linux-sg2042/Documentation/ABI
Linus Torvalds f5e7e844a5 - More robust parsing especially of xattr data in JFFS2
- Updates to mxc_nand and gpmi drivers to support new boards and device tree
  - Improve consistency of information about ECC strength in NAND devices
  - Clean up partition handling of plat_nand
  - Support NAND drivers without dedicated access to OOB area
  - BCH hardware ECC support for OMAP
  - Other fixes and cleanups, and a few new device IDs
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iEYEABECAAYFAk/JG1wACgkQdwG7hYl686M80wCglN4kutx20j+KJWuZofkr9Hog
 weEAoI4jrqEWEdW9EcT2CIWQw7eG+1v+
 =7tdo
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-linus-3.5-20120601' of git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd

Pull mtd update from David Woodhouse:
 - More robust parsing especially of xattr data in JFFS2
 - Updates to mxc_nand and gpmi drivers to support new boards and device tree
 - Improve consistency of information about ECC strength in NAND devices
 - Clean up partition handling of plat_nand
 - Support NAND drivers without dedicated access to OOB area
 - BCH hardware ECC support for OMAP
 - Other fixes and cleanups, and a few new device IDs

Fixed trivial conflict in drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c due to
added include files next to each other.

* tag 'for-linus-3.5-20120601' of git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd: (75 commits)
  mtd: mxc_nand: move ecc strengh setup before nand_scan_tail
  mtd: block2mtd: fix recursive call of mtd_writev
  mtd: gpmi-nand: define ecc.strength
  mtd: of_parts: fix breakage in Kconfig
  mtd: nand: fix scan_read_raw_oob
  mtd: docg3 fix in-middle of blocks reads
  mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Slight cleanup of fixup messages
  mtd: add fixup for S29NS512P NOR flash.
  jffs2: allow to complete xattr integrity check on first GC scan
  jffs2: allow to discriminate between recoverable and non-recoverable errors
  mtd: nand: omap: add support for hardware BCH ecc
  ARM: OMAP3: gpmc: add BCH ecc api and modes
  mtd: nand: check the return code of 'read_oob/read_oob_raw'
  mtd: nand: remove 'sndcmd' parameter of 'read_oob/read_oob_raw'
  mtd: m25p80: Add support for Winbond W25Q80BW
  jffs2: get rid of jffs2_sync_super
  jffs2: remove unnecessary GC pass on sync
  jffs2: remove unnecessary GC pass on umount
  jffs2: remove lock_super
  mtd: gpmi: add gpmi support for mx6q
  ...
2012-06-01 16:55:42 -07:00
..
obsolete Documentation: Fix multiple typo in Documentation 2012-03-07 16:08:24 +01:00
removed netfilter: remove ip_queue support 2012-05-08 20:25:42 +02:00
stable USB: update usbtmc api documentation 2012-04-12 08:26:22 -07:00
testing - More robust parsing especially of xattr data in JFFS2 2012-06-01 16:55:42 -07:00
README [PATCH] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation 2006-06-21 12:40:47 -07:00

README

This directory attempts to document the ABI between the Linux kernel and
userspace, and the relative stability of these interfaces.  Due to the
everchanging nature of Linux, and the differing maturity levels, these
interfaces should be used by userspace programs in different ways.

We have four different levels of ABI stability, as shown by the four
different subdirectories in this location.  Interfaces may change levels
of stability according to the rules described below.

The different levels of stability are:

  stable/
	This directory documents the interfaces that the developer has
	defined to be stable.  Userspace programs are free to use these
	interfaces with no restrictions, and backward compatibility for
	them will be guaranteed for at least 2 years.  Most interfaces
	(like syscalls) are expected to never change and always be
	available.

  testing/
	This directory documents interfaces that are felt to be stable,
	as the main development of this interface has been completed.
	The interface can be changed to add new features, but the
	current interface will not break by doing this, unless grave
	errors or security problems are found in them.  Userspace
	programs can start to rely on these interfaces, but they must be
	aware of changes that can occur before these interfaces move to
	be marked stable.  Programs that use these interfaces are
	strongly encouraged to add their name to the description of
	these interfaces, so that the kernel developers can easily
	notify them if any changes occur (see the description of the
	layout of the files below for details on how to do this.)

  obsolete/
  	This directory documents interfaces that are still remaining in
	the kernel, but are marked to be removed at some later point in
	time.  The description of the interface will document the reason
	why it is obsolete and when it can be expected to be removed.
	The file Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt may describe
	some of these interfaces, giving a schedule for when they will
	be removed.

  removed/
	This directory contains a list of the old interfaces that have
	been removed from the kernel.

Every file in these directories will contain the following information:

What:		Short description of the interface
Date:		Date created
KernelVersion:	Kernel version this feature first showed up in.
Contact:	Primary contact for this interface (may be a mailing list)
Description:	Long description of the interface and how to use it.
Users:		All users of this interface who wish to be notified when
		it changes.  This is very important for interfaces in
		the "testing" stage, so that kernel developers can work
		with userspace developers to ensure that things do not
		break in ways that are unacceptable.  It is also
		important to get feedback for these interfaces to make
		sure they are working in a proper way and do not need to
		be changed further.


How things move between levels:

Interfaces in stable may move to obsolete, as long as the proper
notification is given.

Interfaces may be removed from obsolete and the kernel as long as the
documented amount of time has gone by.

Interfaces in the testing state can move to the stable state when the
developers feel they are finished.  They cannot be removed from the
kernel tree without going through the obsolete state first.

It's up to the developer to place their interfaces in the category they
wish for it to start out in.