In ufs code there is function: ubh_ll_rw_block, it has parameter how many
ufs_buffer_head it should handle, but it always called with "1" on the place
of this parameter. This patch removes unused parameter of "ubh_ll_wr_block".
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
ufs super block contains some statistic about file systems, like amount of
directories, free blocks, inodes and so on.
UFS1 hold this information in one location and uses 32bit integers for such
information, UFS2 hold statistic in another location and uses 64bit integers.
There is transition variant, if UFS1 has type 44BSD and flags field in super
block has some special value this mean that we work with statistic like UFS2
does. and this also means that nobody care about old(UFS1) statistic.
So if start fsck against such file system, after usage linux ufs driver, it
found error: at now only UFS1 like statistic is updated.
This patch should fix this. Also it contains some minor cleanup: CodingSytle
and remove unused variables.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This patch fixes two bugs, which introduced by previous patches:
1) Missed "brelse"
2) Sometimes "baseblk" may be wrongly calculated, if i_size is equal to
zero, which lead infinite cycle in "mpage_writepages".
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
ufs_free_blocks function looks now in so way:
if (err)
goto failed;
lock_super();
failed:
unlock_super();
So if error happen we'll unlock not locked super.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
At now UFS code uses DQUOT_* mechanism, but it also update inode->i_blocks
manually, this cause wrong i_blocks value.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Currently to turn on debug mode "user" has to edit ~10 files, to turn off he
has to do it again.
This patch introduce such changes:
1)turn on(off) debug messages via ".config"
2)remove unnecessary duplication of code
3)make "UFSD" macros more similar to function
4)fix some compiler warnings
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The writing to UFS file system with block/fragment!=8 may cause bogus
behaviour. The problem in "ufs_bitmap_search" function, which doesn't work
correctly in "block/fragment!=8" case. The idea is stolen from BSD code.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
There are two ugly macros in ufs code:
#define UCPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)ucpi)
#define USPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)uspi)
when uspi looks like
struct {
struct ufs_buffer_head ;
}
and USPI_UBH has some sence,
ucpi looks like
struct {
struct not_ufs_buffer_head;
}
To prevent bugs in future, this patch convert macros to inline function and
fix "ucpi" structure.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
First of all some necessary notes about UFS by it self: To avoid waste of disk
space the tail of file consists not from blocks (which is ordinary big enough,
16K usually), it consists from fragments(which is ordinary 2K). When file is
growing its tail occupy 1 fragment, 2 fragments... At some stage decision to
allocate whole block is made and all fragments are moved to one block.
How this situation was handled before:
ufs_prepare_write
->block_prepare_write
->ufs_getfrag_block
->...
->ufs_new_fragments:
bh = sb_bread
bh->b_blocknr = result + i;
mark_buffer_dirty (bh);
This is wrong solution, because:
- it didn't take into consideration that there is another cache: "inode page
cache"
- because of sb_getblk uses not b_blocknr, (it uses page->index) to find
certain block, this breaks sb_getblk.
How this situation is handled now: we go though all "page inode cache", if
there are no such page in cache we load it into cache, and change b_blocknr.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* After block allocation, we map it on the same "address" as 8 others
blocks
* We nullify block several times: once in ufs/block.c and once in
block_*write_full_page, and use different "caches" for this.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Here is update of ufs cleanup patch, brought on by the recently fixed
ubh_get_usb_second() bug that made some ugly code rather painfully
obvious. It also includes
- fix compilation warnings which appears if debug mode turn on
- remove unnecessary duplication of code to support UFS2
I tested it on ufs1 and ufs2 file-systems.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
fs: Use <linux/capability.h> where capable() is used.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Acked-by: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
We need to be sure that current data are sent to disk. Hence we call
ll_rw_block() with SWRITE.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Evgeniy Dushistov