The special value of 0 for device resume latency PM QoS means
"no restriction", but there are two problems with that.
First, device resume latency PM QoS requests with 0 as the
value are always put in front of requests with positive
values in the priority lists used internally by the PM QoS
framework, causing 0 to be chosen as an effective constraint
value. However, that 0 is then interpreted as "no restriction"
effectively overriding the other requests with specific
restrictions which is incorrect.
Second, the users of device resume latency PM QoS have no
way to specify that *any* resume latency at all should be
avoided, which is an artificial limitation in general.
To address these issues, modify device resume latency PM QoS to
use S32_MAX as the "no constraint" value and 0 as the "no
latency at all" one and rework its users (the cpuidle menu
governor, the genpd QoS governor and the runtime PM framework)
to follow these changes.
Also add a special "n/a" value to the corresponding user space I/F
to allow user space to indicate that it cannot accept any resume
latencies at all for the given device.
Fixes: 85dc0b8a40 (PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS latency constraints)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197323
Reported-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Tested-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com>
Use the actual function argument for the validation of the request type,
instead of the type field in a fresh (supposedly zero-initialized)
request structure.
Signed-off-by: Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
After commit 9908859aca (cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume
latency consideration) the cpuidle menu governor calls
dev_pm_qos_read_value() on CPU devices to read the current resume
latency QoS constraint values for them. That function takes a spinlock
to prevent the device's power.qos pointer from becoming NULL during
the access which is a problem for the RT patchset where spinlocks are
converted into mutexes and the idle loop stops working.
However, it is not even necessary for the menu governor to take
that spinlock, because the power.qos pointer accessed under it
cannot be modified during the access anyway.
For this reason, introduce a "raw" routine for accessing device
QoS resume latency constraints without locking and use it in the
menu governor.
Fixes: 9908859aca (cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration)
Acked-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
They were never used in the kernel, so get rid of them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
nvme wants a module parameter that overrides the default latency
tolerance. This makes it easy for nvme to reflect that default in
sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If it was already 'auto', then writing 'auto' again would
incorrectly fail.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Typically when a device is created the bus core it belongs to (for example
PCI) does not know if the device supports things like latency tolerance.
This is left to the driver that binds to the device in question. However,
at that time the device has already been created and there is no way to set
its dev->power.set_latency_tolerance anymore.
So follow what has been done for other PM QoS attributes as well and allow
drivers to expose and hide latency tolerance from userspace, if the device
supports it.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Add lockdep asserts for holding the dev->power.lock to non-static
functions which require this. They could be used outside of the file so
asserts may help in detecting locking misuse.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
After commit b2b49ccbdd (PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is
selected) PM_RUNTIME is always set if PM is set, so quite a few
depend on CONFIG_PM or even may be dropped entirely in some cases.
Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM in the PM core code.
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Rework dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() so that device PM QoS type
is passed to it as the third argument and make it support the
DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE device PM QoS type (in addition to
DEV_PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY).
That will allow the drivers of devices without latency tolerance
hardware support to use their ancestors having it as proxies for
their latency tolerance requirements.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add a new latency tolerance device PM QoS type to be use for
specifying active state (RPM_ACTIVE) memory access (DMA) latency
tolerance requirements for devices. It may be used to prevent
hardware from choosing overly aggressive energy-saving operation
modes (causing too much latency to appear) for the whole platform.
This feature reqiures hardware support, so it only will be
available for devices having a new .set_latency_tolerance()
callback in struct dev_pm_info populated, in which case the
routine pointed to by it should implement whatever is necessary
to transfer the effective requirement value to the hardware.
Whenever the effective latency tolerance changes for the device,
its .set_latency_tolerance() callback will be executed and the
effective value will be passed to it. If that value is negative,
which means that the list of latency tolerance requirements for
the device is empty, the callback is expected to switch the
underlying hardware latency tolerance control mechanism to an
autonomous mode if available. If that value is PM_QOS_LATENCY_ANY,
in turn, and the hardware supports a special "no requirement"
setting, the callback is expected to use it. That allows software
to prevent the hardware from automatically updating the device's
latency tolerance in response to its power state changes (e.g. during
transitions from D3cold to D0), which generally may be done in the
autonomous latency tolerance control mode.
If .set_latency_tolerance() is present for the device, a new
pm_qos_latency_tolerance_us attribute will be present in the
devivce's power directory in sysfs. Then, user space can use
that attribute to specify its latency tolerance requirement for
the device, if any. Writing "any" to it means "no requirement, but
do not let the hardware control latency tolerance" and writing
"auto" to it allows the hardware to be switched to the autonomous
mode if there are no other requirements from the kernel side in the
device's list.
This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add a new field, no_constraints_value, to struct pm_qos_constraints
representing a list of PM QoS constraint requests to be returned by
pm_qos_get_value() when that list of requests is empty.
That field will be equal to default_value for all of the existing
global PM QoS classes and for the resume latency device PM QoS type,
but it will be different from default_value for the new latency
tolerance device PM QoS type introduced by the next changeset.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Rename symbols, variables, functions and structure fields related do
the resume latency device PM QoS type so that it is clear where they
belong (in particular, to avoid confusion with the latency tolerance
device PM QoS type introduced by a subsequent changeset).
Update the PM QoS documentation to better reflect its current state.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Adds tracepoints to dev_pm_qos_add_request, dev_pm_qos_update_request,
and dev_pm_qos_remove_request. It's useful for checking device name,
dev_pm_qos_request_type, and value.
Signed-off-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit b81ea1b (PM / QoS: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks in
device PM QoS) put calls to pm_qos_sysfs_add_latency(),
pm_qos_sysfs_add_flags(), pm_qos_sysfs_remove_latency(), and
pm_qos_sysfs_remove_flags() under dev_pm_qos_mtx, which was a
mistake, because it may lead to deadlocks in some situations.
For example, if pm_qos_remote_wakeup_store() is run in parallel
with dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(), they may deadlock in the
following way:
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.9.0-rc4-next-20130328-sasha-00014-g91a3267 #319 Tainted: G W
-------------------------------------------------------
trinity-child6/12371 is trying to acquire lock:
(s_active#54){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81301631>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x60
but task is already holding lock:
(dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81f07cc3>] dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy+0x23/0x250
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffff811811da>] lock_acquire+0x1aa/0x240
[<ffffffff83dab809>] __mutex_lock_common+0x59/0x5e0
[<ffffffff83dabebf>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3f/0x50
[<ffffffff81f07f2f>] dev_pm_qos_update_flags+0x3f/0xc0
[<ffffffff81f05f4f>] pm_qos_remote_wakeup_store+0x3f/0x70
[<ffffffff81efbb43>] dev_attr_store+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffff812ffdaa>] sysfs_write_file+0xfa/0x150
[<ffffffff8127f2c1>] __kernel_write+0x81/0x150
[<ffffffff812afc2d>] write_pipe_buf+0x4d/0x80
[<ffffffff812af57c>] splice_from_pipe_feed+0x7c/0x120
[<ffffffff812afa25>] __splice_from_pipe+0x45/0x80
[<ffffffff812b14fc>] splice_from_pipe+0x4c/0x70
[<ffffffff812b1538>] default_file_splice_write+0x18/0x30
[<ffffffff812afae3>] do_splice_from+0x83/0xb0
[<ffffffff812afb2e>] direct_splice_actor+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff812b0277>] splice_direct_to_actor+0xe7/0x200
[<ffffffff812b15bc>] do_splice_direct+0x4c/0x70
[<ffffffff8127eda9>] do_sendfile+0x169/0x300
[<ffffffff8127ff94>] SyS_sendfile64+0x64/0xb0
[<ffffffff83db7d18>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6
-> #0 (s_active#54){++++.+}:
[<ffffffff811800cf>] __lock_acquire+0x15bf/0x1e50
[<ffffffff811811da>] lock_acquire+0x1aa/0x240
[<ffffffff81300aa2>] sysfs_deactivate+0x122/0x1a0
[<ffffffff81301631>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x60
[<ffffffff812ff77f>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x7f/0xb0
[<ffffffff813035a1>] sysfs_unmerge_group+0x51/0x70
[<ffffffff81f068f4>] pm_qos_sysfs_remove_flags+0x14/0x20
[<ffffffff81f07490>] __dev_pm_qos_hide_flags+0x30/0x70
[<ffffffff81f07cd5>] dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy+0x35/0x250
[<ffffffff81f06931>] dpm_sysfs_remove+0x11/0x50
[<ffffffff81efcf6f>] device_del+0x3f/0x1b0
[<ffffffff81efd128>] device_unregister+0x48/0x60
[<ffffffff82d4083c>] usb_hub_remove_port_device+0x1c/0x20
[<ffffffff82d2a9cd>] hub_disconnect+0xdd/0x160
[<ffffffff82d36ab7>] usb_unbind_interface+0x67/0x170
[<ffffffff81f001a7>] __device_release_driver+0x87/0xe0
[<ffffffff81f00559>] device_release_driver+0x29/0x40
[<ffffffff81effc58>] bus_remove_device+0x148/0x160
[<ffffffff81efd07f>] device_del+0x14f/0x1b0
[<ffffffff82d344f9>] usb_disable_device+0xf9/0x280
[<ffffffff82d34ff8>] usb_set_configuration+0x268/0x840
[<ffffffff82d3a7fc>] usb_remove_store+0x4c/0x80
[<ffffffff81efbb43>] dev_attr_store+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffff812ffdaa>] sysfs_write_file+0xfa/0x150
[<ffffffff8127f71d>] do_loop_readv_writev+0x4d/0x90
[<ffffffff8127f999>] do_readv_writev+0xf9/0x1e0
[<ffffffff8127faba>] vfs_writev+0x3a/0x60
[<ffffffff8127fc60>] SyS_writev+0x50/0xd0
[<ffffffff83db7d18>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(dev_pm_qos_mtx);
lock(s_active#54);
lock(dev_pm_qos_mtx);
lock(s_active#54);
*** DEADLOCK ***
To avoid that, remove the calls to functions mentioned above from
under dev_pm_qos_mtx and introduce a separate lock to prevent races
between functions that add or remove device PM QoS sysfs attributes
from happening.
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Device PM QoS sysfs attributes, if present during device removal,
are removed from within device_pm_remove(), which is too late,
since dpm_sysfs_remove() has already removed the whole attribute
group they belonged to. However, moving the removal of those
attributes to dpm_sysfs_remove() alone is not sufficient, because
in theory they still can be re-added right after being removed by it
(the device's driver is still bound to it at that point).
For this reason, move the entire desctruction of device PM QoS
constraints to dpm_sysfs_remove() and make it prevent any new
constraints from being added after it has run. Also, move the
initialization of the power.qos field in struct device to
device_pm_init_common() and drop the no longer needed
dev_pm_qos_constraints_init().
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The current device PM QoS code assumes that certain functions will
never be called in parallel with each other (for example, it is
assumed that dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() won't be called in parallel
with dev_pm_qos_hide_flags() for the same device and analogously
for the latency limit), which may be overly optimistic. Moreover,
dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit()
leak memory in error code paths (req needs to be freed on errors)
and __dev_pm_qos_drop_user_request() forgets to free the request.
To fix the above issues put more things under the device PM QoS
mutex to make them mutually exclusive and add the missing freeing
of memory.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The dev_pm_qos_flags() will be used in the usb core which could be
compiled as a module. This patch is to export it.
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Local variable 'error' in dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() need
not contain error codes only, so rename it to 'ret'.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* pm-qos:
PM / QoS: Handle device PM QoS flags while removing constraints
PM / QoS: Resume device before exposing/hiding PM QoS flags
PM / QoS: Document request manipulation requirement for flags
PM / QoS: Fix a free error in the dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy()
PM / QoS: Fix the return value of dev_pm_qos_update_request()
PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account
PM / Domains: Check device PM QoS flags in pm_genpd_poweroff()
PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space
PM / QoS: Introduce PM QoS device flags support
PM / QoS: Prepare struct dev_pm_qos_request for more request types
PM / QoS: Introduce request and constraint data types for PM QoS flags
PM / QoS: Prepare device structure for adding more constraint types
PM QoS flags have to be handled by dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy()
in the same way as PM QoS resume latency constraints. That is, if
they have been exposed to user space, they have to be hidden from it
and the list of flags requests has to be flushed before destroying
the device's PM QoS object. Make that happen.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
dev_pm_qos_add_request() can return 0, 1, or a negative error code,
therefore the correct error test is "if (error < 0)." Checking just for
non-zero return code leads to erroneous setting of the req->dev pointer
to NULL, which then leads to a repeated call to
dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() in st1232_ts_irq_handler(). This in turn
leads to an Oops, when the I2C host adapter is unloaded and reloaded again
because of the inconsistent state of its QoS request list.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since dev_pm_qos_add_request(), dev_pm_qos_update_request() and
dev_pm_qos_remove_request() for PM QoS flags should not be invoked
when device in RPM_SUSPENDED, add pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put()
around these functions in dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and
dev_pm_qos_hide_flags().
[rjw: Modified the subject and changelog to better reflect the code
changes made.]
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In fact, the callers of dev_pm_qos_add_request(),
dev_pm_qos_update_request() and dev_pm_qos_remove_request() for
requests of type DEV_PM_QOS_FLAGS need to ensure that the target
device is not RPM_SUSPENDED before using any of these functions (or
be prepared for the new PM QoS flags to take effect after the device
has been resumed). Document this in their kerneldoc comments.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Free a wrong point to struct dev_pm_qos->latency which suppose to
be the point to struct dev_pm_qos. The patch is to fix the issue.
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit e39473d (PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS device
flags to user space) introduced __dev_pm_qos_update_request() to be
called internally by dev_pm_qos_update_request(), but forgot to make
the latter actually use the return value of the former. Fix this
mistake.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Define two device PM QoS flags, PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF
and PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP, and introduce routines
dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and dev_pm_qos_hide_flags() allowing the
caller to expose those two flags to user space or to hide them
from it, respectively.
After the flags have been exposed, user space will see two
additional sysfs attributes, pm_qos_no_power_off and
pm_qos_remote_wakeup, under the device's /sys/devices/.../power/
directory. Then, writing 1 to one of them will update the
PM QoS flags request owned by user space so that the corresponding
flag is requested to be set. In turn, writing 0 to one of them
will cause the corresponding flag in the user space's request to
be cleared (however, the owners of the other PM QoS flags requests
for the same device may still request the flag to be set and it
may be effectively set even if user space doesn't request that).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Acked-by: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
Modify the device PM QoS core code to support PM QoS flags requests.
First, add a new field of type struct pm_qos_flags called "flags"
to struct dev_pm_qos for representing the list of PM QoS flags
requests for the given device. Accordingly, add a new "type" field
to struct dev_pm_qos_request (along with an enum for representing
request types) and a new member called "flr" to its data union for
representig flags requests.
Second, modify dev_pm_qos_add_request(), dev_pm_qos_update_request(),
the internal routine apply_constraint() used by them and their
existing callers to cover flags requests as well as latency
requests. In particular, dev_pm_qos_add_request() gets a new
argument called "type" for specifying the type of a request to be
added.
Finally, introduce two routines, __dev_pm_qos_flags() and
dev_pm_qos_flags(), allowing their callers to check which PM QoS
flags have been requested for the given device (the caller is
supposed to pass the mask of flags to check as the routine's
second argument and examine its return value for the result).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
The subsequent patches will use struct dev_pm_qos_request for
representing both latency requests and flags requests. To make that
easier, put the node member of struct dev_pm_qos_request (under the
name "pnode") into a union called "data" that will represent the
request's value and list node depending on its type.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
Currently struct dev_pm_info contains only one PM QoS constraints
pointer reserved for latency requirements. Since one more device
constraints type (i.e. flags) will be necessary, introduce a new
structure, struct dev_pm_qos, that eventually will contain all of
the available device PM QoS constraints and replace the "constraints"
pointer in struct dev_pm_info with a pointer to the new structure
called "qos".
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/base/power/qos.c:465:29: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
The current behavior of dev_pm_qos_add_notifier() makes device PM QoS
notifiers less than useful. Namely, it silently returns success when
called before any PM QoS constraints are added for the device, so the
caller will assume that the notifier has been registered, but when
someone actually adds some nontrivial constraints for the device
eventually, the previous callers of dev_pm_qos_add_notifier()
will not know about that and their notifier routines will not be
executed (contrary to their expectations).
To address this problem make dev_pm_qos_add_notifier() create the
constraints object for the device if it is not present when the
routine is called.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by : markgross <markgross@thegnar.org>
A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
of another device in the same power domain, may cause power to be
removed from the entire domain. In that case, the amount of time
necessary to runtime-resume the given device (e.g. the MMC
controller) is often substantially greater than the time needed to
run its driver's runtime resume callback. That may hurt performance
in some situations, because user data may need to wait for the
device to become operational, so we should make it possible to
prevent that from happening.
For this reason, introduce a new sysfs attribute for devices,
power/pm_qos_resume_latency_us, allowing user space to specify the
upper bound of the time necessary to bring the (runtime-suspended)
device up after the resume of it has been requested. However, make
that attribute appear only for the devices whose drivers declare
support for it by calling the (new) dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit()
helper function with the appropriate initial value of the attribute.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
* pm-domains:
PM / shmobile: Allow the A4R domain to be turned off at run time
PM / input / touchscreen: Make st1232 use device PM QoS constraints
PM / QoS: Introduce dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request()
PM / shmobile: Remove the stay_on flag from SH7372's PM domains
PM / shmobile: Don't include SH7372's INTCS in syscore suspend/resume
PM / shmobile: Add support for the sh7372 A4S power domain / sleep mode
ARM: S3C64XX: Implement basic power domain support
PM / shmobile: Use common always on power domain governor
PM / Domains: Provide an always on power domain governor
PM / Domains: Fix default system suspend/resume operations
PM / Domains: Make it possible to assign names to generic PM domains
PM / Domains: fix compilation failure for CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS unset
PM / Domains: Automatically update overoptimistic latency information
PM / Domains: Add default power off governor function (v4)
PM / Domains: Add device stop governor function (v4)
PM / Domains: Rework system suspend callback routines (v2)
PM / Domains: Introduce "save/restore state" device callbacks
PM / Domains: Make it possible to use per-device domain callbacks
Some devices, like the I2C controller on SH7372, are not
necessary for providing power to their children or forwarding
wakeup signals (and generally interrupts) from them. They are
only needed by their children when there's some data to transfer,
so they may be suspended for the majority of time and resumed
on demand, when the children have data to send or receive. For this
purpose, however, their power.ignore_children flags have to be set,
or the PM core wouldn't allow them to be suspended while their
children were active.
Unfortunately, in some situations it may take too much time to
resume such devices so that they can assist their children in
transferring data. For example, if such a device belongs to a PM
domain which goes to the "power off" state when that device is
suspended, it may take too much time to restore power to the
domain in response to the request from one of the device's
children. In that case, if the parent's resume time is critical,
the domain should stay in the "power on" state, although it still may
be desirable to power manage the parent itself (e.g. by manipulating
its clock).
In general, device PM QoS may be used to address this problem.
Namely, if the device's children added PM QoS latency constraints
for it, they would be able to prevent it from being put into an
overly deep low-power state. However, in some cases the devices
needing to be serviced are not the immediate children of a
"children-ignoring" device, but its grandchildren or even less
direct descendants. In those cases, the entity wanting to add a
PM QoS request for a given device's ancestor that ignores its
children will have to find it in the first place, so introduce a new
helper function that may be used to achieve that. This function,
dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(), will search for the first
ancestor of the given device whose power.ignore_children flag is
set and will add a device PM QoS latency request for that ancestor
on behalf of the caller. The request added this way may be removed
with the help of dev_pm_qos_remove_request() in the future, like
any other device PM QoS latency request.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Make the runtime PM core use device PM QoS constraints to check if
it is allowed to suspend a given device, so that an error code is
returned if the device's own PM QoS constraint is negative or one of
its children has already been suspended for too long. If this is
not the case, the maximum estimated time the device is allowed to be
suspended, computed as the minimum of the device's PM QoS constraint
and the PM QoS constraints of its children (reduced by the difference
between the current time and their suspend times) is stored in a new
device's PM field power.max_time_suspended_ns that can be used by
the device's subsystem or PM domain to decide whether or not to put
the device into lower-power (and presumably higher-latency) states
later (if the constraint is 0, which means "no constraint", the
power.max_time_suspended_ns is set to -1).
Additionally, the time of execution of the subsystem-level
.runtime_suspend() callback for the device is recorded in the new
power.suspend_time field for later use by the device's subsystem or
PM domain along with power.max_time_suspended_ns (it also is used
by the core code when the device's parent is suspended).
Introduce a new helper function,
pm_runtime_update_max_time_suspended(), allowing subsystems and PM
domains (or device drivers) to update the power.max_time_suspended_ns
field, for example after changing the power state of a suspended
device.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Make dev_pm_qos_add_request() use WARN() in a better way and do not hardcode
the function's name into the message (use __func__ instead).
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Most of these files were implicitly getting EXPORT_SYMBOL via
device.h which was including module.h, but that path will be broken
soon.
[ with input from Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> ]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To read the current PM QoS value for a given device we need to
make sure that the device's power.constraints object won't be
removed while we're doing that. For this reason, put the
operation under dev->power.lock and acquire the lock
around the initialization and removal of power.constraints.
Moreover, since we're using the value of power.constraints to
determine whether or not the object is present, the
power.constraints_state field isn't necessary any more and may be
removed. However, dev_pm_qos_add_request() needs to check if the
device is being removed from the system before allocating a new
PM QoS constraints object for it, so make it use the
power.power_state field of struct device for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Add a global notification chain that gets called upon changes to the
aggregated constraint value for any device.
The notification callbacks are passing the full constraint request data
in order for the callees to have access to it. The current use is for the
platform low-level code to access the target device of the constraint.
Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Implement the per-device PM QoS constraints by creating a device
PM QoS API, which calls the PM QoS constraints management core code.
The per-device latency constraints data strctures are stored
in the device dev_pm_info struct.
The device PM code calls the init and destroy of the per-device constraints
data struct in order to support the dynamic insertion and removal of the
devices in the system.
To minimize the data usage by the per-device constraints, the data struct
is only allocated at the first call to dev_pm_qos_add_request.
The data is later free'd when the device is removed from the system.
A global mutex protects the constraints users from the data being
allocated and free'd.
Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki