fix spelling and record false positives

doc/src/pair_granular.txt

@@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ For the {hertz/material} model, the force is given by:
 Here, \(E_\{eff\} = E = \left(\frac\{1-\nu_i^2\}\{E_i\} + \frac\{1-\nu_j^2\}\{E_j\}\right)^\{-1\}\) 
 is the effective Young's modulus,
 with \(\nu_i, \nu_j \) the Poisson ratios of the particles of types {i} and {j}. Note that
-if the elastic and shear moduli of the 
-two particles are the same, the {hertz/material}
+if the elastic modulus and the shear modulus of the two particles are the same, the {hertz/material}
 model is equivalent to the {hertz} model with \(k_N = 4/3 E_\{eff\}\)
 
 The {dmt} model corresponds to the "(Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov)"_#DMT1975 cohesive model, 
@@ -188,7 +187,7 @@ for all models except {jkr}, for which it is given implicitly according to \(del
 In this case, \eta_\{n0\}\ is in units of 1/({time}*{distance}).
 
 The {tsuji} model is based on the work of "(Tsuji et al)"_#Tsuji1992. Here, the
-damping coefficient specified as part of the normal model is intepreted
+damping coefficient specified as part of the normal model is interpreted
 as a restitution coefficient \(e\). The damping constant \(\eta_n\) is given by:
 
 \begin\{equation\}
@@ -242,7 +241,7 @@ The tangential damping force \(\mathbf\{F\}_\mathrm\{t,damp\}\) is given by:
 \mathbf\{F\}_\mathrm\{t,damp\} = -\eta_t \mathbf\{v\}_\{t,rel\}
 \end\{equation\}
 
-The tangetial damping prefactor \(\eta_t\) is calculated by scaling the normal damping \(\eta_n\) (see above): 
+The tangential damping prefactor \(\eta_t\) is calculated by scaling the normal damping \(\eta_n\) (see above): 
 \begin\{equation\}
 \eta_t = -x_\{\gamma,t\} \eta_n
 \end\{equation\}
@@ -292,7 +291,7 @@ duration of the contact:
 \mathbf\{\xi\} = \int_\{t0\}^t \mathbf\{v\}_\{t,rel\}(\tau) \mathrm\{d\}\tau 
 \end\{equation\}
 
-This accumlated tangential displacement must be adjusted to account for changes 
+This accumulated tangential displacement must be adjusted to account for changes 
 in the frame of reference 
 of the contacting pair of particles during contact. This occurs due to the overall motion of the contacting particles
 in a rigid-body-like fashion during the duration of the contact. There are two modes of motion
@@ -304,7 +303,7 @@ made by rotating the accumulated displacement into the plane that is tangential
 to the contact vector at each step, 
 or equivalently removing any component of the tangential displacement
 that lies along \(\mathbf\{n\}\), and rescaling to preserve the magnitude. 
-This folllows the discussion in "Luding"_#Luding2008, see equation 17 and 
+This follows the discussion in "Luding"_#Luding2008, see equation 17 and 
 relevant discussion in that work:
 
 \begin\{equation\}
@@ -350,7 +349,7 @@ see discussion above. To match the Mindlin solution, one should set \(k_t = 8G\)
 \(G\) is the shear modulus, related to Young's modulus \(E\) by \(G = E/(2(1+\nu))\), where \(\nu\) 
 is Poisson's ratio. This can also be achieved by specifying {NULL} for \(k_t\), in which case
 a normal contact model that specifies material parameters \(E\) and \(\nu\) is required (e.g. {hertz/material},
-{dmt} or {jkr}). In this case, mixing of shear moduli for different particle types {i} and {j} is done according
+{dmt} or {jkr}). In this case, mixing of the shear modulus for different particle types {i} and {j} is done according
 to:
 \begin\{equation\}
 1/G = 2(2-\nu_i)(1+\nu_i)/E_i + 2(2-\nu_j)(1+\nu_j)/E_j 
@@ -381,7 +380,7 @@ If the {rolling} keyword is not specified, the model defaults to {none}.
 For {rolling sds}, rolling friction is computed via a spring-dashpot-slider, using a 
 'pseudo-force' formulation, as detailed by "Luding"_#Luding2008. Unlike the formulation
 in "Marshall"_#Marshall2009, this allows for the required adjustment of 
-rolling displacement due to changes in the frame of referenece of the contacting pair. 
+rolling displacement due to changes in the frame of reference of the contacting pair. 
 The rolling pseudo-force is computed analogously to the tangential force:
  
 \begin\{equation\}
@@ -487,7 +486,7 @@ Finally, the twisting torque on each particle is given by:
 :line
 
 LAMMPS automatically sets pairwise cutoff values for {pair_style granular} based on particle radii (and in the case
-of {jkr} pulloff distances). In the vast majority of situations, this is adequate.
+of {jkr} pull-off distances). In the vast majority of situations, this is adequate.
 However, a cutoff value can optionally be appended to the {pair_style granular} command to specify
 a global cutoff (i.e. a cutoff for all atom types). Additionally, the optional {cutoff} keyword 
 can be passed to the {pair_coeff} command, followed by a cutoff value. 
@@ -533,7 +532,7 @@ Mixing of coefficients is carried out using geometric averaging for
 most quantities, e.g. if friction coefficient for type 1-type 1 interactions
 is set to \(\mu_1\), and friction coefficient for type 2-type 2 interactions
 is set to \(\mu_2\), the friction coefficient for type1-type2 interactions
-is computed as \(\sqrt\{\mu_1\mu_2\}\) (unless explictly specified to 
+is computed as \(\sqrt\{\mu_1\mu_2\}\) (unless explicitly specified to 
 a different value by a {pair_coeff 1 2 ...} command. The exception to this is 
 elastic modulus, only applicable to {hertz/material}, {dmt} and {jkr} normal 
 contact models. In that case, the effective elastic modulus is computed as:
@@ -542,7 +541,7 @@ contact models. In that case, the effective elastic modulus is computed as:
 E_\{eff,ij\} = \left(\frac\{1-\nu_i^2\}\{E_i\} + \frac\{1-\nu_j^2\}\{E_j\}\right)^\{-1\}
 \end\{equation\}
 
-If the {i-j} coefficients \(E_\{ij\}\) and \(\nu_\{ij\}\) are explictly specified, 
+If the {i-j} coefficients \(E_\{ij\}\) and \(\nu_\{ij\}\) are explicitly specified, 
 the effective modulus is computed as:
 
 \begin\{equation\}

doc/utils/sphinx-config/false_positives.txt

@@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ ba
 Babadi
 backcolor
 Baczewski
+Bagi
+Bagnold
 Bal
 balancer
 Balankura
@@ -343,6 +345,7 @@ Cij
 cis
 civ
 clearstore
+Cleary
 Clebsch
 clemson
 Clermont
@@ -369,6 +372,7 @@ Coeff
 CoefficientN
 coeffs
 Coeffs
+cohesionless
 Coker
 Colberg
 coleman
@@ -442,6 +446,7 @@ cuda
 Cuda
 CUDA
 CuH
+Cummins
 Curk
 customIDs
 cutbond
@@ -485,6 +490,7 @@ darkturquoise
 darkviolet
 Das
 Dasgupta
+dashpot
 dat
 datafile
 datums
@@ -521,6 +527,7 @@ Dequidt
 der
 derekt
 Derjagin
+Derjaguin
 Derlet
 Deserno
 Destree
@@ -1065,6 +1072,7 @@ Hyoungki
 hyperdynamics
 hyperradius
 hyperspherical
+hysteretic
 Ibanez
 ibar
 ibm
@@ -1124,6 +1132,7 @@ interconvert
 interial
 interlayer
 intermolecular
+Interparticle
 interstitials
 Intr
 intra
@@ -1141,6 +1150,7 @@ IPython
 Isele
 isenthalpic
 ish
+Ishida
 iso
 isodemic
 isoenergetic
@@ -1430,6 +1440,7 @@ logfile
 logfreq
 logicals
 Lomdahl
+Lond
 lookups
 Lookups
 LoopVar
@@ -1444,6 +1455,7 @@ lsfftw
 ltbbmalloc
 lubricateU
 lucy
+Luding
 Lussetti
 Lustig
 lwsock
@@ -1482,6 +1494,7 @@ manybody
 MANYBODY
 Maras
 Marrink
+Marroquin
 Marsaglia
 Marseille
 Martyna
@@ -1493,6 +1506,7 @@ masstotal
 Masuhiro
 Matchett
 Materias
+mathbf
 matlab
 matplotlib
 Mattox
@@ -1580,6 +1594,7 @@ Mie
 Mikami
 Militzer
 Minary
+Mindlin
 mincap
 mingw
 minima
@@ -2260,6 +2275,7 @@ rg
 Rg
 Rhaphson
 rheological
+rheology
 rhodo
 Rhodo
 rhodopsin
@@ -2572,6 +2588,7 @@ Tait
 taitwater
 Tajkhorshid
 Tamaskovics
+Tanaka
 tanh
 Tartakovsky
 taskset
@@ -2659,6 +2676,7 @@ tokyo
 tol
 toolchain
 topologies
+Toporov
 Torder
 torsions
 Tosi
@@ -2703,6 +2721,7 @@ Tsrd
 Tstart
 tstat
 Tstop
+Tsuji
 Tsuzuki
 tt
 Tt