There are two fields - id and hw_id - to track what sensor an action was
to performed on. This was because the sensors connected to a TSENS IP
might not be contiguous i.e. 1, 2, 4, 5 with 3 being skipped.
This causes confusion in the code which uses hw_id sometimes and id
other times (tsens_get_temp, tsens_get_trend).
Switch to only using the hw_id field to track the physical ID of the
sensor. When we iterate through all the sensors connected to an IP
block, we use an index i to loop through the list of sensors, and then
return the actual hw_id that is registered on that index.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/30206cd47d303d2dcaef87f4e3c7173481a0bddd.1572526427.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org
memory returned as part of nvmem_read via qfprom_read should be
freed by the consumer once done.
Existing code is not doing it so fix it.
Below memory leak detected by kmemleak
[<ffffff80088b7658>] kmemleak_alloc+0x50/0x84
[<ffffff80081df120>] __kmalloc+0xe8/0x168
[<ffffff80086db350>] nvmem_cell_read+0x30/0x80
[<ffffff8008632790>] qfprom_read+0x4c/0x7c
[<ffffff80086335a4>] calibrate_v1+0x34/0x204
[<ffffff8008632518>] tsens_probe+0x164/0x258
[<ffffff80084e0a1c>] platform_drv_probe+0x80/0xa0
[<ffffff80084de4f4>] really_probe+0x208/0x248
[<ffffff80084de2c4>] driver_probe_device+0x98/0xc0
[<ffffff80084dec54>] __device_attach_driver+0x9c/0xac
[<ffffff80084dca74>] bus_for_each_drv+0x60/0x8c
[<ffffff80084de634>] __device_attach+0x8c/0x100
[<ffffff80084de6c8>] device_initial_probe+0x20/0x28
[<ffffff80084dcbb8>] bus_probe_device+0x34/0x7c
[<ffffff80084deb08>] deferred_probe_work_func+0x6c/0x98
[<ffffff80080c3da8>] process_one_work+0x160/0x2f8
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
tmdev seems to imply that this is a device pointer when in fact it is
just private platform data for each tsens device. Rename it to priv
improve code readability.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Rename to tsens_priv to denote that it is private data for each tsens
instance.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Rename to tsens_plat_data to denote that it is platform-data passed in
at compile-time.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
The TSENS driver currently only uses a limited set of registers from the TM
address space. So it was ok to map just that set of registers and call it
"map".
We'd now like to map a second set: SROT registers to introduce new
functionality. Rename the "map" field to a more appropriate "tm_map".
The 8960 doesn't have a clear split between TM and SROT registers. To avoid
complicating the data structure, it will switchover to using tm_map for its
maps.
There is no functional change with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
The TSENS drivers use a GPL-2.0 license. Replace with equivalent SPDX
tags and delete the full license text.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Trivial: remove the following:
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8916.c:103:24: warning: symbol 'ops_8916' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8996.c:76:24: warning: symbol 'ops_8996' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8974.c:235:24: warning: symbol 'ops_8974' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8960.c:279:24: warning: symbol 'ops_8960' was not declared. Should it be static?
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
8960 family of SoCs have the TSENS device as part of GCC, hence
the driver probes the virtual child device created by GCC and
uses the parent to extract all DT properties and reuses the GCC
regmap.
Also GCC/TSENS are part of a domain thats not always ON.
Hence add .suspend and .resume hooks to save and restore some of
the inited register context.
Also 8960 family have some of the TSENS init sequence thats
required to be done by the HLOS driver (some later versions of TSENS
do not export these registers to non-secure world, and hence need
these initializations to be done by secure bootloaders)
8660 from the same family has just one sensor and hence some register
offset/layout differences which need special handling in the driver.
Based on the original code from Siddartha Mohanadoss, Stephen Boyd and
Narendran Rajan.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Amit Kucheria