lammps/examples/peptide
sjplimp fd0e404679 git-svn-id: svn://svn.icms.temple.edu/lammps-ro/trunk@1395 f3b2605a-c512-4ea7-a41b-209d697bcdaa 2008-01-18 21:48:26 +00:00
..
README git-svn-id: svn://svn.icms.temple.edu/lammps-ro/trunk@390 f3b2605a-c512-4ea7-a41b-209d697bcdaa 2007-03-09 15:45:08 +00:00
data.peptide git-svn-id: svn://svn.icms.temple.edu/lammps-ro/trunk@23 f3b2605a-c512-4ea7-a41b-209d697bcdaa 2006-09-27 19:50:55 +00:00
in.peptide git-svn-id: svn://svn.icms.temple.edu/lammps-ro/trunk@967 f3b2605a-c512-4ea7-a41b-209d697bcdaa 2007-10-05 17:53:44 +00:00
log.peptide.22Jan08.linux.1 git-svn-id: svn://svn.icms.temple.edu/lammps-ro/trunk@1395 f3b2605a-c512-4ea7-a41b-209d697bcdaa 2008-01-18 21:48:26 +00:00
log.peptide.22Jan08.linux.4 git-svn-id: svn://svn.icms.temple.edu/lammps-ro/trunk@1395 f3b2605a-c512-4ea7-a41b-209d697bcdaa 2008-01-18 21:48:26 +00:00

README

If you get bogus, large energies on timestep 0 when you run this
example in.peptide, you likely have a machine/compiler problem with
the pair_style "long" potentials which use Coulombic tabling by
default.

See the "Additional build tips" sub-section of the manual in
Section_start.html in the "Making LAMMPS" section for details and
suggestions on how to work around this issue.