Provide a version of the core AES transform to the aegis128 SIMD
code that does not rely on the special AES instructions, but uses
plain NEON instructions instead. This allows the SIMD version of
the aegis128 driver to be used on arm64 systems that do not
implement those instructions (which are not mandatory in the
architecture), such as the Raspberry Pi 3.
Since GCC makes a mess of this when using the tbl/tbx intrinsics
to perform the sbox substitution, preload the Sbox into v16..v31
in this case and use inline asm to emit the tbl/tbx instructions.
Clang does not support this approach, nor does it require it, since
it does a much better job at code generation, so there we use the
intrinsics as usual.
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Provide an accelerated implementation of aegis128 by wiring up the
SIMD hooks in the generic driver to an implementation based on NEON
intrinsics, which can be compiled to both ARM and arm64 code.
This results in a performance of 2.2 cycles per byte on Cortex-A53,
which is a performance increase of ~11x compared to the generic
code.
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This reverts commit ecc8bc81f2
("crypto: aegis128 - provide a SIMD implementation based on NEON
intrinsics") and commit 7cdc0ddbf7
("crypto: aegis128 - add support for SIMD acceleration").
They cause compile errors on platforms other than ARM because
the mechanism to selectively compile the SIMD code is broken.
Repoted-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Provide an accelerated implementation of aegis128 by wiring up the
SIMD hooks in the generic driver to an implementation based on NEON
intrinsics, which can be compiled to both ARM and arm64 code.
This results in a performance of 2.2 cycles per byte on Cortex-A53,
which is a performance increase of ~11x compared to the generic
code.
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Ard Biesheuvel