1d490ce33e
I saw an lport debug message from the exchange manager saying: "lport 70500: Received response for out of range oxid:ffff" A trace showed this was a BA_RJT sent due to an incoming ABTS which arrived on an unknown exchange. So, the sender of the BA_RJT was in error, but in this case, both the initiator and responder were the same machine. The OX_ID and RX_ID should not have been reversed in this case. Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Makefile | ||
| fc_disc.c | ||
| fc_elsct.c | ||
| fc_exch.c | ||
| fc_fcp.c | ||
| fc_frame.c | ||
| fc_lport.c | ||
| fc_rport.c | ||