forked from lijiext/lammps
git-svn-id: svn://svn.icms.temple.edu/lammps-ro/trunk@12028 f3b2605a-c512-4ea7-a41b-209d697bcdaa
This commit is contained in:
parent
e5e877dd3f
commit
e09f40c9d0
|
@ -76,11 +76,21 @@ points suffer from inaccuracies. The basic problem is that the
|
|||
outward normal of the surface is not continuous at these points. This
|
||||
can cause particles to feel no force (they don't "see" the wall) when
|
||||
in one location, then move a distance epsilon, and suddenly feel a
|
||||
large force because they now "see" the wall. In the worst-case
|
||||
large force because they now "see" the wall. In a worst-case
|
||||
scenario, this can blow particles out of the simulation box. Thus, as
|
||||
a general rule you should not use the fix wall/region command with
|
||||
<I>union</I> or <I>interesect</I> regions that have convex points or edges.
|
||||
</P>
|
||||
<P>IMPORTANT NOTE: Similarly, you should not define <I>union</I> or
|
||||
<I>intersert</I> regions for use with this command that share a common
|
||||
face, even if the face is smooth. E.g. two regions of style block in
|
||||
a <I>union</I> region, where the two blocks have the same face. This is
|
||||
because LAMMPS discards points that are part of multiple sub-regions
|
||||
when calculating wall/particle interactions, to avoid double-counting
|
||||
the interaction. Having two coincident faces could cause the face to
|
||||
become invisible to the particles. The solution is to make the two
|
||||
faces differ by epsilon in their position.
|
||||
</P>
|
||||
<P>The energy of wall-particle interactions depends on the specified
|
||||
style.
|
||||
</P>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -73,11 +73,21 @@ points suffer from inaccuracies. The basic problem is that the
|
|||
outward normal of the surface is not continuous at these points. This
|
||||
can cause particles to feel no force (they don't "see" the wall) when
|
||||
in one location, then move a distance epsilon, and suddenly feel a
|
||||
large force because they now "see" the wall. In the worst-case
|
||||
large force because they now "see" the wall. In a worst-case
|
||||
scenario, this can blow particles out of the simulation box. Thus, as
|
||||
a general rule you should not use the fix wall/region command with
|
||||
{union} or {interesect} regions that have convex points or edges.
|
||||
|
||||
IMPORTANT NOTE: Similarly, you should not define {union} or
|
||||
{intersert} regions for use with this command that share a common
|
||||
face, even if the face is smooth. E.g. two regions of style block in
|
||||
a {union} region, where the two blocks have the same face. This is
|
||||
because LAMMPS discards points that are part of multiple sub-regions
|
||||
when calculating wall/particle interactions, to avoid double-counting
|
||||
the interaction. Having two coincident faces could cause the face to
|
||||
become invisible to the particles. The solution is to make the two
|
||||
faces differ by epsilon in their position.
|
||||
|
||||
The energy of wall-particle interactions depends on the specified
|
||||
style.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue