: AssumptionAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O1-NEXT: Running analysis: TargetIRAnalysis
; CHECK-O1-NEXT: Running analysis: DominatorTreeAnalysis
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: ScopedNoAliasAA
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: TypeBasedAA
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: OuterAnalysisManagerProxy
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running analysis: CallGraphAnalysis
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: GlobalSplitPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: WholeProgramDevirtPass
; CHECK-O1-NEXT: Running pass: LowerTypeTestsPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: GlobalOptPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: PromotePass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: ConstantMergePass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: DeadArgumentEliminationPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: InstCombinePass
; CHECK-O3-NEXT: Running pass: AggressiveInstCombinePass
; CHECK-EP-Peephole-NEXT: Running pass: NoOpFunctionPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: ModuleInlinerWrapperPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: InlineAdvisorAnalysis
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: InlinerPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: InlinerPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Invalidating analysis: InlineAdvisorAnalysis
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: GlobalOptPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: GlobalDCEPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: ArgumentPromotionPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: InstCombinePass
; CHECK-EP-Peephole-NEXT: Running pass: NoOpFunctionPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: JumpThreadingPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: LazyValueAnalysis
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: SROAPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: TailCallElimPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: PostOrderFunctionAttrsPass on (foo)
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: RequireAnalysisPass<{{.*}}GlobalsAA
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: GlobalsAA on [module]
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: InvalidateAnalysisPass<{{.*}}AAManager
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Invalidating analysis: AAManager on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: OpenMPOptCGSCCPass on (foo)
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LoopSimplifyPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: LoopAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LCSSAPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: MemorySSAAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: AAManager on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: ScalarEvolutionAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: InnerAnalysisManagerProxy
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LICMPass on Loop
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: GVNPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: MemoryDependenceAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: PhiValuesAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: MemCpyOptPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: DSEPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: PostDominatorTreeAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: MergedLoadStoreMotionPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LoopSimplifyPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LCSSAPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: IndVarSimplifyPass on Loop
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LoopDeletionPass on Loop
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LoopFullUnrollPass on Loop
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LoopDistributePass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LoopVectorizePass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: BlockFrequencyAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: BranchProbabilityAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running analysis: DemandedBitsAnalysis on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LoopUnrollPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: WarnMissedTransformationsPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: InstCombinePass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: SimplifyCFGPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: SCCPPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: InstCombinePass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: BDCEPass on foo
; CHECK-O2-NEXT: Running pass: SLPVectorizerPass on foo
; CHECK-O3-NEXT: Running pass: SLPVectorizerPass on foo
; CHECK-OS-NEXT: Running pass: SLPVectorizerPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: VectorCombinePass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: AlignmentFromAssumptionsPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: InstCombinePass on foo
; CHECK-EP-Peephole-NEXT: Running pass: NoOpFunctionPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: JumpThreadingPass on foo
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: LowerTypeTestsPass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: LowerTypeTestsPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: SimplifyCFGPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: EliminateAvailableExternallyPass
; CHECK-O23SZ-NEXT: Running pass: GlobalDCEPass
; CHECK-EP-NEXT: Running pass: NoOpModulePass
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: AnnotationRemarksPass on foo
; CHECK-O-NEXT: Running pass: PrintModulePass
; Make sure we get the IR back out without changes when we print the module.
; CHECK-O-LABEL: define void @foo(i32 %n) local_unnamed_addr {
; CHECK-O-NEXT: entry:
; CHECK-O-NEXT: br label %loop
; CHECK-O: loop:
; CHECK-O-NEXT: %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
; CHECK-O-NEXT: %iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
; CHECK-O-NEXT: tail call void @bar()
; CHECK-O-NEXT: %cmp = icmp eq i32 %iv, %n
; CHECK-O-NEXT: br i1 %cmp, label %exit, label %loop
; CHECK-O: exit:
; CHECK-O-NEXT: ret void
; CHECK-O-NEXT: }
;
declare void @bar() local_unnamed_addr
define void @foo(i32 %n) local_unnamed_addr {
entry:
br label %loop
loop:
%iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
%iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
tail call void @bar()
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %iv, %n
br i1 %cmp, label %exit, label %loop
exit:
ret void
}