lammps/doc/include-file-conventions.md

134 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Outline of include file conventions in LAMMPS
This purpose of this document is to provide a point of reference
for LAMMPS developers and contributors as to what include files
and definitions to put where into LAMMPS source.
Last change 2019-06-27
## Table of Contents
* [Motivation](#motivation)
* [Rules](#rules)
* [Tools](#tools)
* [Legacy Code](#legacy-code)
## Motivation
The conventions outlined in this document are supposed to help making
maintenance of the LAMMPS software easier. By trying to achieve
consistency across files contributed by different developers, it will
become easier to modify and adjust files by the code maintainers, and
overall the chance for errors or portability issues will be reduced.
Also the rules employed are supposed to minimize naming conflicts and
simplify dependencies between files (and thus speed up compilation), as
well as make otherwise hidden dependencies visible.
## Rules
Below are the various rules that are applied. Not all are enforced
strictly and automatically. If there are no significant side effects,
exceptions may be possible for cases, where a full compliance to the
rules may require a large effort compared to the benefit.
### Core Files Versus Package Files
All rules listed below are most strictly observed for core LAMMPS files.
Which are the files that are not part of a package and files of the
packages MOLECULE, MANYBODY, KSPACE, and RIGID. On the other end of
the spectrum are USER packages and legacy packages that predate these
rules and thus may not be fully compliant. Also new contributions
will be checked more closely, while existing code is incrementally
adapted to the rules as time and required effort permits.
### System Versus Local Header Files
All system or library provided include files are included with angular
brackets (examples: `#include <cstring>` or `#include <mpi.h>`) while
include files provided with LAMMPS are included with double quotes
(examples: `#include "pointers.h"` or `#include "compute_temp.h"`).
For headers declaring functions of the C-library, the corresponding
C++ versions should be included (examples: `#include <cstdlib>` or
`#include <cctypes>`). However, those are limited to those defined
in the C++98 standard. Some files thus must use the older style unless
the minimum C++ standard requirement of LAMMPS is lifted to C++11 or
even beyond (examples: `#include <stdint.h>` versus `#include <cstdint>`
or `#include <inttypes.h>` versus `#include <cinttypes>`).
### C++ Standard Compliance
LAMMPS core files currently correspond to the C++98 standard. Files
requiring C++11 or later are only permitted in (optional) packages
and particularly packages that are not part of the list of commonly
used packages like MOLECULE, KSPACE, MANYBODY, or RIGID.
Also, LAMMPS uses the C-style stdio library for I/O instead of iostreams.
Since using both at the same time can cause problems, iostreams should
be avoided where possible.
### Lean Header Files
Header files will typically contain the definition of a (single) class.
These header files should have as few include statements as possible.
This is particularly important for classes that implement a "style" and
thus use a macro of the kind `SomeStyle(some/name,SomeName)`. These will
be all included in the auto-generated `"some_style.h"` files which will
result in a high potential for direct or indirect symbol name clashes.
In the ideal case, the header would only include one file defining the
parent class. That would typically be either `#include "pointers.h"` for
the `Pointers` class, or a header of a class derived from it like
`#include "pair.h"` for the `Pair` class and so on. References to other
classes inside the class should be make through pointers, for which forward
declarations (inside the `LAMMPS_NS` or the new class' namespace) can
be employed. The full definition will then be included into the corresponding
implementation file. In the given example from above, the header file
would be called `some_name.h` and the implementation `some_name.cpp` (all
lower case with underscores, while the class itself would be in camel case
and no underscores, and the style name with lower case names separated by
a forward slash).
### Implementation Files
In the implementation files (typically, those would have the same base name
as the corresponding header with a .cpp extension instead of .h) include
statements should follow the "include what you use" principle.
### Order of Include Statements
Include files should be included in this order:
* lmptype.h (should only be included if `MPI_LMP_XXX` data types are used)
* mpi.h
* system and library headers (anything that is using angular brackets; C-library headers first, then C++)
* LAMMPS local headers (first the header matching the implementation file, the rest in mostly alphabetical order)
### Special Cases and Exceptions
#### pointers.h
The `pointer.h` header file also includes `cstdio` and `lmptype.h`
(and through it `stdint.h`, `intttypes.h`, and `climits`).
This means any header including `pointers.h` can assume that `FILE`,
`NULL`, `INT_MAX` are defined.
## Tools
The [Include What You Use tool](https://include-what-you-use.org/)
can be used to provide supporting information about compliance with
the rules listed here. There are some limitations and the IWYU tool
may give incorrect advice. The tools is activated by setting the
CMake variable `CMAKE_CXX_INCLUDE_WHAT_YOU_USE` variable to the
path of the `include-what-you-use` command. When activated, the
tool will be run after each compilation and provide suggestions for
which include files should be added or removed.
## Legacy Code
A lot of code predates the application of the rules in this document,
and those rules are a moving target as well. So there is going to be
significant chunks of code, that does not fully comply. This applies
for example to the USER-REAXC, or the USER-ATC package. The LAMMPS
developers are dedicated to make an effort to improve the compliance
and welcome volunteers wanting to help with the process.