maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/catch-alignment-assumption-...

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

51 lines
4.3 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

[NFC] Disallow unused prefixes under clang/test/CodeGen Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95417
2021-01-26 12:44:41 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsanitize=alignment -fno-sanitize-recover=alignment -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption" --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SANITIZE,CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER,CHECK-SANITIZE-NORECOVER,CHECK-SANITIZE-UNREACHABLE
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-recover=alignment -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption" --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SANITIZE,CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER,CHECK-SANITIZE-RECOVER
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-trap=alignment -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption" --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SANITIZE,CHECK-SANITIZE-TRAP,CHECK-SANITIZE-UNREACHABLE
// CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER: @[[CHAR:.*]] = {{.*}} c"'char **'\00" }
// CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER: @[[LINE_100_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION:.*]] = {{.*}}, i32 100, i32 10 }, {{.*}}* @[[CHAR]] }
char **__attribute__((alloc_align(2)))
passthrough(char **x, unsigned long alignment) {
Revert "[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default" This reverts commit aacfbb953eb705af2ecfeb95a6262818fa85dd92. Revert "Fix lit test failures in CodeGenCoroutines" This reverts commit 63fff0f5bffe20fa2c84a45a41161afa0043cb34.
2021-11-09 01:09:49 +08:00
// CHECK: define{{.*}} i8** @[[PASSTHROUGH:.*]](i8** %[[X:.*]], i64 %[[ALIGNMENT:.*]])
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[X_ADDR:.*]] = alloca i8**, align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[ALIGNMENT_ADDR:.*]] = alloca i64, align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: store i8** %[[X]], i8*** %[[X_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: store i64 %[[ALIGNMENT]], i64* %[[ALIGNMENT_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[X_RELOADED:.*]] = load i8**, i8*** %[[X_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i8** %[[X_RELOADED]]
// CHECK-NEXT: }
return x;
}
char **caller(char **x, unsigned long alignment) {
Revert "[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default" This reverts commit aacfbb953eb705af2ecfeb95a6262818fa85dd92. Revert "Fix lit test failures in CodeGenCoroutines" This reverts commit 63fff0f5bffe20fa2c84a45a41161afa0043cb34.
2021-11-09 01:09:49 +08:00
// CHECK: define{{.*}} i8** @{{.*}}(i8** %[[X:.*]], i64 %[[ALIGNMENT:.*]])
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[X_ADDR:.*]] = alloca i8**, align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[ALIGNMENT_ADDR:.*]] = alloca i64, align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: store i8** %[[X]], i8*** %[[X_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: store i64 %[[ALIGNMENT]], i64* %[[ALIGNMENT_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[X_RELOADED:.*]] = load i8**, i8*** %[[X_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[ALIGNMENT_RELOADED:.*]] = load i64, i64* %[[ALIGNMENT_ADDR]], align 8
Revert "[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default" This reverts commit aacfbb953eb705af2ecfeb95a6262818fa85dd92. Revert "Fix lit test failures in CodeGenCoroutines" This reverts commit 63fff0f5bffe20fa2c84a45a41161afa0043cb34.
2021-11-09 01:09:49 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[X_RETURNED:.*]] = call i8** @[[PASSTHROUGH]](i8** %[[X_RELOADED]], i64 %[[ALIGNMENT_RELOADED]])
Reland [AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use". As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the assumption outlining.
2020-09-12 19:36:45 +08:00
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[PTRINT:.*]] = ptrtoint i8** %[[X_RETURNED]] to i64
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[MASK:.*]] = sub i64 %[[ALIGNMENT_RELOADED]], 1
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[MASKEDPTR:.*]] = and i64 %[[PTRINT]], %[[MASK]]
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[MASKCOND:.*]] = icmp eq i64 %[[MASKEDPTR]], 0
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[PTRINT_DUP:.*]] = ptrtoint i8** %[[X_RETURNED]] to i64, !nosanitize
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: br i1 %[[MASKCOND]], label %[[CONT:.*]], label %[[HANDLER_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION:[^,]+]],{{.*}} !nosanitize
// CHECK-SANITIZE: [[HANDLER_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION]]:
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NORECOVER-NEXT: call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption_abort(i8* bitcast ({ {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}* }* @[[LINE_100_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION]] to i8*), i64 %[[PTRINT_DUP]], i64 %[[ALIGNMENT_RELOADED]], i64 0){{.*}}, !nosanitize
// CHECK-SANITIZE-RECOVER-NEXT: call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption(i8* bitcast ({ {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}* }* @[[LINE_100_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION]] to i8*), i64 %[[PTRINT_DUP]], i64 %[[ALIGNMENT_RELOADED]], i64 0){{.*}}, !nosanitize
UBSAN: emit distinctive traps Sometimes people get minimal crash reports after a UBSAN incident. This change tags each trap with an integer representing the kind of failure encountered, which can aid in tracking down the root cause of the problem.
2020-10-21 17:11:25 +08:00
// CHECK-SANITIZE-TRAP-NEXT: call void @llvm.ubsantrap(i8 23){{.*}}, !nosanitize
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// CHECK-SANITIZE-UNREACHABLE-NEXT: unreachable, !nosanitize
// CHECK-SANITIZE: [[CONT]]:
Reland [AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use". As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the assumption outlining.
2020-09-12 19:36:45 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "align"(i8** %[[X_RETURNED]], i64 %1) ]
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i8** %[[X_RETURNED]]
// CHECK-NEXT: }
#line 100
return passthrough(x, alignment);
}