None of the core ulpi functions perform any changes to the operations
struct, and logically as a struct that contains function pointers
there's no reason it shouldn't be constant.
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Operations now use ulpi->dev.parent directly instead of via the
ulpi_ops struct, making this field unused. Remove it.
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
With the removal of the old {read|write} operations, we can now safely
rename the new api operations {read|write}_dev to use the shorter and
clearer names {read|write}, respectively.
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Now that all users use the new api callbacks, remove the old api
callbacks and force new interface drivers to use the new api.
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Add these two new api callbacks to struct ulpi_ops. These are different
than read, write in that they pass the parent device directly instead
of via the ops argument.
They are intended to replace the old api functions.
If the new api callbacks are missing, revert to calling the old ones
as before.
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
UTMI+ Low Pin Interface (ULPI) is a commonly used PHY
interface for USB 2.0. The ULPI specification describes a
standard set of registers which the vendors can extend for
their specific needs. ULPI PHYs provide often functions
such as charger detection and ADP sensing and probing.
There are two major issues that the bus type is meant to
tackle:
Firstly, ULPI registers are accessed from the controller.
The bus provides convenient method for the controller
drivers to share that access with the actual PHY drivers.
Secondly, there are already platforms that assume ULPI PHYs
are runtime detected, such as many Intel Baytrail based
platforms. They do not provide any kind of hardware
description for the ULPI PHYs like separate ACPI device
object that could be used to enumerate a device from.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Tal Shorer