2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
"LAMMPS WWW Site"_lws - "LAMMPS Documentation"_ld - "LAMMPS Commands"_lc :c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:link(lws,http://lammps.sandia.gov)
|
|
|
|
:link(ld,Manual.html)
|
|
|
|
:link(lc,Section_commands.html#comm)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pair_style bop command :h3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Syntax:]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pair_style bop keyword ... :pre
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
zero or more keywords may be appended :l
|
|
|
|
keyword = {save} :l
|
|
|
|
save = pre-compute and save some values :pre
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
:ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Examples:]
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
pair_style bop
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
pair_coeff * * ../potentials/CdTe_bop Cd Te
|
2015-07-08 22:41:23 +08:00
|
|
|
pair_style bop save
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
pair_coeff * * ../potentials/CdTe.bop.table Cd Te Te
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
comm_modify cutoff 14.70 :pre
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Description:]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The {bop} pair style computes Bond-Order Potentials (BOP) based on
|
|
|
|
quantum mechanical theory incorporating both sigma and pi bondings.
|
|
|
|
By analytically deriving the BOP from quantum mechanical theory its
|
|
|
|
transferability to different phases can approach that of quantum
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
mechanical methods. This potential is similar to the original BOP
|
|
|
|
developed by Pettifor ("Pettifor_1"_#Pettifor_1,
|
|
|
|
"Pettifor_2"_#Pettifor_2, "Pettifor_3"_#Pettifor_3) and later updated
|
2015-07-27 22:41:27 +08:00
|
|
|
by Murdick, Zhou, and Ward ("Murdick"_#Murdick, "Ward"_#Ward).
|
|
|
|
Currently, BOP potential files for these systems are provided with
|
|
|
|
LAMMPS: AlCu, CCu, CdTe, CdTeSe, CdZnTe, CuH, GaAs. A sysstem with
|
|
|
|
only a subset of these elements, including a single element (e.g. C or
|
|
|
|
Cu or Al or Ga or Zn or CdZn), can also be modeled by using the
|
|
|
|
appropriate alloy file and assigning all atom types to the
|
|
|
|
singleelement or subset of elements via the pair_coeff command, as
|
|
|
|
discussed below.
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The BOP potential consists of three terms:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:c,image(Eqs/pair_bop.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where phi_ij(r_ij) is a short-range two-body function representing the
|
|
|
|
repulsion between a pair of ion cores, beta_(sigma,ij)(r_ij) and
|
|
|
|
beta_(sigma,ij)(r_ij) are respectively sigma and pi bond ingtegrals,
|
|
|
|
THETA_(sigma,ij) and THETA_(pi,ij) are sigma and pi bond-orders, and
|
|
|
|
U_prom is the promotion energy for sp-valent systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The detailed formulas for this potential are given in Ward
|
|
|
|
("Ward"_#Ward); here we provide only a brief description.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The repulsive energy phi_ij(r_ij) and the bond integrals
|
|
|
|
beta_(sigma,ij)(r_ij) and beta_(phi,ij)(r_ij) are functions of the
|
|
|
|
interatomic distance r_ij between atom i and j. Each of these
|
|
|
|
potentials has a smooth cutoff at a radius of r_(cut,ij). These
|
|
|
|
smooth cutoffs ensure stable behavior at situations with high sampling
|
|
|
|
near the cutoff such as melts and surfaces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bond-orders can be viewed as environment-dependent local variables
|
|
|
|
that are ij bond specific. The maximum value of the sigma bond-order
|
|
|
|
(THETA_sigma) is 1, while that of the pi bond-order (THETA_pi) is 2,
|
|
|
|
attributing to a maximum value of the total bond-order
|
|
|
|
(THETA_sigma+THETA_pi) of 3. The sigma and pi bond-orders reflect the
|
|
|
|
ubiquitous single-, double-, and triple- bond behavior of
|
|
|
|
chemistry. Their analytical expressions can be derived from tight-
|
|
|
|
binding theory by recursively expanding an inter-site Green's function
|
|
|
|
as a continued fraction. To accurately represent the bonding with a
|
|
|
|
computationally efficient potential formulation suitable for MD
|
|
|
|
simulations, the derived BOP only takes (and retains) the first two
|
|
|
|
levels of the recursive representations for both the sigma and the pi
|
|
|
|
bond-orders. Bond-order terms can be understood in terms of molecular
|
|
|
|
orbital hopping paths based upon the Cyrot-Lackmann theorem
|
|
|
|
("Pettifor_1"_#Pettifor_1). The sigma bond-order with a half-full
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
valence shell is used to interpolate the bond-order expressiont that
|
|
|
|
incorporated explicite valance band filling. This pi bond-order
|
|
|
|
expression also contains also contains a three-member ring term that
|
|
|
|
allows implementation of an asymmetric density of states, which helps
|
|
|
|
to either stabilize or destabilize close-packed structures. The pi
|
|
|
|
bond-order includes hopping paths of length 4. This enables the
|
|
|
|
incorporation of dihedral angles effects.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-11 01:23:56 +08:00
|
|
|
NOTE: Note that unlike for other potentials, cutoffs for BOP
|
2015-07-08 22:41:23 +08:00
|
|
|
potentials are not set in the pair_style or pair_coeff command; they
|
|
|
|
are specified in the BOP potential files themselves. Likewise, the
|
|
|
|
BOP potential files list atomic masses; thus you do not need to use
|
|
|
|
the "mass"_mass.html command to specify them. Note that for BOP
|
|
|
|
potentials with hydrogen, you will likely want to set the mass of H
|
|
|
|
atoms to be 10x or 20x larger to avoid having to use a tiny timestep.
|
|
|
|
You can do this by using the "mass"_mass.html command after using the
|
|
|
|
"pair_coeff"_doc/pair_coeff.html command to read the BOP potential
|
|
|
|
file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One option can be specified as a keyword with the pair_style command.
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The {save} keyword gives you the option to calculate in advance and
|
|
|
|
store a set of distances, angles, and derivatives of angles. The
|
|
|
|
default is to not do this, but to calculate them on-the-fly each time
|
|
|
|
they are needed. The former may be faster, but takes more memory.
|
|
|
|
The latter requires less memory, but may be slower. It is best to
|
|
|
|
test this option to optimize the speed of BOP for your particular
|
|
|
|
system configuration.
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only a single pair_coeff command is used with the {bop} style which
|
|
|
|
specifies a BOP potential file, with parameters for all needed
|
|
|
|
elements. These are mapped to LAMMPS atom types by specifying
|
|
|
|
N additional arguments after the filename in the pair_coeff command,
|
|
|
|
where N is the number of LAMMPS atom types:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
filename
|
|
|
|
N element names = mapping of BOP elements to atom types :ul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As an example, imagine the CdTe.bop file has BOP values for Cd
|
|
|
|
and Te. If your LAMMPS simulation has 4 atoms types and you want the
|
|
|
|
1st 3 to be Cd, and the 4th to be Te, you would use the following
|
|
|
|
pair_coeff command:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pair_coeff * * CdTe Cd Cd Cd Te :pre
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 1st 2 arguments must be * * so as to span all LAMMPS atom types.
|
|
|
|
The first three Cd arguments map LAMMPS atom types 1,2,3 to the Cd
|
|
|
|
element in the BOP file. The final Te argument maps LAMMPS atom type
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
4 to the Te element in the BOP file.
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOP files in the {potentials} directory of the LAMMPS distribution
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
have a ".bop" suffix. The potentials are in tabulated form containing
|
|
|
|
pre-tabulated pair functions for phi_ij(r_ij), beta_(sigma,ij)(r_ij),
|
|
|
|
and beta_pi,ij)(r_ij).
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
The parameters/coefficients format for the different kinds of BOP
|
|
|
|
files are given below with variables matching the formulation of Ward
|
|
|
|
("Ward"_#Ward) and Zhou ("Zhou"_#Zhou). Each header line containing a
|
|
|
|
":" is preceded by a blank line.
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:line
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
[No angular table file format]:
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
The parameters/coefficients format for the BOP potentials input file
|
|
|
|
containing pre-tabulated functions of g is given below with variables
|
|
|
|
matching the formulation of Ward ("Ward"_#Ward). This format also
|
|
|
|
assumes the angular functions have the formulation of ("Ward"_#Ward).
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: # elements N :ul
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
The first line is followed by N lines containing the atomic
|
|
|
|
number, mass, and element symbol of each element.
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the definition of the elements several global variables for
|
|
|
|
the tabulated functions are given.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: nr, nBOt (nr is the number of divisions the radius is broken
|
|
|
|
into for function tables and MUST be a factor of 5; nBOt is the number
|
|
|
|
of divisions for the tabulated values of THETA_(S,ij) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: delta_1-delta_7 (if all are not used in the particular :l
|
|
|
|
formulation, set unused values to 0.0) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following this N lines for e_1-e_N containing p_pi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 3: p_pi (for e_1)
|
|
|
|
Line 4: p_pi (for e_2 and continues to e_N) :ul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains several pair constants for the number of
|
|
|
|
interaction types e_i-e_j, with i=1->N, j=i->N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: r_cut (for e_1-e_1 interactions) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: c_sigma, a_sigma, c_pi, a_pi :l
|
|
|
|
Line 3: delta_sigma, delta_pi :l
|
|
|
|
Line 4: f_sigma, k_sigma, delta_3 (This delta_3 is similar to that of
|
|
|
|
the previous section but is interaction type dependent) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains a line for each three body interaction type
|
|
|
|
e_j-e_i-e_k with i=0->N, j=0->N, k=j->N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: g_(sigma0), g_(sigma1), g_(sigma2) (These are coefficients for
|
|
|
|
g_(sigma,jik)(THETA_ijk) for e_1-e_1-e_1 interaction. "Ward"_#Ward
|
|
|
|
contains the full expressions for the constants as functions of
|
|
|
|
b_(sigma,ijk), p_(sigma,ijk), u_(sigma,ijk)) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: g_(sigma0), g_(sigma1), g_(sigma2) (for e_1-e_1-e_2) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains a block for each interaction type for the
|
|
|
|
phi_ij(r_ij). Each block has nr entries with 5 entries per line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: phi(r1), phi(r2), phi(r3), phi(r4), phi(r5) (for the e_1-e_1
|
|
|
|
interaction type) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: phi(r6), phi(r7), phi(r8), phi(r9), phi(r10) (this continues
|
|
|
|
until nr) :l
|
|
|
|
... :l
|
|
|
|
Line nr/5_1: phi(r1), phi(r2), phi(r3), phi(r4), phi(r5), (for the
|
|
|
|
e_1-e_1 interaction type) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains a block for each interaction type for the
|
|
|
|
beta_(sigma,ij)(r_ij). Each block has nr entries with 5 entries per
|
|
|
|
line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: beta_sigma(r1), beta_sigma(r2), beta_sigma(r3), beta_sigma(r4),
|
|
|
|
beta_sigma(r5) (for the e_1-e_1 interaction type) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: beta_sigma(r6), beta_sigma(r7), beta_sigma(r8), beta_sigma(r9),
|
|
|
|
beta_sigma(r10) (this continues until nr) :l
|
|
|
|
... :l
|
|
|
|
Line nr/5+1: beta_sigma(r1), beta_sigma(r2), beta_sigma(r3),
|
|
|
|
beta_sigma(r4), beta_sigma(r5) (for the e_1-e_2 interaction type) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains a block for each interaction type for
|
|
|
|
beta_(pi,ij)(r_ij). Each block has nr entries with 5 entries per line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: beta_pi(r1), beta_pi(r2), beta_pi(r3), beta_pi(r4), beta_pi(r5)
|
|
|
|
(for the e_1-e_1 interaction type) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: beta_pi(r6), beta_pi(r7), beta_pi(r8), beta_pi(r9),
|
|
|
|
beta_pi(r10) (this continues until nr) :l
|
|
|
|
... :l
|
|
|
|
Line nr/5+1: beta_pi(r1), beta_pi(r2), beta_pi(r3), beta_pi(r4),
|
|
|
|
beta_pi(r5) (for the e_1-e_2 interaction type) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains a block for each interaction type for the
|
|
|
|
THETA_(S,ij)((THETA_(sigma,ij))^(1/2), f_(sigma,ij)). Each block has
|
|
|
|
nBOt entries with 5 entries per line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: THETA_(S,ij)(r1), THETA_(S,ij)(r2), THETA_(S,ij)(r3),
|
|
|
|
THETA_(S,ij)(r4), THETA_(S,ij)(r5) (for the e_1-e_2 interaction type) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: THETA_(S,ij)(r6), THETA_(S,ij)(r7), THETA_(S,ij)(r8),
|
|
|
|
THETA_(S,ij)(r9), THETA_(S,ij)(r10) (this continues until nBOt) :l
|
|
|
|
... :l
|
|
|
|
Line nBOt/5+1: THETA_(S,ij)(r1), THETA_(S,ij)(r2), THETA_(S,ij)(r3),
|
|
|
|
THETA_(S,ij)(r4), THETA_(S,ij)(r5) (for the e_1-e_2 interaction type) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains a block of N lines for e_1-e_N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: delta^mu (for e_1)
|
|
|
|
Line 2: delta^mu (for e_2 and repeats to e_N) :ul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The last section contains more constants for e_i-e_j interactions with
|
|
|
|
i=0->N, j=i->N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: (A_ij)^(mu*nu) (for e1-e1)
|
|
|
|
Line 2: (A_ij)^(mu*nu) (for e1-e2 and repeats as above) :ul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:line
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
[Angular spline table file format]:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The parameters/coefficients format for the BOP potentials input file
|
|
|
|
containing pre-tabulated functions of g is given below with variables
|
|
|
|
matching the formulation of Ward ("Ward"_#Ward). This format also
|
|
|
|
assumes the angular functions have the formulation of ("Zhou"_#Zhou).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: # elements N :ul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first line is followed by N lines containing the atomic
|
|
|
|
number, mass, and element symbol of each element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the definition of the elements several global variables for
|
|
|
|
the tabulated functions are given.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: nr, ntheta, nBOt (nr is the number of divisions the radius is broken
|
|
|
|
into for function tables and MUST be a factor of 5; ntheta is the power of the
|
|
|
|
power of the spline used to fit the angular function; nBOt is the number
|
|
|
|
of divisions for the tabulated values of THETA_(S,ij) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: delta_1-delta_7 (if all are not used in the particular :l
|
|
|
|
formulation, set unused values to 0.0) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following this N lines for e_1-e_N containing p_pi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 3: p_pi (for e_1)
|
|
|
|
Line 4: p_pi (for e_2 and continues to e_N) :ul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains several pair constants for the number of
|
|
|
|
interaction types e_i-e_j, with i=1->N, j=i->N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: r_cut (for e_1-e_1 interactions) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: c_sigma, a_sigma, c_pi, a_pi :l
|
|
|
|
Line 3: delta_sigma, delta_pi :l
|
|
|
|
Line 4: f_sigma, k_sigma, delta_3 (This delta_3 is similar to that of
|
|
|
|
the previous section but is interaction type dependent) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains a line for each three body interaction type
|
|
|
|
e_j-e_i-e_k with i=0->N, j=0->N, k=j->N
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-08 22:41:23 +08:00
|
|
|
Line 1: g0, g1, g2... (These are coefficients for the angular spline
|
|
|
|
of the g_(sigma,jik)(THETA_ijk) for e_1-e_1-e_1 interaction. The
|
|
|
|
function can contain up to 10 term thus 10 constants. The first line
|
|
|
|
can contain up to five constants. If the spline has more than five
|
|
|
|
terms the second line will contain the remaining constants The
|
|
|
|
following lines will then contain the constants for the remainaing g0,
|
|
|
|
g1, g2... (for e_1-e_1-e_2) and the other three body
|
|
|
|
interactions :l,ule
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rest of the table has the same structure as the previous section
|
|
|
|
(see above).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Angular no-spline table file format]:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The parameters/coefficients format for the BOP potentials input file
|
|
|
|
containing pre-tabulated functions of g is given below with variables
|
|
|
|
matching the formulation of Ward ("Ward"_#Ward). This format also
|
|
|
|
assumes the angular functions have the formulation of ("Zhou"_#Zhou).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: # elements N :ul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first two lines are followed by N lines containing the atomic
|
|
|
|
number, mass, and element symbol of each element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the definition of the elements several global variables for
|
|
|
|
the tabulated functions are given.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: nr, ntheta, nBOt (nr is the number of divisions the radius is broken
|
|
|
|
into for function tables and MUST be a factor of 5; ntheta is the number of
|
|
|
|
divisions for the tabulated values of the g angular function; nBOt is the number
|
|
|
|
of divisions for the tabulated values of THETA_(S,ij) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: delta_1-delta_7 (if all are not used in the particular :l
|
|
|
|
formulation, set unused values to 0.0) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following this N lines for e_1-e_N containing p_pi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 3: p_pi (for e_1)
|
|
|
|
Line 4: p_pi (for e_2 and continues to e_N) :ul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains several pair constants for the number of
|
|
|
|
interaction types e_i-e_j, with i=1->N, j=i->N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: r_cut (for e_1-e_1 interactions) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: c_sigma, a_sigma, c_pi, a_pi :l
|
|
|
|
Line 3: delta_sigma, delta_pi :l
|
|
|
|
Line 4: f_sigma, k_sigma, delta_3 (This delta_3 is similar to that of
|
|
|
|
the previous section but is interaction type dependent) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next section contains a line for each three body interaction type
|
|
|
|
e_j-e_i-e_k with i=0->N, j=0->N, k=j->N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1: g(theta1), g(theta2), g(theta3), g(theta4), g(theta5) (for the e_1-e_1-e_1
|
|
|
|
interaction type) :ulb,l
|
|
|
|
Line 2: g(theta6), g(theta7), g(theta8), g(theta9), g(theta10) (this continues
|
|
|
|
until ntheta) :l
|
|
|
|
... :l
|
|
|
|
Line ntheta/5+1: g(theta1), g(theta2), g(theta3), g(theta4), g(theta5), (for the
|
|
|
|
e_1-e_1-e_2 interaction type) :l,ule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rest of the table has the same structure as the previous section (see above).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:line
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-05 04:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
[Mixing, shift, table tail correction, restart]:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This pair style does not support the "pair_modify"_pair_modify.html
|
|
|
|
mix, shift, table, and tail options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This pair style does not write its information to "binary restart
|
|
|
|
files"_restart.html, since it is stored in potential files. Thus, you
|
|
|
|
need to re-specify the pair_style and pair_coeff commands in an input
|
|
|
|
script that reads a restart file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This pair style can only be used via the {pair} keyword of the
|
|
|
|
"run_style respa"_run_style.html command. It does not support the
|
|
|
|
{inner}, {middle}, {outer} keywords.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Restrictions:]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These pair styles are part of the MANYBODY package. They are only
|
|
|
|
enabled if LAMMPS was built with that package (which it is by default).
|
|
|
|
See the "Making LAMMPS"_Section_start.html#start_3 section for more
|
|
|
|
info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These pair potentials require the "newtion"_newton.html setting to be
|
|
|
|
"on" for pair interactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CdTe.bop and GaAs.bop potential files provided with LAMMPS (see the
|
|
|
|
potentials directory) are parameterized for metal "units"_units.html.
|
|
|
|
You can use the BOP potential with any LAMMPS units, but you would need
|
|
|
|
to create your own BOP potential file with coefficients listed in the
|
|
|
|
appropriate units if your simulation does not use "metal" units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Related commands:]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"pair_coeff"_pair_coeff.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Default:]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-tabulated potential file, a_0 is non-zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:link(Pettofor_1)
|
|
|
|
[(Pettifor_1)] D.G. Pettifor and I.I. Oleinik, Phys. Rev. B, 59, 8487
|
|
|
|
(1999).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:link(Pettofor_2)
|
|
|
|
[(Pettifor_2)] D.G. Pettifor and I.I. Oleinik, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84,
|
|
|
|
4124 (2000).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:link(Pettofor_3)
|
|
|
|
[(Pettifor_3)] D.G. Pettifor and I.I. Oleinik, Phys. Rev. B, 65, 172103
|
|
|
|
(2002).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:link(Murdick)
|
|
|
|
[(Murdick)] D.A. Murdick, X.W. Zhou, H.N.G. Wadley, D. Nguyen-Manh, R.
|
|
|
|
Drautz, and D.G. Pettifor, Phys. Rev. B, 73, 45206 (2006).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:link(Ward)
|
|
|
|
[(Ward)] D.K. Ward, X.W. Zhou, B.M. Wong, F.P. Doty, and J.A.
|
|
|
|
Zimmerman, Phys. Rev. B, 85,115206 (2012).
|
2015-07-06 22:03:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:link(Zhou)
|
|
|
|
[(Zhou)] X.W. Zhou, D.K. Ward, M. Foster (TBP).
|