Add 1536 and 4096-byte Adiantum test vectors so that the case where
there are multiple NH hashes is tested. This is already tested by the
nhpoly1305 test vectors, but it should be tested at the Adiantum level
too. Moreover the 4096-byte case is especially important.
As with the other Adiantum test vectors, these were generated by the
reference Python implementation at https://github.com/google/adiantum
and then automatically formatted for testmgr by a script.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This is needed to test that the end of the message is zero-padded when
the length is not a multiple of 16 (NH_MESSAGE_UNIT). It's already
tested indirectly by the 31-byte Adiantum test vector, but it should be
tested directly at the nhpoly1305 level too.
As with the other nhpoly1305 test vectors, this was generated by the
reference Python implementation at https://github.com/google/adiantum
and then automatically formatted for testmgr by a script.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Test that all CTR implementations update the IV buffer to contain the
next counter block, aka the IV to continue the encryption/decryption of
a larger message. When the length processed is a multiple of the block
size, users may rely on this for chaining.
When the length processed is *not* a multiple of the block size, simple
chaining doesn't work. However, as noted in commit 88a3f582be
("crypto: arm64/aes - don't use IV buffer to return final keystream
block"), the generic CCM implementation assumes that the CTR IV is
handled in some sane way, not e.g. overwritten with part of the
keystream. Since this was gotten wrong once already, it's desirable to
test for it. And, the most straightforward way to do this is to enforce
that all CTR implementations have the same behavior as the generic
implementation, which returns the *next* counter following the final
partial block. This behavior also has the advantage that if someone
does misuse this case for chaining, then the keystream won't be
repeated. Thus, this patch makes the tests expect this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Test that all CBC implementations update the IV buffer to contain the
last ciphertext block, aka the IV to continue the encryption/decryption
of a larger message. Users may rely on this for chaining.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Allow skcipher test vectors to declare the value the IV buffer should be
updated to at the end of the encryption or decryption operation.
(This check actually used to be supported in testmgr, but it was never
used and therefore got removed except for the AES-Keywrap special case.
But it will be used by CBC and CTR now, so re-add it.)
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
3DES only has an 8-byte block size, but the 3DES-CTR test vectors use
16-byte IVs. Remove the unused 8 bytes from the ends of the IVs.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Convert alg_test_hash() to use the new test framework, adding a list of
testvec_configs to test by default. When the extra self-tests are
enabled, randomly generated testvec_configs are tested as well.
This improves hash test coverage mainly because now all algorithms have
a variety of data layouts tested, whereas before each algorithm was
responsible for declaring its own chunked test cases which were often
missing or provided poor test coverage. The new code also tests both
the MAY_SLEEP and !MAY_SLEEP cases and buffers that cross pages.
This already found bugs in the hash walk code and in the arm32 and arm64
implementations of crct10dif.
I removed the hash chunked test vectors that were the same as
non-chunked ones, but left the ones that were unique.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Convert alg_test_aead() to use the new test framework, using the same
list of testvec_configs that skcipher testing uses.
This significantly improves AEAD test coverage mainly because previously
there was only very limited test coverage of the possible data layouts.
Now the data layouts to test are listed in one place for all algorithms
and optionally are also randomly generated. In fact, only one AEAD
algorithm (AES-GCM) even had a chunked test case before.
This already found bugs in all the AEGIS and MORUS implementations, the
x86 AES-GCM implementation, and the arm64 AES-CCM implementation.
I removed the AEAD chunked test vectors that were the same as
non-chunked ones, but left the ones that were unique.
Note: the rewritten test code allocates an aead_request just once per
algorithm rather than once per encryption/decryption, but some AEAD
algorithms incorrectly change the tfm pointer in the request. It's
nontrivial to fix these, so to move forward I'm temporarily working
around it by resetting the tfm pointer. But they'll need to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Convert alg_test_skcipher() to use the new test framework, adding a list
of testvec_configs to test by default. When the extra self-tests are
enabled, randomly generated testvec_configs are tested as well.
This improves skcipher test coverage mainly because now all algorithms
have a variety of data layouts tested, whereas before each algorithm was
responsible for declaring its own chunked test cases which were often
missing or provided poor test coverage. The new code also tests both
the MAY_SLEEP and !MAY_SLEEP cases, different IV alignments, and buffers
that cross pages.
This has already found a bug in the arm64 ctr-aes-neonbs algorithm.
It would have easily found many past bugs.
I removed the skcipher chunked test vectors that were the same as
non-chunked ones, but left the ones that were unique.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_WEAK_KEY confuses newcomers to the crypto API because it
sounds like it is requesting a weak key. Actually, it is requesting
that weak keys be forbidden (for algorithms that have the notion of
"weak keys"; currently only DES and XTS do).
Also it is only one letter away from CRYPTO_TFM_RES_WEAK_KEY, with which
it can be easily confused. (This in fact happened in the UX500 driver,
though just in some debugging messages.)
Therefore, make the intent clear by renaming it to
CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_FORBID_WEAK_KEYS.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Currently testmgr has separate encryption and decryption test vectors
for AEADs. That's massively redundant, since usually the decryption
tests are identical to the encryption tests, just with the input/result
swapped. And for some algorithms it was forgotten to add decryption
test vectors, so for them currently only encryption is being tested.
Therefore, eliminate the redundancy by removing the AEAD decryption test
vectors and updating testmgr to test both AEAD encryption and decryption
using what used to be the encryption test vectors. Naming is adjusted
accordingly: each aead_testvec now has a 'ptext' (plaintext), 'plen'
(plaintext length), 'ctext' (ciphertext), and 'clen' (ciphertext length)
instead of an 'input', 'ilen', 'result', and 'rlen'. "Ciphertext" here
refers to the full ciphertext, including the authentication tag.
For now the scatterlist divisions are just given for the plaintext
length, not also the ciphertext length. For decryption, the last
scatterlist element is just extended by the authentication tag length.
In total, this removes over 5000 lines from testmgr.h, with no reduction
in test coverage since prior patches already copied the few unique
decryption test vectors into the encryption test vectors.
The testmgr.h portion of this patch was automatically generated using
the following awk script, except that I also manually updated the
definition of 'struct aead_testvec' and fixed the location of the
comment describing the AEGIS-128 test vectors.
BEGIN { OTHER = 0; ENCVEC = 1; DECVEC = 2; DECVEC_TAIL = 3; mode = OTHER }
/^static const struct aead_testvec.*_enc_/ { sub("_enc", ""); mode = ENCVEC }
/^static const struct aead_testvec.*_dec_/ { mode = DECVEC }
mode == ENCVEC {
sub(/\.input[[:space:]]*=/, ".ptext\t=")
sub(/\.result[[:space:]]*=/, ".ctext\t=")
sub(/\.ilen[[:space:]]*=/, ".plen\t=")
sub(/\.rlen[[:space:]]*=/, ".clen\t=")
print
}
mode == DECVEC_TAIL && /[^[:space:]]/ { mode = OTHER }
mode == OTHER { print }
mode == ENCVEC && /^};/ { mode = OTHER }
mode == DECVEC && /^};/ { mode = DECVEC_TAIL }
Note that git's default diff algorithm gets confused by the testmgr.h
portion of this patch, and reports too many lines added and removed.
It's better viewed with 'git diff --minimal' (or 'git show --minimal'),
which reports "2 files changed, 1235 insertions(+), 6491 deletions(-)".
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
One "rfc4543(gcm(aes))" decryption test vector doesn't exactly match any of the
encryption test vectors with input and result swapped. In preparation
for removing the AEAD decryption test vectors and testing AEAD
decryption using the encryption test vectors, add this to the encryption
test vectors, so we don't lose any test coverage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Some "gcm(aes)" decryption test vectors don't exactly match any of the
encryption test vectors with input and result swapped. In preparation
for removing the AEAD decryption test vectors and testing AEAD
decryption using the encryption test vectors, add these to the
encryption test vectors, so we don't lose any test coverage.
In the case of the chunked test vector, I truncated the last scatterlist
element to the end of the plaintext.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Some "ccm(aes)" decryption test vectors don't exactly match any of the
encryption test vectors with input and result swapped. In preparation
for removing the AEAD decryption test vectors and testing AEAD
decryption using the encryption test vectors, add these to the
encryption test vectors, so we don't lose any test coverage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Fix multiple bugs in the OFB implementation:
1. It stored the per-request state 'cnt' in the tfm context, which can be
used by multiple threads concurrently (e.g. via AF_ALG).
2. It didn't support messages not a multiple of the block cipher size,
despite being a stream cipher.
3. It didn't set cra_blocksize to 1 to indicate it is a stream cipher.
To fix these, set the 'chunksize' property to the cipher block size to
guarantee that when walking through the scatterlist, a partial block can
only occur at the end. Then change the implementation to XOR a block at
a time at first, then XOR the partial block at the end if needed. This
is the same way CTR and CFB are implemented. As a bonus, this also
improves performance in most cases over the current approach.
Fixes: e497c51896 ("crypto: ofb - add output feedback mode")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.20+
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Like some other block cipher mode implementations, the CFB
implementation assumes that while walking through the scatterlist, a
partial block does not occur until the end. But the walk is incorrectly
being done with a blocksize of 1, as 'cra_blocksize' is set to 1 (since
CFB is a stream cipher) but no 'chunksize' is set. This bug causes
incorrect encryption/decryption for some scatterlist layouts.
Fix it by setting the 'chunksize'. Also extend the CFB test vectors to
cover this bug as well as cases where the message length is not a
multiple of the block size.
Fixes: a7d85e06ed ("crypto: cfb - add support for Cipher FeedBack mode")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.17+
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
The kernel's ChaCha20 uses the RFC7539 convention of the nonce being 12
bytes rather than 8, so actually I only appended 12 random bytes (not
16) to its test vectors to form 24-byte nonces for the XChaCha20 test
vectors. The other 4 bytes were just from zero-padding the stream
position to 8 bytes. Fix the comments above the test vectors.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
There is a draft specification for XChaCha20 being worked on. Add the
XChaCha20 test vector from the appendix so that we can be extra sure the
kernel's implementation is compatible.
I also recomputed the ciphertext with XChaCha12 and added it there too,
to keep the tests for XChaCha20 and XChaCha12 in sync.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add support for the Adiantum encryption mode. Adiantum was designed by
Paul Crowley and is specified by our paper:
Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors
(https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf)
See our paper for full details; this patch only provides an overview.
Adiantum is a tweakable, length-preserving encryption mode designed for
fast and secure disk encryption, especially on CPUs without dedicated
crypto instructions. Adiantum encrypts each sector using the XChaCha12
stream cipher, two passes of an ε-almost-∆-universal (εA∆U) hash
function, and an invocation of the AES-256 block cipher on a single
16-byte block. On CPUs without AES instructions, Adiantum is much
faster than AES-XTS; for example, on ARM Cortex-A7, on 4096-byte sectors
Adiantum encryption is about 4 times faster than AES-256-XTS encryption,
and decryption about 5 times faster.
Adiantum is a specialization of the more general HBSH construction. Our
earlier proposal, HPolyC, was also a HBSH specialization, but it used a
different εA∆U hash function, one based on Poly1305 only. Adiantum's
εA∆U hash function, which is based primarily on the "NH" hash function
like that used in UMAC (RFC4418), is about twice as fast as HPolyC's;
consequently, Adiantum is about 20% faster than HPolyC.
This speed comes with no loss of security: Adiantum is provably just as
secure as HPolyC, in fact slightly *more* secure. Like HPolyC,
Adiantum's security is reducible to that of XChaCha12 and AES-256,
subject to a security bound. XChaCha12 itself has a security reduction
to ChaCha12. Therefore, one need not "trust" Adiantum; one need only
trust ChaCha12 and AES-256. Note that the εA∆U hash function is only
used for its proven combinatorical properties so cannot be "broken".
Adiantum is also a true wide-block encryption mode, so flipping any
plaintext bit in the sector scrambles the entire ciphertext, and vice
versa. No other such mode is available in the kernel currently; doing
the same with XTS scrambles only 16 bytes. Adiantum also supports
arbitrary-length tweaks and naturally supports any length input >= 16
bytes without needing "ciphertext stealing".
For the stream cipher, Adiantum uses XChaCha12 rather than XChaCha20 in
order to make encryption feasible on the widest range of devices.
Although the 20-round variant is quite popular, the best known attacks
on ChaCha are on only 7 rounds, so ChaCha12 still has a substantial
security margin; in fact, larger than AES-256's. 12-round Salsa20 is
also the eSTREAM recommendation. For the block cipher, Adiantum uses
AES-256, despite it having a lower security margin than XChaCha12 and
needing table lookups, due to AES's extensive adoption and analysis
making it the obvious first choice. Nevertheless, for flexibility this
patch also permits the "adiantum" template to be instantiated with
XChaCha20 and/or with an alternate block cipher.
We need Adiantum support in the kernel for use in dm-crypt and fscrypt,
where currently the only other suitable options are block cipher modes
such as AES-XTS. A big problem with this is that many low-end mobile
devices (e.g. Android Go phones sold primarily in developing countries,
as well as some smartwatches) still have CPUs that lack AES
instructions, e.g. ARM Cortex-A7. Sadly, AES-XTS encryption is much too
slow to be viable on these devices. We did find that some "lightweight"
block ciphers are fast enough, but these suffer from problems such as
not having much cryptanalysis or being too controversial.
The ChaCha stream cipher has excellent performance but is insecure to
use directly for disk encryption, since each sector's IV is reused each
time it is overwritten. Even restricting the threat model to offline
attacks only isn't enough, since modern flash storage devices don't
guarantee that "overwrites" are really overwrites, due to wear-leveling.
Adiantum avoids this problem by constructing a
"tweakable super-pseudorandom permutation"; this is the strongest
possible security model for length-preserving encryption.
Of course, storing random nonces along with the ciphertext would be the
ideal solution. But doing that with existing hardware and filesystems
runs into major practical problems; in most cases it would require data
journaling (like dm-integrity) which severely degrades performance.
Thus, for now length-preserving encryption is still needed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add a generic implementation of NHPoly1305, an ε-almost-∆-universal hash
function used in the Adiantum encryption mode.
CONFIG_NHPOLY1305 is not selectable by itself since there won't be any
real reason to enable it without also enabling Adiantum support.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Now that the generic implementation of ChaCha20 has been refactored to
allow varying the number of rounds, add support for XChaCha12, which is
the XSalsa construction applied to ChaCha12. ChaCha12 is one of the
three ciphers specified by the original ChaCha paper
(https://cr.yp.to/chacha/chacha-20080128.pdf: "ChaCha, a variant of
Salsa20"), alongside ChaCha8 and ChaCha20. ChaCha12 is faster than
ChaCha20 but has a lower, but still large, security margin.
We need XChaCha12 support so that it can be used in the Adiantum
encryption mode, which enables disk/file encryption on low-end mobile
devices where AES-XTS is too slow as the CPUs lack AES instructions.
We'd prefer XChaCha20 (the more popular variant), but it's too slow on
some of our target devices, so at least in some cases we do need the
XChaCha12-based version. In more detail, the problem is that Adiantum
is still much slower than we're happy with, and encryption still has a
quite noticeable effect on the feel of low-end devices. Users and
vendors push back hard against encryption that degrades the user
experience, which always risks encryption being disabled entirely. So
we need to choose the fastest option that gives us a solid margin of
security, and here that's XChaCha12. The best known attack on ChaCha
breaks only 7 rounds and has 2^235 time complexity, so ChaCha12's
security margin is still better than AES-256's. Much has been learned
about cryptanalysis of ARX ciphers since Salsa20 was originally designed
in 2005, and it now seems we can be comfortable with a smaller number of
rounds. The eSTREAM project also suggests the 12-round version of
Salsa20 as providing the best balance among the different variants:
combining very good performance with a "comfortable margin of security".
Note that it would be trivial to add vanilla ChaCha12 in addition to
XChaCha12. However, it's unneeded for now and therefore is omitted.
As discussed in the patch that introduced XChaCha20 support, I
considered splitting the code into separate chacha-common, chacha20,
xchacha20, and xchacha12 modules, so that these algorithms could be
enabled/disabled independently. However, since nearly all the code is
shared anyway, I ultimately decided there would have been little benefit
to the added complexity.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add support for the XChaCha20 stream cipher. XChaCha20 is the
application of the XSalsa20 construction
(https://cr.yp.to/snuffle/xsalsa-20081128.pdf) to ChaCha20 rather than
to Salsa20. XChaCha20 extends ChaCha20's nonce length from 64 bits (or
96 bits, depending on convention) to 192 bits, while provably retaining
ChaCha20's security. XChaCha20 uses the ChaCha20 permutation to map the
key and first 128 nonce bits to a 256-bit subkey. Then, it does the
ChaCha20 stream cipher with the subkey and remaining 64 bits of nonce.
We need XChaCha support in order to add support for the Adiantum
encryption mode. Note that to meet our performance requirements, we
actually plan to primarily use the variant XChaCha12. But we believe
it's wise to first add XChaCha20 as a baseline with a higher security
margin, in case there are any situations where it can be used.
Supporting both variants is straightforward.
Since XChaCha20's subkey differs for each request, XChaCha20 can't be a
template that wraps ChaCha20; that would require re-keying the
underlying ChaCha20 for every request, which wouldn't be thread-safe.
Instead, we make XChaCha20 its own top-level algorithm which calls the
ChaCha20 streaming implementation internally.
Similar to the existing ChaCha20 implementation, we define the IV to be
the nonce and stream position concatenated together. This allows users
to seek to any position in the stream.
I considered splitting the code into separate chacha20-common, chacha20,
and xchacha20 modules, so that chacha20 and xchacha20 could be
enabled/disabled independently. However, since nearly all the code is
shared anyway, I ultimately decided there would have been little benefit
to the added complexity of separate modules.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add testmgr and tcrypt tests and vectors for Streebog hash function
from RFC 6986 and GOST R 34.11-2012, for HMAC-Streebog vectors are
from RFC 7836 and R 50.1.113-2016.
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add additional test vectors from "The SM4 Blockcipher Algorithm And Its
Modes Of Operations" draft-ribose-cfrg-sm4-10 and register cipher speed
tests for sm4.
Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This patch adds a test vector for lrw(aes) that triggers wrap-around of
the counter, which is a tricky corner case.
Suggested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
These are unused, undesired, and have never actually been used by
anybody. The original authors of this code have changed their mind about
its inclusion. While originally proposed for disk encryption on low-end
devices, the idea was discarded [1] in favor of something else before
that could really get going. Therefore, this patch removes Speck.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=153359499015659
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Acked-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
It was forgotten to increase DH_KPP_SECRET_MIN_SIZE to include 'q_size',
causing an out-of-bounds write of 4 bytes in crypto_dh_encode_key(), and
an out-of-bounds read of 4 bytes in crypto_dh_decode_key(). Fix it, and
fix the lengths of the test vectors to match this.
Reported-by: syzbot+6d38d558c25b53b8f4ed@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: e3fe0ae129 ("crypto: dh - add public key verification test")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
By adding a zero byte-length for the DH parameter Q value, the public
key verification test is disabled for the given test.
Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Remove the original version of the VMAC template that had the nonce
hardcoded to 0 and produced a digest with the wrong endianness. I'm
unsure whether this had users or not (there are no explicit in-kernel
references to it), but given that the hardcoded nonce made it wildly
insecure unless a unique key was used for each message, let's try
removing it and see if anyone complains.
Leave the new "vmac64" template that requires the nonce to be explicitly
specified as the first 16 bytes of data and uses the correct endianness
for the digest.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Currently the VMAC template uses a "nonce" hardcoded to 0, which makes
it insecure unless a unique key is set for every message. Also, the
endianness of the final digest is wrong: the implementation uses little
endian, but the VMAC specification has it as big endian, as do other
VMAC implementations such as the one in Crypto++.
Add a new VMAC template where the nonce is passed as the first 16 bytes
of data (similar to what is done for Poly1305's nonce), and the digest
is big endian. Call it "vmac64", since the old name of simply "vmac"
didn't clarify whether the implementation is of VMAC-64 or of VMAC-128
(which produce 64-bit and 128-bit digests respectively); so we fix the
naming ambiguity too.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Currently testmgr has separate encryption and decryption test vectors
for symmetric ciphers. That's massively redundant, since with few
exceptions (mostly mistakes, apparently), all decryption tests are
identical to the encryption tests, just with the input/result flipped.
Therefore, eliminate the redundancy by removing the decryption test
vectors and updating testmgr to test both encryption and decryption
using what used to be the encryption test vectors. Naming is adjusted
accordingly: each cipher_testvec now has a 'ptext' (plaintext), 'ctext'
(ciphertext), and 'len' instead of an 'input', 'result', 'ilen', and
'rlen'. Note that it was always the case that 'ilen == rlen'.
AES keywrap ("kw(aes)") is special because its IV is generated by the
encryption. Previously this was handled by specifying 'iv_out' for
encryption and 'iv' for decryption. To make it work cleanly with only
one set of test vectors, put the IV in 'iv', remove 'iv_out', and add a
boolean that indicates that the IV is generated by the encryption.
In total, this removes over 10000 lines from testmgr.h, with no
reduction in test coverage since prior patches already copied the few
unique decryption test vectors into the encryption test vectors.
This covers all algorithms that used 'struct cipher_testvec', e.g. any
block cipher in the ECB, CBC, CTR, XTS, LRW, CTS-CBC, PCBC, OFB, or
keywrap modes, and Salsa20 and ChaCha20. No change is made to AEAD
tests, though we probably can eliminate a similar redundancy there too.
The testmgr.h portion of this patch was automatically generated using
the following awk script, with some slight manual fixups on top (updated
'struct cipher_testvec' definition, updated a few comments, and fixed up
the AES keywrap test vectors):
BEGIN { OTHER = 0; ENCVEC = 1; DECVEC = 2; DECVEC_TAIL = 3; mode = OTHER }
/^static const struct cipher_testvec.*_enc_/ { sub("_enc", ""); mode = ENCVEC }
/^static const struct cipher_testvec.*_dec_/ { mode = DECVEC }
mode == ENCVEC && !/\.ilen[[:space:]]*=/ {
sub(/\.input[[:space:]]*=$/, ".ptext =")
sub(/\.input[[:space:]]*=/, ".ptext\t=")
sub(/\.result[[:space:]]*=$/, ".ctext =")
sub(/\.result[[:space:]]*=/, ".ctext\t=")
sub(/\.rlen[[:space:]]*=/, ".len\t=")
print
}
mode == DECVEC_TAIL && /[^[:space:]]/ { mode = OTHER }
mode == OTHER { print }
mode == ENCVEC && /^};/ { mode = OTHER }
mode == DECVEC && /^};/ { mode = DECVEC_TAIL }
Note that git's default diff algorithm gets confused by the testmgr.h
portion of this patch, and reports too many lines added and removed.
It's better viewed with 'git diff --minimal' (or 'git show --minimal'),
which reports "2 files changed, 919 insertions(+), 11723 deletions(-)".
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
One "kw(aes)" decryption test vector doesn't exactly match an encryption
test vector with input and result swapped. In preparation for removing
the decryption test vectors, add this test vector to the encryption test
vectors, so we don't lose any test coverage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
None of the four "ecb(tnepres)" decryption test vectors exactly match an
encryption test vector with input and result swapped. In preparation
for removing the decryption test vectors, add these to the encryption
test vectors, so we don't lose any test coverage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
One "cbc(des)" decryption test vector doesn't exactly match an
encryption test vector with input and result swapped. It's *almost* the
same as one, but the decryption version is "chunked" while the
encryption version is "unchunked". In preparation for removing the
decryption test vectors, make the encryption one both chunked and
unchunked, so we don't lose any test coverage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Two "ecb(des)" decryption test vectors don't exactly match any of the
encryption test vectors with input and result swapped. In preparation
for removing the decryption test vectors, add these to the encryption
test vectors, so we don't lose any test coverage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
crc32c has an unkeyed test vector but crc32 did not. Add the crc32c one
(which uses an empty input) to crc32 too, and also add a new one to both
that uses a nonempty input. These test vectors verify that crc32 and
crc32c implementations use the correct default initial state.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
The Blackfin CRC driver was removed by commit 9678a8dc53 ("crypto:
bfin_crc - remove blackfin CRC driver"), but it was forgotten to remove
the corresponding "hmac(crc32)" test vectors. I see no point in keeping
them since nothing else appears to implement or use "hmac(crc32)", which
isn't an algorithm that makes sense anyway because HMAC is meant to be
used with a cryptographically secure hash function, which CRC's are not.
Thus, remove the unneeded test vectors.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This patch adds test vectors for MORUS-640 and MORUS-1280. The test
vectors were generated using the reference implementation from
SUPERCOP (see code comments for more details).
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This patch adds test vectors for the AEGIS family of AEAD algorithms
(AEGIS-128, AEGIS-128L, and AEGIS-256). The test vectors were
generated using the reference implementation from SUPERCOP (see code
comments for more details).
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Adds zstd support to crypto and scompress. Only supports the default
level.
Previously we held off on this patch, since there weren't any users.
Now zram is ready for zstd support, but depends on CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZSTD,
which isn't defined until this patch is in. I also see a patch adding
zstd to pstore [0], which depends on crypto zstd.
[0] lkml.kernel.org/r/9c9416b2dff19f05fb4c35879aaa83d11ff72c92.1521626182.git.geliangtang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
In order to be able to test yield support under preempt, add a test
vector for CRC-T10DIF that is long enough to take multiple iterations
(and thus possible preemption between them) of the primary loop of the
accelerated x86 and arm64 implementations.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add test vectors for Speck64-XTS, generated in userspace using C code.
The inputs were borrowed from the AES-XTS test vectors, with key lengths
adjusted.
xts-speck64-neon passes these tests. However, they aren't currently
applicable for the generic XTS template, as that only supports a 128-bit
block size.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add test vectors for Speck128-XTS, generated in userspace using C code.
The inputs were borrowed from the AES-XTS test vectors.
Both xts(speck128-generic) and xts-speck128-neon pass these tests.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and
Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much
faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions.
We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an
option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices
with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography
Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not
fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is
used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia,
CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a
modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices.
This is a replacement for our original proposal
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer
ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for
disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much
more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on
top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of
which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place.
Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless,
it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to
be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently,
with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side
channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when
the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough.
We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on
ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode
would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated
and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS.
There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the
original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using
the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The
test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte
arrays using the recommended byte and word orders.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
The RSA private key for the first form should have
version, prime1, prime2, exponent1, exponent2, coefficient
values 0.
With non-zero values for prime1,2, exponent 1,2 and coefficient
the Intel QAT driver will assume that values are provided for the
private key second form. This will result in signature verification
failures for modules where QAT device is present and the modules
are signed with rsa,sha256.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor McLoughlin <conor.mcloughlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
All current SHA3 test cases are smaller than the SHA3 block size, which
means not all code paths are being exercised. So add a new test case to
each variant, and make one of the existing test cases chunked.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add testmgr and tcrypt tests and vectors for SM3 secure hash.
Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Eric Biggers