In general, detailed performance analysis will require knoweldge of the
the SoC beyond the CMN itself - e.g. which actual CPUs/peripherals/etc.
are connected to each node. However for certain development and bringup
tasks it can be useful to have a quick overview of the CMN internal
topology to hand too. Add a debugfs file to map this out.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/159fd4d7e19fb3c8801a8cb64ee73ec50f55903c.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The second generation of CMN IPs add new node types and significantly
expand the configuration space with options for extra device ports on
edge XPs, either plumbed into the regular DTM or with extra dedicated
DTMs to monitor them, plus larger (and smaller) mesh sizes. Add basic
support for pulling this new information out of the hardware, piping
it around as necessary, and handling (most of) the new choices.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e58b495bcc7deec3882be4bac910ed0bf6979674.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
In preparation for supporting newer CMN products, let's introduce a
means to differentiate the features and events which are specific to a
particular IP from those which remain common to the whole family. The
newer designs have also smoothed off some of the rough edges in terms
of discoverability, so separate out the parts of the flow which have
effectively now become CMN-600 quirks.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9f6368cdca4c821d801138939508a5bba54ccabb.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
With the value of CMN_MAX_DTMS increasing significantly, our validation
data structure is set to get quite big. Technically we could pack it at
least twice as densely, since we only need around 19 bits of information
per DTM, but that makes the code even more mind-bogglingly impenetrable,
and even half of "quite big" may still be uncomfortably large for a
stack frame (~1KB). Just move it to an off-stack allocation instead.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0cabff2e5839ddc0979e757c55515966f65359e4.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
In cases where we do know which DTC domain a node belongs to, we can
skip initialising or reading the global count in DTCs where we know
it won't change. The machinery to achieve that is mostly in place
already, so finish hooking it up by converting the vestigial domain
tracking to propagate suitable bitmaps all the way through to events.
Note that this does not allow allocating such an unused counter to a
different event on that DTC, because that is a flippin' nightmare.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/51d930fd945ef51c81f5889ccca055c302b0a1d0.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
When multiple nodes of the same type are connected to the same XP
(particularly in CAL configurations), it seems that they are likely
to be consecutive in logical ID. Therefore, we're likely to gain a
small benefit from an easy tweak to optimise out consecutive reads
of the same set of DTM counters for an aggregated event.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7777d77c2df17693cd3dabb6e268906e15238d82.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Untangle DTMs from XPs into a dedicated abstraction. This helps make
things a little more obvious and robust, but primarily paves the way
for further development where new IPs can grow extra DTMs per XP.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9cca18b1b98f482df7f1aaf3d3213e7f39500423.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Refactor the places where we scan through the set of nodes to switch
from explicit array indexing to pointer-based iteration. This leads to
slightly simpler object code, but also makes the source less dense and
more pleasant for further development. It also unearths an almost-bug
in arm_cmn_event_init() where we've been depending on the "array index"
of NULL relative to cmn->dns being a sufficiently large number, yuck.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ee0c9eda9a643f46001ac43aadf3f0b1fd5660dd.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Add a bit more abstraction for the places where we decompose node IDs.
This will help keep things nice and manageable when we come to add yet
more variables which affect the node ID format. Also use the opportunity
to move the rest of the low-level node management helpers back up to the
logical place they were meant to be - how they ended up buried right in
the middle of the event-related definitions is somewhat of a mystery...
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a2242a8c3c96056c13a04ae87bf2047e5e64d2d9.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Although CMN is currently (and overwhelmingly likely to remain) deployed
in arm64-only (modulo userspace) systems, the 64-bit "dependency" for
compile-testing was just laziness due to heavy reliance on readq/writeq
accessors. Since we only need one extra include for robustness in that
regard, let's pull that in, widen the compile-test coverage, and fix up
the smattering of type laziness that that brings to light.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/baee9ee0d0bdad8aaeb70f5a4b98d8fd4b1f5786.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
On a system with multiple CMN meshes, ideally we'd want to access each
PMU from within its own mesh, rather than with a long CML round-trip,
wherever feasible. Since such a system is likely to be presented as
multiple NUMA nodes, let's also hope a proximity domain is specified
for each CMN programming interface, and use that to guide our choice
of IRQ affinity to favour a node-local CPU where possible.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/32438b0d016e0649d882d47d30ac2000484287b9.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Attempting to migrate the PMU context after we've unregistered the PMU
device, or especially if we never successfully registered it in the
first place, is a woefully bad idea. It's also fundamentally pointless
anyway. Make sure to unregister an instance from the hotplug handler
*without* invoking the teardown callback.
Fixes: 0ba64770a2 ("perf: Add Arm CMN-600 PMU driver")
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2c221d745544774e4b07583b65b5d4d94f7e0fe4.1638530442.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
When multiple dtcs share the same IRQ number, the irq_friend which
used to refer to dtc object gets calculated incorrect which leads
to invalid pointer.
Fixes: 0ba64770a2 ("perf: Add Arm CMN-600 PMU driver")
Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <tuanphan@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1623946129-3290-1-git-send-email-tuanphan@os.amperecomputing.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The driver uses irq_set_affinity_hint() to set the affinity for the PMU
interrupts, which relies on the undocumented side effect that this function
actually sets the affinity under the hood.
Setting an hint is clearly not a guarantee and for these PMU interrupts an
affinity hint, which is supposed to guide userspace for setting affinity,
is beyond pointless, because the affinity of these interrupts cannot be
modified from user space.
Aside of that the error checks are bogus because the only error which is
returned from irq_set_affinity_hint() is when there is no irq descriptor
for the interrupt number, but not when the affinity set fails. That's on
purpose because the hint can point to an offline CPU.
Replace the mindless abuse with irq_set_affinity().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518093118.277228577@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Fix the following coccicheck warning:
./drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c:128:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c:173:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:129:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm_smmu_pmu.c:563:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c:149:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c:139:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c:563:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c:351:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c:224:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm-cci.c:708:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm-cci.c:699:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm-cci.c:528:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
./drivers/perf/arm-cci.c:309:8-16: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
Signed-off-by: Zihao Tang <tangzihao1@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1616148273-16374-2-git-send-email-liuqi115@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Although it's neat to avoid the suffix for the typical case of a
single PMU, it means systems with multiple CMN instances end up with
inconsistent naming. I think it also breaks perf tool's "uncore alias"
logic if the common instance prefix is also the full name of one.
Avoid any surprises by not trying to be clever and simply numbering
every instance, even when it might technically prove redundant.
Fixes: 0ba64770a2 ("perf: Add Arm CMN-600 PMU driver")
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/649a2281233f193d59240b13ed91b57337c77b32.1611839564.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The only usage is to put their addresses in an array of pointers to
const struct attribute group. Make them const to allow the compiler
to put them in read-only memory.
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210117212847.21319-5-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The node type field is an enum type, so print it as a 32-bit quantity
rather than as an unsigned short.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202009302350.QIzfkx62-lkp@intel.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Ensure that the 'irq' field of 'struct arm_cmn_dtc' is a signed int
so that it can be compared '< 0'.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200929170835.GA15956@embeddedor
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1497488 ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: 0ba64770a2 ("perf: Add Arm CMN-600 PMU driver")
Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Initial driver for PMU event counting on the Arm CMN-600 interconnect.
CMN sports an obnoxiously complex distributed PMU system as part of
its debug and trace features, which can do all manner of things like
sampling, cross-triggering and generating CoreSight trace. This driver
covers the PMU functionality, plus the relevant aspects of watchpoints
for simply counting matching flits.
Tested-by: Tsahi Zidenberg <tsahee@amazon.com>
Tested-by: Tuan Phan <tuanphan@os.amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Robin Murphy