Move it from the attr code to the transaction code and make
the attr code call the new function.
We rolltrans is really usefull whenever we want to use rolling
transaction, should be generic, it isn't dependent on any part
of the attr code anyway.
We use this excuse to change all the:
if ((error = xfs_attr_rolltrans()))
calls into:
error = xfs_trans_roll();
if (error)
SGI-PV: 981498
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31729a
Signed-off-by: Niv Sardi <xaiki@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
and not go through xfs_attr_list.
SGI-PV: 983395
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31324a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
the data/attr forks now grow up/down from either end of the literal area,
rather than dividing the literal area into two chunks and growing both
upward. Means we can now make much more efficient use of the attribute
space, incl. fitting DMF attributes inline in 256 byte inodes, and large
jumps in dbench3 performance numbers. It is self enabling, but can be
forced on/off via the attr2/noattr2 mount options.
SGI-PV: 941645
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23835a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Eric Sandeen