Avoid overflow possibility.
[ The overflow is purely theoretical, since this is used for memory
ranges that aren't even close to using the full 64 bits, but this is
the right thing to do regardless. - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Louis Langholtz <lou_langholtz@me.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Joshua reported: Commit cd7b304dfa (x86, range: fix missing merge
during add range) broke mtrr cleanup on his setup in 3.9.5.
corresponding commit in upstream is fbe06b7bae.
The reason is add_range_with_merge could generate blank spot.
We could avoid that by searching new expanded start/end, that
new range should include all connected ranges in range array.
At last add the new expanded start/end to the range array.
Also move up left array so do not add new blank slot in the
range array.
-v2: move left array to avoid enhance add_range()
-v3: include fix from Joshua about memmove declaring when
DYN_DEBUG is used.
Reported-by: Joshua Covington <joshuacov@googlemail.com>
Tested-by: Joshua Covington <joshuacov@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1371154622-8929-3-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.9
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Christian found v3.9 does not work with E350 with EFI is enabled.
[ 1.658832] Trying to unpack rootfs image as initramfs...
[ 1.679935] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88006e3fd000
[ 1.686940] IP: [<ffffffff813661df>] memset+0x1f/0xb0
[ 1.692010] PGD 1f77067 PUD 1f7a067 PMD 61420067 PTE 0
but early memtest report all memory could be accessed without problem.
early page table is set in following sequence:
[ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff]
[ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x6e600000-0x6e7fffff]
[ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x6c000000-0x6e5fffff]
[ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x00100000-0x6bffffff]
[ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x6e800000-0x6ea07fff]
but later efi_enter_virtual_mode try set mapping again wrongly.
[ 0.010644] pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301
[ 0.015302] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x640c5000-0x6e3fcfff]
that means it fails with pfn_range_is_mapped.
It turns out that we have a bug in add_range_with_merge and it does not
merge range properly when new add one fill the hole between two exsiting
ranges. In the case when [mem 0x00100000-0x6bffffff] is the hole between
[mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff] and [mem 0x6c000000-0x6e7fffff].
Fix the add_range_with_merge by calling itself recursively.
Reported-by: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQVofGoSk7q5-0irjkBxemqK729cND4hov-1QCBJDhxpgQ@mail.gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.9
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Also replace deprecated printk(KERN_ERR...) with pr_err() as suggested
by Yinghai, attaching the function name to provide plenty info.
Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This file isn't doing anything with modules and so it should
not be including <linux/module.h> just to get basic stuff
like printk() and min/max. Revector it to <linux/kernel.h>.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
clean_sort_range() should return a number of nonempty elements of range
array, but if the array is full clean_sort_range() returns 0.
The problem is that the number of nonempty elements is evaluated by
finding the first empty element of the array. If there is no such element
it returns an initial value of local variable nr_range that is zero.
The fix is trivial: it changes initial value of nr_range to size of the
array.
The bug can lead to loss of information regarding all ranges, since
typically returned value of clean_sort_range() is considered as an actual
number of ranges in the array after a series of add/subtract operations.
Found by Analytical Verification project of Linux Verification Center
(linuxtesting.org), thanks to Alexander Kolosov.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Remove duplicate definition of ARRAY_SIZE(), which was never used anyway.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
So make interface more consistent with early_res.
Later we can share some code with early_res.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-10-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
We have almost the same code for mtrr cleanup and amd_bus checkup, and
this code will also be used in replacing bootmem with early_res,
so try to move them together and reuse it from different parts.
Also rename update_range to subtract_range as that is what the
function is actually doing.
-v2: update comments as Christoph requested
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Louis Langholtz