2015-11-26 18:05:24 +08:00
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: aarch64
|
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=aarch64-none-freebsd %s -o %t.o
|
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=aarch64-none-freebsd %S/Inputs/abs255.s -o %t255.o
|
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=aarch64-none-freebsd %S/Inputs/abs256.s -o %t256.o
|
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=aarch64-none-freebsd %S/Inputs/abs257.s -o %t257.o
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-05 14:20:24 +08:00
|
|
|
.globl _start
|
|
|
|
_start:
|
2015-11-26 18:05:24 +08:00
|
|
|
.data
|
Align AArch64 and i386 image base to superpage
Summary:
As for x86_64, the default image base for AArch64 and i386 should be
aligned to a superpage appropriate for the architecture.
On AArch64, this is 2 MiB, on i386 it is 4 MiB.
Reviewers: emaste, grimar, javed.absar, espindola, ruiu, peter.smith, srhines, rprichard
Reviewed By: ruiu, peter.smith
Subscribers: jfb, markj, arichardson, krytarowski, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50297
llvm-svn: 342746
2018-09-22 00:58:13 +08:00
|
|
|
.hword foo - . + 0x210eff
|
|
|
|
.hword foo - . + 0x1f8f02
|
2015-11-26 18:05:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-05 14:20:24 +08:00
|
|
|
// Note: If this test fails, it probably happens because of
|
2015-11-26 18:05:24 +08:00
|
|
|
// the change of the address of the .data section.
|
|
|
|
// You may found the correct address in the aarch64_abs16.s test,
|
2015-12-05 14:20:24 +08:00
|
|
|
// if it is already fixed. Then, update addends accordingly.
|
2016-10-04 16:58:55 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: ld.lld -z max-page-size=4096 %t.o %t256.o -o %t2
|
2015-12-05 14:20:24 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-objdump -s -section=.data %t2 | FileCheck %s
|
2015-11-26 18:05:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: Contents of section .data:
|
Align AArch64 and i386 image base to superpage
Summary:
As for x86_64, the default image base for AArch64 and i386 should be
aligned to a superpage appropriate for the architecture.
On AArch64, this is 2 MiB, on i386 it is 4 MiB.
Reviewers: emaste, grimar, javed.absar, espindola, ruiu, peter.smith, srhines, rprichard
Reviewed By: ruiu, peter.smith
Subscribers: jfb, markj, arichardson, krytarowski, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50297
llvm-svn: 342746
2018-09-22 00:58:13 +08:00
|
|
|
// 201000: S = 0x100, A = 0x210eff, P = 0x201000
|
|
|
|
// S + A - P = 0xffff
|
|
|
|
// 201002: S = 0x100, A = 0x1f8f02, P = 0x201002
|
|
|
|
// S + A - P = 0x8000
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 201000 ffff0080
|
2015-11-26 18:05:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Align AArch64 and i386 image base to superpage
Summary:
As for x86_64, the default image base for AArch64 and i386 should be
aligned to a superpage appropriate for the architecture.
On AArch64, this is 2 MiB, on i386 it is 4 MiB.
Reviewers: emaste, grimar, javed.absar, espindola, ruiu, peter.smith, srhines, rprichard
Reviewed By: ruiu, peter.smith
Subscribers: jfb, markj, arichardson, krytarowski, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50297
llvm-svn: 342746
2018-09-22 00:58:13 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: not ld.lld -z max-page-size=4096 %t.o %t255.o -o %t2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=OVERFLOW1
|
[ELF][PPC][X86] Use [-2**(n-1), 2**n) to check overflows for R_PPC_ADDR16, R_PPC64_ADDR{16,32}, R_X86_64_{8,16}
Similar to R_AARCH64_ABS32, R_PPC64_ADDR32 can represent either a signed
value or unsigned value, thus we should use `[-2**(n-1), 2**n)` instead of
`[-2**(n-1), 2**(n-1))` to check overflows.
The issue manifests as a bogus linker error when linking the powerpc64le Linux kernel.
The new behavior is compatible with ld.bfd's complain_overflow_bitfield.
The upper bound of the error message is not correct. Fix it as well.
The changes to R_PPC_ADDR16, R_PPC64_ADDR16, R_X86_64_8 and R_X86_64_16 are similar.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63690
llvm-svn: 364164
2019-06-24 13:37:20 +08:00
|
|
|
// OVERFLOW1: relocation R_AARCH64_PREL16 out of range: -32769 is not in [-32768, 65535]
|
Align AArch64 and i386 image base to superpage
Summary:
As for x86_64, the default image base for AArch64 and i386 should be
aligned to a superpage appropriate for the architecture.
On AArch64, this is 2 MiB, on i386 it is 4 MiB.
Reviewers: emaste, grimar, javed.absar, espindola, ruiu, peter.smith, srhines, rprichard
Reviewed By: ruiu, peter.smith
Subscribers: jfb, markj, arichardson, krytarowski, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50297
llvm-svn: 342746
2018-09-22 00:58:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// RUN: not ld.lld -z max-page-size=4096 %t.o %t257.o -o %t2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=OVERFLOW2
|
[ELF][PPC][X86] Use [-2**(n-1), 2**n) to check overflows for R_PPC_ADDR16, R_PPC64_ADDR{16,32}, R_X86_64_{8,16}
Similar to R_AARCH64_ABS32, R_PPC64_ADDR32 can represent either a signed
value or unsigned value, thus we should use `[-2**(n-1), 2**n)` instead of
`[-2**(n-1), 2**(n-1))` to check overflows.
The issue manifests as a bogus linker error when linking the powerpc64le Linux kernel.
The new behavior is compatible with ld.bfd's complain_overflow_bitfield.
The upper bound of the error message is not correct. Fix it as well.
The changes to R_PPC_ADDR16, R_PPC64_ADDR16, R_X86_64_8 and R_X86_64_16 are similar.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63690
llvm-svn: 364164
2019-06-24 13:37:20 +08:00
|
|
|
// OVERFLOW2: relocation R_AARCH64_PREL16 out of range: 65536 is not in [-32768, 65535]
|