e319e1fbd9
Darrick posted the following warning and Dave Chinner analyzed it: > ====================================================== > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 4.14.0-rc1-fixes #1 Tainted: G W > ------------------------------------------------------ > loop0/31693 is trying to acquire lock: > (&(&ip->i_mmaplock)->mr_lock){++++}, at: [<ffffffffa00f1b0c>] xfs_ilock+0x23c/0x330 [xfs] > > but now in release context of a crosslock acquired at the following: > ((complete)&ret.event){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81326c1f>] submit_bio_wait+0x7f/0xb0 > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #2 ((complete)&ret.event){+.+.}: > lock_acquire+0xab/0x200 > wait_for_completion_io+0x4e/0x1a0 > submit_bio_wait+0x7f/0xb0 > blkdev_issue_zeroout+0x71/0xa0 > xfs_bmapi_convert_unwritten+0x11f/0x1d0 [xfs] > xfs_bmapi_write+0x374/0x11f0 [xfs] > xfs_iomap_write_direct+0x2ac/0x430 [xfs] > xfs_file_iomap_begin+0x20d/0xd50 [xfs] > iomap_apply+0x43/0xe0 > dax_iomap_rw+0x89/0xf0 > xfs_file_dax_write+0xcc/0x220 [xfs] > xfs_file_write_iter+0xf0/0x130 [xfs] > __vfs_write+0xd9/0x150 > vfs_write+0xc8/0x1c0 > SyS_write+0x45/0xa0 > entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe > > -> #1 (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}: > lock_acquire+0xab/0x200 > down_write_nested+0x4a/0xb0 > xfs_ilock+0x263/0x330 [xfs] > xfs_setattr_size+0x152/0x370 [xfs] > xfs_vn_setattr+0x6b/0x90 [xfs] > notify_change+0x27d/0x3f0 > do_truncate+0x5b/0x90 > path_openat+0x237/0xa90 > do_filp_open+0x8a/0xf0 > do_sys_open+0x11c/0x1f0 > entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe > > -> #0 (&(&ip->i_mmaplock)->mr_lock){++++}: > up_write+0x1c/0x40 > xfs_iunlock+0x1d0/0x310 [xfs] > xfs_file_fallocate+0x8a/0x310 [xfs] > loop_queue_work+0xb7/0x8d0 > kthread_worker_fn+0xb9/0x1f0 > > Chain exists of: > &(&ip->i_mmaplock)->mr_lock --> &xfs_nondir_ilock_class --> (complete)&ret.event > > Possible unsafe locking scenario by crosslock: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class); > lock((complete)&ret.event); > lock(&(&ip->i_mmaplock)->mr_lock); > unlock((complete)&ret.event); > > *** DEADLOCK *** The warning is a false positive, caused by the fact that all wait_for_completion()s in submit_bio_wait() are waiting with the same lock class. However, some bios have nothing to do with others, for example in the case of loop devices, there's no direct connection between the bios of an upper device and the bios of a lower device(=loop device). The safest way to assign different lock classes to different devices is to do it for each gendisk. In other words, this patch assigns a lockdep_map per gendisk and uses it when initializing completion in submit_bio_wait(). Analyzed-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Reported-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: amir73il@gmail.com Cc: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: hch@infradead.org Cc: idryomov@gmail.com Cc: johan@kernel.org Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508921765-15396-10-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| acpi | ||
| asm-generic | ||
| clocksource | ||
| crypto | ||
| drm | ||
| dt-bindings | ||
| keys | ||
| kvm | ||
| linux | ||
| math-emu | ||
| media | ||
| memory | ||
| misc | ||
| net | ||
| pcmcia | ||
| ras | ||
| rdma | ||
| scsi | ||
| soc | ||
| sound | ||
| target | ||
| trace | ||
| uapi | ||
| video | ||
| xen | ||