The mechanism used for connecting regulators together when one regulator
supplies another wasn't clear as the names being used weren't really tied
together well.
Reported-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
The documentation for the machine driver was rather badly bitrotted,
using pointers to struct device rather than dev_name() to hook up the
consumers. Update to use dev_name().
Reported-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
supply_regulator_dev (using a struct pointer) has been deprecated in favour
of supply_regulator (using a regulator name) for quite a few releases
now with a warning generated if it is used and there are no current in tree
users so just remove the code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Fix obvious cases of "it's" being used when "its" was meant.
Signed-off-by: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Fix a couple of typos I found while working with this subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This improves the machine level API in order to configure
regulator constraints and consumers as platform data and removes the
old string based API that required several calls to set up each regulator.
The intention is to create a struct regulator_init_data, populate
it's fields with constraints, consumers devices, etc and then register
the regulator device from board.c in the standard Linux way.
e.g. regulator LDO2 (supplying codec and sim) platform data.
/* regulator LDO2 consumer devices */
static struct regulator_consumer_supply ldo2_consumers[] = {
{
.dev = &platform_audio_device.dev,
.supply = "codec_avdd",
},
{
.dev = &platform_sim_device.dev,
.supply = "sim_vcc",
}
};
/* regulator LDO2 constraints */
static struct regulator_init_data ldo2_data = {
.constraints = {
.min_uV = 3300000,
.max_uV = 3300000,
.valid_modes_mask = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,
.apply_uV = 1,
},
.num_consumer_supplies = ARRAY_SIZE(ldo2_consumers),
.consumer_supplies = ldo2_consumers,
};
/* machine regulator devices with thier consumers and constraints */
static struct platform_device wm8350_regulator_devices[] = {
{
.name = "wm8350-regulator",
.id = WM8350_LDO_2,
.dev = {
.platform_data = &ldo2_data,
},
},
};
Changes in detail:-
o Removed all const char* regulator config functions in machine API.
o Created new struct regulator_init_data to contain regulator
machine configuration constraints and consmuers.
o Changed set_supply(), set_machine_constraints(),
set_consumer_device_supply() to remove their string identifier
parameters. Also made them static and moved functions nearer top of
core.c.
o Removed no longer used inline func to_rdev()
o Added regulator_get_init_drvdata() to retrieve init data.
o Added struct device* as parameter to regulator_register().
o Changed my email address.
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Mark Brown