Reimplement augmented RB-trees without sprinkling extra branches
all over the RB-tree code (which lives in the scheduler hot path).
This approach is 'borrowed' from Fabio's BFQ implementation and
relies on traversing the rebalance path after the RB-tree-op to
correct the heap property for insertion/removal and make up for
the damage done by the tree rotations.
For insertion the rebalance path is trivially that from the new
node upwards to the root, for removal it is that from the deepest
node in the path from the to be removed node that will still
be around after the removal.
[ This patch also fixes a video driver regression reported by
Ali Gholami Rudi - the memtype->subtree_max_end was updated
incorrectly. ]
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: Ali Gholami Rudi <ali@rudi.ir>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <1275414172.27810.27961.camel@twins>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* 'x86-pat-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
x86, pat: Update the page flags for memtype atomically instead of using memtype_lock
x86, pat: In rbt_memtype_check_insert(), update new->type only if valid
x86, pat: Migrate to rbtree only backend for pat memtype management
x86, pat: Preparatory changes in pat.c for bigger rbtree change
rbtree: Add support for augmented rbtrees
Add support for augmented rbtrees in core rbtree code.
This will be used in subsequent patches, in x86 PAT code, which needs
interval trees to efficiently keep track of PAT ranges.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100210232343.GA11465@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
The 'rb_first()', 'rb_last()', 'rb_next()' and 'rb_prev()' calls
take a pointer to an RB node or RB root. They do not change the
pointed objects, so add a 'const' qualifier in order to make life
of the users of these functions easier.
Indeed, if I have my own constant pointer &const struct my_type *p,
and I call 'rb_next(&p->rb)', I get a GCC warning:
warning: passing argument 1 of ‘rb_next’ discards qualifiers from pointer target type
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
They all duplicate macros to check for empty root and/or node, and
clearing a node. So put those in rbtree.h.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Since rb_insert_color() is part of the _public_ API, while the others are
purely internal, switch to be consistent with that.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Seems like a strange requirement, but allegedly it was necessary for
struct address_space on CRIS, because it otherwise ended up being only
byte-aligned. It's harmless enough, and easier to just do it than to
prove it isn't necessary... although I really ought to dig out my etrax
board and test it some time.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
We only used a single bit for colour information, so having a whole
machine word of space allocated for it was a bit wasteful. Instead,
store it in the lowest bit of the 'parent' pointer, since that was
always going to be aligned anyway.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This is in preparation for merging those fields into a single
'unsigned long', because using a whole machine-word for a single bit
of colour information is wasteful.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Peter Zijlstra