Update numaq such that it calls numa_add_memblk() and sets
numa_nodes_parsed instead of directly diddling with NUMA states. The
original get_memcfg_numaq() is renamed to numaq_numa_init() and new
get_memcfg_numaq() is created in numa_32.c.
The shim numa_add_memblk() implementation handles node_start/end_pfn[]
and node_set_online() for nodes with memory. The new
get_memcfg_numaq() exactly the same with get_memcfg_from_srat() other
than calling the numaq init function. Things get_memcfgs_numaq() do
are not strictly necessary for numaq but added for consistency and to
help unifying NUMA init handling.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
The PCI initialization in pci_subsys_init() is a mess. pci_numaq_init,
pci_acpi_init, pci_visws_init and pci_legacy_init are called and each
implementation checks and eventually modifies the global variable
pcibios_scanned.
x86_init functions allow us to do this more elegant. The pci.init
function pointer is preset to pci_legacy_init. numaq, acpi and visws
can modify the pointer in their early setup functions. The functions
return 0 when they did the full initialization including bus scan. A
non zero return value indicates that pci_legacy_init needs to be
called either because the selected function failed or wants the
generic bus scan in pci_legacy_init to happen (e.g. visws).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
LKML-Reference: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07559FB80CFE@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
The XQUAD stuff is part of the NUMAQ architecture, so move it there.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1265380629-3212-2-git-send-email-brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:
a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Tejun Heo