Rename _of_get_opp_desc_node to dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node and add it
to include/linux/pm_opp.h to allow other drivers, such as platform OPP
and cpufreq drivers, to make use of it.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The RCU locking isn't well suited for the OPP core. The RCU locking fits
better for reader heavy stuff, while the OPP core have at max one or two
readers only at a time.
Over that, it was getting very confusing the way RCU locking was used
with the OPP core. The individual OPPs are mostly well handled, i.e. for
an update a new structure was created and then that replaced the older
one. But the OPP tables were updated directly all the time from various
parts of the core. Though they were mostly used from within RCU locked
region, they didn't had much to do with RCU and were governed by the
mutex instead.
And that mixed with the 'opp_table_lock' has made the core even more
confusing.
Now that we are already managing the OPPs and the OPP tables with kernel
reference infrastructure, we can get rid of RCU locking completely and
simplify the code a lot.
Remove all RCU references from code and comments.
Acquire opp_table->lock while parsing the list of OPPs though.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table()
to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used.
Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table.
Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are
executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need
to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well.
Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release
routines aren't used anymore, remove them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP
that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate
the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the
OPP entry.
Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as
the callers call them with that lock already held.
Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free()
now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is
handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Later patches would want to remove OPP table (and its OPPs) using the
opp_table pointer instead of 'dev'.
In order to prepare for that, rename _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() as
_dev_pm_opp_find_and_remove_table() split out part of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The OPPs which are never successfully added using _opp_add() are not
required to be freed with the _opp_remove() routine, as a simple kfree()
is enough for them.
Introduce a new light weight routine _opp_free(), which will do that.
That also helps us removing the 'notify' parameter to _opp_remove(),
which isn't required anymore.
Note that _opp_free() contains a call to _remove_opp_table() as the OPP
table might have been added for this very OPP only. The
_remove_opp_table() routine returns quickly if there are more OPPs in
the table. This will be simplified in later patches though.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The code adding static OPPs for V2 bindings already does so. Make the V1
bindings specific code behave the same.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Make the naming consistent with how other routines are named.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This TODO doesn't make sense anymore as we have all the information in a
single OPP table. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There are two types of duplicate OPPs that get different behavior from
the core:
A) An earlier OPP is marked 'available' and has same freq/voltages as
the new one.
B) An earlier OPP with same frequency, but is marked 'unavailable' OR
doesn't have same voltages as the new one.
The OPP core returns 0 for the first one, but -EEXIST for the second.
While the OPP core returns 0 for the first case, its callers don't free
the newly allocated OPP structure which isn't used anymore. Fix that by
returning -EBUSY instead of 0, but make the callers return 0 eventually.
As this isn't a critical fix, its not getting marked for stable kernel.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates
the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator().
This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with
multiple regulators.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This is a preparatory step for multiple regulator per device support.
Move the voltage/current variables to a new structure.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
These log messages are wrong because _of_get_opp_desc_node() returns
an operating-points-v2 node.
Commit a6eed752f5 ("PM / OPP: passing NULL to PTR_ERR()") fixed
static checker warnings, and reworded the messages at the same time
(but the latter was not mentioned in the git-log).
Restore the correct messages.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since commit f47b72a15a ("PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code
in a separate file"), this function is defined and called only in
drivers/base/power/opp/of.c .
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The OPP framework allows each OPP to set a opp-supported-hw property
which provides values that are matched against supported_hw values
provided by the platform to limit support for certain OPPs on specific
hardware. Currently, if the platform does not set supported_hw values,
all OPPs are interpreted as supported, even if they have provided their
own opp-supported-hw values.
If an OPP has provided opp-supported-hw, it is indicating that there is
some specific hardware configuration it is supported by. These constraints
should be honored, and if no supported_hw has been provided by the
platform, there is no way to determine if that OPP is actually supported,
so it should be marked as not supported.
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP
core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the
majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before
invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it.
But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation
is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before
dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller
treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded
performance.
Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum
and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when
the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can
handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share
the table', for example).
Fixes: 6f707daa38 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()"
Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw : Subject & changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't
consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and
ifdef hackery makes it less readable.
Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF
is enabled.
Compile-tested:
- For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled
- For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately)
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Dave Gerlach