Commit Graph

165 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Filipe Manana b06c4bf5c8 Btrfs: fix regression running delayed references when using qgroups
In the kernel 4.2 merge window we had a big changes to the implementation
of delayed references and qgroups which made the no_quota field of delayed
references not used anymore. More specifically the no_quota field is not
used anymore as of:

  commit 0ed4792af0 ("btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented qgroup mechanism.")

Leaving the no_quota field actually prevents delayed references from
getting merged, which in turn cause the following BUG_ON(), at
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c, to be hit when qgroups are enabled:

  static int run_delayed_tree_ref(...)
  {
     (...)
     BUG_ON(node->ref_mod != 1);
     (...)
  }

This happens on a scenario like the following:

  1) Ref1 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 1, added.

  2) Ref2 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 0, added.
     It's not merged with Ref1 because Ref1->no_quota != Ref2->no_quota.

  3) Ref3 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 1, added.
     It's not merged with the reference at the tail of the list of refs
     for bytenr X because the reference at the tail, Ref2 is incompatible
     due to Ref2->no_quota != Ref3->no_quota.

  4) Ref4 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 0, added.
     It's not merged with the reference at the tail of the list of refs
     for bytenr X because the reference at the tail, Ref3 is incompatible
     due to Ref3->no_quota != Ref4->no_quota.

  5) We run delayed references, trigger merging of delayed references,
     through __btrfs_run_delayed_refs() -> btrfs_merge_delayed_refs().

  6) Ref1 and Ref3 are merged as Ref1->no_quota = Ref3->no_quota and
     all other conditions are satisfied too. So Ref1 gets a ref_mod
     value of 2.

  7) Ref2 and Ref4 are merged as Ref2->no_quota = Ref4->no_quota and
     all other conditions are satisfied too. So Ref2 gets a ref_mod
     value of 2.

  8) Ref1 and Ref2 aren't merged, because they have different values
     for their no_quota field.

  9) Delayed reference Ref1 is picked for running (select_delayed_ref()
     always prefers references with an action == BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF).
     So run_delayed_tree_ref() is called for Ref1 which triggers the
     BUG_ON because Ref1->red_mod != 1 (equals 2).

So fix this by removing the no_quota field, as it's not used anymore as
of commit 0ed4792af0 ("btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented
qgroup mechanism.").

The use of no_quota was also buggy in at least two places:

1) At delayed-refs.c:btrfs_add_delayed_tree_ref() - we were setting
   no_quota to 0 instead of 1 when the following condition was true:
   is_fstree(ref_root) || !fs_info->quota_enabled

2) At extent-tree.c:__btrfs_inc_extent_ref() - we were attempting to
   reset a node's no_quota when the condition "!is_fstree(root_objectid)
   || !root->fs_info->quota_enabled" was true but we did it only in
   an unused local stack variable, that is, we never reset the no_quota
   value in the node itself.

This fixes the remainder of problems several people have been having when
running delayed references, mostly while a balance is running in parallel,
on a 4.2+ kernel.

Very special thanks to Stéphane Lesimple for helping debugging this issue
and testing this fix on his multi terabyte filesystem (which took more
than one day to balance alone, plus fsck, etc).

Also, this fixes deadlock issue when using the clone ioctl with qgroups
enabled, as reported by Elias Probst in the mailing list. The deadlock
happens because after calling btrfs_insert_empty_item we have our path
holding a write lock on a leaf of the fs/subvol tree and then before
releasing the path we called check_ref() which did backref walking, when
qgroups are enabled, and tried to read lock the same leaf. The trace for
this case is the following:

  INFO: task systemd-nspawn:6095 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  (...)
  Call Trace:
    [<ffffffff86999201>] schedule+0x74/0x83
    [<ffffffff863ef64c>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xc0/0xea
    [<ffffffff86137ed7>] ? wait_woken+0x74/0x74
    [<ffffffff8639f0a7>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x51a/0x810
    [<ffffffff863a129b>] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0xdf/0x3ce
    [<ffffffff86413a00>] ? ulist_add_merge+0x1b/0x127
    [<ffffffff86411688>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x62a/0x667
    [<ffffffff863ef546>] ? btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw+0x78/0xbe
    [<ffffffff864122d3>] find_parent_nodes+0xaf3/0xfc6
    [<ffffffff86412838>] __btrfs_find_all_roots+0x92/0xf0
    [<ffffffff864128f2>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x45/0x65
    [<ffffffff8639a75b>] ? btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq+0x2b/0x88
    [<ffffffff863e852e>] check_ref+0x64/0xc4
    [<ffffffff863e9e01>] btrfs_clone+0x66e/0xb5d
    [<ffffffff863ea77f>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x48f/0x5bb
    [<ffffffff86048a68>] ? native_sched_clock+0x28/0x77
    [<ffffffff863ed9b0>] btrfs_ioctl+0xabc/0x25cb
  (...)

The problem goes away by eleminating check_ref(), which no longer is
needed as its purpose was to get a value for the no_quota field of
a delayed reference (this patch removes the no_quota field as mentioned
earlier).

Reported-by: Stéphane Lesimple <stephane_btrfs@lesimple.fr>
Tested-by: Stéphane Lesimple <stephane_btrfs@lesimple.fr>
Reported-by: Elias Probst <mail@eliasprobst.eu>
Reported-by: Peter Becker <floyd.net@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Malte Schröder <malte@tnxip.de>
Reported-by: Derek Dongray <derek@valedon.co.uk>
Reported-by: Erkki Seppala <flux-btrfs@inside.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org  # 4.2+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
2015-10-25 19:53:26 +00:00
Qu Wenruo 7cf5b97650 btrfs: qgroup: Cleanup old inaccurate facilities
Cleanup the old facilities which use old btrfs_qgroup_reserve() function
call, replace them with the newer version, and remove the "__" prefix in
them.

Also, make btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free() functions private, as they are
now only used inside qgroup codes.

Now, the whole btrfs qgroup is swithed to use the new reserve facilities.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-10-21 18:41:06 -07:00
Qu Wenruo d9d8b2a51a btrfs: extent-tree: Switch to new check_data_free_space and free_reserved_data_space
Use new reserve/free for buffered write and inode cache.

For buffered write case, as nodatacow write won't increase quota account,
so unlike old behavior which does reserve before check nocow, now we
check nocow first and then only reserve data if we can't do nocow write.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-10-21 18:41:04 -07:00
Anand Jain a4553fefb5 Btrfs: consolidate btrfs_error() to btrfs_std_error()
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing
and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together.
And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely
named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other
is to log the error, so don't closely name them.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-09-29 16:30:00 +02:00
Zhaolei 147d256e09 btrfs: Remove unnecessary variants in relocation.c
These arguments are not used in functions, remove them for cleanup
and make kernel stack happy.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-08-09 07:07:14 -07:00
Zhaolei 4624900dd3 btrfs: Cleanup: Remove objectid's init-value in create_reloc_inode()
objectid's init-value is not used in any case, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-08-09 07:07:13 -07:00
Zhaolei 4b3576e450 btrfs: Error handle for get_ref_objectid_v0() in relocate_block_group()
We need error checking code for get_ref_objectid_v0() in
relocate_block_group(), to avoid unpredictable result, especially
for accessing uninitialized value(when function failed) after
this line.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-08-09 07:07:13 -07:00
Zhaolei 868f401ae3 btrfs: Use ref_cnt for set_block_group_ro()
More than one code call set_block_group_ro() and restore rw in fail.

Old code use bool bit to save blockgroup's ro state, it can not
support parallel case(it is confirmd exist in my debug log).

This patch use ref count to store ro state, and rename
set_block_group_ro/set_block_group_rw
to
inc_block_group_ro/dec_block_group_ro.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-08-09 07:07:12 -07:00
Shilong Wang 9689457b5b Btrfs: fix wrong check for btrfs_force_chunk_alloc()
btrfs_force_chunk_alloc() return 1 for allocation chunk successfully.
This problem exists since commit c87f08ca4.

With this patch, we might fix some enospc problems for balances.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-07-01 17:17:22 -07:00
Liu Bo 64c043de46 Btrfs: fix up read_tree_block to return proper error
The return value of read_tree_block() can confuse callers as it always
returns NULL for either -ENOMEM or -EIO, so it's likely that callers
parse it to a wrong error, for instance, in btrfs_read_tree_root().

This fixes the above issue.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-06-03 04:03:08 -07:00
Dongsheng Yang e2d1f92399 btrfs: qgroup: do a reservation in a higher level.
There are two problems in qgroup:

a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K,
qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup
is not available to user.

b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it,
it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup.

The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes
rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about
the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the
data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to
write and release it in transaction committed.

In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in
btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account
when the data is written in commit_transaction().

Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-04-13 07:52:50 -07:00
Chris Mason 1bbc621ef2 Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout outside critical section in commit
We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write
the free space cache.  In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do
this while no other writers are allowed in the commit.

If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long
stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs
trying to change the filesystem.

This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate
locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit.  We'll still have to
redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work
out of the way without blocking the entire FS.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-04-10 14:07:22 -07:00
David Sterba 7476dfdaad btrfs: sink blocksize parameter to tree_block_processed
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-12-12 18:07:22 +01:00
David Sterba d3e46fea1b btrfs: sink blocksize parameter to readahead_tree_block
All callers pass nodesize.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-12-12 18:07:18 +01:00
Chris Mason 27b19cc886 Merge branch 'cleanup/blocksize-diet-part1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus 2014-10-04 09:57:14 -07:00
Chris Mason bbf65cf0b5 Merge branch 'cleanup/misc-for-3.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
2014-10-04 09:56:45 -07:00
Josef Bacik bbe9051441 Btrfs: fix build_backref_tree issue with multiple shared blocks
Marc Merlin sent me a broken fs image months ago where it would blow up in the
upper->checked BUG_ON() in build_backref_tree.  This is because we had a
scenario like this

block a -- level 4 (not shared)
   |
block b -- level 3 (reloc block, shared)
   |
block c -- level 2 (not shared)
   |
block d -- level 1 (shared)
   |
block e -- level 0 (shared)

We go to build a backref tree for block e, we notice block d is shared and add
it to the list of blocks to lookup it's backrefs for.  Now when we loop around
we will check edges for the block, so we will see we looked up block c last
time.  So we lookup block d and then see that the block that points to it is
block c and we can just skip that edge since we've already been up this path.
The problem is because we clear need_check when we see block d (as it is shared)
we never add block b as needing to be checked.  And because block c is in our
path already we bail out before we walk up to block b and add it to the backref
check list.

To fix this we need to reset need_check if we trip over a block that doesn't
need to be checked.  This will make sure that any subsequent blocks in the path
as we're walking up afterwards are added to the list to be processed.  With this
patch I can now mount Marc's fs image and it'll complete the balance without
panicing.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-10-03 16:14:58 -07:00
Josef Bacik 75bfb9aff4 Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_tree
When balance panics it tends to panic in the

BUG_ON(!upper->checked);

test, because it means it couldn't build the backref tree properly.  This is
annoying to users and frankly a recoverable error, nothing in this function is
actually fatal since it is just an in-memory building of the backrefs for a
given bytenr.  So go through and change all the BUG_ON()'s to ASSERT()'s, and
fix the BUG_ON(!upper->checked) thing to just return an error.

This patch also fixes the error handling so it tears down the work we've done
properly.  This code was horribly broken since we always just panic'ed instead
of actually erroring out, so it needed to be completely re-worked.  With this
patch my broken image no longer panics when I mount it.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-10-03 16:14:58 -07:00
David Sterba 94404e82e5 btrfs: let merge_reloc_roots return void
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02 17:30:31 +02:00
David Sterba ce86cd5917 btrfs: remove parameter blocksize from read_tree_block
We know the tree block size, no need to pass it around.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02 17:14:50 +02:00
David Sterba 453848a05f btrfs: inline code of reada_tree_block and remove it
It's trivial with a single user. And remove one pointless BUG_ON.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02 16:31:27 +02:00
David Sterba 58dc4ce432 btrfs: remove unused parameter from readahead_tree_block
The parent_transid parameter has been unused since its introduction in
ca7a79ad8d ("Pass down the expected generation number when reading
tree blocks").  In reada_tree_block, it was even wrongly set to leafsize.
Transid check is done in the proper read and readahead ignores errors.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02 16:30:18 +02:00
David Sterba 707e8a0715 btrfs: use nodesize everywhere, kill leafsize
The nodesize and leafsize were never of different values. Unify the
usage and make nodesize the one. Cleanup the redundant checks and
helpers.

Shaves a few bytes from .text:

  text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
852418   24560   23112  900090   dbbfa btrfs.ko.before
851074   24584   23112  898770   db6d2 btrfs.ko.after

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:37:14 -07:00
David Sterba c6f83c74fd btrfs: clenaup: don't call btrfs_release_path before free_path
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:37:08 -07:00
David Sterba 351fd35321 btrfs: remove stale newlines from log messages
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search
revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:53 -07:00
Miao Xie 27cdeb7096 Btrfs: use bitfield instead of integer data type for the some variants in btrfs_root
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:40 -07:00
Josef Bacik ba8b028933 Btrfs: do not reset last_snapshot after relocation
This was done to allow NO_COW to continue to be NO_COW after relocation but it
is not right.  When relocating we will convert blocks to FULL_BACKREF that we
relocate.  We can leave some of these full backref blocks behind if they are not
cow'ed out during the relocation, like if we fail the relocation with ENOSPC and
then just drop the reloc tree.  Then when we go to cow the block again we won't
lookup the extent flags because we won't think there has been a snapshot
recently which means we will do our normal ref drop thing instead of adding back
a tree ref and dropping the shared ref.  This will cause btrfs_free_extent to
blow up because it can't find the ref we are trying to free.  This was found
with my ref verifying tool.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-06 17:34:35 -07:00
Miao Xie 6c255e67ce Btrfs: don't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock
We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock,
or we would make the tasks wait for a long time.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:27 -04:00
Wang Shilong 1708cc5723 Btrfs: fix an oops when we fail to relocate tree blocks
During balance test, we hit an oops:
[ 2013.841551] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1174!

The problem is that if we fail to relocate tree blocks, we should
update backref cache, otherwise, some pending nodes are not updated
while snapshot check @cache->last_trans is within one transaction
and won't update it and then oops happen.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:20:14 -08:00
Wang Shilong 25e293c2a2 Btrfs: fix an oops when we fail to merge reloc roots
Previously, we will free reloc root memory and then force filesystem
to be readonly. The problem is that there may be another thread commiting
transaction which will try to access freed reloc root during merging reloc
roots process.

To keep consistency snapshots shared space, we should allow snapshot
finished if possible, so here we don't free reloc root memory.

signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:20:13 -08:00
Wang Shilong dc4103f933 Btrfs: remove unused argument from select_reloc_root()
@nr is no longer used, remove it from select_reloc_root()

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:20:12 -08:00
Frank Holton efe120a067 Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefix
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.

Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.

Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:20:05 -08:00
Wang Shilong 54eb72c05f Btrfs: remove unnecessary filemap writting and waiting after block group relocation
We have commited transaction before, remove redundant filemap writting and
waiting here, it can speed up balance relocation process.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:19:57 -08:00
Wang Shilong 0647bf564f Btrfs: improve forever loop when doing balance relocation
We hit a forever loop when doing balance relocation,the reason
is that we firstly reserve 4M(node size is 16k).and within transaction
we will try to add extra reservation for snapshot roots,this will
return -EAGAIN if there has been a thread flushing space to reserve
space.We will do this again and again with filesystem becoming nearly
full.

If the above '-EAGAIN' case happens, we try to refill reservation more
outsize of transaction, and this will return eariler in enospc case,however,
this dosen't really hurt because it makes no sense doing balance relocation
with the filesystem nearly full.

Miao Xie helped a lot to track this issue, thanks.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:19:43 -08:00
Wang Shilong 467bb1d27c Btrfs: make sure we cleanup all reloc roots if error happens
I hit an oops when merging reloc roots fails, the reason is that
new reloc roots may be added and we should make sure we cleanup
all reloc roots.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-12 07:12:51 -08:00
Wang Shilong 6646374863 Btrfs: skip building backref tree for uuid and quota tree when doing balance relocation
Quota tree and UUID Tree is only cowed, they can not be snapshoted.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-12 07:12:36 -08:00
Wang Shilong c974c4642f Btrfs: fix an oops when doing balance relocation
I hit an oops when inserting reloc root into @reloc_root_tree(it can be
easily triggered when forcing cow for relocation root)

[  866.494539]  [<ffffffffa0499579>] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x79/0xb0 [btrfs]
[  866.495321]  [<ffffffffa044c240>] record_root_in_trans+0xb0/0x110 [btrfs]
[  866.496109]  [<ffffffffa044d758>] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x48/0x80 [btrfs]
[  866.496908]  [<ffffffffa0494da8>] select_reloc_root+0xa8/0x210 [btrfs]
[  866.497703]  [<ffffffffa0495c8a>] do_relocation+0x16a/0x540 [btrfs]

This is because reloc root inserted into @reloc_root_tree is not within one
transaction,reloc root may be cowed and root block bytenr will be reused then
oops happens.We should update reloc root in @reloc_root_tree when cow reloc
root node, fix it.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-12 07:12:20 -08:00
Miao Xie 91aef86f3b Btrfs: rename btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its
name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always
used at the same place.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:13:58 -05:00
Miao Xie b02441999e Btrfs: don't wait for the completion of all the ordered extents
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem,
if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some
space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long
time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:13:44 -05:00
Dulshani Gunawardhana fae7f21cec btrfs: Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1)
Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source
code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling
warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix.

Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:11:53 -05:00
Wang Shilong 7fdf4b608d Btrfs: use 'u64' rather than 'int' to get extent's generation
We define a 'int' to get extent's generation by mistake,fix it.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:10:06 -05:00
Josef Bacik 9e6a0c52b7 Btrfs: stop committing the transaction so much during relocate
I noticed with my horrible snapshot excercisor that we were taking forever to
relocate the larger the file system got.  This appeared to be because we were
committing the transaction _constantly_.  There were a few places where we do
braindead things with metadata reservation, like start a transaction and then
try to refill the block rsv, which not only keeps us from committing a
transaction during the enospc stuff, but keeps us from doing some of the harder
flushing work which will make us more likely to need to commit the transaction.
We also were checking the block rsv and committing the transaction if the block
rsv was below a certain threshold, but we were doing this in a place where we
don't actually keep anything in the block rsv so this was always ending up false
so we always committed the transaction in this case.  I tested this to make sure
it didn't break anything, but it takes about 10 hours to get the box to this
state so I don't know how much of an impact it will really make.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:08:31 -05:00
Josef Bacik 0ef8b72607 Btrfs: return an error from btrfs_wait_ordered_range
I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it's data it
won't actually error out, it will just carry on.  This is because it doesn't
check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn't actually return
anything.  So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look
valid when it really isnt.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:07:35 -05:00
Miao Xie 20dd2cbf01 Btrfs: fix BUG_ON() casued by the reserved space migration
When we did space balance and snapshot creation at the same time, we might
meet the following oops:
 kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3038!
 [SNIP]
 Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa0411ec7>] btrfs_orphan_cleanup+0x293/0x407 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa042dc45>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.28+0x259/0x373 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa042de85>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x126/0x156 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa042dff1>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xd0/0x121 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0430b2c>] btrfs_ioctl+0x414/0x1854 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff813b60b7>] ? __do_page_fault+0x305/0x379
 [<ffffffff811215a9>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39
 [<ffffffff81121d7c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2
 [<ffffffff81057fe7>] ? finish_task_switch+0x80/0xb8
 [<ffffffff81121e88>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83
 [<ffffffff813b39ff>] ? do_device_not_available+0x12/0x14
 [<ffffffff813b99c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
 [SNIP]
 RIP  [<ffffffffa040da40>] btrfs_orphan_add+0xc3/0x126 [btrfs]

The reason of the problem is that the relocation root creation stole
the reserved space, which was reserved for orphan item deletion.

There are several ways to fix this problem, one is to increasing
the reserved space size of the space balace, and then we can use
that space to create the relocation tree for each fs/file trees.
But it is hard to calculate the suitable size because we doesn't
know how many fs/file trees we need relocate.

We fixed this problem by reserving the space for relocation root creation
actively since the space it need is very small (one tree block, used for
root node copy), then we use that reserved space to create the
relocation tree. If we don't reserve space for relocation tree creation,
we will use the reserved space of the balance.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 21:54:28 -05:00
Josef Bacik 4577b014d1 Btrfs: relocate csums properly with prealloc extents
A user reported a problem where they were getting csum errors when running a
balance and running systemd's journal.  This is because systemd is awesome and
fallocate()'s its log space and writes into it.  Unfortunately we assume that
when we read in all the csums for an extent that they are sequential starting at
the bytenr we care about.  This obviously isn't the case for prealloc extents,
where we could have written to the middle of the prealloc extent only, which
means the csum would be for the bytenr in the middle of our range and not the
front of our range.  Fix this by offsetting the new bytenr we are logging to
based on the original bytenr the csum was for.  With this patch I no longer see
the csum errors I was seeing.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 21:53:22 -05:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 7451432394 Btrfs: remove path arg from btrfs_truncate_free_space_cache
Not used for anything, and removing it avoids caller's need to
allocate a path structure.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 21:51:33 -05:00
Miao Xie c00869f1ae Btrfs: fix oops caused by the space balance and dead roots
When doing space balance and subvolume destroy at the same time, we met
the following oops:

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2247!
RIP: 0010: [<ffffffffa04cec16>] prepare_to_merge+0x154/0x1f0 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa04b5ab7>] relocate_block_group+0x466/0x4e6 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04b5c7a>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x143/0x275 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0495c56>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.27+0x5c/0x5a2 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0459871>] ? btrfs_item_key_to_cpu+0x15/0x31 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa048b46a>] ? btrfs_get_token_64+0x7e/0xcd [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04a3467>] ? btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking+0xb2/0xb7 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa049907d>] btrfs_balance+0x9c7/0xb6f [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa049ef84>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x234/0x2ac [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04a1e8e>] btrfs_ioctl+0xd87/0x1ef9 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81122f53>] ? path_openat+0x234/0x4db
 [<ffffffff813c3b78>] ? __do_page_fault+0x31d/0x391
 [<ffffffff810f8ab6>] ? vma_link+0x74/0x94
 [<ffffffff811250f5>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39
 [<ffffffff811258c8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2
 [<ffffffff811259d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83
 [<ffffffff813c3bfa>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10
 [<ffffffff813c73c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

It is because we returned the error number if the reference of the root was 0
when doing space relocation. It was not right here, because though the root
was dead(refs == 0), but the space it held still need be relocated, or we
could not remove the block group. So in this case, we should return the root
no matter it is dead or not.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-10-10 21:31:02 -04:00
Josef Bacik f0de181c9b Btrfs: kill delay_iput arg to the wait_ordered functions
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to
grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it.  However if we have an ordered
extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use
btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on
the inode to start work on the ordered extent.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 11:05:27 -04:00
Josef Bacik 83d4cfd4da Btrfs: fixup error handling in btrfs_reloc_cow
If we failed to actually allocate the correct size of the extent to relocate we
will end up in an infinite loop because we won't return an error, we'll just
move on to the next extent.  So fix this up by returning an error, and then fix
all the callers to return an error up the stack rather than BUG_ON()'ing.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 10:58:54 -04:00
Stefan Behrens 23fa76b0ba Btrf: cleanup: don't check for root_refs == 0 twice
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() already checks if btrfs_root_refs()
is zero and returns ENOENT in this case. There is no need to do
it again in three more places.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:29 -04:00