When compiling for original 68000 or ColdFire targets you will get the
following warning when compiling arch/m68k/lib/memcpy.c:
CC arch/m68k/lib/memcpy.o
arch/m68k/lib/memcpy.c: In function ‘__builtin_memcpy’:
arch/m68k/lib/memcpy.c:13:15: warning: unused variable ‘temp1’
This is easily fixed by moving the definition of temp1 into the code block
where it is used.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
The original 68000 processors cannot copy 16bit or larger quantities from
odd addresses. All newer members of the 68k family (including ColdFire)
can do this.
In the current memcpy implementation after trying to align the destination
address to a 16bit boundary if we end up with an odd source address we go
off and try to copy multi-byte quantities from it. This will trap on the
68000.
The only solution if we end with an odd source address is to byte wise
copy the whole memcpy region. We only need to do this if we are supporting
original 68000 processors.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Older m68k-linux compilers will include pre-defined symbols that
confuse what processor it is being targeted for. For example gcc-4.1.2
will pre-define __mc68020__ even if you specify the target processor
as -m68000 on the gcc command line. Newer versions of gcc have this
corrected.
In a few places the m68k code uses defined(__mc68020__) for optimizations
that include instructions that are specific to the CPU 68020 and above.
When compiling with older compilers this will be true even when we have
selected to compile for the older 68000 processors.
Switch to using the kernel processor defines, CONFIG_M68020 and friends.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Merging the mmu and non-mmu directories we ended up with duplicate
implementations of memcpy(). One is a little more optimized for the
>= 68020 case, but that can easily be inserted into a single
implementation of memcpy(). Clean up the exporting of this symbol
too, otherwise we end up exporting it twice on a no-mmu build.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
There is a lot of common code that could be shared between the m68k
and m68knommu arch branches. It makes sense to merge the two branches
into a single directory structure so that we can more easily share
that common code.
This is a brute force merge, based on a script from Stephen King
<sfking@fdwdc.com>, which was originally written by Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@arndb.de>.
> The script was inspired by the script Sam Ravnborg used to merge the
> includes from m68knommu. For those files common to both arches but
> differing in content, the m68k version of the file is renamed to
> <file>_mm.<ext> and the m68knommu version of the file is moved into the
> corresponding m68k directory and renamed <file>_no.<ext> and a small
> wrapper file <file>.<ext> is used to select between the two version. Files
> that are common to both but don't differ are removed from the m68knommu
> tree and files and directories that are unique to the m68knommu tree are
> moved to the m68k tree. Finally, the arch/m68knommu tree is removed.
>
> To select between the the versions of the files, the wrapper uses
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> #include <file>_mm.<ext>
> #else
> #include <file>_no.<ext>
> #endif
On top of this file merge I have done a simplistic merge of m68k and
m68knommu Kconfig, which primarily attempts to keep existing options and
menus in place. Other than a handful of options being moved it produces
identical .config outputs on m68k and m68knommu targets I tested it on.
With this in place there is now quite a bit of scope for merge cleanups
in future patches.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Use the builtin functions for memset/memclr/memcpy, special optimizations for
page operations have dedicated functions now. Uninline memmove/memchr and
move all functions into a single file and clean it up a little.
Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Greg Ungerer