2011-10-14 06:29:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify -std=c++11 -Wall %s
|
2011-06-12 01:19:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template<bool b> struct ExceptionIf { static int f(); };
|
|
|
|
template<> struct ExceptionIf<false> { typedef int f; };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The exception specification of a defaulted default constructor depends on
|
|
|
|
// the contents of in-class member initializers. However, the in-class member
|
|
|
|
// initializers can depend on the exception specification of the constructor,
|
|
|
|
// since the class is considered complete within them. We reject any such cases.
|
|
|
|
namespace InClassInitializers {
|
|
|
|
// Noexcept::Noexcept() is implicitly declared as noexcept(false), because it
|
|
|
|
// directly invokes ThrowSomething(). However...
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// If noexcept(Noexcept()) is false, then Noexcept() is a constant expression,
|
|
|
|
// so noexcept(Noexcept()) is true. But if noexcept(Noexcept()) is true, then
|
|
|
|
// Noexcept::Noexcept is not declared constexpr, therefore noexcept(Noexcept())
|
|
|
|
// is false.
|
|
|
|
bool ThrowSomething() noexcept(false);
|
|
|
|
struct ConstExpr {
|
|
|
|
bool b = noexcept(ConstExpr()) && ThrowSomething(); // expected-error {{exception specification is not available until end of class definition}}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// We can use it now.
|
|
|
|
bool w = noexcept(ConstExpr());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Much more obviously broken: we can't parse the initializer without already
|
|
|
|
// knowing whether it produces a noexcept expression.
|
|
|
|
struct TemplateArg {
|
|
|
|
int n = ExceptionIf<noexcept(TemplateArg())>::f(); // expected-error {{exception specification is not available until end of class definition}}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
bool x = noexcept(TemplateArg());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// And within a nested class.
|
|
|
|
struct Nested {
|
|
|
|
struct Inner {
|
|
|
|
int n = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested())>::f(); // expected-error {{exception specification is not available until end of class definition}}
|
|
|
|
} inner;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
bool y = noexcept(Nested());
|
|
|
|
bool z = noexcept(Nested::Inner());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME:
|
|
|
|
// The same problem arises in delayed parsing of exception specifications,
|
|
|
|
// which clang does not yet support.
|
|
|
|
namespace ExceptionSpecification {
|
|
|
|
struct Nested { // expected-note {{not complete}}
|
|
|
|
struct T {
|
|
|
|
T() noexcept(!noexcept(Nested())); // expected-error {{incomplete type}}
|
|
|
|
} t;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME:
|
|
|
|
// The same problem arises in delayed parsing of default arguments,
|
|
|
|
// which clang does not yet support.
|
|
|
|
namespace DefaultArgument {
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: this diagnostic is completely wrong.
|
|
|
|
struct Default { // expected-note {{explicitly marked deleted here}}
|
|
|
|
struct T {
|
|
|
|
T(int = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Default())::f()); // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
|
|
|
|
} t;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|