Instead of having the pinctrl driver register the GPIO range
for the gpio_chip, making it necessary to instantiate the
pin controller from the GPIO driver and pass the GPIO chip as
platform data, now let the GPIO chip driver register it's own
ranges and have the pinctrl driver look up the GPIO chip from
the pinctrl core as necessary.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This adds a function to the pinctrl core to retrieve the GPIO
range associated with a certain pin for a certain controller.
This is needed when a pinctrl driver want to look up the
corresponding struct gpio_chip for a certain pin. As the
GPIO drivers can now create these ranges themselves, the
pinctrl driver no longer knows about all its associated GPIO
chips.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
If we try to create a range for a certain GPIO chip and the
target pin controller is not yet available it may return
a probe deferral error code, so handle this all the way
our by checking the error code.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the pinctrl_find_and_add_gpio_range() return
-EPROBE_DEFER if the range hosting pin controller cannot be
located. We may assume that the common case for why adding a
range fails is that the targe pin controller device has not
probed yet.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Rename the function find_pinctrl_and_add_gpio_range()
to pinctrl_find_and_add_gpio_range() so as to be consistent
with the rest of the functions.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Like with commit 3c739ad0df
it is not always enough to specify all the pins of a gpio_chip
from offset zero to be added to a pin map range, since the
mapping from GPIO to pin controller may not be linear at all,
but need to be broken into a few consecutive sub-ranges or
1-pin entries for complicated cases. The ranges may also be
sparse.
This alters the signature of the function to accept offsets
into both the GPIO-chip local pinspace and the pin controller
local pinspace.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
They are not referenced outside of this file, make them static.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
of_match_device() may return NULL.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Dump pinmux register value, not only function part in the pinmux
register.
Also fix the issue on caluclating pin offset. The last parameter
should be pin number, not register offset.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
SPEAr SoC's don't do anything in clk_prepare() of plgpio driver,
so there is no need to call this routine multiple times. Just
call it once at probe.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This driver allows clk_get() failure, and still work without it.
This patch adds !IS_ERR(plgpio->clk) checking in plgpio_request() error path
so we only call clk_disable_unprepare() if clk_prepare_enable() is called.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Currently get_gpio_pingroup() may return NULL or ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) when
no gpio_pingroup found. The caller in gpio_request_endisable() only
checks if the return value is NULL. Return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) for
get_gpio_pingroup() causes problem and seems not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Return -ENOMEM instead of 0 if irq_domain_add_linear fails.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Current code does not work if count > 1, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Current code sets "pin_reg = &info->pin_regs[i];" in each loop iteration,
so in the case of no-match, pin_reg is not NULL.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
They are not referenced outside of this file, make them static.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The clkout group is split into groups clkout1 and clkout2
which allows pins cklkout1 and clkout2 to be muxed
separately.
Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The clkout group is split into groups clkout1 and clkout2
which allows pins cklkout1 and clkout2 to be muxed
separately.
Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Use managed resources API to simplify the code.
Also ensure we do request mem_region before ioremap.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Then we can remove "select PINMUX && PINCONF" from PINCTRL_TEGRA{20,30}.
This simplifies the dependency.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Then we can remove "select PINMUX && PINCONF" from PINCTRL_IMX{23,28}.
This simplifies the dependency.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
They are not referenced outside of this file, make them static.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Currently pinmux_enable_setting does not release all taken pins if
ops->enable() returns error. This patch ensures all taken pins are
released in any error paths.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Both ltq_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map() and ltq_pinctrl_dt_free_map() are not
referenced outside of this file. Make them static.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Current code adds empty ltq_pmx_disable() because pinmux_check_ops() requires
this callback to be defined.
This is not required since commit 02b50ce4cb
"pinctrl: make pinmux disable function optional".
Thus remove ltq_pmx_disable() function.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Different SPEAr SoCs have different approach to configure pins as gpios. Some
configure a group of gpios with single register bit and others have one bit per
gpio pin. Only earlier one is implemented till now, this patch adds support for
later one.
Here we add callbacks to SoC specific code to configure gpios in
gpio_request_enable(). That will do additional SoC specific configuration to
enable gpio pins.
We also implement this callback for SPEAr1340 in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
They are not referenced outside respective driver.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Most of SPEAr SoCs, which support pinctrl, can configure & use pads as gpio.
This patch gpio enable support for SPEAr pinctrl drivers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The <*/gpio.h> includes are updated again: now we need to account
for the problem introduced by commit:
595679a8038584df7b9398bf34f61db3c038bfea
"gpiolib: fix up function prototypes etc"
Actually we need static inlines in include/asm-generic/gpio.h
as well since we may have GPIOLIB but not PINCTRL.
Make sure to move all the CONFIG_PINCTRL business
to the end of the file so we are sure we have
declared struct gpio_chip.
And we need to keep the static inlines in <linux/gpio.h>
but here for the !CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO case, and then we
may as well throw in a few warnings like the other
prototypes there, if someone would have the bad taste
of compiling without GENERIC_GPIO even.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The fact that of_gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
gpiochip_add_pin_range() share too much code is fragile and
will invariably mean that bugs need to be fixed in two places
instead of one.
So separate the concerns of gpiolib.c and gpiolib-of.c and
have the latter call the former as back-end. This is necessary
also when going forward with other device descriptions such
as ACPI.
This is done by:
- Adding a return code to gpiochip_add_pin_range() so we can
reliably check whether this succeeds.
- Get rid of the custom of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range() from
pinctrl. Instead create of_pinctrl_get() to just retrive the
pin controller per se from an OF node. This composite
function was just begging to be deleted, it was way to
purpose-specific.
- Use pinctrl_dev_get_name() to get the name of the retrieved
pin controller and use that to call back into the generic
gpiochip_add_pin_range().
Now the pin range is only allocated and tied to a pin
controller from the core implementation in gpiolib.c.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes us call gpiochio_remove_pin_ranges() in the
gpiochip_remove() function, so we get rid of ranges when
freeing the chip.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Commit 69e1601bca88809dc118abd1becb02c15a02ec71
"gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges"
Introduced both of_gpiochip_remove_pin_range() and
gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(). But the contents are exactly
the same so remove the OF one and rely on the range deletion
in the core.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Commit 69e1601bca88809dc118abd1becb02c15a02ec71
"gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges"
Declared the of_gpiochip_[add|remove]_pin_range() global
while they should be static as they are only ever used in
this file. Let's convert them to static.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Commit 69e1601bca88809dc118abd1becb02c15a02ec71
"gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges"
Got most of it's function prototypes wrong, so fix this up by:
- Moving the void declarations into static inlines in
<linux/gpio.h> (previously the actual prototypes were declared
here...)
- Declare the gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges() functions in <asm-generic/gpio.h>
together with the pin range struct declaration itself.
- Actually only implement these very functions in gpiolib.c
if CONFIG_PINCTRL is set.
- Additionally export the symbols since modules will need to
be able to do this.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Staticize sirfsoc_gpio_irq_map() function.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Staticize u300_pin_config_get() and u300_pin_config_set() functions.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This converts the U300 pin controller to use managed resources
(devm_*) for it's memory region.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This switches the COH 901 pin controller to use managed
resources (devm_*) for memory remaps, clocks, etc.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This switches the COH 901 pinctrl driver to allocate its GPIO
IRQs dynamically, and start to use a linear irqdomain to map
from the hardware IRQs.
This way we can cut away the complex allocation of IRQ numbers
from the <mach/irqs.h> file.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The U300 IRQs were bumped once to offset to 1 (in order to avoid
using IRQ 0 which is now NO_IRQ). This was OK as we were still
passing the number of irqs in the .nr_irqs field of the machine,
with descriptors allocated at boot time.
However .nr_irqs should be 0, leading the system to reserve the
first 16 IRQs. Then the VIC driver will complain that IRQs 1
thru 15 are pre-allocated, so to avoid this and use free
descriptors, move all IRQs up to offset 32.
This will all be done away with as we migrate to device tree,
so it is an interim solution.
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Most of SPEAr SoCs, which support pinctrl, can configure & use
pads as gpio. This patch adds plgpio driver for configuring
these pads as gpio.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
pinctrl subsystem needs gpio chip base to prepare set of gpio
pin ranges, which a given pinctrl driver can handle. This is
important to handle pinctrl gpio request calls in order to
program a given pin properly for gpio operation.
As gpio base is allocated dynamically during gpiochip
registration, presently there exists no clean way to pass this
information to the pinctrl subsystem.
After few discussions from [1], it was concluded that may be
gpio controller reporting the pin range it supports, is a
better way than pinctrl subsystem directly registering it.
[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/184816
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
[Edited documentation a bit]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This reverts earlier commit which removed
pinctrl_remove_gpio_range(), because at that time there
weren't any more users of that routine. It was removed as the
removal of ranges was done in unregister of pinctrl.
But as we are now registering stuff from gpiolib, we may
remove and insert a gpio module multiple times. So, we
need this routine again.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The of_device_id table is supposed to be zero-terminated.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The driver supports old up SiRFprimaII SoCs, this patch makes it support
the new SiRFmarco as well.
SiRFmarco, as a SMP SoC, adds new SIRFSOC_GPIO_PAD_EN_CLR registers, to
disable GPIO pad, we should write 1 to the corresponding bit in the new
CLEAR register instead of writing 0 to SIRFSOC_GPIO_PAD_EN.
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Like the spear platform, the mvebu platform has multiple files: one
core file, and then one file per SoC family. More files will be added
later, as support for mach-orion5x and mach-mv78xx0 SoCs is added to
pinctrl-mvebu. For those reasons, having a separate subdirectory,
drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/ makes sense, and it had already been suggested
by Linus Wallej when the driver was originally submitted.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Linus Walleij