99 lines
3.9 KiB
ReStructuredText
99 lines
3.9 KiB
ReStructuredText
========================
|
|
MMC Asynchronous Request
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
Rationale
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
How significant is the cache maintenance overhead?
|
|
|
|
It depends. Fast eMMC and multiple cache levels with speculative cache
|
|
pre-fetch makes the cache overhead relatively significant. If the DMA
|
|
preparations for the next request are done in parallel with the current
|
|
transfer, the DMA preparation overhead would not affect the MMC performance.
|
|
|
|
The intention of non-blocking (asynchronous) MMC requests is to minimize the
|
|
time between when an MMC request ends and another MMC request begins.
|
|
|
|
Using mmc_wait_for_req(), the MMC controller is idle while dma_map_sg and
|
|
dma_unmap_sg are processing. Using non-blocking MMC requests makes it
|
|
possible to prepare the caches for next job in parallel with an active
|
|
MMC request.
|
|
|
|
MMC block driver
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
The mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() in the MMC block driver is made non-blocking.
|
|
|
|
The increase in throughput is proportional to the time it takes to
|
|
prepare (major part of preparations are dma_map_sg() and dma_unmap_sg())
|
|
a request and how fast the memory is. The faster the MMC/SD is the
|
|
more significant the prepare request time becomes. Roughly the expected
|
|
performance gain is 5% for large writes and 10% on large reads on a L2 cache
|
|
platform. In power save mode, when clocks run on a lower frequency, the DMA
|
|
preparation may cost even more. As long as these slower preparations are run
|
|
in parallel with the transfer performance won't be affected.
|
|
|
|
Details on measurements from IOZone and mmc_test
|
|
================================================
|
|
|
|
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Specs/StoragePerfMMC-async-req
|
|
|
|
MMC core API extension
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
There is one new public function mmc_start_req().
|
|
|
|
It starts a new MMC command request for a host. The function isn't
|
|
truly non-blocking. If there is an ongoing async request it waits
|
|
for completion of that request and starts the new one and returns. It
|
|
doesn't wait for the new request to complete. If there is no ongoing
|
|
request it starts the new request and returns immediately.
|
|
|
|
MMC host extensions
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
There are two optional members in the mmc_host_ops -- pre_req() and
|
|
post_req() -- that the host driver may implement in order to move work
|
|
to before and after the actual mmc_host_ops.request() function is called.
|
|
|
|
In the DMA case pre_req() may do dma_map_sg() and prepare the DMA
|
|
descriptor, and post_req() runs the dma_unmap_sg().
|
|
|
|
Optimize for the first request
|
|
==============================
|
|
|
|
The first request in a series of requests can't be prepared in parallel
|
|
with the previous transfer, since there is no previous request.
|
|
|
|
The argument is_first_req in pre_req() indicates that there is no previous
|
|
request. The host driver may optimize for this scenario to minimize
|
|
the performance loss. A way to optimize for this is to split the current
|
|
request in two chunks, prepare the first chunk and start the request,
|
|
and finally prepare the second chunk and start the transfer.
|
|
|
|
Pseudocode to handle is_first_req scenario with minimal prepare overhead::
|
|
|
|
if (is_first_req && req->size > threshold)
|
|
/* start MMC transfer for the complete transfer size */
|
|
mmc_start_command(MMC_CMD_TRANSFER_FULL_SIZE);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Begin to prepare DMA while cmd is being processed by MMC.
|
|
* The first chunk of the request should take the same time
|
|
* to prepare as the "MMC process command time".
|
|
* If prepare time exceeds MMC cmd time
|
|
* the transfer is delayed, guesstimate max 4k as first chunk size.
|
|
*/
|
|
prepare_1st_chunk_for_dma(req);
|
|
/* flush pending desc to the DMAC (dmaengine.h) */
|
|
dma_issue_pending(req->dma_desc);
|
|
|
|
prepare_2nd_chunk_for_dma(req);
|
|
/*
|
|
* The second issue_pending should be called before MMC runs out
|
|
* of the first chunk. If the MMC runs out of the first data chunk
|
|
* before this call, the transfer is delayed.
|
|
*/
|
|
dma_issue_pending(req->dma_desc);
|