REQ_SYNC is ignored in current raid5 code. Block layer does use it to do
policy,
for example ioscheduler. This patch adds it.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If the allocation of rep1_bio fails, we currently don't free the 'bio'
of the same dev.
Reported by kmemleak.
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When attempting to fix a read error, it is acceptable to read from a
device that is recovering, provided the recovery has got past the
place we are reading from. This makes the test for "can we read from
here" the same as the test in read_balance.
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This ensures that it is always freed - there were case where
we failed to free the page.
Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
dm-raid currently open-codes the freeing of some members of
and rdev. It is more maintainable to have it call common code
from md.c which does this for all call-sites.
So remove free_disk_sb to md_rdev_clear, export it, and use it in
dm-raid.c
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reorders functions in raid6_algos as well as the preference check
to reduce the number of functions tested on initialization.
Also, creates symmetry between choosing the gen_syndrome functions
and choosing the recovery functions.
Signed-off-by: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Test each combination of recovery and syndrome generation
functions.
Signed-off-by: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Add SSSE3 optimized recovery functions, as well as a system
for selecting the most appropriate recovery functions to use.
Originally-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
<linux/module.h> drags in headers which are not visible to userspace,
thus breaking the build for the test program.
Signed-off-by: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
With CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, we need to disable preemption while benchmarking
RAID5 xor checksumming to ensure we're actually measuring what we think
we're measuring.
Signed-off-by: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
In the existing do_xor_speed(), there is no guarantee that we actually
run do_2() for a full jiffy. We get the current jiffy, then run do_2()
until the next jiffy.
Instead, let's get the current jiffy, then wait until the next jiffy
to start our test.
Signed-off-by: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
A 'near' or 'offset' lay RAID10 array can be reshaped to a different
'near' or 'offset' layout, a different chunk size, and a different
number of devices.
However the number of copies cannot change.
Unlike RAID5/6, we do not support having user-space backup data that
is being relocated during a 'critical section'. Rather, the
data_offset of each device must change so that when writing any block
to a new location, it will not over-write any data that is still
'live'.
This means that RAID10 reshape is not supportable on v0.90 metadata.
The different between the old data_offset and the new_offset must be
at least the larger of the chunksize multiplied by offset copies of
each of the old and new layout. (for 'near' mode, offset_copies == 1).
A larger difference of around 64M seems useful for in-place reshapes
as more data can be moved between metadata updates.
Very large differences (e.g. 512M) seem to slow the process down due
to lots of long seeks (on oldish consumer graded devices at least).
Metadata needs to be updated whenever the place we are about to write
to is considered - by the current metadata - to still contain data in
the old layout.
[unbalanced locking fix from Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>]
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
arch/hexagon/kernel/signal.c:do_notify_resume() forgets to call
tracehook_notify_resume() if TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is set.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2 ("signal:
add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which
centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully
delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across
architectures.
In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this helper
function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
It is wrong to change ->blocked directly, see e6fa16ab. Change
handle_signal() and sys_rt_sigreturn() to use the right helper,
set_current_blocked().
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
The current handle_signal() implementation is broken - it will mask
signals if we fail to setup the signal stack frame, which isn't the
desired behaviour, we should only be masking signals if we succeed in
setting up the stack frame. It looks like this code was copied from the
old (broken) arm implementation but wasn't updated when the arm code was
fixed in commit a6c61e9dfd ("[ARM] 3168/1: Update ARM signal delivery
and masking").
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
There are a couple of problems with the current signal code,
1. If we failed to setup the signal stack frame then we should not be
masking any signals.
2. ka->sa.sa_mask is only added to the current blocked signals list if
SA_NODEFER is set in ka->sa.sa_flags. If we successfully setup the
signal frame and are going to run the handler then we must honour
sa_mask.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
get_signal_to_deliver() already resets the signal handler if SA_ONESHOT is
set in ka->sa.sa_flags, there's no need to do it again in handle_signal().
Furthermore, because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which is a copy
of sighand->action[]) instead of sighand->action[] the original code
actually had no effect on signal delivery.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call it.
This also fixes a bug because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which
is a copy of sighand->action[]), whereas the intention of the code was to
modify sighand->action[] directly.
As the original code was working with a copy it had no effect on signal
delivery.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>
Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
If setup_rt_frame() returns -EFAULT then we must not block any signals
in the current process.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>
Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2 ("signal:
add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which
centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully
delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across
architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so
using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
guts of saved_sigmask-based sigsuspend/rt_sigsuspend. Takes
kernel sigset_t *.
Open-coded instances replaced with calling it.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Pull core irq changes from Ingo Molnar:
"A collection of small fixes."
By Thomas Gleixner
* 'irq-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
hexagon: Remove select of not longer existing Kconfig switches
arm: Select core options instead of redefining them
genirq: Do not consider disabled wakeup irqs
genirq: Allow check_wakeup_irqs to notice level-triggered interrupts
genirq: Be more informative on irq type mismatch
genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq requests
genirq: Streamline irq_action
Pull security subsystem updates from James Morris:
"New notable features:
- The seccomp work from Will Drewry
- PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS from Andy Lutomirski
- Longer security labels for Smack from Casey Schaufler
- Additional ptrace restriction modes for Yama by Kees Cook"
Fix up trivial context conflicts in arch/x86/Kconfig and include/linux/filter.h
* 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security: (65 commits)
apparmor: fix long path failure due to disconnected path
apparmor: fix profile lookup for unconfined
ima: fix filename hint to reflect script interpreter name
KEYS: Don't check for NULL key pointer in key_validate()
Smack: allow for significantly longer Smack labels v4
gfp flags for security_inode_alloc()?
Smack: recursive tramsmute
Yama: replace capable() with ns_capable()
TOMOYO: Accept manager programs which do not start with / .
KEYS: Add invalidation support
KEYS: Do LRU discard in full keyrings
KEYS: Permit in-place link replacement in keyring list
KEYS: Perform RCU synchronisation on keys prior to key destruction
KEYS: Announce key type (un)registration
KEYS: Reorganise keys Makefile
KEYS: Move the key config into security/keys/Kconfig
KEYS: Use the compat keyctl() syscall wrapper on Sparc64 for Sparc32 compat
Yama: remove an unused variable
samples/seccomp: fix dependencies on arch macros
Yama: add additional ptrace scopes
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=Kj9v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'virtio-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-for-linus
Pull virtio updates from Rusty Russell.
* tag 'virtio-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-for-linus:
virtio: fix typo in comment
virtio-mmio: Devices parameter parsing
virtio_blk: Drop unused request tracking list
virtio-blk: Fix hot-unplug race in remove method
virtio: Use ida to allocate virtio index
virtio: balloon: separate out common code between remove and freeze functions
virtio: balloon: drop restore_common()
9p: disconnect channel when PCI device is removed
virtio: update documentation to v0.9.5 of spec
- Delete "@request_vqs" and "@free_vqs" comments, since
they are no longer in struct virtio_config_ops.
- According to the macro below, "@val" should be "@v".
Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This patch adds an option to instantiate guest virtio-mmio devices
basing on a kernel command line (or module) parameter, for example:
virtio_mmio.devices=0x100@0x100b0000:48
Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we reset the virtio-blk device before the requests already dispatched
to the virtio-blk driver from the block layer are finised, we will stuck
in blk_cleanup_queue() and the remove will fail.
blk_cleanup_queue() calls blk_drain_queue() to drain all requests queued
before DEAD marking. However it will never success if the device is
already stopped. We'll have q->in_flight[] > 0, so the drain will not
finish.
How to reproduce the race:
1. hot-plug a virtio-blk device
2. keep reading/writing the device in guest
3. hot-unplug while the device is busy serving I/O
Test:
~1000 rounds of hot-plug/hot-unplug test passed with this patch.
Changes in v3:
- Drop blk_abort_queue and blk_abort_request
- Use __blk_end_request_all to complete request dispatched to driver
Changes in v2:
- Drop req_in_flight
- Use virtqueue_detach_unused_buf to get request dispatched to driver
Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Current index allocation in virtio is based on a monotonically
increasing variable "index". This means we'll run out of numbers
after a while. E.g. someone crazy doing this in host side.
while(1) {
hot-plug a virtio device
hot-unplug the virito devcie
}
Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Shaohua Li
Chen Baozi