Commit Graph

328 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
NeilBrown 0efb9e6191 md: add MODULE_DESCRIPTION for all md related modules.
Suggested by  Oren Held <orenhe@il.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-12-14 12:51:41 +11:00
NeilBrown 729a18663a md/raid5: don't complete make_request on barrier until writes are scheduled
The post-barrier-flush is sent by md as soon as make_request on the
barrier write completes.  For raid5, the data might not be in the
per-device queues yet.  So for barrier requests, wait for any
pre-reading to be done so that the request will be in the per-device
queues.

We use the 'preread_active' count to check that nothing is still in
the preread phase, and delay the decrement of this count until after
write requests have been submitted to the underlying devices.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-12-14 12:51:40 +11:00
NeilBrown a2826aa92e md: support barrier requests on all personalities.
Previously barriers were only supported on RAID1.  This is because
other levels requires synchronisation across all devices and so needed
a different approach.
Here is that approach.

When a barrier arrives, we send a zero-length barrier to every active
device.  When that completes - and if the original request was not
empty -  we submit the barrier request itself (with the barrier flag
cleared) and then submit a fresh load of zero length barriers.

The barrier request itself is asynchronous, but any subsequent
request will block until the barrier completes.

The reason for clearing the barrier flag is that a barrier request is
allowed to fail.  If we pass a non-empty barrier through a striping
raid level it is conceivable that part of it could succeed and part
could fail.  That would be way too hard to deal with.
So if the first run of zero length barriers succeed, we assume all is
sufficiently well that we send the request and ignore errors in the
second run of barriers.

RAID5 needs extra care as write requests may not have been submitted
to the underlying devices yet.  So we flush the stripe cache before
proceeding with the barrier.

Note that the second set of zero-length barriers are submitted
immediately after the original request is submitted.  Thus when
a personality finds mddev->barrier to be set during make_request,
it should not return from make_request until the corresponding
per-device request(s) have been queued.

That will be done in later patches.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
2009-12-14 12:49:49 +11:00
NeilBrown 8553fe7ec7 md/raid5: remove some sparse warnings.
qd_idx is previously declared and given exactly the same value!

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-12-14 12:49:47 +11:00
NeilBrown c148ffdcda md/raid5: Allow dirty-degraded arrays to be assembled when only party is degraded.
Normally is it not safe to allow a raid5 that is both dirty and
degraded to be assembled without explicit request from that admin, as
it can cause hidden data corruption.
This is because 'dirty' means that the parity cannot be trusted, and
'degraded' means that the parity needs to be used.

However, if the device that is missing contains only parity, then
there is no issue and assembly can continue.
This particularly applies when a RAID5 is being converted to a RAID6
and there is an unclean shutdown while the conversion is happening.

So check for whether the degraded space only contains parity, and
in that case, allow the assembly.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-11-13 17:47:00 +11:00
NeilBrown 7ef90146a1 Don't unconditionally set in_sync on newly added device in raid5_reshape
When a reshape finds that it can add spare devices into the array,
those devices might already be 'in_sync' if they are beyond the old
size of the array, or they might not if they are within the array.

The first case happens when we change an N-drive RAID5 to an
N+1-drive RAID5.
The second happens when we convert an N-drive RAID5 to an
N+1-drive RAID6.

So set the flag more carefully.
Also, ->recovery_offset is only meaningful when the flag is clear,
so only set it in that case.

This change needs the preceding two to ensure that the non-in_sync
device doesn't get evicted from the array when it is stopped, in the
case where v0.90 metadata is used.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-11-13 17:40:51 +11:00
NeilBrown 8dee721146 md/raid5: make sure curr_sync_completes is uptodate when reshape starts
This value is visible through sysfs and is used by mdadm
when it manages a reshape (backing up data that is about to be
rearranged).  So it is important that it is always correct.
Current it does not get updated properly when a reshape
starts which can cause problems when assembling an array
that is in the middle of being reshaped.

This is suitable for 2.6.31.y stable kernels.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-11-06 14:59:29 +11:00
Dan Williams 6629542e79 md/raid6: kill a gcc-4.0.1 'uninitialized variable' warning
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-10-19 18:09:41 -07:00
NeilBrown 5dd33c9a4c md/async: don't pass a memory pointer as a page pointer.
md/raid6 passes a list of 'struct page *' to the async_tx routines,
which then either DMA map them for offload, or take the page_address
for CPU based calculations.

For RAID6 we sometime leave 'blanks' in the list of pages.
For CPU based calcs, we want to treat theses as a page of zeros.
For offloaded calculations, we simply don't pass a page to the
hardware.

Currently the 'blanks' are encoded as a pointer to
raid6_empty_zero_page.  This is a 4096 byte memory region, not a
'struct page'.  This is mostly handled correctly but is rather ugly.

So change the code to pass and expect a NULL pointer for the blanks.
When taking page_address of a page, we need to check for a NULL and
in that case use raid6_empty_zero_page.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-10-16 16:40:25 +11:00
NeilBrown 5e5e3e78ed md: Fix handling of raid5 array which is being reshaped to fewer devices.
When a raid5 (or raid6) array is being reshaped to have fewer devices,
conf->raid_disks is the latter and hence smaller number of devices.
However sometimes we want to use a number which is the total number of
currently required devices - the larger of the 'old' and 'new' sizes.
Before we implemented reducing the number of devices, this was always
'new' i.e. ->raid_disks.
Now we need max(raid_disks, previous_raid_disks) in those places.

This particularly affects assembling an array that was shutdown while
in the middle of a reshape to fewer devices.

md.c needs a similar fix when interpreting the md metadata.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-10-16 16:35:30 +11:00
NeilBrown e4424fee18 md: fix problems with RAID6 calculations for DDF.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-10-16 16:27:34 +11:00
Dan Williams 417b8d4ac8 md/raid456: downlevel multicore operations to raid_run_ops
The percpu conversion allowed a straightforward handoff of stripe
processing to the async subsytem that initially showed some modest gains
(+4%).  However, this model is too simplistic and leads to stripes
bouncing between raid5d and the async thread pool for every invocation
of handle_stripe().  As reported by Holger this can fall into a
pathological situation severely impacting throughput (6x performance
loss).

By downleveling the parallelism to raid_run_ops the pathological
stripe_head bouncing is eliminated.  This version still exhibits an
average 11% throughput loss for:

	mdadm --create /dev/md0 /dev/sd[b-q] -n 16 -l 6
	echo 1024 > /sys/block/md0/md/stripe_cache_size
	dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=1024k count=2048

...but the results are at least stable and can be used as a base for
further multicore experimentation.

Reported-by: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-10-16 16:25:22 +11:00
Dan Williams f5efd45ae5 md/raid5: initialize conf->device_lock earlier
Deallocating a raid5_conf_t structure requires taking 'device_lock'.
Ensure it is initialized before it is used, i.e. initialize the lock
before attempting any further initializations that might fail.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-10-16 15:55:38 +11:00
NeilBrown 1442577bf6 Revert "md: do not progress the resync process if the stripe was blocked"
This reverts commit df10cfbc4d.

This patch was based on a misunderstanding and risks introducing a busy-wait loop.
So revert it.

Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-10-16 15:55:25 +11:00
NeilBrown 4b3df5668c Merge branch 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/async_tx into for-linus 2009-09-23 18:31:11 +10:00
NeilBrown 3fa841d7e7 md: report device as congested when suspended
This should writeback from coming when the device is temporarily
suspended.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-09-23 18:10:29 +10:00
NeilBrown 0da3c6194e md: Improve name of threads created by md_register_thread
The management thread for raid4,5,6 arrays are all called
mdX_raid5, independent of the actual raid level, which is wrong and
can be confusion.

So change md_register_thread to use the name from the personality
unless no alternate name (like 'resync' or 'reshape') is given.

This is simpler and more correct.

Cc: Jinzc <zhenchengjin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-09-23 18:09:45 +10:00
NeilBrown a9f326ebf2 md: remove sparse waring "symbol xxx shadows an earlier one"
Rename some variable and remove some duplicate definitions
to avoid there warnings.  None of them are actual errors.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-09-23 18:06:41 +10:00
Dan Williams 6c910a78e4 md/raid6: cleanup ops_run_compute6_2
Neil says:
	"It is correct as it stands, but the fact that every branch in
	 the 'if' part ends with a 'return' isn't immediately obvious,
	 so it is clearer if we are explicit about the if / then / else
	 structure."

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-09-16 12:24:54 -07:00
Dan Williams 2d6e4ecc87 md/raid6: eliminate BUG_ON with side effect
As pointed out by Neil it should be possible to build a driver with all
BUG_ON statements deleted.  It's bad form to have a BUG_ON with a side
effect.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-09-16 12:11:54 -07:00
Jens Axboe 1f98a13f62 bio: first step in sanitizing the bio->bi_rw flag testing
Get rid of any functions that test for these bits and make callers
use bio_rw_flagged() directly. Then it is at least directly apparent
what variable and flag they check.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2009-09-11 14:33:31 +02:00
Dan Williams 9134d02bc0 Merge commit 'md/for-linus' into async-tx-next
Conflicts:
	drivers/md/raid5.c
2009-09-08 17:55:54 -07:00
Dan Williams bbb20089a3 Merge branch 'dmaengine' into async-tx-next
Conflicts:
	crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c
	drivers/dma/ioat/dma_v2.h
	drivers/dma/ioat/pci.c
	drivers/md/raid5.c
2009-09-08 17:55:21 -07:00
Dan Williams 0403e38277 dmaengine: add fence support
Some engines optimize operation by reading ahead in the descriptor chain
such that descriptor2 may start execution before descriptor1 completes.
If descriptor2 depends on the result from descriptor1 then a fence is
required (on descriptor2) to disable this optimization.  The async_tx
api could implicitly identify dependencies via the 'depend_tx'
parameter, but that would constrain cases where the dependency chain
only specifies a completion order rather than a data dependency.  So,
provide an ASYNC_TX_FENCE to explicitly identify data dependencies.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-09-08 17:42:50 -07:00
Dan Williams f9dd213437 Merge branch 'md-raid6-accel' into ioat3.2
Conflicts:
	include/linux/dmaengine.h
2009-09-08 17:42:29 -07:00
Dan Williams 07a3b417dc md/raid456: distribute raid processing over multiple cores
Now that the resources to handle stripe_head operations are allocated
percpu it is possible for raid5d to distribute stripe handling over
multiple cores.  This conversion also adds a call to cond_resched() in
the non-multicore case to prevent one core from getting monopolized for
raid operations.

Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:13:13 -07:00
Yuri Tikhonov b774ef491b md/raid6: remove synchronous infrastructure
These routines have been replaced by there asynchronous counterparts.

Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:13:13 -07:00
Yuri Tikhonov 6c0069c0ae md/raid6: asynchronous handle_stripe6
1/ Use STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL to offload completion of read requests to
   raid_run_ops
2/ Implement a handler for sh->reconstruct_state similar to the raid5 case
   (adds handling of Q parity)
3/ Prevent handle_parity_checks6 from running concurrently with 'compute'
   operations
4/ Hook up raid_run_ops

Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:13:13 -07:00
Dan Williams d82dfee0ad md/raid6: asynchronous handle_parity_check6
[ Based on an original patch by Yuri Tikhonov ]

Implement the state machine for handling the RAID-6 parities check and
repair functionality.  Note that the raid6 case does not need to check
for new failures, like raid5, as it will always writeback the correct
disks.  The raid5 case can be updated to check zero_sum_result to avoid
getting confused by new failures rather than retrying the entire check
operation.

Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:13:13 -07:00
Yuri Tikhonov a9b39a741a md/raid6: asynchronous handle_stripe_dirtying6
In the synchronous implementation of stripe dirtying we processed a
degraded stripe with one call to handle_stripe_dirtying6().  I.e.
compute the missing blocks from the other drives, then copy in the new
data and reconstruct the parities.

In the asynchronous case we do not perform stripe operations directly.
Instead, operations are scheduled with flags to be later serviced by
raid_run_ops.  So, for the degraded case the final reconstruction step
can only be carried out after all blocks have been brought up to date by
being read, or computed.  Like the raid5 case schedule_reconstruction()
sets STRIPE_OP_RECONSTRUCT to request a parity generation pass and
through operation chaining can handle compute and reconstruct in a
single raid_run_ops pass.

[dan.j.williams@intel.com: fixup handle_stripe_dirtying6 gating]
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:13:12 -07:00
Yuri Tikhonov 5599becca4 md/raid6: asynchronous handle_stripe_fill6
Modify handle_stripe_fill6 to work asynchronously by introducing
fetch_block6 as the raid6 analog of fetch_block5 (schedule compute
operations for missing/out-of-sync disks).

[dan.j.williams@intel.com: compute D+Q in one pass]
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:13:12 -07:00
Yuri Tikhonov c0f7bddbe6 md/raid5,6: common schedule_reconstruction for raid5/6
Extend schedule_reconstruction5 for reuse by the raid6 path.  Add
support for generating Q and BUG() if a request is made to perform
'prexor'.

Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:13:12 -07:00
Dan Williams ac6b53b6e6 md/raid6: asynchronous raid6 operations
[ Based on an original patch by Yuri Tikhonov ]

The raid_run_ops routine uses the asynchronous offload api and
the stripe_operations member of a stripe_head to carry out xor+pq+copy
operations asynchronously, outside the lock.

The operations performed by RAID-6 are the same as in the RAID-5 case
except for no support of STRIPE_OP_PREXOR operations. All the others
are supported:
STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL
 - copy data into request buffers to satisfy a read request
STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK
 - generate missing blocks (1 or 2) in the cache from the other blocks
STRIPE_OP_BIODRAIN
 - copy data out of request buffers to satisfy a write request
STRIPE_OP_RECONSTRUCT
 - recalculate parity for new data that has entered the cache
STRIPE_OP_CHECK
 - verify that the parity is correct

The flow is the same as in the RAID-5 case, and reuses some routines, namely:
1/ ops_complete_postxor (renamed to ops_complete_reconstruct)
2/ ops_complete_compute (updated to set up to 2 targets uptodate)
3/ ops_run_check (renamed to ops_run_check_p for xor parity checks)

[neilb@suse.de: fixes to get it to pass mdadm regression suite]
Reviewed-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:13:12 -07:00
Dan Williams 4e7d2c0aef md/raid5: factor out mark_uptodate from ops_complete_compute5
ops_complete_compute5 can be reused in the raid6 path if it is updated to
generically handle a second target.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:13:11 -07:00
Dan Williams ad283ea4a3 async_tx: add sum check flags
Replace the flat zero_sum_result with a collection of flags to contain
the P (xor) zero-sum result, and the soon to be utilized Q (raid6 reed
solomon syndrome) zero-sum result.  Use the SUM_CHECK_ namespace instead
of DMA_ since these flags will be used on non-dma-zero-sum enabled
platforms.

Reviewed-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Acked-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:09:26 -07:00
Dan Williams d6f38f31f3 md/raid5,6: add percpu scribble region for buffer lists
Use percpu memory rather than stack for storing the buffer lists used in
parity calculations.  Include space for dma address conversions and pass
that to async_tx via the async_submit_ctl.scribble pointer.

[ Impact: move memory pressure from stack to heap ]

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:09:26 -07:00
Dan Williams 36d1c6476b md/raid6: move the spare page to a percpu allocation
In preparation for asynchronous handling of raid6 operations move the
spare page to a percpu allocation to allow multiple simultaneous
synchronous raid6 recovery operations.

Make this allocation cpu hotplug aware to maximize allocation
efficiency.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-08-29 19:09:26 -07:00
NeilBrown 1a67dde0ab md/raid5: Properly remove excess drives after shrinking a raid5/6
We were removing the drives, from the array, but not
removing symlinks from /sys/.... and not marking the device
as having been removed.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-08-13 10:41:49 +10:00
NeilBrown a639755cf8 md/raid5: make sure a reshape restarts at the correct address.
This "if" don't allow for the possibility that the number of devices
doesn't change, and so sector_nr isn't set correctly in that case.
So change '>' to '>='.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-08-13 10:13:00 +10:00
NeilBrown 67ac6011db md/raid5: allow new reshape modes to be restarted in the middle.
md/raid5 doesn't allow a reshape to restart if it involves writing
over the same part of disk that it would be reading from.
This happens at the beginning of a reshape that increases the number
of devices, at the end of a reshape that decreases the number of
devices, and continuously for a reshape that does not change the
number of devices.

The current code is correct for the "increase number of devices"
case as the critical section at the start is handled by userspace
performing a backup.

It does not work for reducing the number of devices, or the
no-change case.
For 'reducing', we need to invert the test.  For no-change we cannot
really be sure things will be safe, so simply require the array
to be read-only, which is how the user-space code which carefully
starts such arrays works.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-08-13 10:06:24 +10:00
NeilBrown 449aad3e25 md: Use revalidate_disk to effect changes in size of device.
As revalidate_disk calls check_disk_size_change, it will cause
any capacity change of a gendisk to be propagated to the blockdev
inode.  So use that instead of mucking about with locks and
i_size_write.

Also add a call to revalidate_disk in do_md_run and a few other places
where the gendisk capacity is changed.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-08-03 10:59:58 +10:00
NeilBrown 64bd660b51 md: allow raid5_quiesce to work properly when reshape is happening.
The ->quiesce method is not supposed to stop resync/recovery/reshape,
just normal IO.
But in raid5 we don't have a way to know which stripes are being
used for normal IO and which for resync etc, so we need to wait for
all stripes to be idle to be sure that all writes have completed.

However reshape keeps at least some stripe busy for an extended period
of time, so a call to raid5_quiesce can block for several seconds
needlessly.
So arrange for reshape etc to pause briefly while raid5_quiesce is
trying to quiesce the array so that the active_stripes count can
drop to zero.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-08-03 10:59:58 +10:00
NeilBrown e516402c0d md/raid5: set reshape_position correctly when reshape starts.
As the internal reshape_progress counter is the main driver
for reshape, the fact that reshape_position sometimes starts with the
wrong value has minimal effect.  It is visible in sysfs and that
is all.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-08-03 10:59:57 +10:00
Dan Williams 95fc17aac4 md/raid6: release spare page at ->stop()
Add missing call to safe_put_page from stop() by unifying open coded
raid5_conf_t de-allocation under free_conf().

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-07-31 12:39:15 +10:00
Dan Williams a11034b428 md/raid6: release spare page at ->stop()
Add missing call to safe_put_page from stop() by unifying open coded
raid5_conf_t de-allocation under free_conf().

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-07-14 11:48:16 -07:00
NeilBrown e62e58a5ff md: use interruptible wait when duration is controlled by userspace.
User space can set various limits on an md array so that resync waits
when it gets to a certain point, or so that I/O is blocked for a short
while.
When md is waiting against one of these limit, it should use an
interruptible wait so as not to add to the load average, and so are
not to trigger a warning if the wait goes on for too long.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-07-01 13:15:35 +10:00
NeilBrown a5c308d4d1 md/raid5: suspend shouldn't affect read requests.
md allows write to regions on an array to be suspended temporarily.
This allows user-space to participate is aspects of reshape.
In particular, data can be copied with not risk of a race.
We should not be blocking read requests though, so don't.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-07-01 13:15:35 +10:00
Martin K. Petersen 8f6c2e4b32 md: Use new topology calls to indicate alignment and I/O sizes
Switch MD over to the new disk_stack_limits() function which checks for
aligment and adjusts preferred I/O sizes when stacking.

Also indicate preferred I/O sizes where applicable.

Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-07-01 11:13:45 +10:00
NeilBrown 48606a9f2f md/raid5: correctly update sync_completed when we reach max_resync
At the end of reshape_request we update cyrr_resync_completed
if we are about to pause due to reaching resync_max.
However we update it to the wrong value.  We need to add the
"reshape_sectors" that have just been reshaped.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 09:14:12 +10:00
Dan Williams 7a3ab90894 md/raid5: add missing call to schedule() after prepare_to_wait()
In the unlikely event that reshape progresses past the current request
while it is waiting for a stripe we need to schedule() before retrying
for 2 reasons:
1/ Prevent list corruption from duplicated list_add() calls without
   intervening list_del().
2/ Give the reshape code a chance to make some progress to resolve the
   conflict.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:50:18 +10:00
Andre Noll 8c6ac868b1 md: Push down reconstruction log message to personality code.
Currently, the md layer checks in analyze_sbs() if the raid level
supports reconstruction (mddev->level >= 1) and if reconstruction is
in progress (mddev->recovery_cp != MaxSector).

Move that printk into the personality code of those raid levels that
care (levels 1, 4, 5, 6, 10).

Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:48:06 +10:00
NeilBrown 50ac168a6e md: merge reconfig and check_reshape methods.
The difference between these two methods is artificial.
Both check that a pending reshape is valid, and perform any
aspect of it that can be done immediately.
'reconfig' handles chunk size and layout.
'check_reshape' handles raid_disks.

So make them just one method.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:47:55 +10:00
NeilBrown 597a711b69 md: remove unnecessary arguments from ->reconfig method.
Passing the new layout and chunksize as args is not necessary as
the mddev has fields for new_check and new_layout.

This is preparation for combining the check_reshape and reconfig
methods

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:47:42 +10:00
NeilBrown 01ee22b496 md: raid5: check stripe cache is large enough in start_reshape
In reshape cases that do not change the number of devices,
start_reshape is called without first calling check_reshape.

Currently, the check that the stripe_cache is large enough is
only done in check_reshape.  It should be in start_reshape too.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:47:20 +10:00
Andre Noll cdc2ae6d6a md: fix some comments.
1/ Raid5 has learned to take over also raid4 and raid6 arrays.
2/ new_chunk in mdp_superblock_1 is in sectors, not bytes.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:46:47 +10:00
Andre Noll 0ba459d262 md/raid5: Use is_power_of_2() in raid5_reconfig()/raid6_reconfig().
Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:46:10 +10:00
Andre Noll 09c9e5fa1b md: convert conf->chunk_size and conf->prev_chunk to sectors.
This kills some more shifts.

Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:45:55 +10:00
Andre Noll 664e7c413f md: Convert mddev->new_chunk to sectors.
A straight-forward conversion which gets rid of some
multiplications/divisions/shifts. The patch also introduces a couple
of new ones, most of which are due to conf->chunk_size still being
represented in bytes. This will be cleaned up in subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:45:27 +10:00
Andre Noll 9d8f036362 md: Make mddev->chunk_size sector-based.
This patch renames the chunk_size field to chunk_sectors with the
implied change of semantics.  Since

	is_power_of_2(chunk_size) = is_power_of_2(chunk_sectors << 9)
				  = is_power_of_2(chunk_sectors)

these bits don't need an adjustment for the shift.

Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-18 08:45:01 +10:00
raz ben yehuda 740da44918 md: raid5: chunk size check in setup_conf
have raid5 check chunk size in run/reshape method instead of in md

Signed-off-by: raziebe@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-16 17:01:36 +10:00
NeilBrown 070ec55d07 md: remove mddev_to_conf "helper" macro
Having a macro just to cast a void* isn't really helpful.
I would must rather see that we are simply de-referencing ->private,
than have to know what the macro does.

So open code the macro everywhere and remove the pointless cast.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-16 16:54:21 +10:00
Linus Torvalds c9059598ea Merge branch 'for-2.6.31' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block
* 'for-2.6.31' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block: (153 commits)
  block: add request clone interface (v2)
  floppy: fix hibernation
  ramdisk: remove long-deprecated "ramdisk=" boot-time parameter
  fs/bio.c: add missing __user annotation
  block: prevent possible io_context->refcount overflow
  Add serial number support for virtio_blk, V4a
  block: Add missing bounce_pfn stacking and fix comments
  Revert "block: Fix bounce limit setting in DM"
  cciss: decode unit attention in SCSI error handling code
  cciss: Remove no longer needed sendcmd reject processing code
  cciss: change SCSI error handling routines to work with interrupts enabled.
  cciss: separate error processing and command retrying code in sendcmd_withirq_core()
  cciss: factor out fix target status processing code from sendcmd functions
  cciss: simplify interface of sendcmd() and sendcmd_withirq()
  cciss: factor out core of sendcmd_withirq() for use by SCSI error handling code
  cciss: Use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible in SCSI error handling code
  block: needs to set the residual length of a bidi request
  Revert "block: implement blkdev_readpages"
  block: Fix bounce limit setting in DM
  Removed reference to non-existing file Documentation/PCI/PCI-DMA-mapping.txt
  ...

Manually fix conflicts with tracing updates in:
	block/blk-sysfs.c
	drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c
	drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
	drivers/ide/ide-floppy.c
	drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
	include/trace/events/block.h
	kernel/trace/blktrace.c
2009-06-11 11:10:35 -07:00
NeilBrown 0e6e0271a2 md/raid5: fix bug in reshape code when chunk_size decreases.
Now that we support changing the chunksize, we calculate
"reshape_sectors" to be the max of number of sectors in old
and new chunk size.
However there is one please where we still use 'chunksize'
rather than 'reshape_sectors'.
This causes a reshape that reduces the size of chunks to freeze.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-09 16:32:22 +10:00
NeilBrown a8c906ca3f md/raid5 - avoid deadlocks in get_active_stripe during reshape
md has functionality to 'quiesce' and array so that all pending
IO completed and no new IO starts.  This is used to achieve a
stable state before making internal changes.

Currently this quiescing applies equally to normal IO, resync
IO, and reshape IO.
However there is a problem with applying it to reshape IO.
Reshape can have multiple 'stripe_heads' that must be active together.
If the quiesce come between allocating the first and the last of
such a collection, then we deadlock, as the last will not be allocated
until the quiesce is lifted, the quiesce will not be lifted until the
first (which has been allocated) gets used, and that first cannot be
used until the last is allocated.

It is not necessary to inhibit reshape IO when a quiesce is
requested.  Those places in the code that require a full quiesce will
ensure the reshape thread is not running at all.

So allow reshape requests to get access to new stripe_heads without
being blocked by a 'quiesce'.

This only affects in-place reshapes (i.e. where the array does not
grow or shrink) and these are only newly supported.  So this patch is
not needed in earlier kernels.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-09 14:39:59 +10:00
NeilBrown f001a70cdc md/raid5: use conf->raid_disks in preference to mddev->raid_disk
mddev->raid_disks can be changed and any time by a request from
user-space.  It is a suggestion as to what number of raid_disks is
desired.

conf->raid_disks can only be changed by the raid5 module with suitable
locks in place.  It is a statement as to the current number of
raid_disks.

There are two places where the latter should be used, but the former
is used.  This can lead to a crash when reshaping an array.

This patch changes to mddev-> to conf->

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-06-09 14:30:31 +10:00
Dan Williams a08abd8ca8 async_tx: structify submission arguments, add scribble
Prepare the api for the arrival of a new parameter, 'scribble'.  This
will allow callers to identify scratchpad memory for dma address or page
address conversions.  As this adds yet another parameter, take this
opportunity to convert the common submission parameters (flags,
dependency, callback, and callback argument) into an object that is
passed by reference.

Also, take this opportunity to fix up the kerneldoc and add notes about
the relevant ASYNC_TX_* flags for each routine.

[ Impact: moves api pass-by-value parameters to a pass-by-reference struct ]

Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Acked-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-06-03 14:07:35 -07:00
Dan Williams 88ba2aa586 async_tx: kill ASYNC_TX_DEP_ACK flag
In support of inter-channel chaining async_tx utilizes an ack flag to
gate whether a dependent operation can be chained to another.  While the
flag is not set the chain can be considered open for appending.  Setting
the ack flag closes the chain and flags the descriptor for garbage
collection.  The ASYNC_TX_DEP_ACK flag essentially means "close the
chain after adding this dependency".  Since each operation can only have
one child the api now implicitly sets the ack flag at dependency
submission time.  This removes an unnecessary management burden from
clients of the api.

[ Impact: clean up and enforce one dependency per operation ]

Reviewed-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Acked-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-06-03 14:07:34 -07:00
NeilBrown ed37d83e6a md: raid5: change incorrect usage of 'min' macro to 'min_t'
A recent patch to raid5.c use min on an int and a sector_t.
This isn't allowed.
So change it to min_t(sector_t,x,y).

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-05-27 21:39:05 +10:00
NeilBrown 848b318236 md: raid5: avoid sector values going negative when testing reshape progress.
As sector_t in unsigned, we cannot afford to let 'safepos' etc go
negative.
So replace
   a -= b;
by
   a -= min(b,a);

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-05-26 12:41:08 +10:00
Martin K. Petersen ae03bf639a block: Use accessor functions for queue limits
Convert all external users of queue limits to using wrapper functions
instead of poking the request queue variables directly.

Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2009-05-22 23:22:54 +02:00
NeilBrown c03f6a1969 md: update sync_completed and reshape_position even more often.
There are circumstances when a user-space process might need to
"oversee" a resync/reshape process.  For example when doing an
in-place reshape of a raid5, it is prudent to take a backup of each
section before reshaping it as this is the only way to provide
safety against an unplanned shutdown (i.e. crash/power failure).

The sync_max sysfs value can be used to stop the resync from
advancing beyond a particular point.
So user-space can:
  suspend IO to the first section and back it up
  set 'sync_max' to the end of the section
  wait for 'sync_completed' to reach that point
  resume IO on the first section and move on to the next section.

However this process requires the kernel and user-space to run in
lock-step which could introduce unnecessary delays.

It would be better if a 'double buffered' approach could be used with
userspace and kernel space working on different sections with the
'next' section always ready when the 'current' section is finished.

One problem with implementing this is that sync_completed is only
guaranteed to be updated when the sync process reaches sync_max.
(it is updated on a time basis at other times, but it is hard to rely
on that).  This defeats some of the double buffering.

With this patch, sync_completed (and reshape_position) get updated as
the current position approaches sync_max, so there is room for
userspace to advance sync_max early without losing updates.

To be precise, sync_completed is updated when the current sync
position reaches half way between the current value of sync_completed
and the value of sync_max.  This will usually be a good time for user
space to update sync_max.

If sync_max does not get updated, the updates to sync_completed
(together with associated metadata updates) will occur at an
exponentially increasing frequency which will get unreasonably fast
(one update every page) immediately before the process hits sync_max
and stops.  So the update rate will be unreasonably fast only for an
insignificant period of time.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-04-17 11:06:30 +10:00
NeilBrown acb180b0e3 md: improve usefulness and accuracy of sysfs file md/sync_completed.
The sync_completed file reports how much of a resync (or recovery or
reshape) has been completed.
However due to the possibility of out-of-order completion of writes,
it is not certain to be accurate.

We have an internal value - mddev->curr_resync_completed - which is an
accurate value (though it might not always be quite so uptodate).

So:
 - make curr_resync_completed be uptodate a little more often,
   particularly when raid5 reshape updates status in the metadata
 - report curr_resync_completed in the sysfs file
 - allow poll/select to report all updates to md/sync_completed.

This makes sync_completed completed usable by any external metadata
handler that wants to record this status information in its metadata.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-04-14 16:28:34 +10:00
Dan Williams 099f53cb50 async_tx: rename zero_sum to val
'zero_sum' does not properly describe the operation of generating parity
and checking that it validates against an existing buffer.  Change the
name of the operation to 'val' (for 'validate').  This is in
anticipation of the p+q case where it is a requirement to identify the
target parity buffers separately from the source buffers, because the
target parity buffers will not have corresponding pq coefficients.

Reviewed-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Acked-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-04-08 14:28:37 -07:00
NeilBrown c8f517c444 md/raid5 revise rules for when to update metadata during reshape
We currently update the metadata :
 1/ every 3Megabytes
 2/ When the place we will write new-layout data to is recorded in
    the metadata as still containing old-layout data.

Rule one exists to avoid having to re-do too much reshaping in the
face of a crash/restart.  So it should really be time based rather
than size based.  So change it to "every 10 seconds".

Rule two turns out to be too harsh when restriping an array
'in-place', as in that case the metadata much be updates for every
stripe.
For the in-place update, it can only possibly be safe from a crash if
some user-space program data a backup of every e.g. few hundred
stripes before allowing them to be reshaped.  In that case, the
constant metadata update is pointless.
So only update the metadata if the new metadata will report that the
end of the 'old-layout' data is beyond where we are currently
writing 'new-layout' data.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:28:40 +11:00
NeilBrown b0f9ec047b md/raid5: minor code cleanups in make_request.
... and to be certain the that make_request doesn't wait forever,
add a 'wake_up' when ->reshape_progress has been set to MaxSector

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:27:18 +11:00
NeilBrown 2cffc4a01d md: remove CONFIG_MD_RAID_RESHAPE config option.
This was only needed when the code was experimental.  Most of it
is well tested now, so the option is no longer useful.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:27:05 +11:00
NeilBrown ab69ae12ce md/raid5: be more careful about write ordering when reshaping.
When we are reshaping an array, it is very important that we read
the data from a particular sector offset before writing new data
at that offset.

In most cases when growing or shrinking an array we read long before
we even consider writing.  But when restriping an array without
changing it size, there is a small possibility that we might have
some data to available write before the read has happened at the same
location.  This would require some stripes to be in cache already.

To guard against this small possibility, we check, before writing,
that the 'old' stripe at the same location is not in the process of
being read.  And we ensure that we mark all 'source' stripes as such
before allowing new 'destination' stripes to proceed.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:26:47 +11:00
NeilBrown 88ce4930e2 md/raid5: allow layout and chunksize to be changed on active array.
If an array has 3 or more devices, we allow the chunksize or layout
to be changed and when a reshape starts, we use these as the 'new'
values.


Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:24:23 +11:00
NeilBrown 7a66138107 md/raid5: reshape using largest of old and new chunk size
This ensures that even when old and new stripes are overlapping,
we will try to read all of the old before having to write any
of the new.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:21:40 +11:00
NeilBrown e183eaedd5 md/raid5: prepare for allowing reshape to change layout
Add prev_algo to raid5_conf_t along the same lines as prev_chunk
and previous_raid_disks.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:20:22 +11:00
NeilBrown 784052ecc6 md/raid5: prepare for allowing reshape to change chunksize.
Add "prev_chunk" to raid5_conf_t, similar to "previous_raid_disks", to
remember what the chunk size was before the reshape that is currently
underway.

This seems like duplication with "chunk_size" and "new_chunk" in
mddev_t, and to some extent it is, but there are differences.
The values in mddev_t are always defined and often the same.
The prev* values are only defined if a reshape is underway.

Also (and more significantly) the raid5_conf_t values will be changed
at the same time (inside an appropriate lock) that the reshape is
started by setting reshape_position.  In contrast, the new_chunk value
is set when the sysfs file is written which could be well before the
reshape starts.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:19:07 +11:00
NeilBrown 86b42c713b md/raid5: clearly differentiate 'before' and 'after' stripes during reshape.
During a raid5 reshape, we have some stripes in the cache that are
'before' the reshape (and are still to be processed) and some that are
'after'.  They are currently differentiated by having different
->disks values as the only reshape current supported involves changing
the number of disks.

However we will soon support reshapes that do not change the number
of disks (chunk parity or chunk size).  So make the difference more
explicit with a 'generation' number.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:19:03 +11:00
NeilBrown ec32a2bd35 md: allow number of drives in raid5 to be reduced
When reshaping a raid5 to have fewer devices, we work from the end of
the array to the beginning.
md_do_sync gives addresses to sync_request that go from the beginning
to the end.  So largely ignore them use the internal state variable
"reshape_progress" to keep track of what to do next.

Never allow the size to be reduced below the minimum (4 for raid6,
3 otherwise).

We require that the size of the array has already been reduced before
the array is reshaped to a smaller size.  This is because simply
reducing the size is an easily reversible operation, while the reshape
is immediately destructive and so is not reversible for the blocks at
the ends of the devices.
Thus to reshape an array to have fewer devices, you must first write
an appropriately small size to md/array_size.

When reshape finished, we remove any drives that are no longer
needed and fix up ->degraded.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:17:38 +11:00
NeilBrown fef9c61fdf md/raid5: change reshape-progress measurement to cope with reshaping backwards.
When reducing the number of devices in a raid4/5/6, the reshape
process has to start at the end of the array and work down to the
beginning.  So we need to handle expand_progress and expand_lo
differently.

This patch renames "expand_progress" and "expand_lo" to avoid the
implication that anything is getting bigger (expand->reshape) and
every place they are used, we make sure that they are used the right
way depending on whether delta_disks is positive or negative.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:16:46 +11:00
NeilBrown cea9c22800 md: add explicit method to signal the end of a reshape.
Currently raid5 (the only module that supports restriping)
notices that the reshape has finished be sync_request being
given a large value, and handles any cleanup them.

This patch changes it so md_check_recovery calls into an
explicit finish_reshape method as well.

The clean-up from sync_request can do things that need to be
done promptly, typically things local to the raid5_conf_t
structure.

The "finish_reshape" method is called under the mddev_lock
so it can do things involving reconfiguring the device.

This allows us to get rid of md_set_array_sectors_locked, which
would have caused a deadlock if you tried to stop and array
while a reshape was happening.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:15:05 +11:00
NeilBrown 7ec0547838 md/raid5: enhance raid5_size to work correctly with negative delta_disks
This is the first of four patches which combine to allow md/raid5 to
reduce the number of devices in the array by restriping the data over
a subset of the devices.

If the number of disks in a raid4/5/6 is being reduced, then the
default size must be based on the new number, not the old number
of devices.
In general, it should be based on the smaller of new and old.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:10:36 +11:00
NeilBrown 34e04e87fb md/raid5: drop qd_idx from r6_state
We now have this value in stripe_head so we don't need to duplicate
it.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:10:16 +11:00
Dan Williams f701d589aa md/raid6: move raid6 data processing to raid6_pq.ko
Move the raid6 data processing routines into a standalone module
(raid6_pq) to prepare them to be called from async_tx wrappers and other
non-md drivers/modules.  This precludes a circular dependency of raid456
needing the async modules for data processing while those modules in
turn depend on raid456 for the base level synchronous raid6 routines.

To support this move:
1/ The exportable definitions in raid6.h move to include/linux/raid/pq.h
2/ The raid6_call, recovery calls, and table symbols are exported
3/ Extra #ifdef __KERNEL__ statements to enable the userspace raid6test to
   compile

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:09:39 +11:00
Andre Noll 18b0033491 md: raid5 run(): Fix max_degraded for raid level 4.
raid4 allows only one failed disk.

Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 15:00:56 +11:00
Dan Williams b522adcde9 md: 'array_size' sysfs attribute
Allow userspace to set the size of the array according to the following
semantics:

1/ size must be <= to the size returned by mddev->pers->size(mddev, 0, 0)
   a) If size is set before the array is running, do_md_run will fail
      if size is greater than the default size
   b) A reshape attempt that reduces the default size to less than the set
      array size should be blocked
2/ once userspace sets the size the kernel will not change it
3/ writing 'default' to this attribute returns control of the size to the
   kernel and reverts to the size reported by the personality

Also, convert locations that need to know the default size from directly
reading ->array_sectors to <pers>_size.  Resync/reshape operations
always follow the default size.

Finally, fixup other locations that read a number of 1k-blocks from
userspace to use strict_blocks_to_sectors() which checks for unsigned
long long to sector_t overflow and blocks to sectors overflow.

Reviewed-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-03-31 15:00:31 +11:00
Dan Williams 1f403624bd md: centralize ->array_sectors modifications
Get personalities out of the business of directly modifying
->array_sectors.  Lays groundwork to introduce policy on when
->array_sectors can be modified.

Reviewed-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-03-31 14:59:03 +11:00
Dan Williams 80c3a6ce4b md: add 'size' as a personality method
In preparation for giving userspace control over ->array_sectors we need
to be able to retrieve the 'default' size, and the 'anticipated' size
when a reshape is requested.  For personalities that do not reshape emit
a warning if anything but the default size is requested.

In the raid5 case we need to update ->previous_raid_disks to make the
new 'default' size available.

Reviewed-by: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2009-03-31 14:57:49 +11:00
NeilBrown fc9739c6d6 md: add takeover support for converting raid6 back into raid5
If a raid6 is still in the layout that comes from converting raid5
into a raid6. this will allow us to convert it back again.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 14:57:20 +11:00
NeilBrown e9d4758f6e md: add takeover support for raid4 -> raid5 conversion.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 14:57:09 +11:00
NeilBrown b354603527 md/raid5: allow layout/chunksize to be changed on an active 2-drive raid5.
2-drive raid5's aren't very interesting.  But if you are converting
a raid1 into a raid5, you will at least temporarily have one.  And
that it a good time to set the layout/chunksize for the new RAID5
if you aren't happy with the defaults.

layout and chunksize don't actually affect the placement of data
on a 2-drive raid5, so we just do some internal book-keeping.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 14:56:41 +11:00
NeilBrown d562b0c431 md: add ->takeover method for raid5 to be able to take over raid1
The RAID1 must have two drives and be a suitable size to
be a multiple of a chunksize that isn't too small.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 14:39:39 +11:00
NeilBrown 245f46c2c2 md: add ->takeover method to support changing the personality managing an array
Implement this for RAID6 to be able to 'takeover' a RAID5 array.  The
new RAID6 will use a layout which places Q on the last device, and
that device will be missing.
If there are any available spares, one will immediately have Q
recovered onto it.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 14:39:39 +11:00
NeilBrown e0cf8f045b md: md_unregister_thread should cope with being passed NULL
Mostly md_unregister_thread is only called when we know that the
thread is NULL, but sometimes we need to check first.  It is safer
to put the check inside md_unregister_thread itself.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 14:39:39 +11:00
NeilBrown 91adb56473 md/raid5: refactor raid5 "run"
.. so that the code to create the private data structures is separate.
This will help with future code to change the level of an active
array.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 14:39:39 +11:00
NeilBrown 67cc2b8165 md/raid5: finish support for DDF/raid6
DDF requires RAID6 calculations over different devices in a different
order.
For md/raid6, we calculate over just the data devices, starting
immediately after the 'Q' block.
For ddf/raid6 we calculate over all devices, using zeros in place of
the P and Q blocks.

This requires unfortunately complex loops...

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-03-31 14:39:38 +11:00